Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201854 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203207 Jul 17, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
Sometimes the State gets it right! But I would never wish to visit American pew warming bigots onto foreign countires, except maybe Saudi Arabia where they would all be beheaded for believing in the wrong God. It would serve them right.
Yes, that's very nice. Go back to playing in the feces...
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203208 Jul 17, 2013
July142013 wrote:
Uncle Teddy Nugent (Official AH) sees Zimmerman as a modern American hero.
•showed "the fundamental responsibility of a neighbor who cares."
•did "nothing... improper."
•had "potentially life threatening wounds."
•and "represents the purest form of self-defense there is."
And that Martin was a "standard thug" and had "an obvious racist chip on his shoulder."
Nugent for President! I agree with you!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#203209 Jul 17, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I work with a very nice lady in a same sex marriage with twins, biologically hers as well.
She has commented to me that her wife also wants to, but right now they have their hands full with the twins.:)
Nice people
So nice that they deleted the children's father, twice.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203210 Jul 17, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
--Just tired of seeing you and others using children in order to promote anti-homosexual sentiment.
--If you cared about children at all, you'd be thrilled that there are tens of thousands of gay and lesbians willing to take them into their home and provide them with the love and support that they need so that they can grow up to be adults.
But you're not. You're an ignorant jerk who believes that gays are disordered and incapable of such things.
If we're disordered, maybe we should all file for Social Security Disability benefits and live on the dole.
--Yes, you do throw them under the bus. You use them to try to block same-sex marriage. Kids have nothing to do with marriage. You won't find children listed on a marriage certificate application or license. You don't hear them being mentioned at wedding ceremonies.
You use them to advance a hateful, fear-based agenda that has no basis in science.
--Maybe you should direct your "gods" question to Kimare, who constantly zeros in on children and the "remarkable" (sarcasm) belief that only heterosexual couples procreate.
--I guarantee that I know gay men who are better fathers to their biological or adopted children than most straight men. The statistic that I read indicates that there are some 20,000,000 kids in the US who do not have a father present in the home.
You guys are such good role models.
--Are you so "gay paranoid" that you see gay undertones into anything a gay man says to you? Or maybe you're one of those guys who thinks that every gay man wants to take you to bed.
It's been my experience that straight guys who believe such horseshit are usually uglier than a mud fence--nobody would have anything to do with them.
Your personality alone makes you so hideous that no gay man (or probably straight woman) would give you the time of day.
--Such bluster from a mental midget... As they say down here, "Anytime you feel froggy; jump on down to Knoxville."
What's all this? Justification for throwing the kids under the bus.
No, biotch, you come up here!
"Gay fathers who are..."? You mean the ones who ran out on the women that they impregnated?
"If we're.....Live on the dole." Reaching for more free money, I see ...
I'm glad to have youe your assurance that gay men won't have me.
Odd, but that's mightily coincedental.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203211 Jul 17, 2013
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually it does, whether you alter and take my post out of context or not..No, I really hope you're not gay. I wouldn't wish an arrogant piece of sh*t like you on any one, well maybe that asstroll Frankie. BTW no implication of anything, but go ahead be miserable.
No, it doesn't. That's a fine example of poor grammar.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203212 Jul 17, 2013
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
Aww, not in general..just you POS.
Aww. Yes, in general. You suck.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203213 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I love it when fundies use big words like "perpetrating"! They love words that sound sinister!!! Such a tired routine!!
You've exposed nothing you moronic cur. All you do is cite non-existent research (that's called "lying", an act your god despises), obsess over other people's sex (creepy), denigrate adoptive parents (that's called sowing discord, an act your god despises), and pretend that mutual procreation has some sort of value as it relates to marriage.
As noted previously, you've exposed nothing, other than your bigotry. In other words, you've fulfilled every stereotype of a fundamentalist Christian.
Smile be-atch.
Quiet, Birdbath. You don't like the big words? Romper Room not taught you about those? Your side is real big on quoting propaganda. We ain't havin' it, Quiffbert. You can't even use "obsess" properly. We are not "obsessing" over anything. We are refusing to grant a patent of validity, based upon sexual predilection.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203214 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, then you should check more often. I'm a homosexual man, and I have two children, both biological and I have never been part of a hetero sexual couple. Ever.
Gay people aren't sterile. Not all children are created through sex. How and when children are made is still completely irrelevant, not to mention none of your f*cking business. But don't let facts stop you from your fundie-twirling. The more you talk about procreation, the funnier your desperation is everyone reading your bullshyt.
The only one making idiotic assertions is you c*nt. As always.
(I can't wait! Now this agitative, piece-of-shyt coward will respond by attempting to denigrate my family and my children. Christian fundies are such lovely people!)
What'd you do? Find a drunk woman and decide to taint the bloodline?
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203215 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
My husband and my children are genetically linked to both of us.
Was their a reason for your intimately creepy question? Does it make a difference to the state and the state's recognition? Or is it simply that you think it somehow "stings" us homosexuals when you pretend this issue has relevance? Let me assure you it doesn't hurt us in any way. It simply reveals what a petty person you are.
Oh, and Ricky, since I already said they were biologically mine, that should be an indicator that they have my DNA. Is there a reason you continually display your stupidity?
Boi, you're all f**ked up in the head. If you don't want to discuss your predations, then don't bring it up, biotch.
Fleabagger Watch

UK

#203216 Jul 17, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it doesn't. That's a fine example of poor grammar.
I still think it's a laugh riot, the "bigot" ditto machine that screams "piece of shit".

Orwell was right...
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203217 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, as in the biological mother. Jeesus you are so damn stupid.
<quoted text>
No shyt Sherlock! Interaction doesn't require sex as stupid KiMare stated. And I was gay the entire time.
<quoted text>
Right after you don't assume that it is relevant to children.
<quoted text>
yawn. Translation: I want to pretend something exists but I have nothing to support it so I'll just call it "unspoken at times".
You fundies are ridiculous. This is why I typically skip over your posts. Just a bunch of "might", "what if", "could be" nonsense.
<quoted text>
Yawn. Your concern for my children's connections is touching.
<quoted text>
Facts? You mean like the fact that procreation isn't a requirement of marriage, and that gay people aren't sterile? Those kind of facts?
You're ridiculous.
So, you just make babies for the fun of it?
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203218 Jul 17, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>What does Polygamy have to do with same sex marriage???
If we have to explain it, you won't understand it.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203219 Jul 17, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>"creepy"? I didn't bring it up in the first place and was curious about how that can happen. Did I say it makes a difference to the state and the state's recognition? I was simply asking, sorry if asking something gets you so bent. I never questioned or meant to write that it was in doubt not your DNA, I was curious how 2 gays guys DNA could be linked on a child. Sorry if I don't keep up on how to make a baby without the normal methods. Let's hear your next outburst...NEXT! hey dude, cut back on the coffee. You sound wired.
That was the easy part. They blew wads on the poor tykes back, and rubbed it in ...
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203220 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, actually what you stated was this:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/san-diego/TH6FC2NT...
From there I demonstrated how ridiculously mentally defective you are.
You didn't know that?
By pointing out how 2 men or 2 women can conceive? That was especially clever of you....
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203221 Jul 17, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, creepy. I brought up being a biological father. From there you wanted to know medical information pertaining to my children and my husband. Yes, that's creepy.
<quoted text>
I brought it up to demonstrate how stupid KiMare is. You see, unlike most of you morons, I like to use specifics in order to support my statements.
If you are curious how sperm and eggs lead to fertilization, you might enroll in a night class on biology, or try a library.
<quoted text>
Who said 2 gays[sic] guys DNA was linked on the child? No one.
<quoted text>
You don't keep up on much of anything. That's evident from your posts.
Translated: "I made a nonsensical claim and was asked to provide an explanation. This I cannot do, as I was talking out of my ass."
sheesh

Columbiana, AL

#203222 Jul 17, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
<quoted text>
George Z. was only protecting his residence, that is why he followed Trayvon. This was a private, gated community and Trayvons parents did NOT reside there family and friends made it up. Fact is Trayvon became violent when asked a simple question. Instead of answering in a civil manner he bacame very agitated instead of just answering the question, Trayvon was so agiteated that he got into Georges face and hit him with a left hook, the rest is self defense on Georges part, too bad for Trayvon, this is one caper he failed at it was just a matter of time. This is just the way young black boys handle their business and this is why there is so much violence around. Their motto is: put the blame some where esle. Bottom line is that the jury tried extreamly hare to find something George did wrong, and after 16 hrs of deliberation they couldn't end of story. Oh it is hilarious that Trayvons parents and friends were positive that Trayvon did no wrong as if they were there the entire time , just like yourself you were there right? you sound like you have been in trouble with the cops before you idiot. Go FK yourself.
Yet another mangled assault on language by an ignorant buffoon.

OH, my mistake, it wasn't his father's home. It was his father's fiance's rented home. He had every right to be in that gated community as he was there as a guest.

Martin was never anywhere near Zimmerman's home, so Zimmerman wasn't protecting his home.

Martin, petty thief, casual pot smoker. Dead.
Zimmerman, woman beater, drunkard cop assaulting, judge's spoiled undisciplined son turned killer. Free as a bird. I suspect this won't be his last brush with the law. He's been getting away with stuff for too long. He'll be back. Mark my words. You can go cheer for him too. Maybe even waste some of your hard earned money on his defense fund like some other tools. Oh, BTW, he did tick off the judge when he wasn't honest about this at the bail hearing.

I can see where that would make someone like you jump for joy.

I'm glad you stooped to the lowest common denominator. Nope, not been in trouble with the law unless you consider an occasional speeding ticket to be a sign of a hardened criminal. In fact I have testified regularly on behalf of the state in animal cruelty cases. You, OTOH, are an illiterate buffoon.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203223 Jul 17, 2013
commonpeeps wrote:
Good statements as to why our society is going to hell (darn, for you religious bigots let me rephrase that) is becoming morally disfunctional. Once again, for you religious bigots look up the definition of morals, it is neither decided by religion nor legal standards, it is decided by society. We live in a 'society', your personal pleasures do not mean crap! Look up the definition of homosexual, people who enjoy sex with another of the same sex. Being homo means nothing more that enjoying having sex with another (we'll assume another human) of the same sex. The definition says nothing about love, family, social or intellectual interaction, child rearing (not rear-ending) for personal gratification, or any thing other that sex with another of the same sex. So basically, if you are not bum banging or bush munching or any other 'sexual gratification' with another of the same sex you basically are not homosexual. I can love my car, or love my mother or father, or love my kids, or my cat or dog etc. that love does not make me homo, if I bang any one of them, then I am a sexual degenerate. Now I am sure all you homos will try and change the definition of homosexual now like you try to change the ' true and original' definition of marriage, that is how you cope with reality by not accepting it. You are messed up! Your reasons are to try and convince everyone you are o.k. just so you will feel better about yourselves. If you were o.k. with your true selves you wouldn't care about what others thought about you. But you don't, and probably never will.
"We live in a 'society'". "it is decided by society." The same society that they claim has no right to decide what it accepts, and what it decides is immoral. Funny, isn't it?
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203224 Jul 17, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Show me the post where I'm wanting to know medical information pertaining your children? I simply wanted to know how 2 gay guys can have both their DNA on a child. I don't want to know anything about the kids. Why you so scared bro? "My husband and my children are genetically linked to both of us." Can you explain that?
No, he's trying to cloud the isuue with vague references and innuendo. It's all very nonsensical. Whimsical, one might say ...
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203225 Jul 17, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>In what state can you find polygamy legal? The question is this Frank, who are the people arguing for polygamy and on what base.
The same states that allowed gay marriage 15 years ago. And, those people would be the REAL equalists. Not haters like you. And the base[sic](basis) would be marriage equality.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#203226 Jul 17, 2013
The Original Fry Cook wrote:
Let's see if the diehard liberal shitstains with crushing white guilt can reconcile this:
JEANTEL WARNED ZIMMERMAN COULD BE GAY RAPIST
TRAYVON: NOT THAT KIND OF WAY
Tue Jul 16 2013 11:55:00 ET
Last night Trayvon Martin's friend Rachel Jeantel gave CNN her first interview since testifying in the George Zimmerman murder trial.
Jeantel opened up and let loose on the murder case that gripped that nation.
She explained to CNN's Piers Morgan how she warned her childhood friend that Zimmerman -- could be a gay rapist!
MORGAN: You felt that there was no doubt in your mind from what Trayvon was telling you on the phone about the creepy ass cracka and so on, that he absolutely believed that George Zimmerman, this man, you didn't know who he was at the time, but this man, was pursuing him?
JEANTEL: Yes.
MORGAN: And he was freaked out by it?
JEANTEL: Yes. Definitely after I say may be a rapist, for every boy, for every man, every -- who's not that kind of way, seeing a grown man following them, would they be creep out?
She continued:
"And people need to understand, he didn't want that creepy ass cracker going to his father or girlfriend's house to go get -- mind you, his little brother was there. You know -- now, mind you, I told you -- I told Trayvon it might have been a rapist."
You gotta give home-girl cred, she tried her best to seem sensible, but her "relevancy" and "urban-ness" showed too much... After all, "cracka" isn't a racist term, it means a lawman, to her. Not at all a reference to whip-crackers, as the term is really used, by the "urban" and "relevant" crowd...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Los Angeles Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News D.A.: Operators Will Be Prosecuted For Murder I... 1 hr marg 1
Very Large Burmese python bagged in Everglades 19 hr Tom 1
News $75,000 Reward Approved For Information Leading... Wed Kurtz 1
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Jul 28 Samuel-7g-Jackson 20,089
FDA US is banning some Mexican cilantro Jul 28 Ken 1
Car & pedestrian collision? Soon be an app for ... Jul 28 Ginnie 1
Seattle’s $15 Minimum Wage Law Came Back To Bit... Jul 27 Joan 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Los Angeles Mortgages