Bible study rules for public schools proposed

Feb 10, 2010 Full story: The Courier-Journal 133,213

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Full Story

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#102915 May 8, 2013
Doll wrote:
<quoted text>Mr.D. So what if YOU don't believe in anything? That is your loss not mine. It does not change the Truth. Most people don't want to believe in the things they are afraid of. It won't make it go away. I do not ask Mohammed because he has no power. He is a dead god.
I have no fear of your myth. Do you not fear the wrath of Zeus?
God has no power.

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

Manchester, KY

#102916 May 8, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
So before that was just matter in motion that at some point reacted with each other to start the clock?
Before that there was no matter, Just Energy... E=Mc2... No Matter, No Time... No matter no clock, no matter no physical laws... No Matter No Space, No Universe, No Thing.... Just a Quantum of Energy in a Unified Indefinable State... Once the first 2 Physical Particles of matter convert then All the laws of Physics, Space, Time, The Universe exists....

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#102917 May 8, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
So was there some universe in play before that died out and this is round 2?
Highly philosophical and hypothetical question, since by any human definition it would be as totally isolated and discreet from this existence as is absolutely possible. Supposing there is/was/will be a "parent universe," to seed this one, there is/was/will be no reason to suppose it will/does/did resemble/s/d this one in any way.

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

Manchester, KY

#102918 May 8, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
So this time period could not have been part of the creation periods, being executed from the plan of a creator?
Why? There is no need... It's a process that naturally occurs throughout the observed universe... It's still happening now... It will continue to happen for billions of years to come... If Humans do not find a way to leave this tiny ball of mud all human kind will vanish from the universe in the future... the moon is moving away at a few inches per year and in a short million years will be a few million inches further away causing less stability of the planet....

The Insertion of the concept of God is for your own personal ego to make you feel more important than you really are... It's a Human Ego Concept that allows a being that is equivalent to a virus on a mite on a flea on a fly on a bird on a elephants back to feel important... So Important that a God made the universe for them to live in... Actually so important that God takes notice of their lives and allows greatness...

Reality is man is no more than a virus scale critter on a tiny planet orbiting a mundane star on the out skirt of a mundane galaxy among Billions upon billions of other far more notable galaxies with Trillions upon Trillions of far more notable stars....

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#102919 May 8, 2013
Doll wrote:
<quoted text>Mr.D. So what if YOU don't believe in anything? That is your loss not mine. It does not change the Truth. Most people don't want to believe in the things they are afraid of. It won't make it go away. I do not ask Mohammed because he has no power. He is a dead god.
Most people are not afraid of make believe things.
curious

Ocoee, FL

#102920 May 8, 2013
Skeptical Spectacles wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you copy and paste text (from the originator) that you already have quoted in your post?
If I told you,you wouldn't believe me,,,
You would claim that it was a coincidence that could be logically explained......
curious

Ocoee, FL

#102921 May 8, 2013
Quantummist wrote:
<quoted text>
It's Called Evidence.... We have Evidence of the heavy bombardment period, we have Evidence of the early molten rock formations... We have Evidence the moon is moving away from the earth and can mathematically calculate it's distance early on... We know the gravitational Constance, We have millions of other stars and 100's systems to compare ours too.... We know that the sun is a 3rd generation star that has burned and blown up 2 times before and the matter from those explosions reformed to give us the star we orbit today....
Simply because you do not take the opportunity to study the many fields of science that allows us to know what reality is does not mean you can't start learning the basics anytime you wish... I would start with basic general science class and then take Physics, Geology, Chemistry courses to begin with before getting into the more esoteric sciences....
What esoteric science did you study,that gave you the ability to analyze the thinking process of tadpoles?
That might be the Science I'd be interested in learning about.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#102922 May 8, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Tend to go,as you stated,is an opinion,not a fact.
Science has totally failed to explain how unliving matter was able to convert itself into living matter. That seems to be a fact.
Science is unable to show how unintelligent matter was able to evolve into intelligent matter,other than,some unexplainable event that may have taken place or billions of years ago
Here is an explanation given by
Professor Seth Grant, of the University of Edinburgh
The researchers suggest that a simple invertebrate animal living in the sea 500 million years ago experienced a 'genetic accident', which resulted in extra copies of these genes being made
"If the universe is non-intelligent, as in it does not contain any intelligence whatsoever, then how can the universe itself account for intelligent beings? If intelligence does not exist at some point, then it can never exist. Intelligence cannot come into being. If you say it can, the burden is on you to prove how. How can mindless matter possibly produce creatures with minds, with brains, with intelligence? No amount of time, natural selection, and chance can create intelligence out of nothing."
So it would seem that the foundation of your argument is not factual,is not based on any logical or probable deductions we can draw from it,other than,over a period of billions of years some how ,some way life was created from an unliving source and intelligence was created from an unintelligent source.
At least that is what I understand.....
Fossils,on which you place so much credibility,in no way shape or form,provide any evidence as to how life came into being or the origins of intelligence....
Therefore,if the foundation of your argument hinges on some probabilities that may or may not have occured,that were never observed,that can not be tested,how can any reasonable conclusions be drawn from that foundation
If intelligence must be created, then who created that intelligent creator?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#102923 May 8, 2013
So true wrote:
I believe in the sun, even when it doesn't shine. I believe in love, even when it is not shown. I believe in God , even when he doesn't speak.
i believe in the sun because it presents itself. Love is an emotion, not a being or object.

“Speaker of Mountain Wisdom....”

Since: Jan 10

Manchester, KY

#102924 May 8, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
What esoteric science did you study,that gave you the ability to analyze the thinking process of tadpoles?
That might be the Science I'd be interested in learning about.
Biology and comparative psychology..
LMAO

Richmond, KY

#102925 May 8, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
So, you think because "Berkeley" has a YouTube channel, YouTube is considered "scientific"? Really?

BWahahahaha!

It's worse than I thought.
LOL

Richmond, KY

#102926 May 8, 2013
Yiago wrote:
<quoted text>
And if you are not the poster I was replying to earlier, I apologize. But the point stands.
Yiago: The Wiki Researcher.

The YouTube Scientist!

Yiago says, "I got mah GED at Wiki and mah master's at YouTube. I'm edjumacated and can debate sci-entistical stuffs."
curious

Ocoee, FL

#102927 May 8, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe the claim of the resurrection was a lie but the authors of the bible just blindly believed the tale as you do?
Here is the answer to your question as posted by saywhut

"What would the motives be for these apostles to continue to teach Jesus' words? If He did not come back to visit them after death, why would they have reason to believe anything He told them?
So if Jesus would have died and not returned to them to show them that He indeed lives, they would have to be idiots to continue to teach His words and jeopardize their lives over it while remaining dirt poor. They gained nothing financially or socially by carrying on the spreading of the gospel. And almost all of them were killed for their doing so. If Jesus did not rise and speak to them, wouldn't they just have walked away, a little bitter even for wasting that much time of their lives and leaving their family?

Now,let me ask you this;You believe in Evolution;
Is that belief strong enough,that you would be willing to risk your freedom or life ,As the Apostles and other Christians did, for their beliefs? And why would you?
What's more,
If,you did not believe in evolution,would you be willing to risk your life and freedom by claiming that evolution was true?
And,Why would you?
LOL

Richmond, KY

#102928 May 8, 2013
Yiago wrote:
<quoted text>
You do understand what Wikipedia is, right? It is a crowd-sourced online encyclopedia. If you look at the link you refused to read you will see a list of references at the bottom. This is analogous to a bibliography in a book or article. You can vet each and every one of them if you like.
So please educate us. What parts of the Wiki article are incorrect? Cite your own sources and explain why you think they are better.
Remember, the Wiki page is only a gateway to information. It is a summary, not a source. But you would be hard pressed to find a better and more universally accepted starting point for a casual debate than Wikipedia.
Now, do you have something to say about the content or was this just a matter of lazy dodging?
ROFL
Way to showcase your community college degree.

You missed the point.

You actually consider Wiki a valid scientific source. Isn't that a little more than sad?
I wonder how many scientists have to consult Wiki to verify their work.

"A gateway to information" Pardon my cackling.
Hey, it must be scientific research if any old Joe can post it on Wiki!

You go, debater! Post a YouTube link and it will really impress them.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#102929 May 8, 2013
Yes and Amen wrote:
<quoted text>What is taught is...
Learning to care!
What does a child do when caught doing something???
It happens even when you've never told it NOT to do that thing!
They/we know something is wrong before being told...
Just lil sinners needing redemption!
In the early stages, they know not when they do wrong. Sometimes they just know your angry face.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#102930 May 8, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is the answer to your question as posted by saywhut
"What would the motives be for these apostles to continue to teach Jesus' words? If He did not come back to visit them after death, why would they have reason to believe anything He told them?
So if Jesus would have died and not returned to them to show them that He indeed lives, they would have to be idiots to continue to teach His words and jeopardize their lives over it while remaining dirt poor. They gained nothing financially or socially by carrying on the spreading of the gospel. And almost all of them were killed for their doing so. If Jesus did not rise and speak to them, wouldn't they just have walked away, a little bitter even for wasting that much time of their lives and leaving their family?
Now,let me ask you this;You believe in Evolution;
Is that belief strong enough,that you would be willing to risk your freedom or life ,As the Apostles and other Christians did, for their beliefs? And why would you?
What's more,
If,you did not believe in evolution,would you be willing to risk your life and freedom by claiming that evolution was true?
And,Why would you?
People die fighting for all sorts of causes. Some are religious some are not.
If Mohamed was not the true prophet, then why would the terrorists die for him? It is blind belief just as you have. Do you need to see a resurrection for your faith? If not, then why do you expect others to see it?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#102931 May 8, 2013
curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is the answer to your question as posted by saywhut
"What would the motives be for these apostles to continue to teach Jesus' words? If He did not come back to visit them after death, why would they have reason to believe anything He told them?
So if Jesus would have died and not returned to them to show them that He indeed lives, they would have to be idiots to continue to teach His words and jeopardize their lives over it while remaining dirt poor. They gained nothing financially or socially by carrying on the spreading of the gospel. And almost all of them were killed for their doing so. If Jesus did not rise and speak to them, wouldn't they just have walked away, a little bitter even for wasting that much time of their lives and leaving their family?
Now,let me ask you this;You believe in Evolution;
Is that belief strong enough,that you would be willing to risk your freedom or life ,As the Apostles and other Christians did, for their beliefs? And why would you?
What's more,
If,you did not believe in evolution,would you be willing to risk your life and freedom by claiming that evolution was true?
And,Why would you?
Evolution is not a philosophy. Their is no cause in evolution in which to fight for.
The ideas Jesus promoted was a revolt against the status quo. No matter if he was a deity, their was cause to fight.
Yiago-theWikiSch olar

Richmond, KY

#102932 May 8, 2013
Yiago wrote:
<quoted text>
If you look at the link you refused to read....
I'm not the original person you talked to, so I don't need or want to read your link.
I'm just ridiculing you because you deserve it.
When I see any "debater" citing Wiki or YouTube as his/her scientific "proof," thinking he's really showing his intellectual authority, it's hilarious.
Credibility is immediately flushed right down the toilet.

It's like flaunting a community college degree or a certificate from vocational school.

ROFL

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#102933 May 8, 2013
LMAO wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you think because "Berkeley" has a YouTube channel, YouTube is considered "scientific"? Really?
BWahahahaha!
It's worse than I thought.
A science class being video taped and posted on YouTube is no less science than being there in person.
When you say "reality" I am not sure you know the meaning.
curious

Ocoee, FL

#102934 May 8, 2013
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>If intelligence must be created, then who created that intelligent creator?
You are my witnesses,” declares the Lord,
“and my servant whom I have chosen,
so that you may know and believe me
and understand that I am he.
Before me no god was formed,
nor will there be one after me.

11 I, even I, am the Lord,
and apart from me there is no savior.
12 I have revealed and saved and proclaimed—
I, and not some foreign god among you.
You are my witnesses,” declares the Lord,“that I am God.
13 Yes, and from ancient days I am he.

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End."

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Manchester Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Wes Whitehead is at it again!!!! lol school bo... 2 hr Well 5
Tinsy Riley or Jarvis (Nov '13) 6 hr Diane 27
who knows anything about tiffany adkins. from s... 7 hr Tiffany Adkins 6
Clay County Jail Inmate Road Crew 10 hr Sad 3
Chick at the metal place 14 hr To whom ever 5
Desi Roberts (May '14) 21 hr truth 7
I'm a gay athiest. (Apr '11) 23 hr how g 44
Manchester Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Manchester People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:54 am PST

NBC Sports 8:54AM
Andy Dalton replaces Aaron Rodgers on Pro Bowl roster
Yahoo! Sports 9:39 AM
Dalton to replace Rodgers for Pro Bowl
NFL10:12 AM
Andy Dalton added to Pro Bowl roster
NBC Sports12:57 PM
Bengals quarterback Andy Dalton headed to his 2nd Pro Bowl
NBC Sports 3:15 AM
Marvin Lewis on Andy Dalton: We don't have time to waste on QB competition