Obama eyeing your 401K

Posted in the Marne Forum

Comments (Page 6)

Showing posts 101 - 120 of157
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Really

Jenison, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#106
Dec 6, 2012
 
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>...Plese explain, how raising the taxes on those making over $250,000 annually, raises the taxes on everybody? Evidently, you don't have it at all.....
Apparently typing slowly didn't help, using all caps didn't help, being nice didn't help. I guess you will remain clueless until you see how much your taxes go up and your take home pay goes down. Perhaps then you will understand. The tax cuts are expiring on January 1. The tax rates go up, your taxes go up. They CANNOT pick and choose which rates expire. They all expire or none do. And if you honestly believe that Obama will only raise taxes on just one portion of the population to "fix" things, I have some ocean front property in Arizona I will be happy to sell you for a really good price.
Linda

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#109
Dec 6, 2012
 
Linda wrote:
I'm a little many better with a problem with this you fickface nose and then you told Jason was not come here and now he's from Chicago and you really don't know what store anyway cuz you don't have a job only a boner.
Poor Jason!!
Bob

Big Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#110
Dec 7, 2012
 
vox veritatis wrote:
<quoted text>
You do realize that even if they taxed the top 1-2% at 100% that it wouldn't run the government for more than a month, right? So explain to the class again how exactly that's going to help?
Talk about 'why bother'....
I'd be more than willing to explain it to you...... As soon as you tell the class about when you are going to ask your boss for a pay cut.
Bob

Big Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#111
Dec 7, 2012
 
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text> .."if they taxed the top 1-2% at 100%"...is this for some type of dramatic effect?...Has anyone suggested 100 percent taxation, other than you? What harm doe's raising taxes on the 2% actually cause?....BTW, the above post, is now in the proper context, which i prefer.....
It's just a tired FAUX News talking point.

Have you ever heard any of them try to explain that this country pays almost $1.9 BILLION dollars a day on our military? The fact that this is more than the next sixteen countries spend combined? That this budget has almost doubled in the last 10 years? Or that we could have a balanced budget if it was cut by only one third?

Well, neither have I....... Republicans need a strong military, almost like they are compensating for something!
Really

Jenison, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#112
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
It's just a tired FAUX News talking point.
Have you ever heard any of them try to explain that this country pays almost $1.9 BILLION dollars a day on our military? The fact that this is more than the next sixteen countries spend combined? That this budget has almost doubled in the last 10 years? Or that we could have a balanced budget if it was cut by only one third?
Well, neither have I....... Republicans need a strong military, almost like they are compensating for something!
don't like it? MOVE.Your tired old rhetoric is passe these days Bobbie. Try something different for a change. And the Dems and Repubs don't want a balanced budget. You and Blue and your fellow progressives only want to spend money, not make money. That's totally obvious and has been for a whole lot of years.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#113
Dec 7, 2012
 
Really wrote:
<quoted text>Apparently typing slowly didn't help, using all caps didn't help, being nice didn't help. I guess you will remain clueless until you see how much your taxes go up and your take home pay goes down. Perhaps then you will understand. The tax cuts are expiring on January 1. The tax rates go up, your taxes go up. They CANNOT pick and choose which rates expire. They all expire or none do. And if you honestly believe that Obama will only raise taxes on just one portion of the population to "fix" things, I have some ocean front property in Arizona I will be happy to sell you for a really good price.
WE HELD AN ELECTION, AND VOTED IN THE PRESIDENT, WE WANT TO LEAD..........Sorry, you don't get it....

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#114
Dec 7, 2012
 
Really wrote:
<quoted text>We can't wait for you to realize that your hero's proposals raise the taxes on the entire country AND causes inflation to rise AND GDP to further deteriorate. But, since you in your arrogance think it won't affect you, you don't care. We got it.
Not in context of, "fiscal cliff"....say's clearly, your hero's proposal's raise taxes on entire country?
Linda

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#115
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bob wrote:
<quoted text>It's just a tired FAUX News talking point.

Have you ever heard any of them try to explain that this country pays almost $1.9 BILLION dollars a day on our military? The fact that this is more than the next sixteen countries spend combined? That this budget has almost doubled in the last 10 years? Or that we could have a balanced budget if it was cut by only one third?

Well, neither have I....... Republicans need a strong military, almost like they are compensating for something!
Your a fool!! The primary reason for the formation of the government is to protect the people. We are a super power and have to spend money to stay in power. You are so backwards thinking. Without a strong military nothing else matter, especially in the world of Obama's foreign policies. The world is a much more dangerous place than 4 years ago. Remember Obama talked about Al-Qaeda being on its heals and beaten down. Now they have grown and expanded under Obama's leadership. After Syria's fall, if they don't use all of the chemical weapons on themselves Al-Qaeda may get some of those chemical weapons.
Linda

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#116
Dec 7, 2012
 
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>Not in context of, "fiscal cliff"....say's clearly, your hero's proposal's raise taxes on entire country?
Still waiting for the proof Jason blue nuts
Dan Salazar

Los Alamitos, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#117
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

WDRussell wrote:
<quoted text>
And you wonder why Mittwit lost?
No one wonders why Mr. Romney lost. Mr Romney would have expected us all to take advantage of the zillion opportunities Americans have to make something of themselves thus keeping social safety nets secure and affordable for those who were truly needy.

Romney was not Bush nor Obama. He was more JFK. Romney gave us the chance to have a Leader who would serve every one not just his cronies.

Obama just said he Americans were nothing special. We bought it. HE was the Truth and the Light and Big Government was the answer. He would reduce our personal choices and take more and more of all of our money...the Rich first but every one else over time to fund his whims and Marxist dreams.

The majority agreed with Obama that American families didn't measure up to previous generations anymore so Romney lost.

Of course, 401K's will be taxed. Washington politicians and Union members don't have to worry about their retirements. Everyone else has to do without to pay their way after they retire. The Left believes that 401K's are for suckers!

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#118
Dec 7, 2012
 
Bob wrote:
<quoted text>
It's just a tired FAUX News talking point.
Have you ever heard any of them try to explain that this country pays almost $1.9 BILLION dollars a day on our military? The fact that this is more than the next sixteen countries spend combined? That this budget has almost doubled in the last 10 years? Or that we could have a balanced budget if it was cut by only one third?
Well, neither have I....... Republicans need a strong military, almost like they are compensating for something!
Why is it that when the President suggested paring down our bloated defense budget, he was met with all the, "harming our military" stuff? They complain, he doesn't cut spending, but then i guess it's all just political partisan BS....
Linda

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#119
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>Why is it that when the President suggested paring down our bloated defense budget, he was met with all the, "harming our military" stuff? They complain, he doesn't cut spending, but then i guess it's all just political partisan BS....
Wow, they are right it don't matter how many ways you are told. You are just that stupid that you don't understand. We all are still waiting for the proof to back up your claims.
EJ McDuff

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#120
Dec 7, 2012
 
vox veritatis wrote:
<quoted text>
The president does:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-e...
Under his proposed budget, spending will increase by about 41% but only decrease by 6% for a net increase in spending of 35%.
And they haven't figured out how to pay for Obama care yet.
Enjoy those new taxes!
Oh...and you can expect a decrease in pay starting January 1, 2013 when the Social Security payroll tax cuts expire...but you probably won't miss that 20 bucks a week....much. Just cut back on the ganja and Budweiser and it'll be okay.
Hey Genius your article to support your claim that govt. spending will increase in 2013 by net 35% is deficient. where does it say that? In short, like everything else you spew here its garbage. Your keyboard has run amok again. Better try again. I'm waiting.
EJ McDuff

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#121
Dec 7, 2012
 
Dan Salazar wrote:
<quoted text>
No one wonders why Mr. Romney lost. Mr Romney would have expected us all to take advantage of the zillion opportunities Americans have to make something of themselves thus keeping social safety nets secure and affordable for those who were truly needy.
Romney was not Bush nor Obama. He was more JFK. Romney gave us the chance to have a Leader who would serve every one not just his cronies.
Obama just said he Americans were nothing special. We bought it. HE was the Truth and the Light and Big Government was the answer. He would reduce our personal choices and take more and more of all of our money...the Rich first but every one else over time to fund his whims and Marxist dreams.
The majority agreed with Obama that American families didn't measure up to previous generations anymore so Romney lost.
Of course, 401K's will be taxed. Washington politicians and Union members don't have to worry about their retirements. Everyone else has to do without to pay their way after they retire. The Left believes that 401K's are for suckers!
Hahaha
EyeOnYou

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#122
Dec 7, 2012
 
EJ McDuff wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Genius your article to support your claim that govt. spending will increase in 2013 by net 35% is deficient. where does it say that? In short, like everything else you spew here its garbage. Your keyboard has run amok again. Better try again. I'm waiting.
Karl Marx is proud of you. America is not.
EJ McDuff

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#123
Dec 7, 2012
 
EyeOnYou wrote:
<quoted text>Karl Marx is proud of you. America is not.
hahah. You better take a high school intro to civics class and come back when you have something close to relevant. Faux news is not a credible source for anything but comedy.
EJ McDuff

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#125
Dec 7, 2012
 
Linda wrote:
<quoted text>
you are clearly educated Jason fix face that's all your little blue all sandy nuts. Must you always be gay?
like I said, you have to be one of the biggest a-holes there ever was on this sewer site called Topix. you can't even string words together to form a sentence. What a P.O.S.you must be.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#126
Dec 7, 2012
 
EJ McDuff wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Genius your article to support your claim that govt. spending will increase in 2013 by net 35% is deficient. where does it say that? In short, like everything else you spew here its garbage. Your keyboard has run amok again. Better try again. I'm waiting.
It even show's a defense budget of over half a trillion...incredible...Presid ent Obama is correct, in that, it needs to decrease....
EJ McDuff

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#127
Dec 7, 2012
 
Go Blue Forever wrote:
<quoted text>It even show's a defense budget of over half a trillion...incredible...Presid ent Obama is correct, in that, it needs to decrease....
Did you note the wild azz statements the crazy Vox made about spending increases and the other one about not being able to just let the tax cuts to the 1-2% expire, that they have to raise everyone's taxes? Where do these whackos get this stuff?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#128
Dec 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

EJ McDuff wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you note the wild azz statements the crazy Vox made about spending increases and the other one about not being able to just let the tax cuts to the 1-2% expire, that they have to raise everyone's taxes? Where do these whackos get this stuff?
Welcome to the Twilight Zone, of american political theory...otherwise known as, The Grand Rapids Forum....(show theme plays)....

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 101 - 120 of157
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Marne Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Marne People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••