So you purposely provided me a link that was about something else,. and then claimed it disproves what I said. Got it. Those machines seem legit...<quoted text>
I didn't say you did. The article I posted included the Bush election and Diebold which (as they stated) was nothing more than left-wing blog lies. There was nothing wrong with the machines and there certainly was no evidence that anybody fixed the machines to favor Bush.
The state of California ordered that 15,000 of its Diebold voting machines not be used in the 2004 elections due to flaws that the company failed to disclose
I'm sure if a company that contributed heavily to getting Obama elected, were the ones who made the voting machines and while Obama was in fact losing, transferred over to their emergency servers without any reason at all, and suddenly Obama was in the lead, which is EXACTLY what happened with GW Bush, you wouldn't think it was shady at all...right? No need for conspiracies. I'll stick with the facts. Bush stole both elections.