Daniel Crouse Accused Murderer of Nat...

Daniel Crouse Accused Murderer of Nathan Combs

Posted in the Marion Forum

Murderer of Nathan Combs

United States

#1 Dec 10, 2011
I thought that when Nathan was murdered everyone swore that he would not be forgotten -
Dec was start of the Grand Jury Murder Trial against Daniel Crouse, Garrett Crouse of Sugar Grove, Ricky Joseph James, 24, of Marion, Mindie Mae Davidson, 32, also of the Crouse home Michael Ray Brown Jr., 37, of Spring Street, Galax, Jessica James Edwards for abduction of Combs and yet there has been no news updates through the media, no post or discussions on Topix or SWVAToday ...
Does !ANYONE! have any info for those of us are watching and waiting for justice to be done .....?????
Or has NATHAN COMBS MURDER BEEN FORGOTTEN ALREADY?
Laura

United States

#2 Dec 10, 2011
I understand your desire for info, I would love some too, but your accusation is uncalled for. Nathan will never be forgotten. There would be other ways of requesting the information you want besides coming off as hostile and offensive to the rest of us.
Never Forgotten

Humble, TX

#3 Dec 10, 2011
Nathan will NEVER be forgotten. I would like updates as well, as many people probably do. However, sometimes they will not post any news in the media until after the trail has went down. Who knows what's going on with that, but I definitely can NOT wait to see the outcome of this. I hope they get the death penalty, even though it will be too good of a punishment for them.

RIP NATHAN!!
Doc

Charlottesville, VA

#4 Dec 11, 2011
Laura wrote:
I understand your desire for info, I would love some too, but your accusation is uncalled for. Nathan will never be forgotten. There would be other ways of requesting the information you want besides coming off as hostile and offensive to the rest of us.
What accusation? The listed were all charged by police and bound over by the grand jury. The trial will determine guilt/innocence, but the fact these people were accused, charged, and set to be tried is not an accusation.

If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. I hope all involved get justice - maximum sentences for all!
CottonEye

Burlington, VT

#5 Dec 11, 2011
Doc I think she meant accusing people of forgetting Nathan. She did not forget, nor has anyone else in this area. The facts of this crime will probably remain etched in my brain until death. No human should suffer such a horrible death, much less at the hands of another human. May God be with Nathans family and friends as this trial proceeds, be with the Jury as they hear the gruesome details, the lawyers presenting this case, and be with those accused and their families as well. Anyone involved in this case needs prayer. If there are any updates, please post them here for the rest of us.

Since: Nov 11

Greensboro, NC

#6 Dec 11, 2011
Grand juries and trials are two different things. Grand jury activities generally aren't made public.
Laura

United States

#7 Dec 12, 2011
Doc wrote:
<quoted text>
What accusation? The listed were all charged by police and bound over by the grand jury. The trial will determine guilt/innocence, but the fact these people were accused, charged, and set to be tried is not an accusation.
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. I hope all involved get justice - maximum sentences for all!
Doc I have no idea what you are talking about. I was talking to the original poster... the accusation was that no one cares about Nathan. What are you talking about?
shydog

United States

#8 Dec 14, 2011
Y hasn't april m been charged since she was involoved oh that's right she turned as a witness....so she gets to walk free and be with her kids...she could haved made a call and prevented it all
mmm

Roanoke, VA

#9 Dec 28, 2011
no one nos what really happened to nathan but the people who done it. april m and no involment in nathans murder. and nathan will will never be forgoten only loved. no one needs to blame april m for having any part in nathans murder.
StoRm

Esmont, VA

#10 Dec 28, 2011
His dad is suing someone for trying to NOT forget him. What does that tell you? If I was the parent of a murdered child (or a spouse or child of a murdered person) I would WANT any publicity I could get to make people remember, regardless of politics. I'm sure plenty of people will not agree with me but if the shoes were on my feet, I'd want his photo and his story everywhere.
Longlashes

Hermitage, TN

#11 Dec 28, 2011
Good grief....ive read that and read that and all i can say is....wtf....did...you...just. ..say???
StoRm

Esmont, VA

#12 Dec 29, 2011
If you mean me: Nathan's dad is suing Jeff C for using Nathan's photo in an advertisement while running for commonwealth attorney. The dad got mad that Jeff used a photo of Nathan for "poliitcal gain" and now he is suing him for like a million bucks. If my child was murdered I wouldn't care if someone used his or her pic in an advertisement if it brought attention to the situation and made people remember what happened and what my kid went through. Jeff used a slogan about getting justice and his point was that if he was C.A. he would get justice for Nathan. This post was about people forgetting Nathan and the trial. His own dad got mad when someone put Nathan back in the public's eye.
Albert

Charlottesville, VA

#13 Dec 29, 2011
StoRm wrote:
If you mean me: Nathan's dad is suing Jeff C for using Nathan's photo in an advertisement while running for commonwealth attorney. The dad got mad that Jeff used a photo of Nathan for "poliitcal gain" and now he is suing him for like a million bucks. If my child was murdered I wouldn't care if someone used his or her pic in an advertisement if it brought attention to the situation and made people remember what happened and what my kid went through. Jeff used a slogan about getting justice and his point was that if he was C.A. he would get justice for Nathan. This post was about people forgetting Nathan and the trial. His own dad got mad when someone put Nathan back in the public's eye.
No, he got mad that somebody stooped so low to use his baby boy's picture and memory in hopes of winning an election. I'd sue too. I pray you never have the chance to prove you wouldn't mind your child's picture and memory being somebody's commercial.
StoRm

Esmont, VA

#14 Dec 29, 2011
As long as it was nothing negative about my child I would welcome any publicity I could get. You don't see the other families jumping and doing it because they were probably happy that the light was back on their family and the horrible acts done to them. I've lost a very close family member who I would consider I loved as much as a child or any other immediate family member. I would welcome someone to use their photo to shed light on that person. I understand that you see if differently, and I suppose Nathan's dad sees it your way but I stick to my belief if it were me in that situation. It's not so it doesn't really matter.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Marion Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jon and Alisha 1 hr Another Winner 7
SuzieQ 1 hr You are Next 4
Jobs 14 hr Oink Jones 3
good place to drink beer (Feb '12) 16 hr Robbery 45
Becky and Chuck 17 hr Micheal 75
Is it true you have to be a lesbian to work at ... 20 hr Leo 5
Matts Tech Shop on Main Street Sun USDOT24 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Marion Mortgages