Reinstate the Federal Assult Weapons Ban

Reinstate the Federal Assult Weapons Ban

Posted in the Madisonville Forum

First Prev
of 7
Next Last
Law Abiding Citizen

Montréal, Canada

#1 Dec 9, 2012
There is no reason for any firearm to hold more than six rounds. All assault weapons, like the AR-15 need to be confiscated and destroyed, or modified to where they can accept a magazine by the use of a tool, which requires two turns. There is no reason for a magazine to be able to be attached to a receiver in just a matter of seconds and then emptied a few seconds after. Assault weapons are designed to kill people with ease and with new technologies and modifications, they can easily be made functionally fully automatic. This is dangerous. We don't need to make the minor modifications that existed in 1994, like removing collapsible stocks and removing the bayonet lugs, we should eliminate them altogether. These are people killers, they have no purpose for anything otherwise. They cannot kill deer effectively, and you might get lucky with varmints. Our government will bring this act back up and sensible people will support it.

Functionally speaking, they all need to be modified by switching the receiver button, designing internal magazines which can only hold six rounds, a synchronized five second delay on all rounds should be required. Really, they should all be bolt action.

Stand with me. I want you to have a gun, but assault weapons need to go.
forks

Kuttawa, KY

#2 Dec 9, 2012
We should also outlaw 4 tine forks as we know for a fact this is the reason people are fat. Guns don't kill people, people do. Maybe we should ban hands as well because we know OJ didn't have a gun yet he killed two innocent people. I have a right to Keep and Bear Arms and to protect my family and property from invasion. Limiting the amount of force I can use to protect myself is silly and ignorant. Let a gang of thugs kick in your front door and let me know how that bolt action rifle works for ya. I hope they don't harm your wife or daughter as you are trying to reload but if they do, you can rest peacefully knowing you fully supported an Assult Weapons Ban.

“Shoot to protect!!!!”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#3 Dec 9, 2012
Law Abiding Citizen wrote:
There is no reason for any firearm to hold more than six rounds. All assault weapons, like the AR-15 need to be confiscated and destroyed, or modified to where they can accept a magazine by the use of a tool, which requires two turns. There is no reason for a magazine to be able to be attached to a receiver in just a matter of seconds and then emptied a few seconds after. Assault weapons are designed to kill people with ease and with new technologies and modifications, they can easily be made functionally fully automatic. This is dangerous. We don't need to make the minor modifications that existed in 1994, like removing collapsible stocks and removing the bayonet lugs, we should eliminate them altogether. These are people killers, they have no purpose for anything otherwise. They cannot kill deer effectively, and you might get lucky with varmints. Our government will bring this act back up and sensible people will support it.

Functionally speaking, they all need to be modified by switching the receiver button, designing internal magazines which can only hold six rounds, a synchronized five second delay on all rounds should be required. Really, they should all be bolt action.

Stand with me. I want you to have a gun, but assault weapons need to go.
You must be kidding right? Have you seen the new M-4 by colt? Nice piece of equipment. Thinking about buying one for myself and one for each of my kids. Already have the A2 and I'm 41 years old and have had it for 20 years but I have yet to want to shoot someone with it, not even stupid people like you.
joejoe
#4 Dec 9, 2012
Law Abiding Citizen wrote:
There is no reason for any firearm to hold more than six rounds. All assault weapons, like the AR-15 need to be confiscated and destroyed, or modified to where they can accept a magazine by the use of a tool, which requires two turns. There is no reason for a magazine to be able to be attached to a receiver in just a matter of seconds and then emptied a few seconds after. Assault weapons are designed to kill people with ease and with new technologies and modifications, they can easily be made functionally fully automatic. This is dangerous. We don't need to make the minor modifications that existed in 1994, like removing collapsible stocks and removing the bayonet lugs, we should eliminate them altogether. These are people killers, they have no purpose for anything otherwise. They cannot kill deer effectively, and you might get lucky with varmints. Our government will bring this act back up and sensible people will support it.
Functionally speaking, they all need to be modified by switching the receiver button, designing internal magazines which can only hold six rounds, a synchronized five second delay on all rounds should be required. Really, they should all be bolt action.
Stand with me. I want you to have a gun, but assault weapons need to go.
Why is it, that those who want bans, always know the least about guns?

Ape Linkon

“Dont tell me my dress is black”

Since: Nov 09

Pig, KY

#5 Dec 9, 2012
37,000 people are killed from abortions each day, yet they want to ban something that kills about 12,000 people in a year. That makes a ton of sense.
smucker

Tucker, GA

#6 Dec 9, 2012
Canadian eh, let's see your mounted police stop a drive by, you know, like a snowballs chance in hell!
yesmsnancy

Madisonville, KY

#7 Dec 9, 2012
Law Abiding Citizen wrote:
There is no reason for any firearm to hold more than six rounds. All assault weapons, like the AR-15 need to be confiscated and destroyed, or modified to where they can accept a magazine by the use of a tool, which requires two turns. There is no reason for a magazine to be able to be attached to a receiver in just a matter of seconds and then emptied a few seconds after. Assault weapons are designed to kill people with ease and with new technologies and modifications, they can easily be made functionally fully automatic. This is dangerous. We don't need to make the minor modifications that existed in 1994, like removing collapsible stocks and removing the bayonet lugs, we should eliminate them altogether. These are people killers, they have no purpose for anything otherwise. They cannot kill deer effectively, and you might get lucky with varmints. Our government will bring this act back up and sensible people will support it.
Functionally speaking, they all need to be modified by switching the receiver button, designing internal magazines which can only hold six rounds, a synchronized five second delay on all rounds should be required. Really, they should all be bolt action.
Stand with me. I want you to have a gun, but assault weapons need to go.
So my 22 pearl handle pistol that holds 9 rounds is an assault weapon?I never knew that.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#9 Dec 10, 2012
Law Abiding Citizen wrote:
There is no reason for any firearm to hold more than six rounds. All assault weapons, like the AR-15 need to be confiscated and destroyed, or modified to where they can accept a magazine by the use of a tool, which requires two turns. There is no reason for a magazine to be able to be attached to a receiver in just a matter of seconds and then emptied a few seconds after. Assault weapons are designed to kill people with ease and with new technologies and modifications, they can easily be made functionally fully automatic. This is dangerous. We don't need to make the minor modifications that existed in 1994, like removing collapsible stocks and removing the bayonet lugs, we should eliminate them altogether. These are people killers, they have no purpose for anything otherwise. They cannot kill deer effectively, and you might get lucky with varmints. Our government will bring this act back up and sensible people will support it.
Functionally speaking, they all need to be modified by switching the receiver button, designing internal magazines which can only hold six rounds, a synchronized five second delay on all rounds should be required. Really, they should all be bolt action.
Stand with me. I want you to have a gun, but assault weapons need to go.
Hey I've got an idea, lets sterilize all you liberal a@@holes so you can't reproduce and destroy the rights we have in this country. You probably voted for the liberal a@@hole in the White House now. I hope we can keep things like the second admendment in place until hes out of office in 4 years.
smucker

Tucker, GA

#10 Dec 10, 2012
Law Abiding Citizen wrote:
There is no reason for any firearm to hold more than six rounds. All assault weapons, like the AR-15 need to be confiscated and destroyed, or modified to where they can accept a magazine by the use of a tool, which requires two turns. There is no reason for a magazine to be able to be attached to a receiver in just a matter of seconds and then emptied a few seconds after. Assault weapons are designed to kill people with ease and with new technologies and modifications, they can easily be made functionally fully automatic. This is dangerous. We don't need to make the minor modifications that existed in 1994, like removing collapsible stocks and removing the bayonet lugs, we should eliminate them altogether. These are people killers, they have no purpose for anything otherwise. They cannot kill deer effectively, and you might get lucky with varmints. Our government will bring this act back up and sensible people will support it.

Functionally speaking, they all need to be modified by switching the receiver button, designing internal magazines which can only hold six rounds, a synchronized five second delay on all rounds should be required. Really, they should all be bolt action.

Stand with me. I want you to have a gun, but assault weapons need to go.
You ever watch the news, the rock throwers don't seem to have much of a chance, should we limit them to six rocks?
stupidity

Tucker, GA

#12 Dec 10, 2012
Sounds great!! I mean a LAW to ban guns would keep all illegal guns out of the criminals hands right?? So If someone with one of these assault weapons breaks into my home while I'm there I should just calmly explain that the weapon they have is illegal, and I will be forced to report their illegal use.I bet that criminal will feel so bad for breaking that law he or she would just turn themself in.
smucker

Hopkinsville, KY

#15 Dec 10, 2012
FisH wrote:
If a person has a gun left then alot,
He// that ain't so hard is it?
Mug have to kill some Can'S..........
Mes, affra, morok,queba..........etc etc.......
Are you choking on something,I need a translater!
smucker

Dunmor, KY

#17 Dec 10, 2012
FisH wrote:
Nope try a Q-tip or even 3rd grade over?
Had a stroke and words come out fukkerdUp?
It's this new slopBonik's speed talkin' course!
Hell how was I to know, I'll get a lawyer, put out a disclaimer, and apologize to da pope! Carry on my friend!
yesmsnancy

Madisonville, KY

#19 Dec 10, 2012
yesmsnancy wrote:
<quoted text>So my 22 pearl handle pistol that holds 9 rounds is an assault weapon?I never knew that.
Nobody answered,so I guess nobody knows for sure.

“Shoot to protect!!!!”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#20 Dec 10, 2012
yesmsnancy wrote:
<quoted text>So my 22 pearl handle pistol that holds 9 rounds is an assault weapon?I never knew that.
Seems that way according to this moron that started this.
yesmsnancy

Madisonville, KY

#22 Dec 10, 2012
FisH wrote:
What pistol
I see no pistol.........;)
You ain't looking in the right place.
No More

Owensboro, KY

#24 Dec 12, 2012
So banning assault weapons will get them off the street???? Awesome! Maybe they could outlaw meth as well!
joejoe
#25 Dec 12, 2012
No More wrote:
So banning assault weapons will get them off the street???? Awesome! Maybe they could outlaw meth as well!
Lmao. Yeah. Why has no one thought of this? After that, they can ban drunk driving.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#26 Dec 13, 2012
Law Abiding Citizen wrote:
There is no reason for any firearm to hold more than six rounds. All assault weapons, like the AR-15 need to be confiscated and destroyed, or modified to where they can accept a magazine by the use of a tool, which requires two turns. There is no reason for a magazine to be able to be attached to a receiver in just a matter of seconds and then emptied a few seconds after. Assault weapons are designed to kill people with ease and with new technologies and modifications, they can easily be made functionally fully automatic. This is dangerous. We don't need to make the minor modifications that existed in 1994, like removing collapsible stocks and removing the bayonet lugs, we should eliminate them altogether. These are people killers, they have no purpose for anything otherwise. They cannot kill deer effectively, and you might get lucky with varmints. Our government will bring this act back up and sensible people will support it.

Functionally speaking, they all need to be modified by switching the receiver button, designing internal magazines which can only hold six rounds, a synchronized five second delay on all rounds should be required. Really, they should all be bolt action.

Stand with me. I want you to have a gun, but assault weapons need to go.
You make a point but not a very educated one. If you remove all the BAD weapons, as you say, from the Law Abiding Citizens then all you'd have is bad weapons in the hands of criminals. As a law abiding member of this society and a veteran of the US Army, I feel it's everyones right to own whatever they like. Freedom isn't free and when this piss poor economy collapses the the crap really hits the fan you sir will be wishing you had some friends with large capacity magazines. I hope you, my kids, and myself never see an armagedon but we still, as patriots, need to be prepared.
The Mighty

Clarksville, TN

#27 Dec 13, 2012
I never saw the point in any average citizen needing an assault weapon. If they cannot ban them then they should at least require a psychiactric evaluation before leagaly owning one. Anything at that can help prevent mass murder like the one at the "The Dark Knight Rises" premiere would be helpful.
Law Abiding Citizen

Houston, TX

#29 Dec 14, 2012
If there was a time to reinstate, now would be it. Thank goodness we have our right to carry these big assault weapons to kill children.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 7
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Madisonville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Kassidy Clark 34 min B00 YAA 2
What are you thinking now? 36 min Lol 17
oasis (Apr '16) 2 hr B00 YAA 5
finally! Right to work 2 hr B00 YAA 4
Nancy Oldham kicked out of middle school game 6 hr James lee 8
Losing friends to METH... (Aug '13) 6 hr B00 YAA 47
Alyssa Cook 11 hr Foreal 4

Madisonville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Madisonville Mortgages