Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,148

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177843 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
This thread is: Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage
Ok?
The judge did not overturn the ban on polygamy.
He didn't? Oh, nevermind! YUK!YUK!YUK!

Remember Gilda Radner as Emily Litella? You're a real old auntie you've probably seen her.

But seriously, don't you agree that the judge's decision is not bad for the future of legalized polygamy?

Stop with the straw man and ad hominem. Why are you so intent on hijacking this thread for you narrow purposes of cheerleading one form of marriage over another?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177844 Jan 31, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Lean to read English.... is English you native language? Maybe I can have what I am saying translated into whatever language is used where you come from.
I donít have a huge problem with poly marriage. I have a problem with other crimes that are nearly always associated with it. And will not tolerate many of the current adherents of it and their cruel molestation and mistreatment of their young, or the fraud they use to gain multiple government assistance checks at our expense.
I donít have a huge problem with same sex marriage. I have a problem with other crimes that are nearly always associated with it. And will not tolerate many of the current adherents of it and their cruel molestation and mistreatment of their young, or the fraud they use to gain multiple government assistance checks at our expense.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177845 Jan 31, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Lean to read English.... is English you native language? Maybe I can have what I am saying translated into whatever language is used where you come from.
I donít have a huge problem with poly marriage. I have a problem with other crimes that are nearly always associated with it. And will not tolerate many of the current adherents of it and their cruel molestation and mistreatment of their young, or the fraud they use to gain multiple government assistance checks at our expense.
I said "Your huge problem WITH THE ADHERENTS OF POLYGAMY is no better."

Learn to read English. Perhaps it is your second language? Perhaps you are a dope? A liar?
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177846 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
He didn't? Oh, nevermind! YUK!YUK!YUK!
Remember Gilda Radner as Emily Litella? You're a real old auntie you've probably seen her.
But seriously, don't you agree that the judge's decision is not bad for the future of legalized polygamy?
Stop with the straw man and ad hominem. Why are you so intent on hijacking this thread for you narrow purposes of cheerleading one form of marriage over another?
You are hilarious!
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177847 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I donít have a huge problem with same sex marriage. I have a problem with other crimes that are nearly always associated with it. And will not tolerate many of the current adherents of it and their cruel molestation and mistreatment of their young, or the fraud they use to gain multiple government assistance checks at our expense.
What legally married gay couple is getting multiple government assistence checks?

You're about as bright as a black hole.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#177848 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I donít have a huge problem with same sex marriage. I have a problem with other crimes that are nearly always associated with it. And will not tolerate many of the current adherents of it and their cruel molestation and mistreatment of their young, or the fraud they use to gain multiple government assistance checks at our expense.
I always knew that was where you were going, and have been saying so for weeks.

Standard bait and switch tactic, all the opponents of same sex marriage use, and the funny part is the comparison they make is to religious people.

dishonest to the core

Your argument will get no where you relies

Same sex marriage is happening and will continue to happen in more and more states and countries.

Your pet issue is going exactly nowhere.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177849 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>I don't need to convince anybody. It's evident from your posts that you don't understand what you read.
Sure Miss Thing.

So, why do you think the judge's decision has absolutely no bearing on the future of legalized polygamy?

Type slowly maybe I'll understand your answer. But you have to give me an answer before I can understand it silly!
Bruno

Westminster, CA

#177850 Jan 31, 2013
Pizzo, you are a real wack job . . .
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177851 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are hilarious!
Thanks! You're not. Evidence your comedy career fail! Boy you were bad!

But let's get on topic, you always go off. Why do you feel the judge's decision has absolutely no relevance to the future of legalizing poly?
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177852 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure Miss Thing.
So, why do you think the judge's decision has absolutely no bearing on the future of legalized polygamy?
Type slowly maybe I'll understand your answer. But you have to give me an answer before I can understand it silly!
Because the trial testimony was about SSM and NOT poly, the ruling was about SSM, not poly, the appeal was about SSM, not poly, the appeals court ruling was about SSM and not poly. The appeal to SCOTUS is about SSM, not poly. When SCOTUS overturns Prop 8, SSM will be legal again, poly will NOT.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177853 Jan 31, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I always knew that was where you were going, and have been saying so for weeks.
Standard bait and switch tactic, all the opponents of same sex marriage use, and the funny part is the comparison they make is to religious people.
dishonest to the core
Your argument will get no where you relies
Same sex marriage is happening and will continue to happen in more and more states and countries.
Your pet issue is going exactly nowhere.
I am not opposed to same sex marriage. I fully support it. I have been to several gay weddings (have you?) I have friends and family that I love who are in same sex marriages. I resent your dishonest attempts to demonize me.

I am trying to discuss marriage equality. The only reason you will not engage is because you are attempting to avoid revealing your hypocrisy. And failing, I might add.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177854 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks! You're not. Evidence your comedy career fail! Boy you were bad!
But let's get on topic, you always go off. Why do you feel the judge's decision has absolutely no relevance to the future of legalizing poly?
Maybe because there was NOTHING about polygamy in his decision..... geez.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177855 Jan 31, 2013
Bruno wrote:
Pizzo, you are a real wack job ...
It's better than being a SECOND CLASS JACKASS like you!

YUK!YUK!YUK!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177856 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe because there was NOTHING about polygamy in his decision..... geez.
You hate polygamists because "there was NOTHING about polygamy in his decision..... geez."?

Do you rest your case?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177857 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
What legally married gay couple is getting multiple government assistence checks?
You're about as bright as a black hole.
I just replace poly in his hateful rant with same sex marriage to see how he liked the sound of it dummy.

What a dope!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177858 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Because the trial testimony was about SSM and NOT poly, the ruling was about SSM, not poly, the appeal was about SSM, not poly, the appeals court ruling was about SSM and not poly. The appeal to SCOTUS is about SSM, not poly. When SCOTUS overturns Prop 8, SSM will be legal again, poly will NOT.
So you think the judge's decision bodes poorly for the future of legalized poly?

I think you are wrong. I think allowing same sex marriage will help the case for allowing poly. It's just common sense.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#177859 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not opposed to same sex marriage. I fully support it. I have been to several gay weddings (have you?) I have friends and family that I love who are in same sex marriages. I resent your dishonest attempts to demonize me.
I am trying to discuss marriage equality. The only reason you will not engage is because you are attempting to avoid revealing your hypocrisy. And failing, I might add.
You go ahead and rant and rave, Same sex marriage is already a reality and will continue to spread.

Your pet rant is going nowhere, not because of any objection of mine ( I donít have an objection to the concept of it ), but because of the actions of far tooo many of the adherents of it.

There may come a time a couple of decades down the road when this changes, but it is not changing yet, regardless of what you, I or another else in this forum thinks
.

As religion becomes less and less a force in American politics the current adherents of it will sink further into oblivion.

Until a more mature, and more human group champions it, it is moot.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#177860 Jan 31, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe because there was NOTHING about polygamy in his decision..... geez.
We know that Miss Thing! Duh! You need to get up to speed. Perhaps you cannot read well?
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177861 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You hate polygamists because "there was NOTHING about polygamy in his decision..... geez."?
Do you rest your case?
Another fine example of your reading comprehension problem. Where did you see me write write anything about hating poly? See how you are? When you get an answer you can't dispute, you just make something else up to argue about.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#177862 Jan 31, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I just replace poly in his hateful rant with same sex marriage to see how he liked the sound of it dummy.
What a dope!
So you wrote something you didn't mean. Surprise.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brentwood Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Tinder taps an age-old truth Nov '14 whocares 1
Gwyneth Paltrow hosts star-studded fundraiser... Nov '14 star writer 3
Obama helps raise campaign cash for Democrats a... Oct '14 the Light 8
In Santa Monica, Obama chastises GOP on immigra... Oct '14 barefoot2626 38
Archer School for Girls Expansion Plans Oct '14 Atticus 1
Actress Gwyneth Paltrow hosted a slew of celebr... Oct '14 ThenObamaLandGrab... 1
Obama raising money in California for Democrats Oct '14 ObamaProtestSetFo... 1

Brentwood News Video

Los Angeles Dating
Find my Match

Brentwood People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Brentwood News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Brentwood

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:26 pm PST