Did you vote today?

[Reality Check]

David Axlerod was asked several times last night by Chris Wallace if people are better off today than they were 4 yrs ago. His answer always included, not what the Democrats have done to make things better, but rather what the Republicans have done to stop "progres", what Bush did that made recovery not attainable in 4 yrs, do we want to go back to the policies that got us into this mess, ect... Axlerod even said that all the metrics of the economy are in better shape than 4 yrs ago after having Cris Wallace point out that unemployment is higher, median household income is down, and the deficit is way higher. Several other Democrat leaders were asked the same thing last night, "Are we better off than we were 4 yrs ago". Everyone of them blamed the Republicans. This morning however, one of the governors who had said that we are not better off because of the Republicans came out this morning and said that of course we are better off than we were 4 yrs ago due to Obama's leadership. It just so happens that he has a spot as a speaker at the DNC convention. Wow, what change of heart. The Democrats have nothing but lies and deception to go on this voting cycle and the voters are going to see right through it.

[guest]

Reality Check wrote:

David Axlerod was asked several times last night by Chris Wallace if people are better off today than they were 4 yrs ago. His answer always included, not what the Democrats have done to make things better, but rather what the Republicans have done to stop "progres", what Bush did that made recovery not attainable in 4 yrs, do we want to go back to the policies that got us into this mess, ect... Axlerod even said that all the metrics of the economy are in better shape than 4 yrs ago after having Cris Wallace point out that unemployment is higher, median household income is down, and the deficit is way higher. Several other Democrat leaders were asked the same thing last night, "Are we better off than we were 4 yrs ago". Everyone of them blamed the Republicans. This morning however, one of the governors who had said that we are not better off because of the Republicans came out this morning and said that of course we are better off than we were 4 yrs ago due to Obama's leadership. It just so happens that he has a spot as a speaker at the DNC convention. Wow, what change of heart. The Democrats have nothing but lies and deception to go on this voting cycle and the voters are going to see right through it.

Barney will see thisis a mandate for Obama, but then Barney is always looking for a man date

[guess]

Obama has got to go. If he got in things will get worst. Time for him to go. Let's give rommey a chance at least he's had a real job and has ran a company. Obama is not telling everybody everything way to many secrets. He's not honest. Time to take youe blinders off folks. Vote for rommey.

[BARNEYII]

guest wrote:

<quoted text>Barney will see thisis a mandate for Obama, but then Barney is always looking for a man date

Sorry, I fail to see how that could be "a mandate for Obama".
Why don't you explain that to me HOW that is,
"a mandate for Obama"?

Someone told me your thesis you wrote for your masters was on mandates. This task should take little effort on your part, come on explain it..........

[BARNEYII]

Reality Check wrote:

David Axlerod was asked several times last night by Chris Wallace if people are better off today than they were 4 yrs ago. His answer always included, not what the Democrats have done to make things better, but rather what the Republicans have done to stop "progres", what Bush did that made recovery not attainable in 4 yrs, do we want to go back to the policies that got us into this mess, ect... Axlerod even said that all the metrics of the economy are in better shape than 4 yrs ago after having Cris Wallace point out that unemployment is higher, median household income is down, and the deficit is way higher. Several other Democrat leaders were asked the same thing last night, "Are we better off than we were 4 yrs ago". Everyone of them blamed the Republicans. This morning however, one of the governors who had said that we are not better off because of the Republicans came out this morning and said that of course we are better off than we were 4 yrs ago due to Obama's leadership. It just so happens that he has a spot as a speaker at the DNC convention. Wow, what change of heart. The Democrats have nothing but lies and deception to go on this voting cycle and the voters are going to see right through it.

Wait just a minute,

1st question-better off today than they were 4 yrs ago.

Ans. "Everyone of them blamed the Republicans"

..........
I did not see any yes or no answers there''''''''

Then it is some big deal because he says the same thing the next day?

[BARNEYII]

Harry's source may well have been correct...

Mitt paid capital gains, but no income taxes.

(Reuters)- At least a dozen U.S. private equity firms have been subpoenaed by the New York state attorney general as part of a probe into whether a widely used tax strategy that saved these firms hundreds.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/02/us-...

[guest]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, I fail to see how that could be "a mandate for Obama".
Why don't you explain that to me HOW that is,
"a mandate for Obama"?
Someone told me your thesis you wrote for your masters was on mandates. This task should take little effort on your part, come on explain it..........

There is so much you fail at, don't let this one bother you. The thesis wasn't on mandates, it was on consensus.

[BARNEYII]

guest wrote:

<quoted text>There is so much you fail at, don't let this one bother you. The thesis wasn't on mandates, it was on consensus.

LOL, I did not say that I believed it, as a matter of fact, I believe just as strongly that it was not "consensus" either.

[Reality Check]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
Wait just a minute,
1st question-better off today than they were 4 yrs ago.
Ans. "Everyone of them blamed the Republicans"
..........
I did not see any yes or no answers there''''''''
Then it is some big deal because he says the same thing the next day?

That is exactly my point. Several democrats were asked a yes or no question and every one of them launched into a prescripted blaming rant against republicans. Like I said, lies and deceit is all the democrats have to run on because their record is something even they don't want to get near.

[Reality Check]

One of the attacks I hear from liberals against Mitt Romney is that he will raise taxes on the middle class. The only problem is that Romney and Ryan are on record as wanting to lower taxes for all tax brackets. They also want to close loopholes for upper income earners which will either keep their taxes the same because they will be paying a lower rate or actually increase taxes for those that take advantage of any and all loopholes in our current tax structure. The entire liberal campaign is one big lie.

[guest]

BARNEYII wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL, I did not say that I believed it, as a matter of fact, I believe just as strongly that it was not "consensus" either.

If you're not told, you don't know what to believe.

[Citizen]

No

[Obama is the end]

U.S. national debt stands at nearly 16 (T) trillion dollars, and growing exponentially. That's over $50,000 apiece for every man, woman and child in the U.S.A. If the nations holding this debt&#9472;mainly China&#9472;were to call it in: It would almost certainly cause the worst monetary collapse in history.

Billionaire George Soros has sold off some $50 million in corporate stocks and has purchased over $100 million in gold.

Billionaire John Paulson “is buying gold like crazy,” and now has 46% of his $24 billion fund in gold.

Central banks are also grabbing up gold like crazy, having bought 157.5 metric tons of gold just in the last quarter, a 138% increase over the same quarter last year. Apparently these people know something big and bad is about to happen, and are preparing for it the best they know how.

Prison Planet's Alex Jones reports that globalists have planned a staged bank collapse for late October in an attempt to bring in their dream of a new world order, one worldwide government. I can neither confirm nor deny this, but if and when it happens it will probably cause the worst panic in history. Major rioting and a collapse of society as we know it are definite possibilities.

[Obama is the end]

Domestic Terrorism/Staged Attacks

The FBI has issued a list of characteristics to be used to identify potential terrorists. This list includes among other things people who are conservatives or patriots, people who have weapons, people who stockpile food, and even people who pay cash for coffee.

It is widely believed that the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center was a “false flag” attack staged by our own government as an excuse to implement the war on terror. You can find all sorts of videos on this on You Tube. Just do a lookup for 9/11.

Many believe the massacre at the Century Theater in Aurora Colorado and the attack on the Sikh Temple near Milwaukee Wisconsin were both false flag attacks staged by our own government to gain support for the agenda of those who want to disarm our citizens, to make it easier to bring in their one world order. And in each of these attacks indeed there are major discrepancies between eyewitness reports and the official line of what happened.

False flag attacks are attacks carried out by a nation's own government in such a way as to make it appear that an enemy did it. They are nothing new, they have been used by governments as excuses to start wars or to bring about support for some political agenda ever since there have been governments. One classic example is when Nero torched Rome, then blamed the Christians for the fire.

[Obama is the end]

Security

The TSA&#9472;which originally was implemented for airport security has been steadily increasing its reach into everyday life. Now the TSA is showing up at sporting events, bus stations and even highway checkpoints. Where next?

Government agencies have been of late purchasing enormous amounts of hollow point ammunition with no reasonable explanation of why. The Department of Homeland Security alone has to date purchased over a billion rounds and is now redacting their purchase documents to hide what kind and how much of ammo they are buying. They claim they want it for target practice, but you don't use dumdums for target practice. You use them when you want to kill somebody or something. Dumdums are designed to expand and fragment on impact to do maximum damage to the body they hit. They are designed to kill. The damage they can cause is so horrific they aren't even allowed in warfare. Even the Social Security Administration and NOAA are buying large quantities of these bullets. Some agencies are also buying riot gear.

[Obama is the end]

Censorship and other unconstitutional things

For months now Congress has been trying to pass bills allegedly to strengthen intellectual property rights, in great secrecy and in a great rush to ram them through before the general public gets wind of them. SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, CISPA, TPPA, and others, all are ostensibly to protect copyrighted works from unauthorized copying. But these bills go far beyond just protecting intellectual property. They give unprecedented control over the Internet to government and corporate interests, the power to shut down almost any website they don't like for almost any reason or no reason at all, with no due process and no recourse.

In my mind alternative news sites would probably be among the first to get nailed. At present there are no governmental controls on them, and they are free to expose government malfeasance, corruption and other activities, such as the armed raid last year on Rawsome Foods, a private buyers club in California, which sold raw milk and vegetables to members only. This story never saw the light of day on any of the mainline media, not a peep. Only the alternative news sites carried the story, which I imagine was a great embarrassment to those involved. The only reason these bills didn’t get anywhere is because insiders leaked information on what was in them to the alternative media, and massive protests against them made them so toxic no congressman would dare to touch them. But we’re not out of the woods yet, latest news is that CISPA may pass yet&#9472;probably in secret&#9472;and Obama may sign it even though he has said publicly he will oppose it. After all, he lied about the NDAA and signed it when he said he wouldn't, and he has lied about a lot of other things too.

For months now President Obama has been issuing executive order after executive order to take away our constitutional rights and freedoms, and signing bills that do the same. One allows him to take complete control of all food supplies in the USA, another allows him to seize and control all communications facilities, from cell phones to TV broadcast networks. The worst of those perhaps was the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), with its provision allowing US troops to seize and detain any person, even US citizens, indefinitely, without any hearing or due process, just on suspicion. Obama promised not to sign this bill, then sneaked and did it in secret New Years Eve when nobody was looking. And now there is the enemy expatriation act, which could be used to strip any US citizen the government deems a threat of his citizenship, leaving him subject to the arrest and indefinite detention provisions of the NDAA, even though Obama has promised that would not be used against US citizens.

Military and/or paramilitary personnel have been showing up in certain cities, herding people around and apparently carrying out exercises in crowd control or preparations for martial law, it hasn't been clear what their objective is. It would not surprise me to see martial law implemented before long in the U.S.A.

I believe the next big push will be to take away our guns. The infamous Fast and Furious gun running operation carried on by the ATF last year has already been exposed as a political ploy to put guns in the hands of criminals, to give the government ammunition for banning guns. The recent attacks on a theater in Colorado and the Sikh temple in Wisconsin could well have been “false flag” attacks orchestrated by the government for the purpose of gaining support for banning guns. Time will tell.

[true patriot]

Obama has failed its time to give the other guy a try i regret my vote for Obama.

[Amanda two]

true patriot wrote:

Obama has failed its time to give the other guy a try i regret my vote for Obama.

A lot of people regret their vote for Obama, And now know better.
See the movie it's a real eye opener.
Dump obama November 6, 2012

[guest]

Amanda two wrote:

<quoted text>A lot of people regret their vote for Obama, And now know better.
See the movie it's a real eye opener.
Dump obama November 6, 2012

Got that right.

[Skip - Florida Boy]

Smarter Than The Avg Bear wrote:

<quoted text>
If it saved one union pension or bought 1,000 Obama votes, the billions are worth it.

You quoted Bloomberg Report for your source. I have not been able to find this report. Can you advise where you found it? Thanks