Largest fire in NM history might have been averted [11:53 a.m.]
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Farmington Daily Times.
#1 Jul 13, 2011
While that may be true that the fire could have been averted, the government's policies to put out every fire and not doing enough thinning of the trees is what led to this catastrophe. I am in favor of a thinning project on a larger scale than previously allowed and a project whereby firebreaks are constructed in forest zones. With the advent of roads and more people in wilderness areas such as that destroyed by the Las Conchas fire, there needs to be more initiative taken to provide more frequent and larger firebreaks. Heck, I know I couldve used all of that firewood for many many years. Imagine how much useful timber was simply destroyed because we dont allow enough commercial and private logging. What a waste.
#2 Jul 13, 2011
What a pointless article.
I am sure a caretaker, like any other person, will need to go to town from time to time. Let's not point fingers at the caretaker. He wasn't sitting there lighting matches.
Why don't reporters investigate the bigger issues (such as the one raised in Jonny's comment) rather than regurgitating an easy quote and making a headline that makes people "click?"
They could have at least gotten a corresponding quote from the caretaker.
Add your comments below
|Martinez prefers to stick to issues (Jun '10)||19 hr||More||6,866|
|The Latest: Supporters line up for Trump in Alb...||May '16||wowed||4|
|Danny K Burns, The Finishing Touch||May '16||Hope||5|
|Bill Clinton to campaign in New Mexico for Hill...||May '16||Another||26|
|unleashed dogs (Aug '15)||May '16||LatroFrema||2|
|Wshington State Department of Non-Citations||Mar '16||The Guy Who Posted||1|
|For Espanola, NM, And People Of THis Town (Nov '15)||Jan '16||Food And||11|
Find what you want!
Search Los Alamos Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC