Should child sex offenders be able to...

Should child sex offenders be able to live in trailer parks around children?

Posted in the Lucedale Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Scoop

Pinola, MS

#1 Feb 25, 2010
These are just a couple of people now living in trailer parks among children. Do the owners know or care?

http://www.sor.mdps.state.ms.us/sorpublic/hps...

Name: LORRI DANETA RETZLAFF

Date of Photo: 12/2/2009
Race: Black
Sex: Female
Date of Birth: 6/11/1978
Height: 5 ft 10 inches
Weight: 350 lbs
Eye Color: Brown
Hair Color: Black
Address:

176 HWY 198 WEST LOT 26
LUCEDALE, MS 39452
GEORGE County

Aliases: CLORRISA RETZLAFF, FLOWER RETZLAFF, LORRI FOWLER, NIGHT FLOWER RETZLAFF

Brazos TX 7/27/1998 AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT CHILD/Any other offense committed in another state for which registration is required in that state

Name: LINDY DALE AMMONS JR

Date of Photo: 1/27/2010
Race: White
Sex: Male
Date of Birth: 8/24/1972
Height: 6 ft 1 inches
Weight: 200 lbs
Eye Color:Hazel
Hair Color:Brown
Address:

2213 HWY 63 SOUTH LOT 1
LUCEDALE, MS 39452

GEORGE County

Aliases: LUNDY DALE AMMONS

Mobile AL 12/10/1997 SEXUAL ABUSE 1ST DEGREE/Any other offense committed in another state for which registration is required in that state
Mobile AL 12/10/1997 SEXUAL ABUSE 2ND DEGREE (2 COUNTS)Any other offense committed in another state for which registration is required in that state
Mobile AL 12/10/1997 SODOMY 2ND DEGREE ( 2 COUNTS)Any other offense committed in another state for which registration is required in that state
mentul_autocrat

Meadville, MS

#2 Feb 25, 2010
looks like lundy needs casturated, not even living outside of a prison. but i dont know all the facts
mentul_autocrat

Meadville, MS

#3 Feb 25, 2010
and no to the question.
I SHOULD KNOW

Petal, MS

#4 Feb 25, 2010
My only thought is what young man would screw around with a 350-pound woman???
mentul_autocrat

Meadville, MS

#5 Feb 26, 2010
must have been winter isk.
_N0_N33D_T0_T33L _

Huntersville, NC

#6 Feb 26, 2010
I SHOULD KNOW wrote:
My only thought is what young man would screw around with a 350-pound woman???
Lord jesus christ i cant even see myself getting that drunk to make this big black spook look good lmfao
mentul_autocrat

Meadville, MS

#7 Feb 26, 2010
teel, looks like that woman make you like it ffs
mentul_autocrat

Meadville, MS

#8 Feb 26, 2010
loni marie folks could sexually batter me i wouldnt report her honest.
Scoop

Pinola, MS

#9 Feb 26, 2010
I SHOULD KNOW wrote:
My only thought is what young man would screw around with a 350-pound woman???
Maybe he didn't, just couldn't fight or get loose from her.
_N0_N33D_T0_T33L _

Lake, MS

#10 Feb 26, 2010
mentul_autocrat wrote:
teel, looks like that woman make you like it ffs
Oh hell nooooooooooooooo lol
mentul_autocrat

Meadville, MS

#11 Feb 26, 2010
lmaoooooo teel
_N0_N33D_T0_T33L _

Richland, MS

#12 Mar 5, 2010
I want to know i had somebody tell me is was ok for a underage girl to talk to grown thugs that talks about putting there big black meat to her all the nasty shit one person said its just the internet theres nothing wrong with it ISK,WWK SCOOP,MENTUL yall let me know what to do on this one the one that told me this has got me in shock thanks if yall can help
Jacker 66

Austin, TX

#13 Mar 5, 2010
_N0_N33D_T0_T33L_ wrote:
I want to know i had somebody tell me is was ok for a underage girl to talk to grown thugs that talks about putting there big black meat to her all the nasty shit one person said its just the internet theres nothing wrong with it ISK,WWK SCOOP,MENTUL yall let me know what to do on this one the one that told me this has got me in shock thanks if yall can help
How old are you and how old is he?
_N0_N33D_T0_T33L _

Richland, MS

#14 Mar 5, 2010
Jacker 66 wrote:
<quoted text>
How old are you and how old is he?
Im not the one doing it i know a underage girl that grown men was talking shit to and this one man said its ok because it was just internet
I SHOULD KNOW

Petal, MS

#15 Mar 5, 2010
Don't worry, one day that guy will be featured on, "To Catch A Predator" LOL.
Scoop

United States

#16 Mar 5, 2010
This is kind of weak, I admit. It depends on the situation and people she chooses to associate with. Plus intent is difficult to prove.

§ 97-5-33. Exploitation of children; prohibitions.

(1) No person shall, by any means including computer, cause, solicit or knowingly permit any child to engage in sexually explicit conduct or in the simulation of sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct.

(2) No person shall, by any means including computer, photograph, film, video tape or otherwise depict or record a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct or in the simulation of sexually explicit conduct.

(3) No person shall, by any means including computer, knowingly send, transport, transmit, ship, mail or receive any photograph, drawing, sketch, film, video tape or other visual depiction of an actual child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

(4) No person shall, by any means including computer, receive with intent to distribute, distribute for sale, sell or attempt to sell in any manner any photograph, drawing, sketch, film, video tape or other visual depiction of an actual child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

(5) No person shall, by any means including computer, possess any photograph, drawing, sketch, film, video tape or other visual depiction of an actual child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

(6) No person shall, by any means including computer, knowingly entice, induce, persuade, seduce, solicit, advise, coerce, or order a child to meet with the defendant or any other person for the purpose of engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

(7) No person shall by any means, including computer, knowingly entice, induce, persuade, seduce, solicit, advise, coerce or order a child to produce any visual depiction of adult sexual conduct or any sexually explicit conduct.

(8) The fact that an undercover operative or law enforcement officer posed as a child or was involved in any other manner in the detection and investigation of an offense under this section shall not constitute a defense to a prosecution under this section.

(9) For purposes of determining jurisdiction, the offense is committed in this state if all or part of the conduct described in this section occurs in the State of Mississippi or if the transmission that constitutes the offense either originates in this state or is received in this state.

Sources: Laws, 1979, ch. 479,§ 2; Laws, 1988, ch. 558; Laws, 1995, ch. 484,§ 2; Laws, 2003, ch. 562,§ 2; Laws, 2005, ch. 467,§ 1; Laws, 2005, ch. 491,§ 1; Laws, 2007, ch. 376,§ 1, eff from and after July 1, 2007.
_N0_N33D_T0_T33L _

Lake, MS

#17 Mar 5, 2010
Scoop wrote:
This is kind of weak, I admit. It depends on the situation and people she chooses to associate with. Plus intent is difficult to prove.
§ 97-5-33. Exploitation of children; prohibitions.
(1) No person shall, by any means including computer, cause, solicit or knowingly permit any child to engage in sexually explicit conduct or in the simulation of sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct.
(2) No person shall, by any means including computer, photograph, film, video tape or otherwise depict or record a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct or in the simulation of sexually explicit conduct.
(3) No person shall, by any means including computer, knowingly send, transport, transmit, ship, mail or receive any photograph, drawing, sketch, film, video tape or other visual depiction of an actual child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
(4) No person shall, by any means including computer, receive with intent to distribute, distribute for sale, sell or attempt to sell in any manner any photograph, drawing, sketch, film, video tape or other visual depiction of an actual child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
(5) No person shall, by any means including computer, possess any photograph, drawing, sketch, film, video tape or other visual depiction of an actual child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
(6) No person shall, by any means including computer, knowingly entice, induce, persuade, seduce, solicit, advise, coerce, or order a child to meet with the defendant or any other person for the purpose of engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
(7) No person shall by any means, including computer, knowingly entice, induce, persuade, seduce, solicit, advise, coerce or order a child to produce any visual depiction of adult sexual conduct or any sexually explicit conduct.
(8) The fact that an undercover operative or law enforcement officer posed as a child or was involved in any other manner in the detection and investigation of an offense under this section shall not constitute a defense to a prosecution under this section.
(9) For purposes of determining jurisdiction, the offense is committed in this state if all or part of the conduct described in this section occurs in the State of Mississippi or if the transmission that constitutes the offense either originates in this state or is received in this state.
Sources: Laws, 1979, ch. 479,§ 2; Laws, 1988, ch. 558; Laws, 1995, ch. 484,§ 2; Laws, 2003, ch. 562,§ 2; Laws, 2005, ch. 467,§ 1; Laws, 2005, ch. 491,§ 1; Laws, 2007, ch. 376,§ 1, eff from and after July 1, 2007.
thanks scoop
Scoop

United States

#19 Mar 5, 2010
There may be some obscure law about the incident that a lawyer may know about. I have an idea that it would be a mean and expensive deal thru the courts though. Wish I could do better.
Scoop

United States

#20 Mar 6, 2010
§ 97-29-47. Profanity or drunkenness in public place.

If any person shall profanely swear or curse, or use vulgar and indecent language, or be drunk in any public place, in the presence of two (2) or more persons, he shall, on conviction thereof, be fined not more than one hundred dollars ($100.00) or be imprisoned in the county jail not more than thirty (30) days or both.

Sources: Codes, Hutchinson's 1848, ch. 64, art. 4(1); 1857, ch. 64, art. 340; 1871,§ 2833; 1880,§ 2974; 1892,§ 1219; 1906,§ 1295; Hemingway's 1917,§ 1028; 1930,§ 1059; 1942,§ 2291; Laws, 1912, ch. 212; Laws, 1971, ch. 448,§ 2, eff from and after passage (approved March 25, 1971).
One who cares

Chandler, AZ

#21 Mar 23, 2010
The answer is hell no.
Because these offenders are liars and manipulators. They will take their time and gain the child's trust before they take advantage of them. Then they make them ashamed and afraid to tell.
They may even become "friends" with the family to fool everyone and have access to the children.
If you are a neighbor of Lindy Ammons Jr be aware that it would not be your daughter that he is interested in, it's your SON. Lindy plead guilty to molesting 3 young boys in Mobile.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Lucedale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
George countian dies in car wreck, others injured (Feb '10) Jun 17 will_get_your_azz 72
Building Permit (Jan '11) Jun 12 Ponderosa1969 10
Car cranking Jun 4 Bullhauler 1
Cost of a Septic Tank in Lucedale (Feb '12) May 28 Kimberly 11
News Photos: People seen at Donald Trump rally in Bi... May '16 AIPAC owns Trump 5
The Times They Are A Changing May '16 busting on homo l... 3
Debate: Gay Marriage - Lucedale, MS (Jul '10) Apr '16 busta_without_the... 221
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Lucedale Mortgages