Yosemite Suit Could Affect Park Access

Yosemite Suit Could Affect Park Access

There are 3 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 28, 2007, titled Yosemite Suit Could Affect Park Access. In it, Newsday reports that:

The plunging waterfalls and soaring crags chiseled by the Merced River draw millions of visitors each year, but the crowds are precisely what threatens the waterway and the park.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

JES

Arlington, VA

#1 Jan 28, 2007
I have visited Yosemite on several occasions and it is truly a scenic wonderland. Visiting there, one truly appreciates the natural beauty and wonderment of nature.

If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a noise? If a secnic wonderland is unseen (because of artificially mandated caps on visitors), is it still a scenic wonderland?

There is plenty of room in Yosemite for managed access roads and mobility. Environmentalists claim they wish to "save" Yosemite. From whom? For whom?

This is public land and should be available to the public; otherwise, why preserve it.

Thank you.
Kent Richards

Newark, CA

#2 Jan 29, 2007
The argument above is a bit flawed: capping the number of visitors *would not* result in the park being unseen and *would* result in a lower impact to the beautiful place, making it even more beautiful to those who do visit.

There are already managed access roads in Yosemite. Curbing further development in the park and capping the number of visitors will keep Yosemite from becoming The Park Formerly Known as a Scenic Wonderland.
JTM

Orlando, FL

#3 Feb 2, 2007
I am bitterly opposed to the efforts of these environmentalists to limit public access to Yosemite. Making our parks inaccessible to people will serve to undermine the very support upon which they depend, especially in a time of dramatically decreasing visitation. Sure the park will still be seen, but by whom? And who are these people to dictate that? The Yosemite Valley Plan which the park service proposes DOES call for the restoration of natural processes in the park, and was widely endorsed by the public and by most environmental groups. What is the issue and why must park policy be approved by these people to the exclusion of the rest of us?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mariposa Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Caltrans Liter Day Totals For San Joaquin County Apr 26 Julie Ann 1
Poll which gang would you choose to be in? Apr 26 Rhino 3
News Silveira first woman in Merced County District ... Apr 24 Lucy Jane 1
News North Valley leaders fuel bipartisan fast track... Apr 24 Lucy Jane 1
News Trash Littering California Highways Cost Taxpay... Apr 24 Lucy Jane 1
News Show goes on for Pacheco theater students after... Apr 24 Lucy Jane 1
News The Board Room for April 25 Apr 24 Lucy Jane 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Mariposa Mortgages