BS IS Called

Dallas, TX

#17690 Jul 9, 2013
Who wrote:
<quoted text>
And temps have no benefits of any kind, and are glad if they get the money promised on time.
But Obamacare will force them to buy their own benefits.
Who

Clarkesville, GA

#17691 Jul 9, 2013
BS IS Called wrote:
<quoted text>
But Obamacare will force them to buy their own benefits.

And many will probably not buy into it. They are already strapped for money and it's a lot cheaper to do without Obamacare than to have it. Which is more important? to buy food, pay the mortgage or rent, pay daily living bills, OR buy Obamacare at 3 times the cost of what they would pay as a penalty.


Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#17692 Jul 9, 2013
danger zone wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
I hope whoever it was arguing about this, just a week or so ago, reads this. They went on & on about how welfare recipients DO NOT out number private sector workers... Good grief, what planet do they post from?
Yeah that discussion revealed that public sector workers didn't count as contributing workers, gotta watch how those statements are parsed.
danger zone

Marietta, GA

#17693 Jul 9, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah that discussion revealed that public sector workers didn't count as contributing workers, gotta watch how those statements are parsed.
I knew it was you, Oh my. rotfl
You'll SAY anything.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#17694 Jul 9, 2013
danger zone wrote:
The media buries the Obamacare trainwreck.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/347071/s...
But, but, but IO told us not 10 or so posts back that the media is Right Wing. You mean IO is WRONG????????

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#17695 Jul 9, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
That's an easy one.
First, the survey says that uninsured are certain they'll buy insurance -- that doesn't mean they won't have to pay fines to help be responsible for their health care costs.
That's what seems to drive Right Winger mad, that those who don't obtain insurance are taxed and fined to cover the costs of their irresponsibility.
So, either way, we get them insured or they are forced to pay toward their costs and I am relieved to some extent of supporting their freeloading deadbeat butts.
But further.
Why would we want to let "the perfect" be the enemy of "the possible" ?
If we have 40 millions uninsured freeloading deadbeats who for force you and I to pay their medical costs because they want to spend their money on ATVs, PBR, or Mad Dog 20/20;
... and we pass a law that takes at least 10,000,000 of them and makes them be responsible adults;
... We should just give up because the law isn't perfect enough to force all freeloading deadbeats to pay their own way;
.... Instead we should throw our the law because it's not perfect enough to stop all freeloading deadbeats from being, at least partial, freeloading deadbeats ?
Here's my question -
Why are Right Wingers,(who claim to be all about personal responsibility), so outraged that freeloading deadbeats might be forced to be responsible for their own health care costs ?
There can be only two answers:
1- Right Wingers really don't give a damn about personal responsibly,
or
2- Right Wingers are the freeloading deadbeats.
If there is a third answer let me know.
I realize it is a waste of time, but what the hey, the laundry can wait.

"That's what seems to drive Right Winger mad, that those who don't obtain insurance are taxed and fined to cover the costs of their irresponsibility." "Right Wingers are the freeloading deadbeats."

These are perfect examples of why your posts are not taken seriously. Those of us on the Right are the ones buying insurance and taking responsibility for our own lives and contributing to charities with both our time and our money and yet your arguments constantly substitute RW for the place where lib/dem belong be it in not paying taxes, not paying for their own healthcare,
or whatever rant you are on for the moment.
The same way you try to claim Obama is right wing rather than acknowledging that is he is arguably the most left wing president we have ever had.

=======
It isn't a question of waiting for "the perfect" rather than trying "the possible" - it is a question of ignoring the "possible and logical" and instead instituting the "bureaucratic and unworkable" - as evidenced by the delay in the employer mandate.

========
To answer your question, which you once again worded in a deliberately misleading fashion:

We on the right would not be outraged at all if "freeloading deadbeats" were actually forced to take responsibility. But that was not/is not/never was the goal of Obamacare. The goal of Obamacare was/is/always will be to eventually force our country in to a single payer system with the government controlling our health care system to the detriment of us all.

Which takes me back to the question you keep ignoring:
If Obamacare is so great and will be so wonderful for the country, why - after having 3 years to get it running - is Obama delaying a major foundation of Obamacare, the employer mandate, until after the election?
Who

Clarkesville, GA

#17696 Jul 9, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah that discussion revealed that public sector workers didn't count as contributing workers, gotta watch how those statements are parsed.

Maybe Oh my can tell us how many public sector workers there are in america.
Who

Clarkesville, GA

#17697 Jul 9, 2013
or maybe not.
Who

Clarkesville, GA

#17698 Jul 9, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
But, but, but IO told us not 10 or so posts back that the media is Right Wing. You mean IO is WRONG????????

Naw- he just got into ugly Eve's stash.
OMTE

Ford City, PA

#17699 Jul 9, 2013
danger zone wrote:
<quoted text>
The duped ones ACTUALLY believe Obama cares about them. Just like those poor uneducated, low information voters from Ghettoland & da hood. Astounding!
You need to watch you mouth. You're about dumb as they come. You have no room to talk about anyone. Ya dumb b*T*h.
James

Blue Ridge, GA

#17700 Jul 9, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
I was just scrolling through the web and found this interesting article about prison inmates that are on a hunger strike. Seems to me that the prisons should just start preparing only one meal a day for them in case they start to change their minds. Think how much money the taxpayers would save feeding those criminals. The prisoners would be trying to riot if the prisons cut off the prisoners normal food rations. I guess it matters who thought of this idea.
Seems that the inmates want to run the prisons, not the other way around. I doubt there are many people that care if they starve themselves to death.
I say let them hunger strike as long as they want because I don't care. Treat these people for what they are. Criminals that are being punished.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-ff-pr...
There really should be a minimum I.Q. Requirement to post ,to keep this stuff off here. But I do believe In our 1st amendment rights no matter how low a I.Q. Some have
OMTE

Ford City, PA

#17701 Jul 9, 2013
James wrote:
<quoted text>
There really should be a minimum I.Q. Requirement to post ,to keep this stuff off here. But I do believe In our 1st amendment rights no matter how low a I.Q. Some have
What is your I.Q.? Do you realize how contradicting you just sounded? Just askin.
danger zone

Decatur, GA

#17702 Jul 9, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>You need to watch you mouth. You're about dumb as they come. You have no room to talk about anyone. Ya dumb b*T*h.
I suppose you can say whatever you please, whenever you please. I didn't say I don't care about them...I clearly said OBAMA doesn't care about them. Good grief, your mouth is worse than any on this forum, bar none. You like us then you hate us, you like us, then you hate us. You hate Mexicans & you hate gays, but we're suppose to give you a pass???? Grow up..... and may I remind you, I've never told anyone, I'd like to kill them.
OMTE

Ford City, PA

#17703 Jul 9, 2013
danger zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose you can say whatever you please, whenever you please. I didn't say I don't care about them...I clearly said OBAMA doesn't care about them. Good grief, your mouth is worse than any on this forum, bar none. You like us then you hate us, you like us, then you hate us. You hate Mexicans & you hate gays, but we're suppose to give you a pass???? Grow up..... and may I remind you, I've never told anyone, I'd like to kill them.
I have never liked you hun. You're stupid. Period. I don't hate anyone moron. Well maybe Bill and you. You got give me sh*t. Dummy. I don't need a pass from you. You really are stupid. Ain't ya? You start with your stupid a$$ name callin and I finish it with mine. There is nothin you can do to stop it, just as there's nothing I can do to stop you. So don't start the name callin and there won't be any. Understand? When have I said I'd like to kill anyone?
danger zone

Decatur, GA

#17705 Jul 9, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I have never liked you hun. You're stupid. Period. I don't hate anyone moron. Well maybe Bill and you. You got give me sh*t. Dummy. I don't need a pass from you. You really are stupid. Ain't ya? You start with your stupid a$$ name callin and I finish it with mine. There is nothin you can do to stop it, just as there's nothing I can do to stop you. So don't start the name callin and there won't be any. Understand? When have I said I'd like to kill anyone?
Don't start with the name calling?? Now that's so stupid, it's stupid. You beat me to the punch, dude.
OMTE

Ford City, PA

#17706 Jul 9, 2013
danger zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't start with the name calling?? Now that's so stupid, it's stupid. You beat me to the punch, dude.
Maybe you're right. I just didn't like what you said. Sorry. I'll go back to ignoring you.
James

Blue Ridge, GA

#17707 Jul 9, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>What is your I.Q.? Do you realize how contradicting you just sounded? Just askin.
My I.Q. Is far lower than I would like it to be. As for the statement about starving poisoners to save money I don't think the 1$ per day we currently spend to feed them is as much of a taxpayer burden as the 75,000 per year it cost to incarcerate them. Now as for starving them to death to save money once again we run into trouble as there would be a million lawyers fileing wrongfull death law suites, plobably starting around a million dollars per inmate for older inmates starved to death and much more for younger inmates as they lost more of there life. And to sum all this up the statement made was just cruel and inhumane to say the least
OMTE

Ford City, PA

#17708 Jul 9, 2013
James wrote:
<quoted text>
My I.Q. Is far lower than I would like it to be. As for the statement about starving poisoners to save money I don't think the 1$ per day we currently spend to feed them is as much of a taxpayer burden as the 75,000 per year it cost to incarcerate them. Now as for starving them to death to save money once again we run into trouble as there would be a million lawyers fileing wrongfull death law suites, plobably starting around a million dollars per inmate for older inmates starved to death and much more for younger inmates as they lost more of there life. And to sum all this up the statement made was just cruel and inhumane to say the least
You have to ignore Dave sometimes. He's special.*smilin* Ya know?
Who

Clarkesville, GA

#17709 Jul 9, 2013
Moonbean deomcrats propose new National Park----------on the Moon.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/09/ho...

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#17710 Jul 9, 2013
James wrote:
<quoted text>
My I.Q. Is far lower than I would like it to be. As for the statement about starving poisoners to save money I don't think the 1$ per day we currently spend to feed them is as much of a taxpayer burden as the 75,000 per year it cost to incarcerate them. Now as for starving them to death to save money once again we run into trouble as there would be a million lawyers fileing wrongfull death law suites, plobably starting around a million dollars per inmate for older inmates starved to death and much more for younger inmates as they lost more of there life. And to sum all this up the statement made was just cruel and inhumane to say the least
I was wondering about your previous post. Now I understand. You thought I said that we should starve the prisoners. No, that is no where near what I said. The prisoners are on hunger strike. There are 33,000 of them making demands or they won't eat. You don't understand what you read.
I have had my IQ tested 2 different times by 2 different credible organizations and I know what my IQ is. It is plenty high enough that I am not ashamed of it. I bet it is much higher than yours. It is high enough that I have no emotional need to go around bragging about it.
I still don't care if they want to starve themselves or not. They shouldn't be demanding anything as they are in prison to be punished. They broke societies rules so they should abide by the prison's rules.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Ludowici Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jesup man accused of robbing, murdering woman a... 1 hr pjot 1
Jesup man again found guilty of murdering mothe... 1 hr pjot 1
Men Wearing Thongs (Sep '08) Tue 19thongman 244
GA Who do you support for Governor in Georgia in 2... (Oct '10) Tue tammy101 2,072
Review: Clyde's Market #64 Sep 28 Nita 1
local business Sep 27 a jesup customer 1
Scientific Evidence Proves Ebola Is Airborne Sep 26 Up close and pers... 5
Ludowici Dating
Find my Match

Ludowici Jobs

Ludowici People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Ludowici News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Ludowici

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]