Comments
61 - 80 of 89 Comments Last updated Oct 1, 2013
pipedream

Grand Blanc, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Another "good" guy with a gun. Wouldn't it have been nice if the congregation were all armed during this inciden? But in any case Shooter had no known prior criminal history.

Pastor Ronald J. Harris Sr. Shot, Killed While Preaching During Church Service In Lake Charles Louisiana

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/28/past...
Jim

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#63
Sep 28, 2013
 
pipedream wrote:
<quoted text>You're wrong again. Get a job and then Stick it up your fat azz you ignorant little freak show.
That's the best you got poledancer? You better get to work, the boys at the Rainbow Club are waiting for you.
Jim

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64
Sep 28, 2013
 
pipedream wrote:
Another "good" guy with a gun. Wouldn't it have been nice if the congregation were all armed during this inciden? But in any case Shooter had no known prior criminal history.

Pastor Ronald J. Harris Sr. Shot, Killed While Preaching During Church Service In Lake Charles Louisiana

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/28/past...
What is your point? The pastor should of been armed to defend himself? Someone else should have been armed to possibly defend him? Or are you saying that it is good that everybody be unarmed and defenseless so that the criminal could have his way with them?
Maybe even have a mass killing spree?
vox veritatis

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65
Sep 28, 2013
 
pipedream wrote:
in any case Shooter had no known prior criminal history.
Thanks for providing still more proof that more background checks won't do squat.
vox veritatis

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66
Sep 28, 2013
 
Well whaddya know? Seems even Barry agrees that armed officers in schools are a good way to protect kids from nutballs with guns.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/28/ob...
"The Obama administration plans to spend millions of dollars to place armed police officers in schools throughout the country"
Jim

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67
Sep 28, 2013
 
vox veritatis wrote:
Well whaddya know? Seems even Barry agrees that armed officers in schools are a good way to protect kids from nutballs with guns.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/28/ob...
"The Obama administration plans to spend millions of dollars to place armed police officers in schools throughout the country"
As Booby would say "The NRA is sure to beat the drums about this one."
Obama must be one of those many new members Booby was talking about. Well at least Obama seems to agree now that more guns equal less crime.
Darker Moth

Byron Center, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
Sep 28, 2013
 
pipedream wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again! You ought to study the situation before opening your big trap as usual. More guns do not equate to less crime. There's a whole host of issues, primarily having to do with societal cultures, apart from guns, their numbers, their accessibility, etc. Americans are seeped in wild west, shoot first, and this silly notion that guns of any kind and any amount is guaranteed in the Constitution. Put that in your big mouth and spoke it dip $hit. And stick to one name on here you little coward.
Make sure you get a good firm hold on Mike Bloomberg's manhood before you go down on it. I know you'll love being his kid.
OhOhObama

Saline, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
Sep 29, 2013
 
Bob wrote:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state's basketball court, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
I really hope that the members of the NRA understand that every time they donate to their favorite cause......
A Gang-Banger Smiles!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/20/chic...
I think they smile as they walk across the border, even like all the way from Ecuador.
Jim

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
Sep 29, 2013
 
OhOhObama wrote:
<quoted text>I think they smile as they walk across the border, even like all the way from Ecuador.
No, my understanding is Mexico actually protects it's southern boarder. They are very strict on people trying to cross
Bob

Big Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
Sep 29, 2013
 
Really wrote:
<quoted text>What is your solution besides taking everyone's guns away? You keep running around in circles claiming that those who agree with the 2nd amendment are against gun laws. There are a myriad of laws on the books that are NOT being enforced as we type. Sooo, tell us Bob, who would YOU allow to own guns? My Dad always used to say, "if you are not part of the solution, you are a part of the problem". So, which are you Bob? The problem or the solution? And you constant rantings about the NRA are just that, rantings. The NRA is just another lobbying group, much like your favorite Planned Parenthood group or MoveOn.org and they want to influence peddle just like George Soros and any good progressive or (before you whine again) the Chamber of Commerce.
The reason you remember what daddy said is most likely because he had to you that so many time.....

You were asked for your opinion for a solution you could live with, and went off in the typical mode of never answering the question.

What a surprise!
Bob

Big Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#73
Sep 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oneal wrote:
<quoted text>
That's an excellent rant, TacoBob. Not sure where you stole it from, but it does take a factual jab at many of those arguing against increased gun control in something more than your usual spit-drooling troll manner.
If I thought for two seconds the progressives' true intent was to stop at responsible gun ownership I'd agree with them. BUT, we were told that Obamacare was not leading us into single-payer system, until Harry Reid slipped up and spilled the beans on that:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/201...
SO, if history tells us anything with this administration it's that the progressives true intent is to destroy the 2nd Amendment and their "responsible gun control" hogwash is "absolutely" a step toward taking our guns away.
Prove that this administration means what it says and says what it means , or stop making crap up and whining about people not trusting a single thing that they try to jam down we Americans' throats.
This has never been about American gun owners not wanting background checks and responsible gun ownership. It's about a valid lack of trust in the progressive radicals you morons elected, and they're radical steps to government control over every aspect of our lives.
When asked for your opinion for a solution.......

We get the Dingo pretending he is Special Edna rant.
Bob

Big Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
Sep 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

free thinker wrote:
<quoted text>
All the guns used in the Sandy Hook shooting were registered. How'd THAT work?
We already have a myriad of laws on the books regarding guns, their ownership, their use and, last I checked, it's against the law to commit murder, but that doesn't seem to stop the criminals. More laws are not the answer...better enforcement of the laws already in place would be a good start.
Congratulations, you came the closest to actually answering the question...... Are you some kind of closet commie pinko democrat?

If the current laws aren't being enforced, don't you think the better idea would be to scrap those laws and come up with something easier to enforce?
Bob

Big Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#75
Sep 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dr X wrote:
<quoted text>After all your huff'n and puff'n, you socialist Nazis will never get a gun registry here. They tried that in California back in 2001 and only 20 percent of firearms were actually brought in for the said purpose of registering them. The Nazis over at MAIG have failed and their membership is dwindling as we speak. The treasonous Eric Holder cannot say or do anything about it because he's tied to F&F. There are more so-called "assault" weapons in the hands of the American citizenry than ever before. Millions of them. I know you hate guns, so be it. I don't care. If you would feel more comfortable living in a gun-free society then I suggest you move to Europe or maybe Australia. Take you cats with you.
And your normal diatribe was the farthest, even though it was the funniest!

The look on your face when you get whacked on the first day of your fantasy war is going to be priceless. Hopefully someone will catch it on youtube so we can all get a good laugh.
Really

Wyoming, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76
Sep 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
The reason you remember what daddy said is most likely because he had to you that so many time.....
You were asked for your opinion for a solution you could live with, and went off in the typical mode of never answering the question.
What a surprise!
No, the reason I remember what Dad told me is I respected him. He treated others with respect and loved me until the day he died. You, on the other hand, don't even respect yourself left alone others. You are nothing but a coward and that has been exhibited many, many times. As for my solution, I have given it several times, you just don't like it so you don't realize it's a solution. No surprise there...you, Blue and Sassy all have the same mindset...I don't like it so therefore it's not a solution. Let's just throw everything away and start over. No wonder you clowns are so pleased with Obama and Obamacare.
Oneal

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77
Sep 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
When asked for your opinion for a solution.......
We get the Dingo pretending he is Special Edna rant.
Maybe next time I'll explain my opinion to you in a coloring book format like Obama has to do in order for you liberals to understand.
Dr X

Byron Center, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
Sep 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
And your normal diatribe was the farthest, even though it was the funniest!
The look on your face when you get whacked on the first day of your fantasy war is going to be priceless. Hopefully someone will catch it on youtube so we can all get a good laugh.
Progressives, like you, would all be dead in the first four hours if it went down. Progressive socialists haven't any love for country nor do they believe in anything greater than that of the state. That's why you'd be handed the biggest can of whoop-azz in the history of warfare. Smoking pot and throwing petrol bombs or water balloons filled with urine are not effective weapons of war.
Warforitall

Byron Center, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
Sep 29, 2013
 
Bob

Big Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#80
Sep 30, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Dr X wrote:
<quoted text>Progressives, like you, would all be dead in the first four hours if it went down. Progressive socialists haven't any love for country nor do they believe in anything greater than that of the state. That's why you'd be handed the biggest can of whoop-azz in the history of warfare. Smoking pot and throwing petrol bombs or water balloons filled with urine are not effective weapons of war.
I won't be dead in the first four hours....... Unless you run over me as you're headed for Canada!

I predict that you'll buy it within sight of the Blue Water Bridge as you make your retreat to safety.
free thinker

Farmington, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#81
Sep 30, 2013
 
Bob wrote:
Congratulations, you came the closest to actually answering the question...... Are you some kind of closet commie pinko democrat?
If the current laws aren't being enforced, don't you think the better idea would be to scrap those laws and come up with something easier to enforce?
You would first need to answer the question of why the current laws are not being enforced. Your turn to come up with an answer, there, TacoBob. Let's see if you're ready to be let off the short bus.
Just to recap:

The Navy yard shooter brought a gun into DC (illegal)
They carried it through DC (illegal)
they brought it onto a military installation (illegal)
they committed multiple acts of murder with it (illegal)

And somehow all you libritards seem to think that more (and now apparently 'different, easier to enforce') laws would have somehow prevented this.
Newsflash, TacoBob...laws don't PREVENT crime. They simply lay out the punishment for committing the crime.
free thinker

Farmington, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#82
Sep 30, 2013
 
Bob wrote:
The look on your face when you get whacked on the first day of your fantasy war is going to be priceless. Hopefully someone will catch it on youtube so we can all get a good laugh.
Likewise for you. Hopefully someone will catch you on YouTube pissing your pants before they off you so the rest of us can nod and say,'we knew it would be that way all along'. Wonder if you'll be screaming 'Allah Akbar'?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••

Marne Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Marne People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Marne News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Marne
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••