How can you write the drivel you write? Do you have no comprehension at all of the article you posted?
"Ultimately, the intent of the sequester was to secure the commitment of both sides to future negotiation by means of an enforcement mechanism that would be unpalatable to Republicans and Democrats alike."
Read that again. Try to understand what it means. Then follow-up on the negotiations that took place to prevent it.
It means it was Obama's idea and he has abided by it, by not presenting a budget in 4 years.
So when repubs say sequestation is Obama's bag, they are correct, so how can you say otherwise?