Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 Full story: CBS2 51,286

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Full Story
ohoh

Sugar Grove, IL

#35615 Oct 1, 2012
Ninja wanna be wrote:
<quoted text>
Boo
Saluki rod has not been heard from since he started this gay thread, he is to busy taking care of his boy callers.
Anonymous

Waterloo, IL

#35616 Oct 1, 2012
Honestly, this shouldn't even be an issue in this day & age. Marriage is just a word. What's the big deal? Religion? Dictionary definition? One shouldn't live their life so blindly by a book & definititions are always being reviewed & redone. So give gays the right to MARRY each other. Honestly. Some people need to grow up.
Until an actual reason arises that is significant enough to prove gay marriage being wrong, I see no issue. Religion shouldn't be shoved down people's throats. Neither should the AIDS excuse or the fact homosexuals can't reproduce. Because they can. Look it up.
Grim Reaper

Saint Louis, MO

#35617 Oct 4, 2012
This thread has expired.
RIP
papafox

Markham, IL

#35618 Oct 4, 2012
papa doc is in luck--same sex unions
Grim Reaper

Saint Louis, MO

#35619 Oct 4, 2012
I SAID "Rest In Peace"!!!!!!!!!
papafox wrote:
papa doc is in luck--same sex unions
papafox

Markham, IL

#35620 Oct 4, 2012
Grim Reaper wrote:
I SAID "Rest In Peace"!!!!!!!!!
<quoted text>
thats not nice to say about papa doc he still has a few years left in his funny little world ..come back later mr reaper
David

Niles, IL

#35621 Oct 4, 2012
Good point...Marry who you want, but make divorce illegal. http://kingdavidmovers.com
Rushton

Mooresville, NC

#35622 Oct 4, 2012
This is what u would call drama ! I am now tired just reading this . I was read n updates on someone I know with brain cancer at age 28 an my goodness how I got this site have no Idea :) I don't think any of u r get n a point across lol good luck I am now worn out from the read n ! AWR "A"
jane

Anonymous Proxy

#35623 Oct 5, 2012
Gay Mom wrote:
<quoted text>
We just want what you already have. Simple, really.
not very long
Valmeyer Illinois

Waterloo, IL

#35624 Oct 5, 2012
informant wrote:
I dont think its ok.
I don't think it is ok either.
Voice of Reason

United States

#35627 Oct 6, 2012
Although I do not judge, I also do not agree with same sex relationships. It is just unnatural.

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#35628 Oct 6, 2012
Voice of Reason wrote:
Although I do not judge, I also do not agree with same sex relationships. It is just unnatural.
it can't be unnatural. over 1500 species of animals including humans have been documented as demonstrating same sex attraction exclusively in 10% of males, and 8% of females.

if it's in nature, then it's natural.

“Marriage equality for all”

Since: Jul 07

Illinois

#35629 Oct 7, 2012
Voice of Reason wrote:
Although I do not judge, I also do not agree with same sex relationships. It is just unnatural.
For YOU it is unnatural.

For US, it's perfectly normal.
Voice of Reason

Conway, MO

#35630 Oct 7, 2012
If it was natural then the species would be able to reproduce that way. Just how I believe.

“Marriage equality for all”

Since: Jul 07

Illinois

#35631 Oct 7, 2012
Voice of Reason wrote:
If it was natural then the species would be able to reproduce that way. Just how I believe.
Well then, we should probably exterminate barren women and sterile men. They're just unnatural.
cdc

Saint Louis, MO

#35632 Oct 8, 2012
Correction: Puuurrrrfectly not normal.
I'm not a cat person. HA!
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
For YOU it is unnatural.
For US, it's perfectly normal.
sick

Libertyville, IL

#35633 Oct 8, 2012
God made Adam & Eve, NOT Adam & Steve you queer No matter how you spin it, it is NOT normal
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
For YOU it is unnatural.
For US, it's perfectly normal.
sicker

Saint Louis, MO

#35634 Oct 8, 2012
Madam and Eve on the other hand is great and even encouraged.
sick wrote:
God made Adam & Eve, NOT Adam & Steve you queer No matter how you spin it, it is NOT normal
<quoted text>

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#35635 Oct 9, 2012
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
it can't be unnatural. over 1500 species of animals including humans have been documented as demonstrating same sex attraction exclusively in 10% of males, and 8% of females.
if it's in nature, then it's natural.
Same sex sexual behavior is distinct from homosexuality, and your percentage is a blatent lie.

A distortion and a lie. You are the dark side.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#35636 Oct 9, 2012
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
if it's in nature, then it's natural.
Genetic defects are a natural part of nature.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Marion Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ann Colborn is running for mayor 4 hr Diggs 20
Cody Wece 11 hr Got Nikki beat 10
Gratitude for HeroTypes 12 hr Yorick1951 1
heather hodge 14 hr Ancient History 4
Jon Mcanelly 16 hr Benson 16
How bad is working at Pepsi, really? (Apr '12) 18 hr Toby 348
Jimmy Jackson 22 hr buck 2014 6
Marion Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Marion People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Marion News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Marion

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:50 pm PST

Bleacher Report 5:50PM
Complete Preview of Rams vs. Seahawks
Bleacher Report 2:12 AM
St. Louis Rams vs. Seattle Seahawks: Complete Week 17 Preview for Seattle
NBC Sports 3:43 AM
Jay Cutler on Bears: "Everyone could get axed"
Bleacher Report 6:00 AM
Bears vs. Vikings: What Experts Are Saying About Chicago
NBC Sports 6:03 AM
Jim Caldwell: No concerns about starting a rookie center