Appeals Court rules on Fort Hill

Appeals Court rules on Fort Hill

There are 1 comment on the Cleveland Daily Banner story from Jun 6, 2011, titled Appeals Court rules on Fort Hill. In it, Cleveland Daily Banner reports that:

The Court of Appeals at Knoxville ruled Betty Saint Rogers did not prove intentional infliction of emotional distress by Fort Hill Cemetery owner Joe V. Williams III and Louisville Land Company in a case that has been in Bradley County courts since 2004.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Cleveland Daily Banner.

intentional distress

Secaucus, NJ

#1 Jun 17, 2011
If you know you are distressing someone (while breaking the law, which "Louisville land Co. and Joe V. Williams was doing), then the distress is intentional.

What's to prove?

The cemetery was supposed to be maintained, it was not. Complaints were made and ignored, INTENTIONALLY and WILLFULLY.

I hope they have a retrial.

And stalling til things are supposedly forgotten is so lame. THAT should be illegal.

http://www.swafford-swoffordfamiliesofamerica...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Louisville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Blue eyed blonde long hair fun party girl 2 hr Info 1
surveillance drones flying over knox and other ... (Mar '13) 3 hr Cat Woman 58
Shooting on Whittle Springs Rd 11 hr Rudy Kipyard 4
News Problems With Some Patients At Mid-State Pain C... (Aug '09) 22 hr vbrown 325
Roads closings for bike races WHY??? Mon Charity Fraud 7
Another Fatal Stabbing on Knoxville Greenway :( Sun What a waist 36
cheaters!! (May '11) Mar '17 Tracy 8

Louisville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Louisville Mortgages