Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
It is just the standard bait and switch tactics used by people opposed to something like same sex marriage.
it is meaningless

I support marriage equality. You and Jane Dodo do not.

So climb down off your high horse for a minute and tell us why.

I am not trying to bait you or switch you or trick you. I am trying to discuss marriage.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Disagreed.

Of course, you bash everyone for the overturn of prop 8 and defend everyone that is opposed to same sex marriage and then constantly try to equate it to poly marriage which has nothing to do with prop 8 which is a standard tactic of bait and switch that the opponents of same sex marriage use.

You are going to disagree with anyone supporting same sex marriage, regardless of if you claim to be for it or not.

You don’t think anyone believes you…. do you?

[DorN]

The judge made a wise decision. The vote to ban same sex marriage was discriminatory, and against the constitution.
In my opinion gays marry straights either because they are not fully aware of their sexual orientation or because they want to be able to keep their jobs or avoid being harassed.
Gays married to straights pass on the 'trait for gayness' to their offspring.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
No need to whine, we're trying to discuss marriage, if you don't like my message tell me why or just ignore me! Easy!
Do you think polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage?
The answer is not "this is not the issue at hand." It's either yes or no.

I wasn’t whining, I was saying it will probably have no effect on it whatsoever. I don’t think much about poly marriage and really don’t have an opinion on the subject. I honestly don’t care as it is not the issue at hand.

That isn’t support, that isn’t opposition, it is an honest appraisal of an issue that is not going to the supreme court and is not likely to in this decade.

[Black momma]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
No need to whine, we're trying to discuss marriage, if you don't like my message tell me why or just ignore me! Easy!
Do you think polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage?
The answer is not "this is not the issue at hand." It's either yes or no.

if polygamy pass you will see male population dwindle to almost nothing just regular non religious cults.Prime example American.... Why does she get the black car why don't you ask that other wife of
yours to make you meatloaf or by the way here is your little league coach dates oh also we all
have a headache tonight remember it is trash day I want it to pass.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course, you bash everyone for the overturn of prop 8 and defend everyone that is opposed to same sex marriage and then constantly try to equate it to poly marriage which has nothing to do with prop 8 which is a standard tactic of bait and switch that the opponents of same sex marriage use.
You are going to disagree with anyone supporting same sex marriage, regardless of if you claim to be for it or not.
You don’t think anyone believes you…. do you?

Sure you don't like me, we get it Squeaky, but try and control your outbursts and get on topic.

Do you think polygamy deserves the same respect as same sex marriage?

P.S. I support same sex marriage and poly marriage. I think maybe you do not. So if there's any baiting and switching or trickery, it's yours.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Black momma wrote:

<quoted text> if polygamy pass you will see male population dwindle to almost nothing just regular non religious cults.Prime example American.... Why does she get the black car why don't you ask that other wife of
yours to make you meatloaf or by the way here is your little league coach dates oh also we all
have a headache tonight remember it is trash day I want it to pass.

Oh hell yeah, I know! Polygamy is not for me! I can hardly handle one woman.

But some people want it. I don't see why it should be illegal or how it will hurt anyone if made legal.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Sure you don't like me, we get it Squeaky, but try and control your outbursts and get on topic.
Do you think polygamy deserves the same respect as same sex marriage?
P.S. I support same sex marriage and poly marriage. I think maybe you do not. So if there's any baiting and switching or trickery, it's yours.

I didn’t say that

I don’t care about poly marriage and have put no thought to it, nor an I about to start now as it simply is a non-issue. It won’t be going before the supreme court anytime soon nor will be a part of national debate in the near future.

I don’t believe you support same sex marriage or you would not attack those in support and defend those opposed, and use the same tactics they use to attack it.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
I wasn’t whining, I was saying it will probably have no effect on it whatsoever. I don’t think much about poly marriage and really don’t have an opinion on the subject. I honestly don’t care as it is not the issue at hand.
That isn’t support, that isn’t opposition, it is an honest appraisal of an issue that is not going to the supreme court and is not likely to in this decade.

You are indifferent to polygamy. Fine. Why all the hostility then? Is it just me? YUK!YUK!YUK!

I don't see any compelling reasons not to allow polygamy. Probably the biggest reason I get against it is paranoid fear that it's a trick to sabotage same sex marriage. You are guilty of this thinking.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
You are indifferent to polygamy. Fine. Why all the hostility then? Is it just me? YUK!YUK!YUK!
I don't see any compelling reasons not to allow polygamy. Probably the biggest reason I get against it is paranoid fear that it's a trick to sabotage same sex marriage. You are guilty of this thinking.

Go gather your supporters and bring the case to the supreme court... go ahead.

It isn’t the case before them now, it simply isn’t the issue, and isn’t going to be the issue and nothing they decide will have any impact on it.

What may have an impact on is something you don’t like discussed, and that is the decline of religion in America, as the vast majority of supporters of it are splinter cults of religious fanatics, often( but not always ) religous child molester cults.

I am willing to wager that your primary concern will not go before the supreme court in the next decade, want to take that wager?

[Largelanguage]

Jane Dodo wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm older than you, you flaming dumbass. You can't back up one single word you've written, because it's all your opinion, and that's not based on facts.

Older? Nah! I bet you're really young, wild, and evil inside! A perfect target to burn on the youthful energies of satan! Oh reasuring yourself! Lying to yourself! Feel better? No! Inside you still *feel* weaker, and more vulnerable! Folly of youth! Suppress your feelings of intimidation and inferioty? Yes BOY? Eh BOY?

[Largelanguage]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Stupid, try this thought experiment.
There are 100 men, and 100 women.
With me so far?
36 of these women have anal sex, and 44 of the men have anal sex with these women. You do know a woman can have sex with more than one man?

Yes I do. More women still have sex. Wrong stats.

[Largelanguage]

Most sex women have they call rape, so it doesn't count as sex. Wrong stats!

[Largelanguage]

Marriage isn't legal. Marriage is a formal and real bonding of a man and women, and announcing they are one with each other and for each other. Rose knows nothing.

[Big D]

Largelanguage wrote:

Most sex women have they call rape, so it doesn't count as sex. Wrong stats!

If you are saying all the sex you have with women is rape I would believe you, but I can tell you that is NOT the case for most women that have sex.

[Largelanguage]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
If you are saying all the sex you have with women is rape I would believe you, but I can tell you that is NOT the case for most women that have sex.

Yes it is! Mary coss and her 1 in 4 women rape statistics were based around situations that weren't really rape at all!

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Go gather your supporters and bring the case to the supreme court... go ahead.
It isn’t the case before them now, it simply isn’t the issue, and isn’t going to be the issue and nothing they decide will have any impact on it.
What may have an impact on is something you don’t like discussed, and that is the decline of religion in America, as the vast majority of supporters of it are splinter cults of religious fanatics, often( but not always ) religous child molester cults.
I am willing to wager that your primary concern will not go before the supreme court in the next decade, want to take that wager?

Look Fruitloops. Your hobby is astronomy. Do you discuss space travel with your friends? Do you actually travel in space?

You are allowed to discuss going to Mars without actually doing it, and I am allowed to discuss polygamy without having a case before SCOTUS. OK Squeaky? Thanks.

P.S. "religious child molester cults"? WOW! Your bigotry and ignorance is showing.

P.P.S. You are a liar for saying I lament the decline of religion in America. You know this is not true, liar.

[Largelanguage]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Look Fruitloops. Your hobby is astronomy. Do you discuss space travel with your friends? Do you actually travel in space?
You are allowed to discuss going to Mars without actually doing it, and I am allowed to discuss polygamy without having a case before SCOTUS. OK Squeaky? Thanks.
P.S. "religious child molester cults"? WOW! Your bigotry and ignorance is showing.
P.P.S. You are a liar for saying I lament the decline of religion in America. You know this is not true, liar.

Gays = paedophiles.

[Rush]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes it is! Mary coss and her 1 in 4 women rape statistics were based around situations that weren't really rape at all!

If all sex that women have is rape, but 1 in 4 getting raped werent really getting raped at all, how does that make any sence? You pluck this crap out of the air and pass it off as fact.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>

...I don’t believe you support same sex marriage or you would not attack those in support and defend those opposed, and use the same tactics they use to attack it.

There's that paranoia I have mentioned.

What possible motive would I have to trick you and lie about supporting same sex marriage? If I didn't support it, I'd tell you! You know me well enough to know I am not shy about expressing my opinions.

You're paranoid. And you're also pretty ignorant about poly. And I believe you are bigoted too and against it's decriminalization.