Since: Feb 10
#66 Jul 13, 2013
Lynch, you are assuming again! You know what assuming does Lynch? Let me break it down for you, assuming makes an a.s.s out of you. LMAO
#68 Jul 30, 2013
You are harassing me. You are intelligent!
You state LIES! The list of individuals, including the City of Fitchburg, the FFD, The FPD and many others were put on a list of people I had agree not to sue. You are smarter than you put on.
You want to act highly intelligent and them dumb as a stump when common sense thinking is applied!
This deal was a strong arming straight out of the GOOD OLE BOY HANDBOOK! Look at the list of names and entities! Why put together such a list????? Why?
Because they did me wrong and people were going to be held accountable for it!
THEY POINTED TO 1992 AS THE ONLY REASON FOR THIS ENTIRE SITUATION!!
THE RMV POINTED TO 1992 AND THE PHONY FITCHBURG CASE AS REASONS FOR TAKING MY RIGHT TO DRIVE TAKEN AWAY!
Maybe someday you will have the courage that I have had to stand to such POWER!!!But until that day you will remain an anonymous COWARD!
#69 Jul 30, 2013
You're pretty funny. But they still took your license, didn't they? So they were right and you are wrong.
#71 Jul 30, 2013
They took my license? How cute!!! What is your standing? Do you believe in the Constitution?
Keep protecting the corrupt! Just because you know them?
How do you feel about an officer filing a false report? Can you answer with honesty??
Come on Nancy, answer truthfully or can you?
It all depends on if the person is an undesirearable???
This is a good thing in society ,huh??
Our lt governor drives at 108 miles an hr on an icy rd flipping his car and he is driving today,huh??
These are the likes whom you protect!
#72 Jul 30, 2013
Your type has succeeded on one thing, fucking the entire system up through your improper labeling of everyone else besides who you know??
Do you know who Sandusky is? He raped young boys and people like you protected him from being caught while putting other helpless boys in harms way!!!
Feel proud , Nancy!! Corruption along the lines of NAZI Germany ruled the day and took my license. Feel good!
Say Heil Hitler Nancy because that is who you support! You have to answer to God for your nastiness as well. Maybe God is "colored"???
#73 Jul 30, 2013
Driving is a privilege. Yes folks, we have privileges in a free society!
This is 100% wrong! A driving license is a right once you pass the safety course. But the corrupt government enjoys not having to follow the Constitution by labeling it a "privilege"!
This is why everything attacks the citizens driving license now because they have the protection to be able to violate and not even have to abide by Constitutional protections.
But don't be too happy donkey as they are about to take your license, LMAO!
You are so comfortable with other citizens having their rights violated?
Even though the license is a privilege it STILL MUST ABIDE BY THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE!!!!
Do you know the ONLY other privilege quoted in law is a PAROLE HEARING??
So, do you believe that the drivers license should be ruled on along with parole hearings????
Stand up for once!!! Stop standing up for corruption! Or are you involved in it? Did you take undocumented comp time?? Crook!!!
As I thought! It is Okay for you to steal tax money but dam those welfare recipients,huh?? Thought so!!!
#75 Jul 30, 2013
Explain to us how the RMV did not follow the Constitution during your hearing. And kindly tell us the reason that your license was yanked to begin with. And is this permanent? No nonsense about the GOBN, please. Just the facts, as Jack Webb used to say.
So you went through this process. And I would assume you appealed. Now you assert that the RMV are fascists who don't follow the constitution. Am I correct so far? But the big problem with this, as with most of your nonsense, is that you are the only one that sees it this way. No one else in government, apparently, has agreed with your assessment. Just as you label people "corrupt" without pointing out any statutes that the police, mayor, or FSU president have violated, you can't point to a part of the constitution either.
None of this plays well with voters, by the way.
#76 Jul 30, 2013
WTF is your fairness doctrine Mr. Lynch? You yourself have admitted that you are not healthy enough to work. In terms that means you are not fit to drive. If you are fit to drive then you can be a pizza delivery boy. That's fair. I think you call it level playing ground.
#77 Jul 30, 2013
You claim you walk around knocking on doors all the time so there you go! It's a win win for you. You could knock on a door and say "Hi I'm running for President, Mayor, councilor, chief of police, and President of the glee club did you order a large mushroom pizza?". You earn some $$ and get to talk to potential voters.
#78 Jul 30, 2013
"Lynch, 42, of 48 Cedar St.,#2, is ordered to not commit any misdemeanor or felony crimes, to abide by any existing harassment orders, and to not publicly comment in writing about the officer, or the officer's family, in relation to the case. Lynch is also barred from pursuing civil action related to the incident against the Fitchburg police, JR's Pub or any of their employees."
This is from the Sentinel story. Notice that it says "Lynch is barred from pursuing civil action." No mention of you agreeing to refrain from suing anyone, as you have asserted. So if this was wrong, if the court did not specifically prohibit you from doing this, where is the clarification or correction? So the only conclusion that we are to draw is that you are not telling the truth. Again (And no mention of the FFD, by the way). And how about abiding by any existing harassment orders? Did the GOBN orchestrate this as well?
#79 Jul 30, 2013
So Lynch you hate everyone and you're going to press charges because Nazis are following you? Sounds perfectly sane to me.
#80 Jul 30, 2013
Ok, the Assistant Attorney General investigated and stated that my rights were violated. The hearing officer after hearing my side and reading all the reports stated, "I feel that the other driver should be in front of me today and not you and it seems like this officer has a personal issue". So he told me once the case was dropped in court then he would reissue my license at no cost.
The case was dismissed. The other driver stated, "I do not want to go any further with this situation but the state police will not let it go as they want these guys".
So, I went back to the RMV and the guy was removed from his position there and they will not tell me where he works of if he is still with the RMV.
So, I had another hearing but this time the hearing officer stated I am ruling solely from the State police report. She refused me to be able to testify. So, I appealed and went to the three person panel. At the beginning they stated that 99.9% of those in court were leaving there without a license. So I was called up. They stated the 1992 case and the current case in Fitchburg as reasons why my license should be taking and nothing about the incidence.
I attempted to testify and they stated that I was not able to and that only the other side could testify. They also added that I received a $100 ticket in 1985.
One member was from the AGs office, I stated to her that it seemed like she was versed on the case before the hearing. I explained that the AG was investigating and that it was conflict of interests for her to be there. I also explained that the FBI was investigating the Fitchburg incident.
So, they took it under advisement, they agreed with the second hearing officers' decision. They wanted me to go to a two day class and pay $500 for reinstatement costs. I appealed.
I paid $300 again to appeal to the court. The court was heldin Worcester. I put in a motion to strike the booklet that the AGs attorney filed. It was filled with double and triple copies. I had another persons driving record included and there were 30 blank pages. I also requested for the AGs attorney to be taken off the case due to conflict of interests. The judge stated that I could not argue the facts of the incident at all but only procedure.
The judge accepted my position and disallowed the AG to speak but he never made a ruling on the packet that they filed.
I explained in writing as well as in my testimony that the law was not being applied correctly as the reasons that I was there does not fall under the statute at hand. I also stated that I was not afforded to defend myself at any point in the process besides the initial hearing which was ruled in my favor.
So now you will state that I am stubborn. You will state why not just pay the $500 and the $200 for the class as I already paid $400 plus to appeal.
You know, when we lay down to such Nazi ways then we make a path for further injustices. The law to revoke my license without being afforded a hearing is against our Constitution.
What happened here is I appealed and was making progress as the AG was in my corner. And that AGs name was Allen. I spelled his name wrong and he chastised me for it, he was so straight laced. He was extremely professional as well. I have since been told that he is no longer in the civil rights division but they will not divulge where he is at.
I would need roughly $10,000 to hire an attorney who would be able to first overturn this law. This I am in the process of doing. I am also talking with State reps in an effort to be able to speak at the state house in opposition of this law.
I have been to Governor Devals office twice over this issue. I thought they he would be a champion of civil rights but have found out that he is just an opportunist. I campaigned for him and people would tell me as much then.
So, I have been without my license for roughly 4 years now.
#81 Jul 30, 2013
That's it, I have to ask you. Are you stoned? You are like stuck on dumb. There are no existing harassment orders as the judge denied them to continue. They were total nonsense anyway.
Just to state, this is a wider issue at hand here as the citizens in general are denied proper access to fairness and the government does not abide by the Constitution. It is all a sham and this is why the citizens do not trust government.
Look at the "leaker" American stuck in Russia as the US wants to prosecute him for whistle blowing on them. This is the same sort of BS but on a much bigger scale. That guy blew the whistle on Big Brother violating every Americans rights. In other cases the government protects the whistle blower calling them courageous heroes.
My main problem is that I believe in the Constitution as if it were bible. Americans died for this Constitution. And people are taking it as a slight when the government violates the peoples rights.
They want you to just follow and not speak out against injustice.
#82 Jul 30, 2013
Lets see if I have this correct. You have been banned from parts of the city including FSU and banned from using any road in the state or the country and it's all because cowards, pedophiles and nazis are out to get you? Ok that sure makes sense to me.
#83 Jul 30, 2013
Let me tell you, you are going to remember my name. I will make differences for all Americans.
Your compliance with such a corrupt government is a direct insult to all Americans who died for our Constitution. You minimalize their ultimate sacrifice for freedom and equality.
Under your view they have all laid their lives down for not. Respect the Constitution as if it was Bible!!!!!
Are you an American of a Nazi contributor?
#84 Jul 31, 2013
Of course you feel that they were nonsense. Of course you will say that the judge "denied them to continue." But the paper said otherwise. Which hasn't been challenged by anyone except you. So how many were there, anyway?
#85 Jul 31, 2013
OK. So you went through the whole process. And the RMV won't tell you where the hearing officer works, which should tell you that they don't want you harassing anyone. And you still don't have your license. Which means that the only person who feels that an injustice was done is you. Not surprising. But what was the incident that triggered this to begin with? What did the officer pull you over for?
#86 Jul 31, 2013
So, Lynch, in light of your statement above, let's compare it with one of your other posts:
So, fake (in your eyes only I would assume) or not, there were two restraining orders against you. And how many afterward? And, here's the key thing, the voters will only conclude that you are lying. About something. Won't they?
Add your comments below
|Concerned Fitchburg residents get tour of propo...||5 hr||David Lynch||12|
|Just Another Monday||Wed||Lynch for Cow Dung||2|
|Fitchburg fire chief and firefighters honored T...||Dec 7||Medal of Truth||7|
|Help Feed Our Community (HFOC)||Dec 6||Tami||1|
|Fitchburgs corruption being exposed (Feb '16)||Dec 6||Fat Stevie||85|
|Uncle Remus||Dec 6||Irvine||1|
|Fitchburg man and Worcester woman pronounced de... (Jul '10)||Dec 5||Mom to Tom||27|
Find what you want!
Search Lunenburg Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC