#20402 Jul 31, 2013
Look at what this moron Pablo Alvarado(beaner) said about Rep. Trey Gowdy's immigration enforcement bill. He said "When Police enforce immigration laws, everyone is less safe" WTF!!!What he should have said is... If we allow the police to enforce the laws on ILLEGAL CRIMINAL ALIENS, we will all go to jail, because we're breaking the law. My question is... Why are only Americans held accountable to the law, by the police? I thought a healthy fear of the law is what kept order and prevented chaos. Why should only Americans have to obey the law or run the risk of their family being split up, by prison and police? They are no better than we are. They come over here and commit ID fraud, tax evasion and a whole host of other crimes. They are far from peaceful and are criminals. They should lock them up just the same, as any American, commiting the same offense. They are NO BETTER than we are, if fact, they are NOT as good as any American.(IMO)
#20403 Jul 31, 2013
So Mr Nubbinhead, do you belong to the North American Man/Boy Love Association?
They endorsed the study.
While the APA no longer has the study on their site from being embarrassed by it, the following half link (you can take my word for it or look the rest up yourself) should put a nail in your coffin. But I don't expect you to play dead, especially if you do belong to the organization above.
"The paper was first published by the American Psychological Association (APA) in July, 1998."
"Shortly thereafter, the North American Man/Boy Love Association posted an approving review of the study on their website, furthering the impression that the piece was an endorsement of pedophilia."
"In response, the APA declared in a press statement that child sexual abuse is harmful and wrong, and that the study was in no way an endorsement of pedophilia."
Psychologist = eggheads who set around and play with themselves and others.
#20404 Jul 31, 2013
Boehner and Obama are refusing to acknowledge these crimes I mentioned and this article mentions. He doesn't want to talk about it, because he and his rich buddies want amnesty. They want amnesty for illegal criminal aliens, because they make all the profits from these criminal's cheap labor. The American people should push for enforcement reform, and border security, and that's it. We shouldn't let Obama pass the Senate's amnesty bill and we shouldn't allow Boehner to continue to grant the amnesty they've enjoyed either, by doing nothing. Impeach Obama and Boehner today.
#20405 Jul 31, 2013
So let's see,
your post is a nail in my coffin because a report that has been touted as being from the APA was later refuted by the APA, and the original report is no longer available to see EXACTLY what it said, and your link leads to nothing. And for the record I've never endorsed pedophilia, but it's a well known fact that Right Wing Whackos consistently score low in comprehension.
Since: Nov 12
#20406 Jul 31, 2013
Because whether or not the quotes referenced were from the same report, they, in essence, say the same thing and the second was clearly linked. You are really grasping at straws here and it is pretty evident to anyone who has bothered to follow these posts.
#20407 Jul 31, 2013
So after all the babble you put out, you now say you don't endorse.
Glad you see it our way and now that you have.....
here's the link..
You'll see the APA was sucker punched by Rind and others.
#20408 Jul 31, 2013
All of them get big money from special interest, i.e. national Chamber of Commerce, big corporations, big time libroid billionaires.
Us little guys can only bi**h and vote.
I'm not voting for anyone presently in office from now on.
#20410 Jul 31, 2013
Evident to me, but he has posted he does not endorse pedophilia. That's the best we'll get out of him, other than he'll try to make some other argument about it.
#20411 Jul 31, 2013
I doesn't matter who's in office, or how they vote. If law enforcement aren't allowed to do their job, by the Federal Government. Then nothing will ever change. All these rich Republicans that blame Obama for everything only enable Obama. They need to look in the mirror and realize Americans aren't stupid. That's why nobody wants to hear anything bad about Obama, because, we know they could stop illegal immigration, as well as, alot of other problems. If.... They would talk with their big business friends to stop hiring illegal criminal aliens and stop sending jobs overseas. If they did that, the rich Democrats would have no choice, but to follow their lead. We have no leaders in Washington willing to lead. It's all about profits. Period. On both sides of the isle. This is where the american people need to step in. We are what makes the USA the greatest country on Earth. Not them.
Correct me if I'm wrong somebody, but the numbers on the Dow exchange reflect profit and not jobs in America? Wouldn't the sending jobs overseas and bringing mexicans in the USA, all for cheap labor, boost profits? In return, boost the numbers on the Dow exchange? So that tells me, in my mind, that the higher the Dow jones exchange numbers rise, the fewer jobs for Americans there actually are, and more profits for the rich. If that's the case, then that right there, would show that Obama is the worst President in history. He needs and this inactive Congress needs, to be wiped from the history books. They are destroying this country. Impeach Obama, Boehner and arrest Harry Reid today. Please pray for America. I approve this message. ;)
#20412 Jul 31, 2013
#20413 Jul 31, 2013
I know, like serial killers who cannot control their compulsions blame the police for not catching them sooner,
Right Wing Wackos knows their policies destroy America, and want to blame us Normal Americans for not stopping them.
Thanks to you Right Wing Wackos, I had no choice.
It was either vote for Obama , a Right Winger with a brain, or vote for McCain, a clueless Right Wing Wacko or Romney, an evil Right Wing Wacko.
As a registered Republican, I dream of the day we throw the Right Wing Wackos aside, and nominate a Normal American.
#20414 Jul 31, 2013
Your misplaced rage towards Republicans, because of that criminal Bush, is only taking the spotlight off of his evil twin, Obama. Try to focus on what's going on now. All these laws, that Bush put into effect, that were against our rights and freedoms. Obama has continued and even took them even farther to the extreme. He now wants to give crimnals, from another country amnesty, to continue to breakk our laws worse. While we are put in prison for the same offenses. I was hoping he'd put a end to the mexican drug cartels, by legalizing marijuana. Instead, he uped marijuana to a Scedule 1 narcotic, the same class that Heroin is in. Scedule 1 narcotics are reserved for drugs that have no proven or documented medical use. WTF? They control this, by the FDA. I wonder does Obama know that hundreds of doctors prescribe it everyday in this country? Of course he does. If he loves black americans so much. Then why is stiffening the penalty, for a crime. That has been proven, to target young black males more than anybody? He did this so Americans would get longer sentences, to discourage them from cutting into his buudies(Congress and the mexican drug cartel) profits. The CIA, DEA, and other government bodies make billion every year, off the sell of narcotics, and the imprisonment of Americans that sell it. The illegal drug trade for them, will stop, if the border is secure. That is why Boehner is stalling, by working on little bills, that the President will never even look at. While the President is making the most unharmful drugs, that fuel his buddies profits, more illegal, for only Americans. They are in this together. The only way to ever make Bush Pay for his crimes, is to start by, holding the current Admistration accountable.(IMO) They will all turn on each other then and bring each other down.(IMO) Remember, Obama is the one spyin on your phone records and Email, because he wants to lockup American citizens, and replace them with illegal criminal aliens. He wants us to work for free, on a chaingang. Ya know?
#20415 Jul 31, 2013
If me, and alot Americans wouldn't have voted for him, because he was black, and could give good speeches, and were more interested in the greater good of this Country. We would have pushed for Ron Paul for President. I didn't, because I thought it was time we had a black president. I thought he could end racism and lead us to real change and equality. Instead, he looks at americans, both black and whites, as infidels to his religion, In our own country. He wants to convert, replace, or imprison us and turn this into a Islamic nation. I think Obama is scary smart and if he was on our side, we would have seen change, that poor Americans, so desparately needed. It's heartbreaking to know he is the enemy and a real cracka at heart. It is to me anyway. Impeach Obama today.
#20416 Jul 31, 2013
Let me be the peace maker here.
As required, we'll turn the other cheek, love our enemy, and forgive others who trespass against us.
But I have to ask, I'm confused, is your complaint she accused you of "using" the terms, or accused you of "being" the terms.
If the complaint is the former, that's really not worth much outrage. If its the latter, you're still a saint compared with what I've been accused of here on TOPIX.
But hey, go with it if it makes you happy. Like 'Ol Rushbo says, "Outrage is always entertaining."
#20417 Jul 31, 2013
I know it's politically incorrect,
but if one of my good-looking female high school teachers enticed me to engage in sexual activity with her, and gave me great grades too, I sure wouldn't have complained.
But hey... Maybe I am just still a 90's kind of guy.
#20418 Jul 31, 2013
Better said, with your track record of Right Wing Wacko lunacy, who are you to lecture to anyone, anytime, anywhere, about anything ?
#20419 Jul 31, 2013
Debating Right Wingers is like watching "Animal House" where Otter chastises Greg Marmalard for attacking the United States of America.
But you can't hold a whole fraternity responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted individuals.
For if you do, then shouldn't we blame the whole fraternity system?
And if the whole fraternity system is guilty, then isn't this an indictment of our educational institutions in general?
I put it to you, Greg - isn't this an indictment of our entire American society?
Well, you can do whatever you want to us, but I for one am not going to stand here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America.
#20420 Jul 31, 2013
Ya know, they say the apple doesn't fall to far the tree.:) To bad American Citizens, can't hide their family tree and birth certificate, like Obama. Yee-haw. LoL. Senator Reid is a liar and a thief. His grandpappy would be proud. Ya think?
#20421 Jul 31, 2013
I'm sorry that was Reid's uncle in the above post. LoL.
#20422 Jul 31, 2013
Does your post make any sense to even you ?
The Rind et al. controversy was a debate in the scientific literature, public media, and government legislatures in the United States regarding a 1998 peer reviewed meta-analysis of the self-reported harm caused by child sexual abuse (CSA).
The study's lead author ...
controversially concluding that the harm caused by child sexual abuse was not necessarily intense or pervasive, that the prevailing construct of CSA was not scientifically valid, as it failed empirical verification, and that the psychological damage caused by the abusive encounters depends on other factors such as the degree of coercion or force involved.
Common sense rears its ugly head - a small child being severely beaten would be more harmful than a 16 year old having consensual sex with his 18 year old girlfriend.
The authors concluded that even though CSA may not result in lifelong, significant harm to all victims, this does not mean it is not morally wrong and indicated that their findings did not imply current moral and legal prohibitions against CSA should be changed.
More common sense - child abuse is bad - there's another shock.
Seven years after the publication of Rind et al.'s (1998) meta-analysis, Heather Marie Ulrich, with two colleagues, replicated the study in The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice and confirmed its main findings, although they did not endorse its authors' conclusions
( scientific confirmation - how horrible !
Uh oh - here come the Right Wing Wackos too stupid to understand the scientific method - or just seeking "Outrage !!!"
In March 1999, talk show host Laura Schlessinger criticized the study as "junk science" and stated that since its conclusions were contrary to conventional wisdom, its findings should never have been released.
She criticized the study's use of meta-analysis, saying. "I frankly have never seen this in general science.... This [pooling of studies] is so outrageous!" This was not a study! They didnât do a study! They arbitrarily found 59 studies that other people had done [and] combined them all."
The paper eventually provoked a reaction from several conservative American members of Congress, notably the Republican representatives Matt Salmon of Arizona and Tom DeLay of Texas, who both condemned the study as advocating for the normalization of pedophilia.
In the process Delay confused the American Psychological Association with the American Psychiatric Association, an error also made by Schlessinger.
Right Wing Wacko morons.
In September 1999 the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), upon a request by the APA to independently review the article, stated that it saw no reason to second-guess the peer review process that approved it initially and that it saw no evidence of improper methodology or questionable practices by the authors.
The AAAS also expressed concern that the materials reviewed demonstrated a grave lack of understanding of the study on the part of the media and politicians and were also concerned about the misrepresentation of its findings.
Right Wing Wackos misunderstood - what a surprise.
In August 2000, the APA drafted and adopted a position statement in response to the Rind et al. controversy that opposed any efforts to censor controversial or surprising research findings and asserting that researchers must be free to investigate and report findings as long as the research has been conducted within appropriate ethical and research standards.
Right Wingers - are they really that stupid ?
Add your comments below
|The Billy Crowder Case (Mar '12)||Aug 18||lpotporme||126|
|Jones murder case re-opened (May '08)||Jul '16||A on looker||8|
|Bert Guy||May '16||camden man||2|
|Good/Bad areas in Hinesville (Sep '09)||Apr '16||Ceci||11|
|Ludowici woman denied bond again (Aug '07)||Feb '16||Dallas Brennan||87|
|Looking for male CKC German Shepherd to breed w... (Dec '14)||Feb '16||JakeandTasha||2|
|McDonalds in Ludowici (Apr '06)||Dec '15||pondscogin||17|
Find what you want!
Search Ludowici Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC