Did you vote today?

[BARNEYII]

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I would not be okay wiping out innocents. I don't agree with war at all but I was simply stating a fact of war. If you make it known that there are limitations to what you will do to win then the enemy will exploit that limitation to your detriment. This is exactly what has happened to us in the Middle East. Women and children have been used against us because our enemy knows that we don't want to kill any women or children. In WWII we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the war ended in short order because Japan knew that we would do whatever it took to win the war and preserve our freedom. Taking things out of context, which you did, is something that makes you look bad.

" our enemy knows that we don't want to kill any women or children."

No shit Sherlock, ever hear of the the Geneva Conventions?

The articles of the Fourth Geneva Convention (1949) extensively defined the basic rights of prisoners (civil and military) during war; established protections for the wounded; and established protections for the civilians in and around a war zone. The treaties of 1949 were ratified, in whole or with reservations, by 194 countries.[1] The Geneva Convention also defines the rights and protections of non-combatants.

[WM Resident]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Where you get this "we" shit, Harry S Truman was a liberal and a Democrat.

We the People of the United States of America or so it was back when that happened. In our times "we" is twisted by the person trying to identify with some present or past event and to expunge "we" as if their ideology is mainstream and has always been so.

[vote with your dollars]

boycott walmart

ROGERS, Ark.-- Walmart Stores (WMT), the world's No. 1 retailer and the biggest seller of firearms in the United States, is dropping out of a U.S. conservative advocacy group that has been a lightning rod over voting and gun laws.

Walmart said late Wednesday it is suspending membership in the American Legislative Council (ALEC), which the retailer joined in 1993.

ALEC sparked controversy recently because of its involvement in voting laws and in "stand your ground" gun laws, including the one under scrutiny in the Florida killing of unarmed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in February.

A coalition of liberal advocates targeted the group for its support of the self-defense laws.

ALEC, which serves as a forum for corporations and mostly Republican state lawmakers and lobbyists to discuss model legislation, has been criticized by liberals for promoting laws that require photo identification to vote.

ColorOfChange, a liberal advocacy group for black Americans, has said the voting laws put the poor and minorities at a disadvantage.

In April, ALEC said it was abandoning the committee that worked on "public safety and elections" to focus on the economy. Despite the change, Walmart decided it was no longer focused on the same issues as the council.

[Old Army]

Dump Obama/Biden in 2012. Replace them with Clinton/Edwards. Thanks for your support, sincerely, Bill

[guest]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Ironically, one of the hottest new books for conservatives is far left-winger Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, which was written way back in 1971.
After reading the book, my personal opinion is that Alinsky was a brilliant yet cynical, habitually dishonest, utterly amoral human being with a deep understanding of large swathes of human nature. Was he a good guy? No, not at all. But, is there a lot conservatives can learn from his tactics? Absolutely. Some of it we can apply and some of it we can see how the Left has applied it against us.
http://rightwingnews.com/quotes/the-best-quot...
Put that in your pipe and smoke it .
LMAO--"But, is there a lot conservatives can learn from his tactics? Absolutely."
Tell me Mr. Wizard, how does that Crow taste, I bet it is not as good as Fox NEWS told you it was.

Fascinating, you used all three rules in one post. Thanks for proving my point.

[Charmed]

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I would not be okay wiping out innocents. I don't agree with war at all but I was simply stating a fact of war. If you make it known that there are limitations to what you will do to win then the enemy will exploit that limitation to your detriment. This is exactly what has happened to us in the Middle East. Women and children have been used against us because our enemy knows that we don't want to kill any women or children. In WWII we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the war ended in short order because Japan knew that we would do whatever it took to win the war and preserve our freedom. Taking things out of context, which you did, is something that makes you look bad.

I apologize for commenting on the end of your post. It allowed both of us to get off track. The point of my post was Republicans are out of touch. They whine that decreasing our military will jeopardize our national security, but our current numbers of military personnel will not be necessary. The reason is the same one that made jobs go away - technology. Fewer people are needed to accomplish just about everything. Why would they want to waste money when they constantly complain about our national debt? Okay, just to summarize, Republicans are out of touch. Vote for them at your peril.

[Reality Check]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Where you get this "we" shit, Harry S Truman was a liberal and a Democrat.

"We" Americans. Or do you not consider some citizens of this country to be Americans? Is this like Hitler and his perfect race idea? You think the perfect race is a bunch of Democrats? I sure hope you never get into public office in any capacity. It does shed some light into your liberal ideology though.

[BARNEYII]

guest wrote:

<quoted text>Fascinating, you used all three rules in one post. Thanks for proving my point.

ROFLMAO, Yep "used all three rules in one post" with a cut and paste from a ULTRA RIGHT WING web site, giving you righties advice such as this, "Some of it we can apply", talking about Alinsky’s book.

[guest]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
ROFLMAO, Yep "used all three rules in one post" with a cut and paste from a ULTRA RIGHT WING web site, giving you righties advice such as this, "Some of it we can apply", talking about Alinsky’s book.

Well, that one was just two out of the three. Not bad.

[BARNEYII]

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
"We" Americans. Or do you not consider some citizens of this country to be Americans? Is this like Hitler and his perfect race idea? You think the perfect race is a bunch of Democrats? I sure hope you never get into public office in any capacity. It does shed some light into your liberal ideology though.

You have it all wrong again, I was amused at how anti liberal you are till you need one to add to your constant barrage of ignorance.

[guest]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
You have it all wrong again, I was amused at how anti liberal you are till you need one to add to your constant barrage of ignorance.

That one only used rule #5

[BARNEYII]

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
"We" Americans. Or do you not consider some citizens of this country to be Americans? Is this like Hitler and his perfect race idea? You think the perfect race is a bunch of Democrats? I sure hope you never get into public office in any capacity. It does shed some light into your liberal ideology though.

Interesting, what is your definition of "Americans"?

I consider a United States Citizen, a citizen, regardless of where they were Bourne.


I also conceder "a bunch of Democrats" as members of a political party, not a "perfect race".

I also conceder any one who could conceive such ignorance, as you put in that post to be, pardon the term, BAT SHIT CRAZY.

[guest]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Interesting, what is your definition of "Americans"?
I consider a United States Citizen, a citizen, regardless of where they were Bourne.
I also conceder "a bunch of Democrats" as members of a political party, not a "perfect race".
I also conceder any one who could conceive such ignorance, as you put in that post to be, pardon the term, BAT SHIT CRAZY.

3,4 and 5

[BARNEYII]

guest wrote:

<quoted text>That one only used rule #5

I presume by the way you are posting you think that these rules are derogatory in nature. Can you please explain to me, if I am correct in my assumption, why you find them so bad.

If I am correct in my assumption, how do you feel about Right wing web sites' such as,

http://rightwingnews.com/quotes/the-best-quo

saying,

"But, is there a lot conservatives can learn from his tactics? Absolutely. Some of it we can apply"

What rule numbers are you useing? BTW what is my score now?

[guest]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
I presume by the way you are posting you think that these rules are derogatory in nature. Can you please explain to me, if I am correct in my assumption, why you find them so bad.
If I am correct in my assumption, how do you feel about Right wing web sites' such as,
http://rightwingnews.com/quotes/the-best-quo
saying,
"But, is there a lot conservatives can learn from his tactics? Absolutely. Some of it we can apply"
What rule numbers are you useing? BTW what is my score now?

3 and 4

[BARNEYII]

guest wrote:

<quoted text>3 and 4

What is the problem Bubba, can you not address the entire question?

[Redd Neckerson]

Whoever said that our President, Mr. Obama, hasn’t acomplished anything in his first term?
WHAT AN IMPRESSIVE LIST OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS!…
First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.
First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.
First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States .
First President to violate the War Powers Act.
First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico .
First President to defy a Federal Judge’s court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law.
First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party, a violation of the U.S. Constitution.
First President to spend a trillion dollars on ‘shovel-ready’ jobs when there was no such thing as ‘shovel-ready’ jobs.
First President to recommend changing our National Anthem as it portrays and promotes violence and is warlike in its theme.
First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer Breakfast and activities.
First President to initiate a Cash for Clunkers Program to clean up exhaust that adds to global warming, then extended it because it was so popular — wasting hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars.
First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.
First President to bypass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.
First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.
First President to demand a company hand over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.
First President to terminate America ’s ability to put a man in space.
First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.
First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases.
First President to tell a major manufacturing company which state they are allowed to locate a factory in.
First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).
First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.
First President to fire an inspector general of Americorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.
First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office, 90 to date.
First President to pledge complete transparency while campaigning, then hide his medical, educational,and travel records.
First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.
First President to go on multiple global ‘apology tours’.
First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends; paid for by the taxpayer.
First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.
First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.
First President to repeat the Holy Qur’an and tells us that the early morning Islamic call to worship is the most beautiful sound on earth.
Now it is up to us Freedom-loving Americans to see to it that he is voted out after his FIRST term. "We have a Muslim in the White House."

[guest]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
What is the problem Bubba, can you not address the entire question?

3 and 5

[guest]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
What is the problem Bubba, can you not address the entire question?

We've all enjoyed watching you continue to prove my point. Have a good weekend.

[BARNEYII]

guest wrote:

<quoted text>3 and 5

LMAO, IT would appear, you are at a loss of words, but you can count to five. Well that deserves a great big ole , ATABOY''''