No one needs ten bullets to kill a deer

[The Anti-Troll]

Obskeptic wrote:

<quoted text>
The law is stupid, and like before, will have no effect other then talking about gun control causing millions of guns and rounds of ammo to be sold in the last month.

And yet you still feel the need to cry about it.

[The Stinker]

The Anti-Troll wrote:

<quoted text>
You're EXACTLY the kind of guy that needs to be on the registry.

Why do you think he should be on a registry?

[The Anti-Troll]

The Stinker wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you think he should be on a registry?

His first line of defense is bragging about his suppposed gun collection & at the first sign of disagreement, he wants to shoot me in the chest! Pretty simple logic. The guy's not right.

[The Stinker]

The Anti-Troll wrote:

<quoted text>
His first line of defense is bragging about his suppposed gun collection & at the first sign of disagreement, he wants to shoot me in the chest! Pretty simple logic. The guy's not right.

I have a gun collection also. As far as shooting you in the chest goes, I have a feeling he's not the only one. You've said a lot of things on topix that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You've argued with everyone on this thread. nIt seems that anyone who disagrees with you should be on a gun registry because he's nuts.

You can get away with this line of bs you've usbjected us to, but I can't help buy wonder if you take this attitude with your family members, neighbors, co-workers, etc. Or are you just trolling?

[Obskeptic]

The Stinker wrote:

<quoted text>
I have a gun collection also. As far as shooting you in the chest goes, I have a feeling he's not the only one. You've said a lot of things on topix that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You've argued with everyone on this thread. nIt seems that anyone who disagrees with you should be on a gun registry because he's nuts.
You can get away with this line of bs you've usbjected us to, but I can't help buy wonder if you take this attitude with your family members, neighbors, co-workers, etc. Or are you just trolling?

He's just trolling. If he was this big an ass with everyone he personally crosses paths with, he would not only have no friends or family that would want to be around him, but he would find himself being helped up from the ground more often then he would care for. He knew what I meant, and I know what he is.

[Obskeptic]

The Anti-Troll wrote:

<quoted text>
His first line of defense is bragging about his suppposed gun collection & at the first sign of disagreement, he wants to shoot me in the chest! Pretty simple logic. The guy's not right.

I mentioned one gun that I own versus one gun my son owns and pointed out the differences between the two. The fact your twisted and closed mind cannot distinguish the difference is the problem TAT. I think that the gun register should only require liberal democrats to be registered after your demonstration of their pathological propensity for being angry and ignorant. The constitution is something your supposed to defend, not attack.

[The Anti-Troll]

The Stinker wrote:

<quoted text>
I have a gun collection also. As far as shooting you in the chest goes, I have a feeling he's not the only one. You've said a lot of things on topix that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You've argued with everyone on this thread. nIt seems that anyone who disagrees with you should be on a gun registry because he's nuts.
You can get away with this line of bs you've usbjected us to, but I can't help buy wonder if you take this attitude with your family members, neighbors, co-workers, etc. Or are you just trolling?

See, what most would consider "debate", you consider "argument" because my views don't match yours. I find it ridiculously ironic how the NRA gun nuts want to fight for their 2nd ammendment rights, yet want to restrict the 1st ammendment rights of those who disagree with them. Double standards. Don't be that guy.

[The Anti-Troll]

The Fox News propoganda runs strong on this thread, huh?

Carry on with your blind ignorance & ridiculous hyperbole.

[The Anti-Troll]

Obskeptic wrote:

<quoted text>
I mentioned one gun that I own versus one gun my son owns and pointed out the differences between the two. The fact your twisted and closed mind cannot distinguish the difference is the problem TAT. I think that the gun register should only require liberal democrats to be registered after your demonstration of their pathological propensity for being angry and ignorant. The constitution is something your supposed to defend, not attack.

You're not even worth the debate anymore. You just go around picking out big words from a Google search in a desperate yet vain attempt to make yourself look educated. You're a low-watt tool. Go play with your loaded phallic symbol. Don't shoot your eye out.

[The Stinker]

The Anti-Troll wrote:

<quoted text>
See, what most would consider "debate", you consider "argument" because my views don't match yours. I find it ridiculously ironic how the NRA gun nuts want to fight for their 2nd ammendment rights, yet want to restrict the 1st ammendment rights of those who disagree with them. Double standards. Don't be that guy.

Troll.

[The Anti-Troll]

The Stinker wrote:

<quoted text>
Troll.

I'll take that as a "win".

[Ken]

May not need 10 for a deer but theirs no telling how many I may need for some savage black Burglars.

[Plotts]

How many bullets are required to stop newspaper deliverers in LA while a lack of concern for the immediate safety of the public is most obvious.....who's protecting the best interests of the onstituents while 40 targeted lapd are wholed up in a heavily fortified and armed bunker?.
Do not let the politicians use this incident to take away the publics 2nd amendment rights...it should raise concerns on how these quasi military police departments need to be held responsable for creating the situation...

[The Stinker]

The Anti-Troll wrote:

<quoted text>
I'll take that as a "win".

Take it any way you want to.

[PHANTON HELL RIDER]

Homo Cuomo Think's Some One May Come Long And Cap his Fagett Azz..With Ten Round's That Bitcn!!

[Every Dog has his Day]

Well, it would appear that we have now retained our right to bear arms---thanks to the efforts of the NRA --After the recent win I decided to say thank you to Mr. Lapierre (I think that's how it's spelled) by paying for a 3 year membership in the NRA...

[Just Saying]

Every Dog has his Day wrote:

Well, it would appear that we have now retained our right to bear arms---thanks to the efforts of the NRA --After the recent win I decided to say thank you to Mr. Lapierre (I think that's how it's spelled) by paying for a 3 year membership in the NRA...

They still need to fight Cuomo's anti-gun laws in New York.

[42nd Street]

shameless-li wrote:

<quoted text>
second amendment is for people to have the right to bear arms.
it doesn't say anything about buying the biggest gun you can find to go murder people...

And the First Amendment isn't about porn movies - but the ACLU thinks it is.