Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#11751 May 27, 2012
Waco, On your site you can write me a personal note. Give me your phone number and I will give you mine. I will not abuse the privacy. I just want to talk and maybe help you find the right direction. I have some experience in the field. We all just want you to heal and not have to live under a cloud. There is always hope for the future. I'm always 24/7. We never close the store.
TSF

Rougemont, NC

#11752 May 27, 2012
If you actually believe this garbage, you are lying to yourself.:(
Typical Nazi.
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
I truly wish you had not stooped to the level of calling me a "Nazi". I cannot lie to you or anyone else here. For that reason I must tell you I feel no empathy for what has happened to you. Hopefully I can overcome this with growth and maturity in time.
I can tell you I applaud your openness and honesty.
The Truth

Knoxville, TN

#11753 May 27, 2012
TSF wrote:
If you actually believe this garbage, you are lying to yourself.:(
Typical Nazi.
<quoted text>
Typical high school response. You have time to grow, fool. Someday you may even be a real life grown-up.

(Do not bet on it, though.)

“Seek ”

Since: May 12

Houston

#11754 May 27, 2012
Arnold-Ziffel wrote:
Waco, On your site you can write me a personal note. Give me your phone number and I will give you mine. I will not abuse the privacy. I just want to talk and maybe help you find the right direction. I have some experience in the field. We all just want you to heal and not have to live under a cloud. There is always hope for the future. I'm always 24/7. We never close the store.
I did it buddy but who knows if I did it right...I'll try again later....it says I sent it.but it works better if someone messages me first...then I just respond

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#11755 May 27, 2012
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
It is odd how YOU sit idly by while doctors perform late term abortions.
(Yes, Mikey, this is YET another of those "Doohhh!" moments for you.)
Free choice is not up for a vote.
The Truth

Knoxville, TN

#11756 May 27, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Free choice is not up for a vote.
The day science proves life begins at conception it is.

Think how far the reduction in weeks for the viability of the child (fetus in liberal-speak) has moved. What happens to your theory when viability begins at conception?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#11757 May 27, 2012
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> I did it buddy but who knows if I did it right...I'll try again later....it says I sent it.but it works better if someone messages me first...then I just respond
I sent my phone numbers . Call me or give me yours.
Observer

Charlotte, NC

#11758 May 27, 2012
Men should not have a vote in issues that directly affect a womans body.

“Seek ”

Since: May 12

Houston

#11759 May 27, 2012
Observer wrote:
Men should not have a vote in issues that directly affect a womans body.
That's bold of you to say...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#11760 May 27, 2012
Observer wrote:
Men should not have a vote in issues that directly affect a womans body.
To tell you the 'truth', I think 'BB's' should make all the rules for the rich and powerful spoiled elite parasites of the ruling class. One thing is for certain, they would run all the Nazi's out of town in a hurry!

“Seek ”

Since: May 12

Houston

#11761 May 27, 2012
I'm near Houston.....not Chandler Texas.....oh well....what can you do....you know.....maybe I should throw morality and decency to the side.....and become a lawyer! Nah....that won't work...I still have a few shreds of decency left...damn....I could have made money and been better than everybody else....at the same time!
The Truth

Knoxville, TN

#11762 May 28, 2012
Observer wrote:
Men should not have a vote in issues that directly affect a womans body.
That is an interesting proposition.

Should:

Someone not owning a home be allowed to vote on property tax increases?

Someone on welfare be allowed to vote on an increase in welfare benefits?

Congress be allowed to vote itself a raise?

The list goes on and on.

I have always been intrigued with this subject. The main premise is should someone with no exposure to loss or financial hardship be allowed to vote this hardship on others who are exposed to it?

“Seek ”

Since: May 12

Houston

#11763 May 28, 2012
Its Memorial Day Truth.....what ya gonna do?
Taxper

Gatesville, NC

#11764 May 28, 2012
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what is for dinner, liberty is a well-armed lamb willing to contest the decision.
And you people have the right to vote!
As it has been written.
Abraham Lincoln did not cause the death of so many people from a mere love of slaughter, but only to bring about a state of consent that could not otherwise be secured for the government he had undertaken to administer. When a government has once reduced its people to a state of consent—that is, of submission to its will—it can put them to a much better use than to kill them; for it can then plunder them, enslave them, and use them as tools for plundering and enslaving others. And these are the uses to which most governments, our own among the rest, do put their people, whenever they have once reduced them to a state of consent to its will. Andrew Jackson said that those who did not consent to the government he attempted to administer upon them, for that reason, were traitors, and ought to be hanged. Like so many other so-called "heroes," he thought the sword and the gallows excellent instrumentalities for securing the people's consent to be governed. The idea that, although government should rest on the consent of the governed, yet so much force may nevertheless be employed as may be necessary to produce that consent embodies everything that was ever exhibited in the shape of usurpation and tyranny in any country on earth.

“Seek ”

Since: May 12

Houston

#11765 May 28, 2012
Taxper wrote:
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what is for dinner, liberty is a well-armed lamb willing to contest the decision.
And you people have the right to vote!
As it has been written.
Abraham Lincoln did not cause the death of so many people from a mere love of slaughter, but only to bring about a state of consent that could not otherwise be secured for the government he had undertaken to administer. When a government has once reduced its people to a state of consent—that is, of submission to its will—it can put them to a much better use than to kill them; for it can then plunder them, enslave them, and use them as tools for plundering and enslaving others. And these are the uses to which most governments, our own among the rest, do put their people, whenever they have once reduced them to a state of consent to its will. Andrew Jackson said that those who did not consent to the government he attempted to administer upon them, for that reason, were traitors, and ought to be hanged. Like so many other so-called "heroes," he thought the sword and the gallows excellent instrumentalities for securing the people's consent to be governed. The idea that, although government should rest on the consent of the governed, yet so much force may nevertheless be employed as may be necessary to produce that consent embodies everything that was ever exhibited in the shape of usurpation and tyranny in any country on earth.
Ya think? So what do we do now? Revolution? Slingshots against tanks?
TSF

Rougemont, NC

#11766 May 28, 2012
Just couldn't resist a little roughing up of a neocon nazi neurotic nincompoop forum bully. Who started this name calling BS?
(BB, nixxer, black thug, nazi , smarty pants,liar liar pants on fire )
Yes, you and John Boener need to grow up. No go burst into tears.
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical high school response. You have time to grow, fool. Someday you may even be a real life grown-up.
(Do not bet on it, though.)

“Seek ”

Since: May 12

Houston

#11767 May 28, 2012
TSF wrote:
Just couldn't resist a little roughing up of a neocon nazi neurotic nincompoop forum bully. Who started this name calling BS?
(BB, nixxer, black thug, nazi , smarty pants,liar liar pants on fire )
Yes, you and John Boener need to grow up. No go burst into yet....dumbass
<quoted text>
You old meanie...
Observer

Charlotte, NC

#11768 May 28, 2012
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
That is an interesting proposition.
Should:
Someone not owning a home be allowed to vote on property tax increases?
Someone on welfare be allowed to vote on an increase in welfare benefits?
Congress be allowed to vote itself a raise?
The list goes on and on.
I have always been intrigued with this subject. The main premise is should someone with no exposure to loss or financial hardship be allowed to vote this hardship on others who are exposed to it?
Should someone who has no womb. Never had one. Never will have one. Does not have the slightest idea of what it's like to have one, even be allowed to discuss it? Reading this thread has amply answered that question. Why don't you neanderthals go talk about sports.

“Seek ”

Since: May 12

Houston

#11769 May 28, 2012
Observer wrote:
<quoted text>
Should someone who has no womb. Never had one. Never will have one. Does not have the slightest idea of what it's like to have one, even be allowed to discuss it? Reading this thread has amply answered that question. Why don't you neanderthals go talk about sports.
I know what its like to have my wife die of ovarian cancer...you little snot...

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#11770 May 28, 2012
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
That is an interesting proposition.
Should:
Someone not owning a home be allowed to vote on property tax increases?
Someone on welfare be allowed to vote on an increase in welfare benefits?
Congress be allowed to vote itself a raise?
The list goes on and on.
I have always been intrigued with this subject. The main premise is should someone with no exposure to loss or financial hardship be allowed to vote this hardship on others who are exposed to it?
You forgot. Should someone who hates another group of people that are villified in their churches by ignorant 'representatives of God', be allowed to vote on this hated groups personal right to form a union in marriage on a state wide popular vote referendum? Hell NO! Human rights are NEVER to be determined by popular vote!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Marshall Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 12 min Chimney1 150,660
Review: The Chocolate Fetish (Feb '13) 16 hr Sandy 4
News The drag queen with Gov. Pat McCrory on her ear... 20 hr union 1 2
News Trump-loving tow truck driver says God told him... Thu Robert 1
Queers demand a carpet munching Elsa. Thu Dan 1
Replace Jackson with Rosa Parks on $20 bill -- ... (Apr '15) Thu Dan 5
Donald Trump Next President Wed Sandy 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Marshall Mortgages