Interesting and helpful. As of yet there is insufficient data on Snowdon. Personally have worked in many areas where we had to have secret clearance or authorized access. What I came across I could understand the need for maintaining strict discrepancy. Observe some of the loose threads on just this one thread!! LOLThe basic understanding the concept of behavior has not been understood by radicals.
Because there are growing too many extremists as they only know how to break rules and International ruling and Universal law, such as forcing out the UN WMD inspection and going forced bombing Iraq, in addition to do crazy droning without clear evidences by playing the big brother (while some acts are criminal), these are facts of the symbol of radicalism.
""""" """"Relate d to the example of Snowden case, Snowden said he wanted to live a in a country of liberty.""" """"" ""
"modern world with many beliefs and ""Thus, HE WOULD BE VIEWED A DEFECTOR when he spoke of such."""
In regard to this, when some keep calling him as fugitive, but they still have to comply with rules as if they are so backward to not know living in a diversities of ideology, to abide to the realization in the understanding of logic and rules. That is why it is easy to generate the outlaws in that way with lots of extremism, like still living in the old wild west. How can radicals come to make calls then?
WHEN SOMEONE SAYS HE/SHE WANTS TO LIVE IN A COUNTRY OF LIBERTY AND FREEDOM RIGHTS, HOW FREEDOM LIBERTY COMES ABOUT AND EXISTS IN WHICHEVER COUNTRIES IS ACCORDING TO THAT SOMEONE WHO SAYS WANTING LIBERTY.
THAT MEANS, WHILE A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE FEEL THEY HAVE LIBERTY IN US, yet SNOWDEN OR SOME OTHERS DO NOT. Thus, as how he thinks, Snowden has freed himself to Russia when Russia says it would give him asylum and hence Snowden is the defector, whereby Uncle Sam has no case to present to Russia.
Some call Snowden as a traitor. He worked for a private contractor firm and was not a direct government worker, despite his work involved in the matters of interests to the government. That is somewhat different than bureaucrats, department heads, FBI, military personnel, etc., where a lot of them have done lots of calling policies or giving information to others to gain valuable technology, such as satellite and radar technology given away from Clinton--whereas this gives the disadvantage and imbalance of US military stand that can cause US damage. Therefore, Snowden might have breached the firm's contract and yet he had data from the work he was in regarding government snooping programs. But then, for any breach he had committed, that was not as serious as the direct government people, including policy makers, and uniform people from military to policemen and so on, if they ever break rules.
Have to say, to maintain the liberty, for even these loose threads, its best they do not have all the facts. LOL they can’t even handle the simple facts that are public. Most here are just interested in presenting a comment to achieve their goal by any means. Why they even edit words from articles or studies to satisfy their “Beliefs‘”. Can you believe that?
Its best the depth of truth be kept very shallow for these loose threads. LOL they could never be able to comprehend or handle the real truth. Most are color blind, others have no conceptions of the various shades of truth. Simple folks that prefer the old Black and White T.V.’s of yesteryear where we always knew the good guy wears a white hat… Good for chuckles and amusing…