how well do you know your local cops?

how well do you know your local cops?

Posted in the Marble Hill Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
none

Saint Louis, MO

#1 Aug 2, 2009
Bollinger county cops have got to be THE WORST! How safe can you feel in your town when the cops in town are sleeping with the local sluts instead of out keeping the crime down and working on the cases that are really important. How safe can you feel knowing that when a cop goes to arrest someone they will use a taser gun on someone for close to 20 mins. straight...just because he was sleepin with the guys baby mamma.
Sarah B

Cape Girardeau, MO

#2 Aug 2, 2009
I sense some hostility
mike maddox

Saint Louis, MO

#3 Aug 3, 2009
wat do u guys think about officer Crooks
scared in dolton

Dolton, IL

#4 Aug 3, 2009
i live in dolton need i say more
concerned

United States

#5 Aug 3, 2009
crooked crooks boy with a gun
really

United States

#6 Aug 3, 2009
if it isn't on paper it didn't happen.everyone that witnessed this needs to put it in writing. not on topix,for real. topix is nothing!
if you were done wrong get everyone together on this put it on paper
as if

United States

#7 Aug 3, 2009
bollinger county has enough problems without cops beating people up. i heard mike wasn't the only one that he is after. several others were going to get a piece of his stick. girls the stick in his pants and guys the stick on his side
noname

United States

#8 Aug 3, 2009
really wrote:
if it isn't on paper it didn't happen.everyone that witnessed this needs to put it in writing. not on topix,for real. topix is nothing!
if you were done wrong get everyone together on this put it on paper
call kfvs12 that wound get him
anon

Sterling, VA

#9 Aug 3, 2009
as if wrote:
bollinger county has enough problems without cops beating people up. i heard mike wasn't the only one that he is after. several others were going to get a piece of his stick. girls the stick in his pants and guys the stick on his side
soooo i guess mike was being a good prisoner? everyone with a scanner knows better!!!!
noname

United States

#10 Aug 4, 2009
anon wrote:
<quoted text> soooo i guess mike was being a good prisoner? everyone with a scanner knows better!!!!
but that did not give the cop the right to beat someone just because he is sleeping with mike's ex and everone knows that.
How About

United States

#12 Aug 4, 2009
If you really have a problem with the county cops, I'd suggest voting the sheriff out and replacing him with someone who will fire all the deputies and hire new ones. But, how do you know they are sleeping with the "local sluts," and if they are, the more important question is are they doing this on or off the clock? If it's off the clock, then it's really none of your business what they do in their private lives, and I agree with "really," Topix isn't really the place for you to make such accusations. If you have a problem, take it up with the proper officials - this doesn't include the gossip and trash forum here.
The Real Truth

Saint Louis, MO

#13 Aug 4, 2009
First of all deputies must respond when they are called, they don't get to pick and choose what calls they go to. They don't have time just to follow people around, if so Mike would have been back in jail a long long time ago. If Mike doesn't want to get arrested, then he should not be beating people up. If Mike didn't want to get handled roughly, then he should not have assaulted the officer by spitting and kicking him while he was resisting. It appears the issue is that Mike got caught doing wrong, so he has to whine and cry with his lies to keep attention off himself. Just like 'Anon' said the people with scanners could hear what was going on. If supposidly the officer tased him for over 20 mins, then the officer would have had to have the taser on him the whole time while he was driving.Kudos to the officer for pulling that one off...lol. If you do wrong, then don't complain and cry when you get caught.
Amazed

Brooklyn, NY

#14 Aug 4, 2009
I have to agree with "The Real Truth". Two deputies responded to a call of a fight at twin bridges (which never useally has problems untill conveinetly a certain someone was camping there) with no idea that Mike was even there.... When they got there there were no problems untill Mike came out of hiding (if he did nothing wrong them why was he the only one that ran away?). When he found out he was going to jail, he fought BOTH deputies there. And yes, anybody that heard the scanner knows that there was not enough time for him to be tazed for 20 minutes.... They also will have heard that Crooks was on the radio alot, and during that time Crooks was relitivly calm but Mike could be heard yelling and swearing- and it was VERY obvious that he was yelling in anger and hate- not in pain or suffering.... The man that Mike beat up suffered broken ribs and cuts to the face- Mike had no injuries from the man or from either of the deputies.... I am not saying anything bad about Mike, just simply that it is time to start taking responsabilty for his own actions and realizing there are prices to pay for them. Please people, stop blaming everything on the deputies and law enforcement when you have no idea what your talking about!!
noname

United States

#15 Aug 5, 2009
Amazed wrote:
I have to agree with "The Real Truth". Two deputies responded to a call of a fight at twin bridges (which never useally has problems untill conveinetly a certain someone was camping there) with no idea that Mike was even there.... When they got there there were no problems untill Mike came out of hiding (if he did nothing wrong them why was he the only one that ran away?). When he found out he was going to jail, he fought BOTH deputies there. And yes, anybody that heard the scanner knows that there was not enough time for him to be tazed for 20 minutes.... They also will have heard that Crooks was on the radio alot, and during that time Crooks was relitivly calm but Mike could be heard yelling and swearing- and it was VERY obvious that he was yelling in anger and hate- not in pain or suffering.... The man that Mike beat up suffered broken ribs and cuts to the face- Mike had no injuries from the man or from either of the deputies.... I am not saying anything bad about Mike, just simply that it is time to start taking responsabilty for his own actions and realizing there are prices to pay for them. Please people, stop blaming everything on the deputies and law enforcement when you have no idea what your talking about!!
the ones that was at the river are the only ones that knows what really happen and thay were gonna more then 20 minutes so please people, stop blaming everything on mike when you have no idea what happen. when mike left the river he had one cute on his face that was it.
Amazed

Brooklyn, NY

#16 Aug 5, 2009
When Mike got to the sheriffs office he still only had one cut on his face- I'm sure u did not examin him before he left... He was just involved in a fight where he broke someones ribs and left various cuts and bruises on him as well- so maybe Mike got a little banged up as well... If u get in a fight, run and hide under a camper, resist arrest, spit in a deputies face, and kick a deputy in the chest as he trys to place u in the back of a car- then yes, expect to be roughed up a little!!!! Remember, these deputies left ANOTHER call they were working on to respond to a fight at twin bridges campground because of two 911 calls from two seperate people!!! They didn't go there to pick on Mike- they did thier job and they did it very well!!! I know police officers and deputies have made mistakes and bad decisions just like all of us have- but in this case things were done right and Mike was the one that kept taking things to the next level- from start to finish... Once again, no disrespect to Mike or anyone else, but let's let the facts be the facts and let Mike take responsibilty for his own actions, not blame it on everyone else including the deputies that were doing thier job....
FYI

Saint Louis, MO

#17 Aug 5, 2009
noname wrote:
<quoted text>the ones that was at the river are the only ones that knows what really happen and thay were gonna more then 20 minutes so please people, stop blaming everything on mike when you have no idea what happen. when mike left the river he had one cute on his face that was it.
If Mike or his friends would not have decided to start this forum pointing blame at the deputy, then all the other things would not have been brought up. People are only trying to state the facts to disclaim the lies originally posted. I'm sorry if the facts make it seem like everyone is picking on Mike, but it is what it is.
enough

United States

#18 Aug 5, 2009
let it go
Amazed

Brooklyn, NY

#19 Aug 5, 2009
FYI wrote:
<quoted text>If Mike or his friends would not have decided to start this forum pointing blame at the deputy, then all the other things would not have been brought up. People are only trying to state the facts to disclaim the lies originally posted. I'm sorry if the facts make it seem like everyone is picking on Mike, but it is what it is.
Thank you "FYI", very well put.... I by no means am picking on Mike- I just hate to see people make up lies trying to dis credit someones charactor just to cover up thier own wrong doings.... If it was true that Crooks did all the things he was being accused of then I would be on the other side of this and defending Mike. But all these rumors going around are simply that- rumors.... Alot of investigating has gone into the rumors and nothing has been found- in fact, it's almost all been PROVED WRONG.... This is an arguement that you people are not going to win- because when your wrong, your wrong....
noname

United States

#20 Aug 5, 2009
Amazed wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you "FYI", very well put.... I by no means am picking on Mike- I just hate to see people make up lies trying to dis credit someones charactor just to cover up thier own wrong doings.... If it was true that Crooks did all the things he was being accused of then I would be on the other side of this and defending Mike. But all these rumors going around are simply that- rumors.... Alot of investigating has gone into the rumors and nothing has been found- in fact, it's almost all been PROVED WRONG.... This is an arguement that you people are not going to win- because when your wrong, your wrong....
we will see what happens i know what happen i am not taking up for anyone. so we will see,the guy that mike got into it with is on mikes side.
dont have his back

Patton, MO

#21 Aug 5, 2009
What do I think of the local police?... Well, let's see... I think the sheriff needs to be replaced ASAP and as his deputies, they need to go too, not all of them but most of them. Crooks goes around "stirring the pot" all the time. He loves it when he gets people worked up and ready to fight, anybody that knows him would know this, so I have no doubt in my mind that that is exactly what he did to Mike. True, Mike should not have been out there fighting at the campground, but Crooks wants nothing more than for Mike to be in prison so of course he's going to do whatever he can to put him there. Everybody has heard about Crooks and Miss Cureton, probably because neither one of them can keep their mouths shut! I have never see the county's sheriff department in worse condition than what it is in now. Law enforcement should be set a part from society since it is their job to "protect and serve," people should not be afraid to go to them for help, but have you heard how these guys are talking to people? Crooks has made comments to girls in public places about things he would like to do to them and when the sheriff was told about it from many different people, he just blew it off like it was no big deal. The citizens of Bollinger County should know by now that no matter what Crooks does, no matter how many times he screws up, he is always going to have his job at the sheriffs office for as long as he wants it... all because he is the sheriff's snitch. Crooks is an idiot and thats the kind of people the sheriff wants to employ because they will do whatever they are told to do, know matter how wrong it is. When election time rolls around lets vote in a sheriff that will actually do the job he is put there to do, somebody who will hire decent deputies to "Protect and Serve" and not "get drunk and screw."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Marble Hill Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Daelin crass and Kaytlin mifflin 16 min To young 1
Searching for Amanda Womack 20 hr Guest 2 3
Police dept? Wed Yep 5
Susan Hayden Wed Shrumpue 1
Marble Hill, Pool, Cars and other (Jul '10) May 22 Guest 37
Pregnant teenagers May 22 Big Mac 5
Dowdco May 21 myown name 13

Marble Hill Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Marble Hill Mortgages