Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29761 Nov 3, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should she be punished? According to the article, it was her husband's gun.
Community Property, chain of culpability, who left the gun readily accessible? Investigate the situation, her gun, his gun? "Their" house? There was a clear lack of reasonable and prudent action regarding the location of this weapon, and who was in control of it. Responsible firearms owners do not do such things. Responsible firearms owners are in control of their weapons at all times. While the thief had no right to invade their property, no responsible gun owner wants their weapons stolen and/or used in criminal acts.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29762 Nov 3, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
I totally agree with you on this. PUNISH THE NEGLIGENCE, but not "allowing" law abiding citizens own whichever guns they want to own is just more government control.
Who said anything about what kind of gun anyone can own. PUNISH THE NEGLIGENCE, and if the court delivers a guilty verdict, law abiding citizen does not apply further, at least for the length of time as decided upon by the court.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29763 Nov 3, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't ask me, but I'll answer. The war on drugs is a DISMAL failure. A lot of money spent, but at least this country tried. Hopeless. Worse now than ever.
Legalize pot. Collect the taxes.
This country did not try, else this country would have won.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29764 Nov 3, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never suggested they haven't. I've never suggested that citizens shouldn't have guns. Don't go putting words into my mouth.
What I will say is that a lot of people take their responsibility as gun owners way less seriously than they thought, and that it is extremely easy for people who shouldn't have guns to get them.
Oddly enough, the states with the toughest gun laws statistically have the lowest rates of gun deaths. There's a very direct correlation.
But again - quit going all nuclear and assigning positions to me that I've never taken. Take a deep breath and actually read what is written.
Statewide, maybe so, but the biggest problem is in the large metropolitan areas, Chicago has very tough laws, and is a leading gun violence city.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29765 Nov 3, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't ask me, but I'll answer. The war on drugs is a DISMAL failure. A lot of money spent, but at least this country tried. Hopeless. Worse now than ever.
Legalize pot. Collect the taxes.
That's the same logic as passing more strict gun laws, gun violence increases, but at least we tried.
guest

United States

#29766 Nov 3, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
This country did not try, else this country would have won.
Do you advocate a return to prohibition of alcohol albeit in a more stringent approach (in other words to just "try" harder)?

Do you support the government having more control of how folks behave (read: consuming various substances that have been arbitrarily selected by certain people, based on their individual or collective sense of morality, in the privacy of their home or in private establishments).

Why is it important for the country to "try" harder to keep drugs and/or alcohol illegal?

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29767 Nov 3, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you advocate a return to prohibition of alcohol albeit in a more stringent approach (in other words to just "try" harder)?
Do you support the government having more control of how folks behave (read: consuming various substances that have been arbitrarily selected by certain people, based on their individual or collective sense of morality, in the privacy of their home or in private establishments).
Why is it important for the country to "try" harder to keep drugs and/or alcohol illegal?
I advocate that the laws be followed, and enforced. If you don't like the laws, either work to change them, or move. The "home privacy" thing, takes a back seat to the law.
guest

United States

#29768 Nov 3, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
I advocate that the laws be followed, and enforced. If you don't like the laws, either work to change them, or move. The "home privacy" thing, takes a back seat to the law.
Well duh, the whole point of the discussion is wether the laws should be changed. You've said nothing really. Following the laws is not the same as "try[ing]" harder to enforce them.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29769 Nov 3, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
Well duh, the whole point of the discussion is wether the laws should be changed. You've said nothing really. Following the laws is not the same as "try[ing]" harder to enforce them.
Well duh, just trying to be nice in regards to your baiting questions.
truth be told

Hiawassee, GA

#29770 Nov 3, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
The REASON for all the deaths is human behavior, nothing more, nothing less.
You are in some ways correct. The behavior of people like you puts so many guns on the streets people with mental problems have no problem getting them. Can't take all the nuts off the streets, don't know who they are. But we can make it one hell of a lot harder for nuts to get guns. Our first problem is getting the nuts that think guns don't contribute to mass murders to wake the hell up.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29771 Nov 3, 2013
truth be told wrote:
<quoted text>
You are in some ways correct. The behavior of people like you puts so many guns on the streets people with mental problems have no problem getting them. Can't take all the nuts off the streets, don't know who they are. But we can make it one hell of a lot harder for nuts to get guns. Our first problem is getting the nuts that think guns don't contribute to mass murders to wake the hell up.
I am, in all ways, correct with my statement. The behavior of people like you that keeps putting criminals back on the streets is of much larger concern than that of those with mental issues.
OMTE

Gray, GA

#29772 Nov 3, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
I advocate that the laws be followed, and enforced. If you don't like the laws, either work to change them, or move. The "home privacy" thing, takes a back seat to the law.
This is by far, your worst post ever!

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
truth be told

Hiawassee, GA

#29773 Nov 3, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>that all private sales
Ok, so suppose that universal background checks and gun registration for all retail sales were the law. Suppose all private sales had to be background checked and registered as well. Better yet, all those in possession of "deadly weapons" have to be background checked and register their weapons. Would that be sufficient?
YES, except for AK-47s, oversize clips and the like, nobody has a need for them. Anyone caught with a gun not registered should be guilty of a felony. I don't care how many guns or how much ammo anyone has. But the guns with one purpose, to kill lots of people fast should be gone. It will take a long time to get the illegal guns that are on the streets off the streets, but sometime is better than never. Would that be sufficient for you?
whom

Cleveland, GA

#29774 Nov 3, 2013


Maybe all you libroids should join
The Liberal Gun Club, Libertas, Gravitas, Civitas


and work out your aggressions...

http://www.theliberalgunclub.com/

whom

Cleveland, GA

#29775 Nov 3, 2013
or this one....

"The Constitution of the United States guarantees to you the right to bear arms…You have the unquestioned right, under the law, to defend your life and protect the sanctity of your fireside. Failing in either, you are a coward and a craven and undeserving of the name of man.”— Eugene V. Debs"

Eugene Debs was a Labour organizer and Socialist Party candidate for U.S. president five times between 1900 and 1920.


http://www.liberalswithguns.com/


You modern day libroids are spineless....

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29776 Nov 3, 2013
truth be told wrote:
<quoted text>
YES, except for AK-47s, oversize clips and the like, nobody has a need for them. Anyone caught with a gun not registered should be guilty of a felony. I don't care how many guns or how much ammo anyone has. But the guns with one purpose, to kill lots of people fast should be gone. It will take a long time to get the illegal guns that are on the streets off the streets, but sometime is better than never. Would that be sufficient for you?
No, it wouldn't. Getting the criminals off the streets, for good, would be the best immediate action to reduce gun violence.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29777 Nov 3, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>This is by far, your worst post ever!
How so?
read the post stoopid

Alpharetta, GA

#29778 Nov 3, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>This is by far, your worst post ever!
You are too stoopid to understand it.
OMTE

Gray, GA

#29779 Nov 3, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
How so?
I don't think the law, has any right, to tell anyone what to do in their own home. As long as they are not harming anybody else.... No matter what the law is. The system is rigged for profit, workin to try and change the law is often times useless... Example: Obamacare.

Judged:

10

10

8

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#29780 Nov 3, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think the law, has any right, to tell anyone what to do in their own home. As long as they are not harming anybody else.... No matter what the law is. The system is rigged for profit, workin to try and change the law is often times useless... Example: Obamacare.
So a pot farm in your basement doesn't harm anyone else?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Marietta Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 1 hr Mickie 20,928
Creflo 4 hr Nope 2
NAACP investigating George and Donald Norcross ... 7 hr Kim Jo 14
Ardith I love you 10 hr Twisted sistah 5
ANOTHER FAKE HATE CRIME HOAX, again. 16 hr Trippin White Boy 4
Organized Gang Stalking What You Need To Know (Sep '10) 17 hr anonymous 609
Did WGCL-TV (CBS 46) force Ben Swann to shut do... 20 hr Doravillian 6

Marietta Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Marietta Mortgages