Obama Spies on Citizens

Wilkes Barre, PA

#57075 Apr 4, 2014
U.S. confirms warrantless searches of Americans
April 2, 2014

The Obama administration has conducted warrantless searches of Americans' communications as part of the National Security Agency's surveillance operations that target foreigners located outside of the U.S., the administration's top intelligence official confirmed in a letter to Congress disclosed Tuesday.

These searches were authorized by a secret surveillance court in 2011, but it was unclear until Tuesday whether any such searches on Americans had been conducted.
...
Wyden, Udall and other civil liberties advocates call this type of search a back-door loophole in the law that governs surveillance of Americans.

"If a government agency thinks that a particular American is engaged in terrorism or espionage, the Fourth Amendment requires that the government secure a warrant or emergency authorization before monitoring his or her communications," Wyden and Udall said.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2...
Teabagger

West Mifflin, PA

#57077 Apr 4, 2014
There is no voter fraud; The Dept of Justice under Bush II examined 300 million votes and found 120 fraudulent votes. This article is malarkey. Duplicative entries; people with common names could explain much of it. Also, it does not even say how they know if anyone voted fraudulently. This is just people trying to lessen the blow that an intelligent black man is running the country and beat two Caucasians resoundingly ... for no reason than he is the better man. No one was worried about voter fraud when the recovering alcoholic, draft dodging, cocaine using, half wit led the whole nation into two wars, destroyed the economy and doubled the debt .. but then I guess his skin color was the right pigment.

“If you put your ear to this,”

Since: May 13

You can hear a conservative

#57078 Apr 4, 2014
Teabagger wrote:
There is no voter fraud; The Dept of Justice under Bush II examined 300 million votes and found 120 fraudulent votes. This article is malarkey. Duplicative entries; people with common names could explain much of it. Also, it does not even say how they know if anyone voted fraudulently. This is just people trying to lessen the blow that an intelligent black man is running the country and beat two Caucasians resoundingly ... for no reason than he is the better man. No one was worried about voter fraud when the recovering alcoholic, draft dodging, cocaine using, half wit led the whole nation into two wars, destroyed the economy and doubled the debt .. but then I guess his skin color was the right pigment.
They have a solution looking for a problem. But shhhhh! Don't tell them they need to keep women and high school graduates to stop voting. Let them keep thinking they lose because young people and blacks vote.

Still haven't figured out how closing polling places and ending Sunday voting "protects the integrity of the election."
Love you

Philadelphia, PA

#57079 Apr 4, 2014
Love my hubby even tho he makes me mad sometimes :)
J Bush

West Mifflin, PA

#57080 Apr 4, 2014
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
They have a solution looking for a problem. But shhhhh! Don't tell them they need to keep women and high school graduates to stop voting. Let them keep thinking they lose because young people and blacks vote.
Still haven't figured out how closing polling places and ending Sunday voting "protects the integrity of the election."
In one of the closest contests in U.S. history, the 2000 presidential election between Democratic Vice-President Al Gore and Republican governor of Texas George W. Bush (hereafter referred to as Bush Jr. to distinguish him from his father who was also a president), the final outcome hinged on how the vote went in Florida. Independent investigations in that state revealed serious irregularities directed mostly against ethnic minorities and low-income residents who usually voted heavily Democratic. Some 36,000 newly registered voters were turned away because their names had never been added to the voter rolls by Florida’s secretary of state Kathleen Harris. By virtue of the office she held, Harris presided over the state’s election process while herself being an active member of the Bush Jr. state-wide campaign committee. Other voters were turned away because they were declared--almost always incorrectly--“convicted felons.” In several Democratic precincts, state officials closed the polls early, leaving lines of would-be voters stranded.
Under orders from Governor Jeb Bush (Bush Jr.’s brother), state troopers near polling sites delayed people for hours while searching their cars. Some precincts required two photo IDs which many citizens do not have. The requirement under Florida law was only one photo ID. Passed just before the election, this law itself posed a special difficulty for low-income or elderly voters who did not have drivers licenses or other photo IDs. Uncounted ballot boxes went missing or were found in unexplained places or were never collected from certain African-American precincts. During the recount, GOP agitators shipped in from Washington D.C. by the Republican national leadership stormed the Dale County Canvassing Board, punched and kicked one of the officials, shouted and banged on their office doors, and generally created a climate of intimidation that caused the board to abandon its recount and accept the dubious pro-Bush tally.1
Then a five-to-four conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court in a logically tortured decision ruled that a complete recount in Florida would be a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause because different counties have different ways of counting the votes. At that point Gore was behind by only a few hundred or so votes in Florida and was gaining ground with each attempt at a recount. By preventing a complete tally, the justices handed Florida’s electoral votes and the presidency to Bush, a stolen election in which the conservative activists on the Supreme Court played a key role.
Read more facts here:
http://www.michaelparenti.org/stolenelections...
J Bush

West Mifflin, PA

#57081 Apr 4, 2014
The 2004 presidential contest between Democratic challenger Senator John Kerry and the incumbent president George W. Bush amounted to another stolen election. Some 105 million citizens voted in 2000, but in 2004 the turnout climbed to at least 122 million. Pre-election surveys indicated that among the record 16.8 million new voters Kerry was a heavy favorite, a fact that went largely unreported by the press. In addition, there were about two million progressives who had voted for Ralph Nader in 2000 who switched to Kerry in 2004. Yet the official 2004 tallies showed Bush Jr. with 62 million votes, about 11.6 million more than he got in 2000. Meanwhile Kerry showed only eight million more votes than Gore received in 2000. To have achieved his remarkable 2004 tally, Bush would needed to have kept all his 50.4 million from 2000, plus a majority of the new voters, plus a large share of the very liberal Nader defectors. Nothing in the campaign and in the opinion polls suggest such a mass crossover. The numbers simply do not add up.

In key states like Ohio, the Democrats achieved immense success at registering new voters, outdoing the Republicans by as much as five to one. Moreover the Democratic party was unusually united around its candidate-—or certainly against the incumbent president. In contrast, prominent elements within the GOP displayed open disaffection, publicly voicing serious misgivings about the Bush administration’s huge budget deficits, reckless foreign policy, theocratic tendencies, and threats to individual liberties. Sixty newspapers that had endorsed Bush in 2000 refused to do so in 2004; forty of them endorsed Kerry.3

All through election day 2004, exit polls showed Kerry ahead by 53 to 47 percent, giving him a nationwide edge of about 1.5 million votes, and a solid victory in the electoral college. Yet strangely enough, the official tally gave Bush the election by two million votes. What follows are examples of how the GOP “victory” was secured.4

Read the shocking story here:

http://www.michaelparenti.org/stolenelections...
D Cheney

West Mifflin, PA

#57082 Apr 4, 2014
In October 2002, after several days of full-dress debate in the House and Senate, the US Congress fell into line behind almost-elected president George W. Bush, giving him a mandate to launch a massive military assault against the already battered nation of Iraq. The discourse in Congress was marked by its usual cowardice. Even many of the senators and representatives who voted against the president's resolution did so on the narrowest procedural grounds, taking pains to tell how they too detested Saddam Hussein, how they agreed with the president on many points, how something needed to be done about Iraq but not just yet, not quite in this way. So it is with Congress: so much political discourse in so narrow a political space. Few of the members dared to question the unexamined assumptions about US virtue, and the imperial right of US leaders to decide which nations shall live and which shall die. Few, if any, pointed to the continual bloody stream of war crimes committed by a succession of arrogant US administrations in blatant violation of human rights and international law.
Pretexts for War
Bush and other members of his administration gave varied and unpersuasive reasons to justify the “war”—actually a one-sided massacre—against Iraq. They claimed it was necessary to insure the safety and security of the Middle East and of the United States itself, for Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear missiles. But as of 1998, UN inspection teams determined that Iraq had no such nuclear capability and actually had been in compliance with yearly disarmament inspections. And, as of February 2003, UN inspection teams found little to support Bush’s case for aggression, despite Colin Powell's slide-show shenanigans before the United Nations.
As for the fact that Iraq once had factories that produced chemical and bacteriological weapons, whose fault was that? It was the United States that supplied such things to Saddam. This is one of several key facts about past US-Iraq relations that the corporate media have consistently suppressed. In any case, according to UN inspection reports, Iraq’s C&B warfare capability has been dismantled. Still the Bushites keep talking about Iraq’s dangerous “potential.” As reported by the Associated Press (2 November 2002), Undersecretary of State John Bolton claimed that “Iraq would be able to develop a nuclear weapon within a year if it gets the right technology.” If it gets the right technology? The truistic nature of this assertion has gone unnoticed. Djibouti, Qatar, and New Jersey would be able to develop nuclear weapons if they got “the right technology.”
Through September and October of 2002, the White House made it clear that Iraq would be attacked if it had weapons of mass destruction. Then in November 2002, Bush announced he would attack if Saddam denied that he had weapons of mass destruction. So if the Iraqis admit having such weapons, they will be bombed; and if they deny having them, they still will be bombed—whether they have them or not.

Read more here:
http://www.michaelparenti.org/IRAQGeorge2.htm

“If you put your ear to this,”

Since: May 13

You can hear a conservative

#57084 Apr 4, 2014
Love you wrote:
Love my hubby even tho he makes me mad sometimes :)
Dumb c_nt.
Just wondering

Glenside, PA

#57085 Apr 4, 2014
What's next
Love you

Philadelphia, PA

#57086 Apr 4, 2014
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumb c_nt.
Retarded d__chebag d_ck.
Mandela Funeral Selfie OK

Scranton, PA

#57087 Apr 4, 2014
White House objects to Samsung Ortiz and Obama selfie
April 4, 2014

The White House has objected to the tweeting of a selfie snapped by a member of a leading baseball team which included President Obama in the photograph.

The White House said the President's image should not be used for commercial gain.

David Ortiz denied that he was paid by Samsung to take the picture, as Alpa Patel reports.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-26880...
Lipstick on a Pig

Scranton, PA

#57088 Apr 4, 2014
Noonan: A Catastrophe Like No Other
April 3, 2014
The president tries to put a good face on ObamaCare.

...Support it or not, you cannot look at ObamaCare and call it anything but a huge, historic mess. It is also utterly unique in the annals of American lawmaking and government administration.

Its biggest proponent in Congress, the Democratic speaker of the House, literally said—blithely, mindlessly, but in a way forthcomingly—that we have to pass the bill to find out what's in it....

Her comments alarmed congressional Republicans but inspired Democrats, who for the next three years would carry on like blithering idiots making believe they'd read the bill and understood its implications. They were later taken aback by complaints from their constituents.

The White House, on the other hand, seems to have understood what the bill would do, and lied in a way so specific it showed they knew exactly what to spin and how.

"If you like your health-care plan, you can keep your health-care plan, period." "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, period." That of course was the president, misrepresenting the facts of his signature legislative effort. That was historic, too.

If you liked your doctor, your plan, your network, your coverage, your deductible you could not keep it....

What the bill declared it would do—insure tens of millions of uninsured Americans—it has not done. There are still tens of millions uninsured Americans. On the other hand, it has terrorized millions who did have insurance and lost it, or who still have insurance and may lose it.
...
There are very, very few Democrats who would do ObamaCare over again. Some would do something different, but they wouldn't do this. The cost of the blunder has been too high in terms of policy and politics.

They, and the president, are trying to put a good face on it.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142...
Unsettled Science

Scranton, PA

#57089 Apr 4, 2014
Climate scientists refuse to debate global warming ‘skeptics’ in the media
03/24/2014

Climate scientists and environmentalists are venting their frustrations debating those who are skeptical of man-made global warming — and some have even gone so far as to refuse debating skeptics.

Dan Weiss, the director of climate strategy at the liberal Center for American Progress, refused to appear on Fox Business to debate climate skeptic Marc Morano last week. Morano runs the blog Climate Depot, where he reports on environment and climate news.

Weiss was set to debate Morano on the show “The Independents” but “refused to debate directly with Morano, and chided [the show] for airing his views,” according to the Fox Business show.

“In what is part of a growing trend, yet another global warming activist ducked a TV debate,” Morano told the Daily Caller News Foundation.“Weiss and other activists claim the debate is so settled that granting a skeptic ‘equal time’ does some type of disservice to ‘science.’ Climate activists want to impose everything from carbon taxes, UN treaties, cap-and-trade, EPA regulations, light bulb restrictions, automobile regulations, even our bedtimes — yet they will not debate the basis for these actions.”

http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/24/climate-sci...

“If you put your ear to this,”

Since: May 13

You can hear a conservative

#57090 Apr 4, 2014
Unsettled Science wrote:
Climate scientists refuse to debate global warming ‘skeptics’ in the media
03/24/2014
Climate scientists and environmentalists are venting their frustrations debating those who are skeptical of man-made global warming — and some have even gone so far as to refuse debating skeptics.
Dan Weiss, the director of climate strategy at the liberal Center for American Progress, refused to appear on Fox Business to debate climate skeptic Marc Morano last week. Morano runs the blog Climate Depot, where he reports on environment and climate news.
Weiss was set to debate Morano on the show “The Independents” but “refused to debate directly with Morano, and chided [the show] for airing his views,” according to the Fox Business show.
“In what is part of a growing trend, yet another global warming activist ducked a TV debate,” Morano told the Daily Caller News Foundation.“Weiss and other activists claim the debate is so settled that granting a skeptic ‘equal time’ does some type of disservice to ‘science.’ Climate activists want to impose everything from carbon taxes, UN treaties, cap-and-trade, EPA regulations, light bulb restrictions, automobile regulations, even our bedtimes — yet they will not debate the basis for these actions.”
http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/24/climate-sci...
Make you a deal. You tell us what happens to the 27 billion metric tons of CO2 we pump in the atmosphere, and we'll debate. Unfortunately, not one idiot science denier can say. To debate against someone whose position is "Derr... I dunno" is quite the waste of time. The notion that we can deforest millions of acres of forest and pump 300 times more greenhouse gases in the atmosphere than is naturally produced and none of it have any detrimental effect is simply laughable. So please, tell us what happens. I'm all ears.
O_zone

Washington, DC

#57093 Apr 4, 2014
Basically one of the O's in the O2's living in an outer valance band of the CO2 molecule finds it more accomodating to join an random Oxygen molecule that then becomes O3 or something known as ozone. This ozone is being produced by those metric tons of soot that the No Brain blunt heads think isn't doing any harm to the wonderful weather we have been experiencing these days.
So. This ozone stuff likes to accumulate in the upper atmosphere of the Earth...you know the place we humans call home...the green house gases are up there baby. Even though we have had a cold winter this has been one of the warmest winters on average around the globe. Those super twisters will be coming to a neighborhood near you real soon ...its like a coming attraction at the theater.
Anyway, just about any reliable scientist who isn't on the energy company dole will attest to climate problems due to man made polutants. So, maybe 90 some percent...these independent scientists don't need to see it with their own eyes...they just know this is based on things like statistical data, physics, chemistry. You know the stuff that the blunt headed oddballs (Tea Party) despise and ridicule.
rainman

West Mifflin, PA

#57094 Apr 4, 2014
I guess the teabaggers don't believe in acid rain either,
but all scientists do, and it is real !
it's for real and has nothing to do with the earth's cycle as far as cold/hot years over millions of years.

Two elements, sulfur and nitrogen, are primarily responsible for the harmful effects of acid rain.

Sulfur is found as a trace element in coal and oil. When these are burned in power plants and industrial boilers, the sulfur combines with oxygen to form sulfur dioxide (SO2). Because SO2 does not react with most chemicals found in the atmosphere, it can travel long distances. Eventually, if it comes in contact with ozone or hydrogen peroxide, it can be converted to sulfur trioxide. Sulfur trioxide can dissolve in water, forming a dilute solution of sulfuric acid.
O_zone

Baltimore, MD

#57095 Apr 5, 2014
rainman wrote:
I guess the teabaggers don't believe in acid rain either,
but all scientists do, and it is real !
it's for real and has noething to do with the earth's cycle as far as cold/hot years over millions of years.
Two elements, sulfur and nitrogen, are primarily responsible for the harmful effects of acid rain.
Sulfur is found as a trace element in coal and oil. When these are burned in power plants and industrial boilers, the sulfur combines with oxygen to form sulfur dioxide (SO2). Because SO2 does not react with most chemicals found in the atmosphere, it can travel long distances. Eventually, if it comes in contact with ozone or hydrogen peroxide, it can be converted to sulfur trioxide. Sulfur trioxide can dissolve in water, forming a dilute solution of sulfuric acid.
No, they don't. They think its raining soda water. Thier blunted skulls are impervious to facts but they love fiction.....one of the great mysteries of our time.
LaughingAtYou

Chicago, IL

#57096 Apr 5, 2014
Love you wrote:
Love my hubby even tho he makes me mad sometimes :)
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumb c_nt.
A stranger's kind comment sets you off?

All that pent-up, irrational anger can't be healthy for you. You're wound too tight.

Professional therapy can sometimes help bitter, maladjusted women like you, sweetheart.

“If you put your ear to this,”

Since: May 13

You can hear a conservative

#57097 Apr 5, 2014
LaughingAtYou wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
A stranger's kind comment sets you off?
All that pent-up, irrational anger can't be healthy for you. You're wound too tight.
Professional therapy can sometimes help bitter, maladjusted women like you, sweetheart.
Poor dumb tea baggers will never understand comedy, music or have style. It's so funny.

George Bush is an admitted international war criminal. There. Go run back to your bunker now.
Understandably Ineloquent

Wilkes Barre, PA

#57099 Apr 5, 2014
Hillary struggles to list accomplishments during tenure as Secretary of State
April 4, 201

On April 3, 2014, Hillary Clinton spoke at the Women of the World Summit in New York City and was asked what she was most proud of during her tenure as Secretary of State.

Clinton could not provide any concrete examples of the accomplishments she holds in high regard.

“When you look at your time as Secretary of State, what are you most proud of? And what do you feel was unfinished, and maybe have another crack at one day?” the moderator asks.

“Well, I really see — that was good — that’s why he wins prizes. Look, I really see my role as Secretary, in fact leadership in general in a democracy, as a relay race. When you run the best race you can run, you hand off the baton. Some of what hasn’t been finished may go on to be finished, so when President Obama asked me to be Secretary of State I agreed,” Clinton responded.

She continued,“We had the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, we had two wars. We had continuing threats from all kinds of corners around the world that we had to deal with. So it was a perilous time frankly. What he said to me was,‘Look, I have to be dealing with the economic crisis, I want you to go out and represent us around the world.’ And it was a good division of labor because we needed to make it clear to the rest of the world, that we were going to get our house in order. We were going to stimulate, and grow, and get back to positive growth and work with our friends and partners.”

http://capitolcityproject.com/hillary-struggl...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Loretto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
grace mcguire (Feb '13) Nov 21 Gary Pelphrey 4
Apartment Hunting Sep '14 Jima 1
Nellie Lou Esworthy Aug '14 MARIANNE DUBOIS-Z... 1
Woman accused of having sex with boy Aug '14 no sex 1
celebrities phone numbers (Mar '08) Apr '14 CJ Robertson 16
brother in prison in loretto (Feb '10) Oct '13 Concerned 17
Pennsylvania: accused Franciscan friar commits ... (Feb '13) Feb '13 Fictional Shamed... 1
Loretto Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Loretto People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Loretto News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Loretto

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:58 pm PST

Bleacher Report 5:58PM
Kansas City Chiefs vs. Pittsburgh Steelers Betting Odds, Analysis, NFL Pick
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Eagles vs. Redskins: TV Info, Spread, Injury Updates, Game Time and More
Bleacher Report 4:24 AM
Kansas City Chiefs vs. Pittsburgh Steelers: Breaking Down the Chiefs' Game Plan
NBC Sports 5:16 AM
Chuck Pagano: It will take all hands on deck to contain Dez Bryant
NFL 6:04 AM
Chip: 'Shame on us' if Eagles miss playoffs with 11 wins