1.) I am not trying to equate a couple's ability to procreate with another couple's inability to procreate. I'm simply saying that there is no reason to compare the two. Why do you try to equate one another based on procreation ability?<quoted text>
1. You are still trying to equate the natural ability of heterosexuals to procreate with the defective absolute failure of ss couples to do so? Really???
2. You are calling the inherent harm, unhealthiness and demeaning nature of anal sex natural, once again trying to equate it with the natural design of intercourse. Really dumbing down again...
3. POST 198969;
"Mating behavior" or as the rest of us call it "sexual intercourse" does not always result in children. Marriage unions do not always result in children. So, it is not a "natural result" of sexual intercourse; and certainly not a "natural result" of the marriage union.
VV, look at the last sequence of posts. You are like a slimy snake avoiding reality. It is truly psychotic denial. Get help!
Being able to procreate or possessing the desire to procreate IS NOT a prerequisite for marriage. If it were, then there would be REQUIREMENTS for couples to do so. And since NONE of the attorneys in these two cases maintained that any couples, heterosexual or homosexual, MUST agree to procreate in order to marry, your continued focus on this issue is pointless.
2.) I AM calling anal sex "natural". I have maintained that all along. I have provided proof that all orientations engage in it and have engaged in it for eons. If it was harmful, demeaning, degrading, or un-pleasurable then people would not engage in it.
3.) You've got to be kidding. You said in your previous post that I claimed mating behavior is unnatural. And looking at my post, you can clearly see that I DID NOT say this.
I said that procreation is not a "natural result" of mating behavior (i.e. sexual intercourse). If procreation was the result of ALL mating behavior then couples would only have sex for procreative purposes.
And since many newlyweds have sex several times a week, they would end up with a little over 30 children (could be more if they have twins) by time they reached their 25th wedding anniversary.
Did you have a child each time you climbed on top of your wife and banged her like a storm door in a hurricane?
Probably not. You probably used some method of birth control. That's why you have a few kids instead of a small platoon.
As many have said to the "Duggar Family" of the TV show "Nineteen Kids and Counting", the womb is not a clown car--to see how many people will pop out.
4.) Pull your head out of your ass... It's demeaning, unnatural, and painful.