Appeals Court rules on Fort Hill

Appeals Court rules on Fort Hill

There are 1 comment on the Cleveland Daily Banner story from Jun 6, 2011, titled Appeals Court rules on Fort Hill. In it, Cleveland Daily Banner reports that:

The Court of Appeals at Knoxville ruled Betty Saint Rogers did not prove intentional infliction of emotional distress by Fort Hill Cemetery owner Joe V. Williams III and Louisville Land Company in a case that has been in Bradley County courts since 2004.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Cleveland Daily Banner.

intentional distress

Secaucus, NJ

#1 Jun 17, 2011
If you know you are distressing someone (while breaking the law, which "Louisville land Co. and Joe V. Williams was doing), then the distress is intentional.

What's to prove?

The cemetery was supposed to be maintained, it was not. Complaints were made and ignored, INTENTIONALLY and WILLFULLY.

I hope they have a retrial.

And stalling til things are supposedly forgotten is so lame. THAT should be illegal.


Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Louisville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Anyone in Knoxville voting for Lying Hillary Cl... 6 min Monica 17
Zach Tolley (Dec '15) 21 min Big B 11
News Our Stories: Michael Jackson comes to Knoxville (Feb '08) 1 hr Mom to Toby 87
Amanda Hara (Feb '15) 1 hr Karl Childers 26
Massage parlor next to papa Murphy's pizza (Sep '15) 1 hr Patron from the past 16
tennessee lottery for losers (Aug '12) 5 hr chell 39
News If Wal-Mart Can't Bring Manufacturing Back to A... 6 hr wormwood 10

Louisville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Louisville Mortgages