Tell me exactly how many relationships include all of the elements that I mentioned. You say there are "numerous". Please list as many as you can.KiMare wrote:
I'm just saying that it is obvious to anyone with eyes and a brain that a duplicate gendered couple is clearly not the same as marriage.
No law can change that.
Most relational elements you mention are part of numerous relationships that don't demand or qualify for the title of marriage.
1. Intimacy. I'm sorry, but your attempt to equate natural sex with harmful, unhealthy and demeaning sex is an insult to intelligence.
2. Procreation. Ss couples DO NOT mutually procreate as you attempted to claim. You attempted to pass off a blatant lie again. Disgraceful.
Ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. A defective failure of mating behavior. Ss marriage is an oxymoron.
I'm not addressing personal views of homosexuality. I'm addressing the distinct differences between marriage and a ss couple.
And since we've already established SO MANY times that "mating behavior" and/or procreation are not a prerequisites for marriage, please stop using it as an excuse. No one buys it. I don't even think you buy it at this point.
You really need to get new material.
Go "demean" yourself...