Kishore in jail
I would like to know

Cynthiana, KY

#284 Apr 24, 2012
The laws of child pornography:

Child pornography is defined under United States law as the visual depiction of minor children under the age of 18 engaging in various sex acts. The definition also covers photographs or depictions of children’s genitalia.

In the United States, child pornography is prohibited under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 110, Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children. While this law defines child pornography as “depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct,” the actual definition of what is a pornographic image is somewhat more subjective. Many court cases now use “Dost factors”(named after the U.S. v. Dost case in 1986) to determine whether an image is pornographic: these factors ask whether the focal point of the visual depiction is the child’s genital region; whether the setting of the image is sexually suggestive; whether the child is posed unnaturally or in inappropriate attire; whether the child is nude, semi-clothed or fully clothed; whether the picture indicates the child’s willingness to engage in sexual activity; and whether the image is intended to elicit a sexual response in its consumer or viewer. Notwithstanding the popularity of these factors, the U.S. Supreme Court has also stated that fully clothed images may constitute child pornography.

In recent years, much attention has been given to the presence and availability of child pornography on the Internet. Laws such as the Child Online Protection Act (47 U. S. C.§231) and the Children's Internet Protection Act (47 U.S.C.§ 254) outlaw child pornography and cover new media such as websites and other online forms of child porn.

Prosecution of child pornographers can be pursued through many agencies, which include the FBI, the Department of Justice, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, U.S. Customs, the U.S. Attorney General, state attorneys general, state and local law enforcement, and local prosecutors. The government often participates in sting operations to catch child pornographers and consumers of child pornography. Consumption of child pornography can lead to a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison, while distribution of child pornography has a maximum penalty of 15 years in federal prison.
FOXNEWS

London, KY

#285 Apr 24, 2012
GRANNY wrote:
<quoted text>yes i sawhim in the office and the hospital. we have sit and talked for half an hour at a time. how many dotors know you when they see tou at the store. and as for my age i'm 69 years old. my son is older then the doc. if hewas just wanting the money that sso. pays him i'm sure he would not send half an hour with me. yes i know him and you'll never get me believe he wasn't set up. by the way iv'e been raising kids fo 50 years. and am rasing my great grandughter now. so i do know what kids will do. he's not guilty.
so you are saying if they have proof to show a jury you will still think the underage child is a liar.and deserved what it got its really people that think like you that has destroyed our youth.
I would like to know

Cynthiana, KY

#286 Apr 24, 2012
Hahaha, I don't live on the draw like you and your family. I don't supplement draw with drug dealing like you and your family. There are such things as TYPOS. Typos and ignorance are not the same thing. I have demonstrated typos, you have demonstrated ignorance. uhhhh.
Perhaps you should be looking for a new dope doctor, since I don't foresee that your's will be seeing freedom anytime soon. hahaha!
Even his homeland of India is posting his crimes! I guess they are adding him to the list of people that can't come back to the hell hole! hahaha!
Secrets wrote:
<quoted text>uhhh...you didn't misspell, but you may have misused "work". Of course, you may not know what "work" is, if you live on the draw, and think it is synonymous with "word".
FOXNEWS

London, KY

#287 Apr 24, 2012
GRANNY wrote:
<quoted text>YOUR SUCH A SMART ASS; if he was to go to prison[which he won't] i'll go see him and i;ll have his wife drive me. now i'm not writing anymore for i've had my say. DR KISHORE IS NOT GUILY. and these littel children your so worryed about were two 16 year olds that set him up bye
if you know they were 16 years old im really suprised you didnot mention their names seeing as how you are so smart. i wonder if kishore will tell his lawyer he wants granny as a chracter witness but then again i would say he does not that would allow the jury to see what kind of people he associated with. take your old tired ass back to dayton dumbass.
I would like to know

Cynthiana, KY

#288 Apr 24, 2012
Actually, she is blaming two 16 year olds that a 50 year old man was a pervert.
And even if it were two 50 year old women, why in the hell are these people taking up for him? He has a wife and two young sons, they keep yelling... Umm, wife means a woman that is married to a man, which means that their Saint Doctor cheated on his wife... sighs.
FOXNEWS, I think we can both see what is going on... They are defending their drugs more than their doctor.
FOXNEWS wrote:
<quoted text>so you are saying if they have proof to show a jury you will still think the underage child is a liar.and deserved what it got its really people that think like you that has destroyed our youth.
I would like to know

Cynthiana, KY

#289 Apr 24, 2012
Granny will be deep into withdrawals before the trial ever comes about. It was probably her 16 year old granddaughters that she sold to him. That would be another reason for her to not want to be a witness. And the fact she wants to visit him in prison, that is remorse and guilt, she feels bad that her scripts were not enough, and that her grandchildren wanted paid, too. I mean, after all, Granny knows an awful lot about Kishore, the case, the victims... And Kishore is her best friend in the whole wide world, so much that his wife will even let her have a ride to prison to see him!
FOXNEWS wrote:
<quoted text>if you know they were 16 years old im really suprised you didnot mention their names seeing as how you are so smart. i wonder if kishore will tell his lawyer he wants granny as a chracter witness but then again i would say he does not that would allow the jury to see what kind of people he associated with. take your old tired ass back to dayton dumbass.
Justice for all

Owenton, KY

#290 Apr 24, 2012
Granny you certainly may have your opinion!I can only say I'm proud you aren't the Granny to any of my family!I think while your Dr. is in federal;you need to take your medicare card and visit a good psychiatrist.If he sees you for 30 min.he can bill your card for an extended exam;think you might need it!
I would like to know

Cynthiana, KY

#291 Apr 24, 2012
Preferably she will see a psychiatrist that is not associated with Kishore...

AND! I am happy for your family, too!
Justice for all wrote:
Granny you certainly may have your opinion!I can only say I'm proud you aren't the Granny to any of my family!I think while your Dr. is in federal;you need to take your medicare card and visit a good psychiatrist.If he sees you for 30 min.he can bill your card for an extended exam;think you might need it!
pedestal

Dexter, MO

#292 Apr 24, 2012
IM from clay co and im ashamed of most of the comments on here you people sre acting crazy how do you know hes not guilty hes my dr i dont get any drugs from him or any dr ive got enough sense to know all that glitters isnt gold you can be my neighbor and not really know me or what secrets im hiding a child is more important to me than doc calm down get a grip
worker

Hazard, KY

#293 Apr 24, 2012
I would like to know wrote:
I called them. Be waiting. Tell them how you were set up.
Do you know what the word ALLEGED means? I don't guess you do.
And just like you have the right to defend that poor excuse of a human, I and others have the right to defend the children that he hurt.
<quoted text>
of course I know what alleged means,do you? Tell them how I was set up? I haven't been set-up, I don't have any idea of what your talking about. I'm not anyone to judge anyone that is up to the lord and he will judge.
worker

Hazard, KY

#294 Apr 24, 2012
Secrets wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess he doesn't have a key to open his office AFTER HOURS....duh...I doubt it happened with his waiting room full and his staff on duty.
Kishore owns the building. I figger he can get into his office anytime he wants to.
Has anyone said what time that was suppose to happen.. Go figger. LOL
I would like to know

Cynthiana, KY

#295 Apr 24, 2012
You truly are stupid. That is right, you are stupid. Ignorant people have the ability to be taught. And stupid, the Lord is not the judge of the law of the land. There are judges and juries for that. Your Lord can stand with your doctor while your doctor takes it up his rear.
worker wrote:
<quoted text>of course I know what alleged means,do you? Tell them how I was set up? I haven't been set-up, I don't have any idea of what your talking about. I'm not anyone to judge anyone that is up to the lord and he will judge.
Funny

Pineville, KY

#296 Apr 24, 2012
I would like to know wrote:
Even though Kishore Jadhav has not been charged with statutory rape...
Kentucky Age of Consent Laws
The age of consent in Kentucky is 16. This is the age at which a man or woman may legally consent to sex with a partner over the age of 21. The age of consent applies to both men and women in homosexual as well as heterosexual relationships.
Under the Kentucky age of consent laws, a different standard applies when the relations involve an adult who is in a position of power over a young person, such as a teacher, coach, employer or a member of the clergy. In general, it is wiser to assume that in situations involving an imbalance of power, the legal age of consent is 18 or even 21 years.
Like the majority of states, Kentucky does not actually have a single age of consent. Other factors enter into the equation, such as the age difference between partners. In some circumstances in Kentucky, it is legal for someone aged 14 or older to have sex with a partner who is under 19. For example, a 15-year-old girl having sex with her 16-year-old boyfriend would not be breaking the law in Kentucky. If the same girl had sex with a 21-year-old man, however, he would be guilty of statutory rape.
First-degree rape is defined in the Kentucky age of consent laws as sexual intercourse with someone under the age of 12. It is punishable by 20 to 50 years in state prison.
Second-degree rape occurs when someone aged 18 or older engages in sexual intercourse with a partner under the age of 14. The penalty for this crime is 5 to 10 years in state prison.
Third-degree rape under the Kentucky age of consent laws occurs when someone aged 21 or older engaging in sexual intercourse with someone under the age of 16. It carries a sentence of 1 to 5 years in state prison.
It's a good thing child pornogrophy is still considered child porn if the child is under 18. It did say that there was a possibility of more victims. Wonder if they were ALL 16.
FOXNEWS

London, KY

#297 Apr 24, 2012
worker wrote:
<quoted text>Has anyone said what time that was suppose to happen.. Go figger. LOL
yes they have, it was the wrong time, anytime that he was doing sometime and he will probably be doin time.
I would like to know

Cynthiana, KY

#298 Apr 24, 2012
For his sake, he better hope so. If any where under 16, he has an entire new set of problems.
Funny wrote:
<quoted text>
It's a good thing child pornogrophy is still considered child porn if the child is under 18. It did say that there was a possibility of more victims. Wonder if they were ALL 16.
worker

Hazard, KY

#299 Apr 24, 2012
I would like to know wrote:
Actually, she is blaming two 16 year olds that a 50 year old man was a pervert.
And even if it were two 50 year old women, why in the hell are these people taking up for him? He has a wife and two young sons, they keep yelling... Umm, wife means a woman that is married to a man, which means that their Saint Doctor cheated on his wife... sighs.
FOXNEWS, I think we can both see what is going on... They are defending their drugs more than their doctor.
<quoted text>
I don't do drugs nor have I ever,because you do drugs don't mean everyone does. Leave the judgement up to the one that has the right to (The Lord)
I would like to know

Cynthiana, KY

#300 Apr 24, 2012
Yer sew smert, eye bit ewe wuz ferst inn yer skool.

Yes, I do so many drugs, that is why I make so much more sense than you do.

I will leave the judging up to the man in the black robe that is going to send Kishore up the creek without a paddle. But it will be okay, some big bubba will make sure that Kishore gets a nice hard stick to replace that paddle.

And you and your lord can go visit Kishore and his new found love.
worker wrote:
<quoted text>I don't do drugs nor have I ever,because you do drugs don't mean everyone does. Leave the judgement up to the one that has the right to (The Lord)
saddened

Hazard, KY

#301 Apr 24, 2012
Dr.Kishore Jadhav,has already been tried and pronounced guilty without being in a court of law. Its so sad,people needs to pray for the girls and his wife and children and also for him. If this is true then justice will be served and if its not true then someone just destroyed a Dr. and his family, and everything that he has worked for. Look at the schooling that he has went thru, all of that is gone, and if its not true that will follow him where ever he goes.Now, that is all I have to say and I want be back on here. Topic should be banned all it is for is someone to get on here and talk about someone else, and gossip.
So Sad

Hazard, KY

#302 Apr 24, 2012
I would like to know wrote:
The laws of child pornography:
Child pornography is defined under United States law as the visual depiction of minor children under the age of 18 engaging in various sex acts. The definition also covers photographs or depictions of children’s genitalia.
In the United States, child pornography is prohibited under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 110, Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children. While this law defines child pornography as “depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct,” the actual definition of what is a pornographic image is somewhat more subjective. Many court cases now use “Dost factors”(named after the U.S. v. Dost case in 1986) to determine whether an image is pornographic: these factors ask whether the focal point of the visual depiction is the child’s genital region; whether the setting of the image is sexually suggestive; whether the child is posed unnaturally or in inappropriate attire; whether the child is nude, semi-clothed or fully clothed; whether the picture indicates the child’s willingness to engage in sexual activity; and whether the image is intended to elicit a sexual response in its consumer or viewer. Notwithstanding the popularity of these factors, the U.S. Supreme Court has also stated that fully clothed images may constitute child pornography.
In recent years, much attention has been given to the presence and availability of child pornography on the Internet. Laws such as the Child Online Protection Act (47 U. S. C.§231) and the Children's Internet Protection Act (47 U.S.C.§ 254) outlaw child pornography and cover new media such as websites and other online forms of child porn.
Prosecution of child pornographers can be pursued through many agencies, which include the FBI, the Department of Justice, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, U.S. Customs, the U.S. Attorney General, state attorneys general, state and local law enforcement, and local prosecutors. The government often participates in sting operations to catch child pornographers and consumers of child pornography. Consumption of child pornography can lead to a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison, while distribution of child pornography has a maximum penalty of 15 years in federal prison.
How long did it take you to pull that up?
worker

Hazard, KY

#303 Apr 24, 2012
I would like to know wrote:
Yer sew smert, eye bit ewe wuz ferst inn yer skool.
Yes, I do so many drugs, that is why I make so much more sense than you do.
I will leave the judging up to the man in the black robe that is going to send Kishore up the creek without a paddle. But it will be okay, some big bubba will make sure that Kishore gets a nice hard stick to replace that paddle.
And you and your lord can go visit Kishore and his new found love.
<quoted text>
One day you will remember saying things like you just have. I feel sorry for people like you. what is all that garbage at the top of the page. You got a problem?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Manchester Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 1 hr North Mountain 159,609
Asher fork community 5 hr Blanch 1
Asset Forfeiture! 11 hr The Law 2
sherry jones Sat imo 1
ABORTION is cold blooded murder Sat Israiel 6
Teresa Grubb banks Fri Ruby 11
The "ICE" has overpowered Clay County Fri Maybe baby 49

Manchester Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Manchester Mortgages