Supreme Court says drug dog’s sniff a...

Supreme Court says drug dog’s sniff at front door is unconstitutional search

Posted in the Manchester Forum

WaPo

Flat Lick, KY

#1 Mar 26, 2013
The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that police cannot bring drug-sniffing police dogs onto a suspect's property to look for evidence without first getting a warrant for a search, a decision which may limit how investigators use dogs' sensitive noses to search out drugs, explosives and other items hidden from human sight, sound and smell.

http://wapo.st/105wt6q

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Manchester Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 2 hr Church State 163,753
House across from the hospital 6 hr Bullshipper 4
Manchester mcdonalds (Dec '13) 6 hr Gin 34
Tv show about a artifact rock found in creek 8 hr KET 7
Speedway gals Whoop 15 hr Whoop 2 22
Poll do you think that welzie wagers is a deciever? May 21 Yes he did 4
CHAD`S HOPE[ what a joke] (May '09) May 21 Been There 78

Manchester Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Manchester Mortgages