Jacksonville lambipie Jews

Posted in the Macclenny Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#1 Apr 25, 2014
http://nypost.com/2014/04/24/jewish-nyu-stude...

A gentile republican certainly hopes Jacksonville Jews will not go-meekly to the Muzzi-wog slaughter as did their Euro-grandfathers to the Nazi butchers.

Obama.nation has been pimping you like a Rogero St. hoe while his Bantu and cosmopolitan Neoliths dis-assemble our republic. But, don't think you will stand in the wind, when others fall ... history has no mercy for those playing-the-slutt. If you're a Jew consider being armed a simple cost-of-doing-business ... and do not exempt your own from a just accounting. Think on it.
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#2 Apr 26, 2014
noshellswill wrote:
http://nypost.com/2014/04/24/j ewish-nyu-students-targeted-by -pro-palestine-activists-repor t/
A gentile republican certainly hopes Jacksonville Jews will not go-meekly to the Muzzi-wog slaughter as did their Euro-grandfathers to the Nazi butchers.
No need to worry about the jews because they run this country.. Also keep in mind that the US will sacrifice many US citizens to preserve the jew state of israel..

The Nazis were armatures when it came to butchering compared to the jews today with their christian crony capitalist counterparts..
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#3 Apr 27, 2014
I listen-to & see many American Jews follow the cosmopolitan line to sheep-like passivity --- to a refusal to take responsibility for their own physical safety. Perhaps yes, many Jews are deluded that their influence over the American legal system will protect them. Foolish arrogance when Bantu savages come prowling ... as in the Detroit/La riots of the 1990s.

Only armed white Christian militia in-the-streets ( and armed slant business owners on their workroom roof-tops ) pushed back the Bantu surge of looting, burning and personal violence.

I guess post-modern La. narco.MEX wettbakkks ... practiced in butchery from their own drug wars ... would defend their families & slaughter any burning Bantu juju or Muzzi-Wog JiHad! Not so sure Jacksonville Jews will systematically practice such self-defense ... instead of bleating-like-sheep and bleeding-out in the gutter with gawdsakes no thought to their republican responsibilities.
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>
No need to worry about the jews because they run this country.. Also keep in mind that the US will sacrifice many US citizens to preserve the jew state of israel..
The Nazis were armatures when it came to butchering compared to the jews today with their christian crony capitalist counterparts..
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#4 Apr 27, 2014
noshellswill wrote:
I listen-to & see many American Jews follow the cosmopolitan line to sheep-like passivity --- to a refusal to take responsibility for their own physical safety. Perhaps yes, many Jews are deluded that their influence over the American legal system will protect them. Foolish arrogance when Bantu savages come prowling ... as in the Detroit/La riots of the 1990s.
Only armed white Christian militia in-the-streets ( and armed slant business owners on their workroom roof-tops ) pushed back the Bantu surge of looting, burning and personal violence.
I guess post-modern La. narco.MEX wettbakkks ... practiced in butchery from their own drug wars ... would defend their families & slaughter any burning Bantu juju or Muzzi-Wog JiHad! Not so sure Jacksonville Jews will systematically practice such self-defense ... instead of bleating-like-sheep and bleeding-out in the gutter with gawdsakes no thought to their republican responsibilities.
<quoted text>
Screw the american jew.. I have more respect for bedlice..

The american jews control christians that have control of the crony US government that sends our troops to war on behalf of the security for the jew state of israel..

Its time for the US to end support for the freeloading jew state of israel... As a matter of fact, any American that supports the jew state of israel, is an enemy of the US in reality... And more folks are realizing this everyday...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#5 Apr 27, 2014
And to prove that what I said is not bias.. I have no more respect for christians or muslims then that of a jew...

As far as Im concerned, they are all lowlife examples of human beings...
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#6 Apr 27, 2014
I have previously explained why the term "free-loading" is inappropriate. You really need to read a good book on the creation of nuclear weaponry.

King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>

<clip>

Its time for the US to end support for the freeloading jew state of israel...

<clip>
..
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#7 Apr 28, 2014
noshellswill wrote:
I have previously explained why the term "free-loading" is inappropriate. You really need to read a good book on the creation of nuclear weaponry.
<quoted text>
If you believe that ww2 could not have been won without the use of nuclear weaponry then I suggest that you read a book... Further more if you want to give the jews all the credit for developing nuclear weaponry then you can blame them for the unclear arms race as well.. Not to mention the nuclear waste that generations will haft to deal with long after you are I are gone..
And when the world has a nuclear war, it can be blamed on the jews as well.... Keep in mind that Russia has bigger bombs then the US has...
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#8 Apr 28, 2014
AS you recall the ppoint at issue is "freeloading Israel" ... abd I see you (implicitly) agree with my point that Jews can **argue** a call on USA special treatment for their creation of an "allied" nuclear weapon.

Surely we defeated Germany without "the bomb" and would have defeated Japan also in a bloody non-nuclear invasion. But we were lucky ... aided by enemy blunders on both fronts and the BOMB **clould** have been crucial to our victory.

Anyrate I'm not claiming Israel has unlimited call on our military power, and I don't believe Israel got us into either Iraq or Afganland --- that was republifat determination to WASTE free money ratjer than spend it on American social projects.

After 9/11 we should have nuked the instigating Saudi Muzzi-pimps , pumped away their oil and left Iraq and Iran to butcher themselves into decrepitude.

Where Zionists figure in that is nowhere, really or perhaps between Syrian Mig29s and Israeli F-16s. Nice fireworks.
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>
If you believe that ww2 could not have been won without the use of nuclear weaponry then I suggest that you read a book... Further more if you want to give the jews all the credit for developing nuclear weaponry then you can blame them for the unclear arms race as well.. Not to mention the nuclear waste that generations will haft to deal with long after you are I are gone..
And when the world has a nuclear war, it can be blamed on the jews as well.... Keep in mind that Russia has bigger bombs then the US has...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#9 Apr 28, 2014
noshellswill wrote:
AS you recall the ppoint at issue is "freeloading Israel" ...
<quoted text>
Yes.. So let me ask you this, schoolteacher.. At what point does the US debt to the free loading jew state of israel end, for the creation of nuclear weaponry that as made the world a much more dangerous place today to live in?

Thousands saved during WW2, verses billions today with the threat of worldwide nuclear might several times the fold then the nukes used in ww2.... I might not be as smart as you are school teacher, but somehow the numbers, and your jew rearend kissing doesn't add up to me...
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#10 Apr 28, 2014
Nuclear weapons arguably made the world a safer place ... at least they saved ~1,000,000 American lives during the anticipated invasion of Japan ... you KNOW how stupid American generals are at plunging straight ahead and taking HUGE casualties before destroying an enemy. Too bad we didn't nuke-out the chi.com s in Korea or later when the Russians asked us to.....

As for our responsibility toward Zionists .. I'd forcably retrieve the USA nukes Israel stole from us during the 1960S ... and then encourage Israel to either destroy its local enemies. go-down in a splash of blood or negotiate alliance with local "big-dogs".

I would finance not one nickle of the cost, nor allow American Jews to make "charity" contributions to Israel ... no two-staters or dual-citizens are allowed in my book!'Course Jews pay-off lots of American politicians to pimp Zionism --- I'd stop that DEAD.

But, since I would have already vaporized the Saudis and Paks for being Muzzi-wog *zzwholes and pimping 9/11, then Israel would arguably have an easier time surviving on-its-own.

Israel would make a nice Jewish province of a local multi-cultural Turkish or Egyptian Empire. Just got to squash the Sunni MuJad first! Watch UTUBE fighting vids ... they are serious butchering bytches and you must kill a lot of them. Any questions on my mideast socio-political doctrines?
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes.. So let me ask you this, schoolteacher.. At what point does the US debt to the free loading jew state of israel end, for the creation of nuclear weaponry that as made the world a much more dangerous place today to live in?
Thousands saved during WW2, verses billions today with the threat of worldwide nuclear might several times the fold then the nukes used in ww2.... I might not be as smart as you are school teacher, but somehow the numbers, and your jew rearend kissing doesn't add up to me...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#11 Apr 30, 2014
noshellswill wrote:
Nuclear weapons arguably made the world a safer place ... at least they saved ~1,000,000 American lives during the anticipated invasion of Japan ...
<quoted text>
I dont know where you get your numbers from but never the less Japan was already beaten before the bombs were dropped, killing many civilians...

The US used the bomb for one reason and that was to show the world the destruction power that it had at the time.. And you believe that the world is a safer place today because of it ? hahahahahahhaha!

Keep in mind that the world is getting smaller while nuclear weaponry is growing like wildflowers, thanks to the jews....Also keep in mind that being that the US used nukes on civilians first, it gives others the right to use nukes on US civilians... Even non nuclear bombs is morally justified to kill US civilians.. The US does it all the time today in other countries, and they did it during the Vietnam and Korean wars as well..

I believe that the US and the world would be a better place, if the US was bombed into minding its own business.. Iraq and Afghanistan is proof of that... It would also put US crony capitalism in check as well...
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#12 May 1, 2014
WRONG WRONG & WRONG Kow!

1) Japan citizens in WW2 would have fought street-to-street for the Emperor. Just like in Okinawa ... only worse. We would have had to kill every male in the country. So my 1,000,000 American dead number is pretty-good.

2) Yes nukes ---> safe! I see you don't believe in MAD (mutually assured destruction.) What's wrong, you want WW1 butchery in the trenches? The Brits had 80,000 troops killed in one afternoon --- nukes are safer! You think people are nice rational folks; I believe only nuke terror & drugs(religion) keeps them acting 1/2 human. Most Amazon tribes are 5/1 female because the males kill-off eachother in vendetta --- same for Sicily. Care to share your data showing otherwise?

3) Jewboys don't pass-around nuclear secrets (except to Russia). Italian researchers knew everything by lab fission exps about 1937, but never pushed. Americans gave France and Israel the A-bomb tek, and educated Paks and Chi.com s in nuclear physics/QM/STR so they could develop their own bomb. South Africa developed their own again American educated; Brazil & Argentina passed (expat Germans hehehe) even though they have the tek. All insane? Yes I'd say so.
King of wisdom wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont know where you get your numbers from but never the less Japan was already beaten before the bombs were dropped, killing many civilians...
The US used the bomb for one reason and that was to show the world the destruction power that it had at the time.. And you believe that the world is a safer place today because of it ? hahahahahahhaha!
Keep in mind that the world is getting smaller while nuclear weaponry is growing like wildflowers, thanks to the jews....Also keep in mind that being that the US used nukes on civilians first, it gives others the right to use nukes on US civilians... Even non nuclear bombs is morally justified to kill US civilians.. The US does it all the time today in other countries, and they did it during the Vietnam and Korean wars as well..
I believe that the US and the world would be a better place, if the US was bombed into minding its own business.. Iraq and Afghanistan is proof of that... It would also put US crony capitalism in check as well...
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#13 May 1, 2014
SEZ KOW;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

"Keep in mind that the world is getting smaller while nuclear weaponry is growing like wildflowers, thanks to the jews....Also keep in mind that being that the US used nukes on civilians first, it gives others the right to use nukes on US civilians... Even non nuclear bombs is morally justified to kill US civilians.. The US does it all the time today in other countries, and they did it during the Vietnam and Korean wars as well.."

SEZ ME++++++++++

So what are you telling me I don't know? Hand ax or laser beam ... the strong do as they will; the weak do as they must. Quoted by Thucydides, but true since homo-Habilis ... or lemurs ... as Cane slew Abel.
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#14 May 2, 2014
noshellswill wrote:
WRONG WRONG & WRONG Kow!
1) Japan citizens in WW2 would have fought street-to-street for the Emperor. Just like in Okinawa ... only worse. We would have had to kill every male in the country. So my 1,000,000
<quoted text>
The use of the atomic bomb is not why Japan surrendered.. The Soviets declaration of war on Japan after the bomb was dropped was the key factor in Japans surrender.. The Soviets had over a million troops armed and ready to invade Japan...

That pretty much kills your argument, schoolteacher.. And the way I see it, the US doesn't owe the freeloading jew state of israel anything.....
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#15 May 2, 2014
The bottom line here schoolteacher, is that it was Stalin, not the Bomb that made Japan surrender, ending WW2, saving many American from bloodshed and death ... So instead of kissing the rearend of a jews, you should be kissing the rearend of Russians...
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#16 May 2, 2014
Nope. Fantasyland. From where does Russia launch their seaborne assault on Japan? From frozen-*zz Kamchatka? REM anti.com Chang-ki-Chek was beating Mao in 1945! Do Russki-troups swim or float on inflated bear-blatters ... hahaha ...
King of wisdom wrote:
The bottom line here schoolteacher, is that it was Stalin, not the Bomb that made Japan surrender, ending WW2, saving many American from bloodshed and death ... So instead of kissing the rearend of a jews, you should be kissing the rearend of Russians...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#17 May 3, 2014
noshellswill wrote:
Nope. Fantasyland. From where does Russia launch their seaborne assault on Japan? From frozen-*zz Kamchatka? REM anti.com Chang-ki-Chek was beating Mao in 1945! Do Russki-troups swim or float on inflated bear-blatters ... hahaha ...
<quoted text>
"Despite the death toll from the atomic bombings 140,000 in Hiroshima, 80,000 in Nagasaki the Imperial Military Command believed it could hold out against an Allied invasion if it retained control of Manchuria and Korea, which provided Japan with the resources for war, according to Hasegawa and Terry Charman, a historian of World War II at London's Imperial War Museum.

"The Soviet attack changed all that," Charman said. "The leadership in Tokyo realized they had no hope now, and in that sense August Storm did have a greater effect on the Japanese decision to surrender than the dropping of the A-bombs."

The impact of the lightning Soviet advance comes through in the words of Japan's wartime prime minister, Kantaro Suzuki, urging his cabinet to surrender.

Operation August Storm was launched Aug. 9, 1945, as the Nagasaki bomb was dropped, and would claim the lives of 84,000 Japanese and 12,000 Soviet soldiers in two weeks of fighting. The Soviets ended up just 50 kilometers (30 miles) from Japan's main northern island, Hokkaido.

He is quoted in Hasegawa's book as saying, "If we miss (the chance) today, the Soviet Union will take not only Manchuria, Korea and Sakhalin, but also Hokkaido. We must end the war while we can deal with the United States."

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/08/14/histo...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#18 May 3, 2014
Do you see schoolteacher... Japan only surrendered to the US because they were terrified of the Russians.. The bomb had nothing to do with it...
noshellswill

Jacksonville, FL

#19 May 4, 2014
WIKI supports your argument ... without ever explaining how Russian troops might get to Japans northern Isles. In 1945 Japan still had subs, corvettes and destroyers sufficient to repel light craft ... of which Russia had none in-the-east.

Still ... you reference no book so I'll consult my history pal and find a reference. You are claiming a lot .... Stalins threats & talk is cheap. While A-bombs go BOOOOOOM!
King of wisdom wrote:
Do you see schoolteacher... Japan only surrendered to the US because they were terrified of the Russians.. The bomb had nothing to do with it...
King of wisdom

Jacksonville, FL

#20 May 5, 2014
noshellswill wrote:
WIKI supports your argument ... without ever explaining how Russian troops might get to Japans northern Isles. In 1945 Japan still had subs, corvettes and destroyers sufficient to repel light craft ... of which Russia had none in-the-east.
Still ... you reference no book so I'll consult my history pal and find a reference. You are claiming a lot .... Stalins threats & talk is cheap. While A-bombs go BOOOOOOM!
<quoted text>
The Russians had allies with ships and the US was just one of them, and Japan knew this....

Im not claiming alot, Im just stating fact so consult with anyone that you like..

On a side note.....Can you imaged how the war would have ended if Hitler never would have invaded Russia? I can, and no doubt in my mind that the freeloading jew state of israel would not exist today... And the US most likely would have lost the war, but sometimes losing a war can be a good thing in the long run...

Shame on Hitler, for attacking Russia.....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Macclenny Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Bantu savages jigaabboo at cops murder 2 hr King of wisdom 17
The interview 3 hr John 3
Fool Austrailians let-in the Muzzi-wogs ... 3 hr King of wisdom 11
Georgia - Inmates Complain of Treatment at Clay... (Jan '08) 21 hr Hamitup8 81
Peaceful protest, does it mean damage to business? Thu King of wisdom 5
King of wisdom Thu King of wisdom 1
Marco Rubio Thu King of wisdom 6
Macclenny Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Macclenny People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Macclenny News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Macclenny

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:52 am PST

NBC Sports 6:52AM
Louis Murphy gets three-year extension from Bucs
ESPN 6:52 AM
Buccaneers give Murphy a 3-year extension
NFL 7:01 AM
Louis Murphy, Buccaneers strike contract extension
Bleacher Report 7:02 AM
Bucs Sign WR Louis Murphy to 3-Yr Extension
Bleacher Report 8:04 AM
Breaking Down Saints' Game Plan vs. Bucs