First off, there should be some sort of regulations concerning news reporters/stations providing false or misleading information. The article has very litte truth to it and can be verified by Graingr County Courthouse if you'd like to check.
Truth is, yes Mr Coulter and Mr Farmer were both arrested, along with a third person that goes by "Fat Tony". They were NOT all charged with the same offences. AND these crimes alledgedly took place between 1 1/2 and 2 years ago (2011). I know this doesn't make much difference, except this article makes it sound like it was recent.
Mr Coulter is charged with "breaking and entering other than a habitation" ie convenience store. He is NOT charged with breaking and entering Or vandalism of a church. Mr Farmer and Mr "Fat Tony" were charged with the church and the store and at the time of arrest, drug and drug paraphanailia charges were added to Mr Farmer.....and other outstanding charges to Mr "Tony".
What happened to getting the facts before reporting it as News/truth?
Am I trying to defend these guys? NOT AT ALL!! If they are found guilty they should "pay the price"......I just think that should be determined by the truth, not by twisting the facts for ratings to 1000's of people who will automaticaly jump to conclusions by taking it as the "Gospel truth.....It must be true it's on tv!"
What happened to these guys? They were arrested, charged, arraigned and awaiting trial.