NY gun charges for Blount County woman

NY gun charges for Blount County woman

There are 155 comments on the Knoxville News Sentinel story from Dec 30, 2011, titled NY gun charges for Blount County woman. In it, Knoxville News Sentinel reports that:

LOUISVILLE, Tenn. - Neighbors of a Blount County woman arrested on a gun possession charge at the 9/11 memorial in New York City a few days before Christmas say they're shocked to hear of her arrest.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Knoxville News Sentinel.

First Prev
of 8
Next Last

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#1 Dec 30, 2011
A citizen with a handgun in the city of New York, is a lot like an escaped negro slave from the south during the days of slavery, LOL.

Like or not, it has been well know that the state of New York and The City of New York are anti gun communist collectives, well known.

"Local firearms instructors said they are shocked that someone who has taken the required training for a gun permit would not understand the importance of understanding the firearms laws of places in which they travel.

“I find it hard to believe,” said David Dukes, firearms instructor at Gunny’s in Maryville."

Since: Nov 11

Salt Lake City, UT

#2 Dec 30, 2011
Yet another reason for national reciprocity for licenses.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#3 Dec 30, 2011
duzitreallymatter wrote:
Yet another reason for national reciprocity for licenses.
Exactly, lets usurp the sovereignty of the states by making it a federal license so that the feds can dictate concealed permits, much like federalizing health care insurance instead of regulating it at the state level. While we're at it, why not federalize driver's licensing and marriage licenses, LOL.

“Now thats a tin hat!”

Since: Oct 07

Blue Ridge Mountains

#4 Dec 30, 2011
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly, lets usurp the sovereignty of the states by making it a federal license so that the feds can dictate concealed permits, much like federalizing health care insurance instead of regulating it at the state level. While we're at it, why not federalize driver's licensing and marriage licenses, LOL.
ehhhhhhhh, wrong answer bob,

How about the Feds enforce ALL rights and not let the states radomly violate them.

I guess with your reasoning, when Eisenhower called in the troops to make MS allow black kids to exercise their rights (go to white school) you felt they were violating the sovereignty of old Miss.

The states do not have the authority to violate the 2nd Amendment. Unfortunately, with enough people thinking like you, they have the power.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#5 Dec 30, 2011
ZigmunnDroid wrote:
<quoted text>

How about the Feds enforce ALL rights and not let the states radomly violate them.
Actully, concealed carry isn't a right, open carry is. Concealed carry is a state licensed privilege.

Since: Nov 11

Salt Lake City, UT

#6 Dec 30, 2011
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>Exactly, lets usurp the sovereignty of the states by making it a federal license so that the feds can dictate concealed permits, much like federalizing health care insurance instead of regulating it at the state level. While we're at it, why not federalize driver's licensing and marriage licenses, LOL.
We don't need to federalize any of them. There is already reciprocity for driver's licenses, there is already reciprocity for license plates, there is already reciprocity for marriage licenses, there is already reciprocity for vehicle insurance, etc.

Weapon carry (or ownership) is not mandated. Health insurance will be. your analogy is an apple and watermelon comparison.

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

#7 Dec 30, 2011
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>Actully, concealed carry isn't a right, open carry is. Concealed carry is a state licensed privilege.
WHERE in the U.S. Constitution, or in ~any~ of the Amending Articles, is there any statement regarding the method of carriage of arms mentioned?
.
PUT =>YOUR<= FINGER on that part.
.
You'll be doing that, won't you?
.

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

#8 Dec 30, 2011
duzitreallymatter wrote:
<quoted text>
We don't need to federalize any of them. There is already reciprocity for driver's licenses, there is already reciprocity for license plates, there is already reciprocity for marriage licenses, there is already reciprocity for vehicle insurance, etc.
Weapon carry (or ownership) is not mandated. Health insurance will be. your analogy is an apple and watermelon comparison.
"Health insurance will be."
.
No, it most certainly WILL =NOT= be!
.
There is NO enumerated power in the U.S. Constitution which authorises any such power as to mandate that the citizens ~must~ purchase anything, PERIOD.
.
No enumerated power? No legal or lawful ability to pursue.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#9 Dec 30, 2011
Highlander wrote:
<quoted text>
WHERE in the U.S. Constitution, or in ~any~ of the Amending Articles, is there any statement regarding the method of carriage of arms mentioned?
.
PUT =>YOUR<= FINGER on that part.
.
You'll be doing that, won't you?
.
The b1tch is going down, lol.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#10 Dec 30, 2011
duzitreallymatter wrote:
<quoted text>
We don't need to federalize any of them. There is already reciprocity for driver's licenses, there is already reciprocity for license plates, there is already reciprocity for marriage licenses, there is already reciprocity for vehicle insurance, etc.
Weapon carry (or ownership) is not mandated. Health insurance will be. your analogy is an apple and watermelon comparison.
Nope, you don't know what you're talking about. The feds cannot force states to accept other states concealed carry permits. As for license plates and driver's licenses, people have a right to drive, they don't have a right to concealed carry of weapons...only the bearing of them.

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

#11 Dec 30, 2011
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>The b1tch is going down, lol.
Yeah, YOU =ARE= going down.
.
Now, one again: WHERE in the U.S. Constitution, or in ~any~ of the Amending Articles, is there any statement regarding the method of carriage of arms mentioned?
.
PUT =>YOUR<= FINGER on that part.
.
You'll be doing that, won't you?

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

#12 Dec 30, 2011
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>Nope, you don't know what you're talking about. The feds cannot force states to accept other states concealed carry permits. As for license plates and driver's licenses, people have a right to drive, they don't have a right to concealed carry of weapons...only the bearing of them.
And once again: WHERE in the U.S. Constitution, or in ~any~ of the Amending Articles, is there any statement regarding the method of carriage of arms mentioned?
.
PUT =>YOUR<= FINGER on that part.
.
You'll be doing that, won't you?

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#13 Dec 30, 2011
Highlander wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, YOU =ARE= going down.
.
Now, one again: WHERE in the U.S. Constitution, or in ~any~ of the Amending Articles, is there any statement regarding the method of carriage of arms mentioned?
.
PUT =>YOUR<= FINGER on that part.
.
You'll be doing that, won't you?
Blount is going down, you whince and moan all you want, Blount is not coming back from her sentencing hearing.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#14 Dec 30, 2011
Highlander wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, YOU =ARE= going down.
.
Now, one again: WHERE in the U.S. Constitution, or in ~any~ of the Amending Articles, is there any statement regarding the method of carriage of arms mentioned?
.
PUT =>YOUR<= FINGER on that part.
.
You'll be doing that, won't you?
There's no concealed carry amendment, just a bearing of arms amendment, bearing is open carry...otherwise the states wouldn't have the right to regulate concealed carry, you dunce.

“Tu ne cede malis”

Since: Dec 06

Lots of different places

#15 Dec 30, 2011
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>There's no concealed carry amendment, just a bearing of arms amendment, bearing is open carry...otherwise the states wouldn't have the right to regulate concealed carry, you dunce.
.
ONCE AGAIN: WHERE — in the U.S. Constitution, or in ~any~ of the Amending Articles— is there =ANY= statement regarding the METHOD OF CARRIAGE of arms mentioned?
.
PUT =>YOUR<= FINGER on that part.
.
You'll be doing that, won't you?
.
So far =>YOU<= HAVE NOT!
.
Why not?
.
Could it be —would it be— Richard_, that you fully realise that your argument is without validity?
GUNSHOWHOHO

Thailand

#16 Dec 30, 2011
Highlander wrote:
<quoted text>
.
ONCE AGAIN: WHERE — in the U.S. Constitution, or in ~any~ of the Amending Articles— is there =ANY= statement regarding the METHOD OF CARRIAGE of arms mentioned?
.
PUT =>YOUR<= FINGER on that part.
.
You'll be doing that, won't you?
.
So far =>YOU<= HAVE NOT!
.
Why not?
.
Could it be —would it be— Richard_, that you fully realise that your argument is without validity?
Brother Highlander, stop putting your finger IN CAPS LOCK on the transsexual posters here. It makes you look silly.
Packin

Kilmichael, MS

#17 Dec 31, 2011
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>There's no concealed carry amendment, just a bearing of arms amendment, bearing is open carry...otherwise the states wouldn't have the right to regulate concealed carry, you dunce.
Oh you mean like California where you can only carry open but the gun must not be loaded? Their argument is you can bare arms but the constitution does not say you can have it loaded. Nowhere does "keep and bare" mean open. Open = open, keep =keep, bare = bare. The constitution does not give us those rights but recognizes we have them and tells the government HANDS OFF those rights.

Since: Nov 11

Salt Lake City, UT

#18 Dec 31, 2011
Richard_ wrote:
<quoted text>Nope, you don't know what you're talking about. The feds cannot force states to accept other states concealed carry permits. As for license plates and driver's licenses, people have a right to drive, they don't have a right to concealed carry of weapons...only the bearing of them.
SAY WHAT? Driving is a right? You may be correct but I have never seen driving documented as a right.

Can I bear my firearm in the front of my motorhome while driving in CA, NJ, NY, IL, et al? Don't think so (so I don't spend my money in these states). But if they honored my license to carry in those states like they did my driver's license, license plates...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#19 Dec 31, 2011
Packin wrote:
<quoted text> Oh you mean like California where you can only carry open but the gun must not be loaded? Their argument is you can bare arms but the constitution does not say you can have it loaded. Nowhere does "keep and bare" mean open. Open = open, keep =keep, bare = bare. The constitution does not give us those rights but recognizes we have them and tells the government HANDS OFF those rights.
Bear Arms... Not Bare Arms. Bear as in "To carry"... No place is it stipulated that the arms have to be openly displayed or can be concealed. Keep and Bear means that you have the right to own and carry...

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#20 Dec 31, 2011
duzitreallymatter wrote:
<quoted text>
SAY WHAT? Driving is a right? You may be correct but I have never seen driving documented as a right.
Yeah, driving for non commercial purpose is a right.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 8
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Louisville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
wbir/abby ham (Dec '11) 1 hr SnarkyMcD 237
News Knoxville tops list of high gas prices in Tenne... 3 hr ElDiablo 9
Knox County's 24 hour arrest and inmat populat... (Oct '12) 12 hr Hump Hammer 7
Married people who Cheat 17 hr Myth 7
DCS, Youth Villages, and others lie in court. (Apr '11) Fri Fedupwithkidsforcash 34
News TBI investigates missing records at Lenoir City... (Jan '11) Fri AIPAC is treason 116
Springfield tn police dept. (Jul '13) Fri etaylor1012 20

Louisville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Louisville Mortgages