Since: Jan 10

Royse City

#23 Jan 30, 2014
Walkinginlove wrote:
<quoted text>Do not be fooled, Heath knows that a 10 minute or even an hour slice of time debate protects him against being held accountable over context, in a blitz debate he can get away with many out of context quotations and there is not time to expose them.

Secondly he lives under a system of appealing to his fellow COC denomination members, and I say that because they require people to crucify Christ to themselves a second time in order to join their club. This process is baptism, and there are no examples of anyone in scripture being re-baptized after being baptized in the authority of Jesus Christ. They however, have taken a re-baptism of people baptized in John baptism that carried no authority after his death and removed Jesus authority to forgive there sins.

On the forums like here, Heath has to debate on level ground, where there is time to research a response and that level playing field where he or his group can't rehash things the next week without a response coming hurts his financial collection process.

After all an edited video that shows only the strong points shown to his fellow club members gains more funds then printing out a thread on topix.

So only the ignorant will agree with him along with his fellow club members who allow almost any sin from their own especially lies. For reference see poegate, or John's latest deception claiming to have inadvertently placed one of his videos in the selection of videos he was airing when clearly he did it on purpose.
"ignorant"

1 Corinthians 1:26 For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth.

www.roysecitycoc.org
Jerry Taylor

Martinsville, VA

#24 Jan 31, 2014
Wrong heath. I read the remark from walkiniinlove andhe nailed it.

Since: Jan 10

Royse City

#25 Jan 31, 2014
Jerry Taylor wrote:
Wrong heath. I read the remark from walkiniinlove andhe nailed it.
I'm sure he did.

In your mind.

Since: Jan 10

Royse City

#26 Jan 31, 2014
Jerry, are you in the true church?
William

Anniston, AL

#27 Jan 31, 2014
Romans 1:29 (KJV)

Debate is not a positive thing.

2 Timothy 2:15 (KJV)

Studying most certainly is.
William

Anniston, AL

#28 Jan 31, 2014
Heath when did the modern change agents come into the Church of Christ and get rid of the King James Bible?

The ESV is most certainly corrupt, since the reader of it would think that Joseph is the father of Jesus Christ after coming across Luke 2:33.

If they got that important piece of information wrong, what else did they get wrong.
Jerry Taylor

Martinsville, VA

#29 Jan 31, 2014
HEATH - 72 wrote:
Jerry, are you in the true church?
Oh, you mean the one cupper Church? The personal-literal indwelling of the Holy Ghost Church? Stop, you making me laugh too hard. You care to explain away your many disagreements in YOUR denomination. I know, I know Ö you arenít in a denomination lol. You should seriously consider comedy, you are good at that!

Since: Jan 10

Royse City

#30 Jan 31, 2014
William wrote:
Romans 1:29 (KJV)

Debate is not a positive thing.

2 Timothy 2:15 (KJV)

Studying most certainly is.
Amen to those passages.

Debate is negative. So is rebuke. It's part of God's will.

Read Matthew 23.

Since: Jan 10

Royse City

#31 Jan 31, 2014
Jerry Taylor wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, you mean the one cupper Church? The personal-literal indwelling of the Holy Ghost Church? Stop, you making me laugh too hard. You care to explain away your many disagreements in YOUR denomination. I know, I know … you aren’t in a denomination lol. You should seriously consider comedy, you are good at that!
One cup?

Nope, we use multiple containers.

Now, are you in the true church?
Mike Peterson

Birmingham, AL

#32 Jan 31, 2014
HEATH - 72 wrote:
<quoted text>
One cup?
Nope, we use multiple containers.
Now, are you in the true church?
I am. All others come from the Church each one taking what they personally believe after a having a falling out from the previous one. Luther started it but eventually everyone realized how wacked out he was.

Now there is as many Churches as protestants.
William

Birmingham, AL

#33 Jan 31, 2014
HEATH - 72 wrote:
Amen to those passages.

Debate is negative. So is rebuke. It's part of God's will.

Read Matthew 23.
Matthew 23:28 (KJV)

28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

Looks like he nailed it on the head, no matter what the dispensation.
Walkinginlove

Danville, VA

#34 Jan 31, 2014
HEATH - 72 wrote:
<quoted text>
Amen.
Acts 15:2 (ESV) And after Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and debate with them, Paul and Barnabas and some of the others were appointed to go up to Jerusalem to the apostles and the elders about this question.
Acts 15:7 (ESV) And after there had been much debate, Peter stood up and said to them, "Brothers, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the gospel and believe.
much debate
www.roysecitycoc.org
Any here is a perfect example of the out of context quotations. Heath quotes text indicating that brothers and that is what Paul and Barnabas were in the first century, debated their issues.

However what Heath did not say is that he does not consider us brothers at all, and that anyone not in his sect for that matter are all lost and hell bound, even though they were baptized in the authority of Jesus name.

So if we were in the 10 minute blitz debate, I would have to spend my time explaining his false use of the scripture as I have done here and take away from my time to express other points.
Walkinginlove

Danville, VA

#35 Jan 31, 2014
HEATH - 72 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure he did.
In your mind.
once again let me add contact to this "in your mind" most of Heath's debates online are not his thoughts at all but links to others who have indoctrinated him into his denomination.

So the humor here is Heath presents very little online in his own words and this leads me to doubt he even understands what he is linking to at times!

He hung himself out to dry big time on Church of Christ history when he claimed as part of his clan someone who history showed had divorced his wire, and a North African Pope of all things.

But I guess it is why he stays with others works LOL!
Walkinginlove

Danville, VA

#36 Jan 31, 2014
HEATH - 72 wrote:
Jerry, are you in the true church?
Here is an example that shows Heath's denominational roots, church has migrated to being an organization or a building, in reality you are not in a church, you are the church as a believer!

When ever two or three are gathered in my name..... Or was Jesus wrong?

Since: Jan 10

Royse City

#37 Jan 31, 2014
Mike Peterson wrote:
<quoted text>I am. All others come from the Church each one taking what they personally believe after a having a falling out from the previous one. Luther started it but eventually everyone realized how wacked out he was.

Now there is as many Churches as protestants.
You're in the pope cult.

Praying to dead people and forcing "baptism" on babies.

Since: Jan 10

Royse City

#38 Jan 31, 2014
William wrote:
<quoted text>Matthew 23:28 (KJV)

28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

Looks like he nailed it on the head, no matter what the dispensation.
Amen to that passage. Keep them coming.
Walkinginlove

Danville, VA

#39 Jan 31, 2014
HEATH - 72 wrote:
<quoted text>
You're in the pope cult.
Praying to dead people and forcing "baptism" on babies.
Speaking of dead people, do you baptize for the dead as they did in the first century?

1 Cor 15:29 Otherwise, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why then are they baptized for them?

Since: Jan 10

Royse City

#40 Feb 1, 2014
Walkinginlove wrote:
<quoted text>Speaking of dead people, do you baptize for the dead as they did in the first century?

1 Cor 15:29 Otherwise, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why then are they baptized for them?
Amen to that verse.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#41 Feb 2, 2014
HEATH - 72 wrote:
<quoted text>
You're in the pope cult.
Praying to dead people and forcing "baptism" on babies.
It took about 300 years after the Protester movement started, around 1800, before you low end prots decided that your own children were not part of your household and you refused to bring them to Jesus like he commanded.

I know you consider them part of your household for the census and tax reasons. For salvation reasons, they are pagans and they are not part of your household.

Asinine

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#42 Feb 2, 2014
Jesus was considered part of Mary and Joseph's household 8 days after he was born.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Martinsville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Axel Reid 4 hr HEATH - 72 3
Did the Second Coming of Jesus Occur A.D. 70 4 hr HEATH - 72 110
Resurrection of the righteous and wicked 4 hr HEATH - 72 8
World without end 7 hr Axel Reid 95
The Book of Revelation, Before AD70 or in AD96?... 7 hr Axel Reid 5
Able... a part of a covenant? 8 hr Axel Reid 4
Catholics (Feb '14) 9 hr Mike_Peterson 2,136
More from around the web

Martinsville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]