Bible study rules for public schools ...

Bible study rules for public schools proposed

There are 148165 comments on the The Courier-Journal story from Feb 10, 2010, titled Bible study rules for public schools proposed. In it, The Courier-Journal reports that:

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Courier-Journal.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112883 Sep 11, 2013
Interesting. Curious, you've slandered, offended, and wronged almost everyone who doesn't share your beliefs on this very forum, If you are indeed a child of god, when can we expect you to make amends to those you've offended? I'm still waiting for my apology, as I've not witnessed you offering absolution to anyone else either!

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112884 Sep 11, 2013
ack...didn't mean offering absolution. I meant asking those you've offended for absolution...

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112885 Sep 11, 2013
You supposed to be a child of god now?? or is this forum exempt from your misdeeds? What you are doing now is wrong,, yet you are doing it.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112886 Sep 11, 2013
Unless of course the NT allows slandering? Does it Curious?

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112887 Sep 11, 2013
Prove to Chrom, MD, Q, Witw, and myself, that you are indeed a true bible believing child of god, by offering up your sincerest apologies to those you've offended.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112888 Sep 11, 2013
Just think Curious...this could be one of those "test" that (Joe Dirt) and YaY speak of. Are you willing to concede and risk the opportunity of perhaps turning a lost soul around, by a humble act of selflessness???

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112889 Sep 11, 2013
hum. Pride comes before the fall(from grace) in this case
curious

Winter Garden, FL

#112890 Sep 11, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
Just think Curious...this could be one of those "test" that (Joe Dirt) and YaY speak of. Are you willing to concede and risk the opportunity of perhaps turning a lost soul around, by a humble act of selflessness???
It seems you are confessing to being a lost soul.
In a previous posting you claimed to have no problems.

Having said that;
Why do you feel you are a lost soul?
What steps ,if any , have you taken to remedy that situation?
What role has your Atheistic unbelief played in your feeling lost?

Once you answer those questions , I may be able to be of assistance...

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112891 Sep 11, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems you are confessing to being a lost soul.
In a previous posting you claimed to have no problems.
Having said that;
Why do you feel you are a lost soul?
What steps ,if any , have you taken to remedy that situation?
What role has your Atheistic unbelief played in your feeling lost?
Once you answer those questions , I may be able to be of assistance...
Show me where I am confessing to being a lost soul...are you of the mindset that just 7 or 8 people are following this thread?

But nice diversion ... Curious you have a lot of similarities
with Peter, as you've just denied being a child of god, just as peter denied knowing jesus.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112892 Sep 11, 2013
Curious, you failed. I hope you are proud of yourself and the choices you've just made!
curious

Winter Garden, FL

#112893 Sep 11, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
Prove to Chrom, MD, Q, Witw, and myself, that you are indeed a true bible believing child of god, by offering up your sincerest apologies to those you've offended.
Personally , I don't know anyone by the name of Chrom ,MD .Q ,witw or you.
I suspect that those are fictional monikers used by one and the same person.
Who that person may be , I have no idea.
Prove to me who you are ,what your name is and how and when I have ever offended you and then we can discuss the issue in an intelligent manner...
If what I am suggesting is unacceptable , then ,you may choose to sue me for slander.
Provide your evidence before a court of Law and let the courts be the judge as to the validity of your charges .
But keep in mind and be prepared to be laughed out of court.
Generally speaking , judges takea dim viewe of cases where a fictitious character offended and slandered other fictitious characters.
Irt could well be that your insolent behaviour may well earn you a fictional sentence of 50 years at hard labor at the nonfictional Folsom Prison.
Then you can change your namr from Stuck in a Lodi , to that which was immortalized by the Great Johnny Cash;
Stuck in Folsom Prisom
And just think...You didn't even shoot a man in Reno.
You merely filed a fraudulent lawsuit.

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112894 Sep 11, 2013
Curious, your double standards are not going to work here, the difference being, the bible is in place, which is a road map for Christians to follow, specific instructions for those that are indeed a child of god. One of those instructions being, if you have wronged, or offended another person, to go to him/her and ask them for forgiveness.

I've stated to you, that you have offended me with slander. Where is my apology, and when are you going to ask for my forgiveness?

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112895 Sep 11, 2013
I guess I'll get that apology and you asking for forgiveness when hell freezes over?

“There is no god.”

Since: Jan 12

USA

#112896 Sep 11, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes they are all correct in their own mind.
JCototheburn wrote:
It seems that the closest religion to be correct, is no other then Wicca.
All religions seem to not recognize a contradiction or irony.
I agree. It's what happens when reason and logic are tossed aside for "poof".

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112897 Sep 11, 2013
Isn't that a saying "you Christians" like to say when emphasizing your unwillingness to do something?

“There is no god.”

Since: Jan 12

USA

#112898 Sep 11, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
Curious, you failed. I hope you are proud of yourself and the choices you've just made!
Welcome to topics "lodi". Good to see you have registered.

“There is no god.”

Since: Jan 12

USA

#112899 Sep 11, 2013

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

Somerset, KY

#112900 Sep 11, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Personally , I don't know anyone by the name of Chrom ,MD .Q ,witw or you.
I suspect that those are fictional monikers used by one and the same person.
Who that person may be , I have no idea.
Prove to me who you are ,what your name is and how and when I have ever offended you and then we can discuss the issue in an intelligent manner...
If what I am suggesting is unacceptable , then ,you may choose to sue me for slander.
Provide your evidence before a court of Law and let the courts be the judge as to the validity of your charges .
But keep in mind and be prepared to be laughed out of court.
Generally speaking , judges takea dim viewe of cases where a fictitious character offended and slandered other fictitious characters.
Irt could well be that your insolent behaviour may well earn you a fictional sentence of 50 years at hard labor at the nonfictional Folsom Prison.
Then you can change your namr from Stuck in a Lodi , to that which was immortalized by the Great Johnny Cash;
Stuck in Folsom Prisom
And just think...You didn't even shoot a man in Reno.
You merely filed a fraudulent lawsuit.
"Personally , I don't know anyone by the name of Chrom ,MD .Q ,witw or you. I suspect that those are fictional monikers used by one and the same person."
Are you mentally disabled?

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112901 Sep 11, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Personally , I don't know anyone by the name of Chrom ,MD .Q ,witw or you.
I suspect that those are fictional monikers used by one and the same person.
Who that person may be , I have no idea.
Prove to me who you are ,what your name is and how and when I have ever offended you and then we can discuss the issue in an intelligent manner...
If what I am suggesting is unacceptable , then ,you may choose to sue me for slander.
Provide your evidence before a court of Law and let the courts be the judge as to the validity of your charges .
But keep in mind and be prepared to be laughed out of court.
Generally speaking , judges takea dim viewe of cases where a fictitious character offended and slandered other fictitious characters.
Irt could well be that your insolent behaviour may well earn you a fictional sentence of 50 years at hard labor at the nonfictional Folsom Prison.
Then you can change your namr from Stuck in a Lodi , to that which was immortalized by the Great Johnny Cash;
Stuck in Folsom Prisom
And just think...You didn't even shoot a man in Reno.
You merely filed a fraudulent lawsuit.
So you don't think what you've said is liable? SS was banned from topix because of things being said on this very forum to another Moniker.... it's unclear if further action was taken in a court of law! I suggest you re-read topix TOS
Fictitious Characters, laughing... Keep thinking that Curious!

Since: Sep 13

United States of America

#112902 Sep 11, 2013
Thanks LOL. appreciate that

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Manchester Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
who is beautiful blonde waitress at Mexican res... 15 min interested 4
Anyone wanna hook up tonight 32 min Loaderman 20
Billy Joe Henson 2 hr someone 12
Janel Hoskins (Dec '12) 4 hr Rpg3 26
Whatever happened to Vicky mills 4 hr hello 5
Tony Crafts Tattoos? (Jan '12) 6 hr Tina 31
Clay County class of '94 Wed Shonnon 9
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Manchester Mortgages