Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204622 Jul 25, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I do have several Christian friends, but they disagree with their church and support same sex marriage... canít think of one right off the bat.
Real proud of you! Real proud!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204623 Jul 25, 2013
Amy wrote:
<quoted text>
Honey, from the ignorant rants about procreation on here, I'd rather enter a contract with one. No woman in her right mind would have sex with any of you.
No woman has a right mind.
Gustavo

North Hollywood, CA

#204624 Jul 25, 2013
Amy wrote:
<quoted text>
Same with you sweetie, but yet you still fill pages and pages of moronic rant.
Are you in a SSM ?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204625 Jul 25, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>Sup Paco.
"Sup". What a moron. You ain't cool Jizzy, stop trying. Makes it even worse when you say dopey stuff like that.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204626 Jul 25, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't notice anyone asking you on here....
Good one! I wouldn't do her. Attitude like that.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204628 Jul 25, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
No woman has a right mind.
Good one!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204629 Jul 25, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Big D has no friends that disagree with his opinions. I suppose the moment one of them does, he's not Big D's friend anymore.
I didnít say that, I said I donít know of any that donít support same sex marriage.

I have not lost any friends over my views.

I probably just donít travel much in the gutter trash circles you do.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204630 Jul 25, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I didnít say that, I said I donít know of any that donít support same sex marriage.
I have not lost any friends over my views.
I probably just donít travel much in the gutter trash circles you do.
Too funny!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204631 Jul 25, 2013
Ah good times!
Delicious Felicia

Ashburn, VA

#204632 Jul 25, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
What matters is that you will not be defining others relationships.
Fact: same sex couples are married, as married as any other couple.
deal with it :)
not every where, wake up flagHag

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204633 Jul 25, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>Sup Paco.
Come va?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204634 Jul 25, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You donít understand reality.
There is a fact however that you cannot avoid. Same sex marriages are the same under California and federal law as marriage, not treated or viewed any differently than any other marriage.
The same huh? Exact same? So "I now pronounce you husband and wife" applies to them? They consumate the sane way? Can get an annulment for failure to consumate?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204635 Jul 25, 2013
Amy wrote:
<quoted text>
Then marry a turkey baster.
So is your Dad the turkey baster, and your Mom, the turkey? So that makes you a turkey.
Amy

Fullerton, CA

#204636 Jul 25, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
No woman has a right mind.
How sweet, sticking up for your fellow moron. With a statement like that, obviously we don't have to worry about you procreating.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204637 Jul 25, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
The same huh? Exact same? So "I now pronounce you husband and wife" applies to them? They consumate the sane way? Can get an annulment for failure to consumate?
Those words are not on the marriage license and are not requirements, nor is any ceremony, people marry in front of a justice of the peace all the time.

nor is the term consummate

You can get an annulment or divorce for no reason at all.

And our government will not step in and force and annulment regardless of your "consummation" argument if neither party wants one, we donít force the ending of marriages, one party has to actually desire it, and if one party does, they donít even need a reason, so consummation is totally irrelevant

Do you have any other non-issues you would like me to explain to you?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204638 Jul 25, 2013
Amy wrote:
<quoted text>
How sweet, sticking up for your fellow moron. With a statement like that, obviously we don't have to worry about you procreating.
You got that right

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#204639 Jul 25, 2013
Amy wrote:
<quoted text>
How sweet, sticking up for your fellow moron. With a statement like that, obviously we don't have to worry about you procreating.
Birds of a feather...

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204642 Jul 25, 2013
Amy wrote:
<quoted text>
How sweet, sticking up for your fellow moron. With a statement like that, obviously we don't have to worry about you procreating.
Already did, four times too, all by a woman "not in her right mind". Thanks for asking though.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204643 Jul 25, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>Your mom was a flower pot, so you must be a blooming idiot
That was funny Poofy....gotta give ya that one.:)

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204644 Jul 25, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Those words are not on the marriage license and are not requirements, nor is any ceremony, people marry in front of a justice of the peace all the time.
"Husband" and "wife" aren't on the marriage license? Not requirements? In 30 plus states they are. I pointed out the pronouncement, I did not specify who pronounced them.
nor is the term consummate
It is part of marriage law though.
You can get an annulment
Failure to consummate is grounds for an annulment in several states, including California.
or divorce for no reason at all
With no fault divorce, that's true.
And our government will not step in and force and annulment regardless of your "consummation" argument if neither party wants one, we donít force the ending of marriages, one party has to actually desire it,
Never said the government would force an annulment.
and if one party does, they donít even need a reason, so consummation is totally irrelevant
Do you have any other non-issues you would like me to explain to you?
You continue to state SSM and OSM are treated the same. I've pointed out the obvious, which you are unable to, or unwilling to, acknowledge. They're not exactly the same. Nice try though.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Westwood Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News For Jewish Americans, echoes of the Holocaust a... Aug 20 Fit2Serve 12
News 'Let 1994 go': Simpson case's racial symbolism ... Aug 20 GODS GIFT 18
News Suddenly Infamous: Casting JonBenet And Rodney ... Aug 7 Tex- 3
Review: Broady Earl & Lynch Howard Law (Oct '11) Aug 6 Deanne Wilson 2
News Selena Gomez Shares 'Nude' Photo On Instagram, ... (Mar '14) Jul 29 Alejandrojoaquin110 10
News $20,000 reward offered for missing California cat Jul '17 Nikki 1
News One City One Pride Art Festival gets underway May '17 Darius 4

Westwood Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Westwood Mortgages