Who do you support for Governor in Pe...

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#52365 Aug 31, 2013
Did all that whining come out of the racial hating tea bag? YEP YEP. Blame your Reagan for being a socialist. You can call whatever makes it easier for your ignorant pea brain to sleep at night, now open that bottle of Limbaugh's nut juice and lay down fool.ahhhhhh what a tough hard ass on this here Internet. Stay away from reality
dbar

Perkasie, PA

#52366 Sep 1, 2013
Roger the Man LOL wrote:
<quoted text>BS. You post the same way, same typos, same misspellings and same grammar. You also forgot to log out a few times. Only a retard couldn't see this. You are a retard for trying to hide it. LMFAO. What exactly do you do for a living you retarded punk? When you were outed a few months ago, posting with the West Mifflin IP you started using the Homestead IP. When I mention dbar you crawled back out of your hole. Why don't you just post as Dan the Man<--------LMAO and forget all your other ID's? Really, get a woman or a man, you are one big loser.
you really are delusional.
medication probably would not help as you have slipped so far.

perhaps you are using the cheap stuff.
try
http://www.reynoldskitchens.com/products/alum...

"Reynolds Wrap® Super Strength is an even heavier weight foil "

perhaps you need help with.

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/build.html

"It can't be stressed enough how important it is to have the shiny side pointing out. This is needed because the shiny side is most reflective to psychotronic radiation, while the dull side can actually, in certain environmental conditions, absorb it. However, as is illustrated in the instructions above, it is also wise to complement this with a layer of foil pointing shiny side in. This will keep your brain waves, which are also reflected by the shiny side, from being picked up by mind-reading equipment. There is a small number of aluminum foil researchers who believe that this may cause an alpha-wave harmonic to build up in the skull resulting in memory loss or pseudo-religious visions, but their findings have never been replicated by the aluminum foil research community at large. Even if their findings are validated, the risk involved is small compared to the potential of mind-intrusion."

good luck as you need it.

“Comfort the afflicted”

Since: May 13

Afflict the comfortable

#52369 Sep 1, 2013
The BHO Legacy wrote:
NSA Overreach May Have Contributed To UK's Unwillingness To Help With Syria
Aug 30th 2013
As you may have heard, UK Prime Minister David Cameron dealt with something of an embarrassment when the UK Parliament voted down his Syria policy this week. There are a number of reasons why this likely happened, but an editorial in the Guardian notes that the latest NSA surveillance revelations may have had something to do with it:
"There is no evidence that British public opinion has turned isolationist. There is plenty of evidence that it is fed up with the debilitating post 9/11 years of national sacrifice, with the humiliating excesses of US national security policy (not least its abuses of human rights and surveillance), with the unequal burden-sharing among allies and, above all, with the failures of policy."
Yes, there are a variety of issues buried in there, but key among them is the "excesses" of the US' "national security policy" complete with excess surveillance. We've been pointing out for a while that these revelations could have wider impact and reverberate much further than US officials seem willing to admit, but this may be a small sign of that in action.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130830/170...
They're talking about the war criminal sonuvaBush, not Obama, dipshit. Brits are still astonished he isn't at the Hague for what he did to our nation as well Britain and Iraq with his lies. after all, Bush started the surveillance program and invading the wrong country is the "embarrassment."
Al Busillo

Ringwood, NJ

#52372 Sep 1, 2013
A little nerve gas keeps them in line

“Comfort the afflicted”

Since: May 13

Afflict the comfortable

#52374 Sep 1, 2013
Why do you dumb tea baggers talk about Congress authorizing the war criminal's invasion of the wrong country? It was based on Bush's lies. You don't get to hold up a picture of a water truck and claim it's a "mobile chemical weapons facility" then wonder why people want to attack. He lied. Congress fell for it. And if the '88 attacks warranted our 2003 invasion, I guess that means Obama has until around 2034 to go after Syria. Dumbasses.
D Cheney

West Mifflin, PA

#52375 Sep 1, 2013
It took Bush 2 years to plan an attack against Iraq.......why the rush to attack Syria?
dbar

Perkasie, PA

#52376 Sep 1, 2013
The BHO Legacy wrote:
NSA Overreach May Have Contributed To UK's Unwillingness To Help With Syria
Aug 30th 2013
As you may have heard, UK Prime Minister David Cameron dealt with something of an embarrassment when the UK Parliament voted down his Syria policy this week. There are a number of reasons why this likely happened, but an editorial in the Guardian notes that the latest NSA surveillance revelations may have had something to do with it:
"There is no evidence that British public opinion has turned isolationist. There is plenty of evidence that it is fed up with the debilitating post 9/11 years of national sacrifice, with the humiliating excesses of US national security policy (not least its abuses of human rights and surveillance), with the unequal burden-sharing among allies and, above all, with the failures of policy."
Yes, there are a variety of issues buried in there, but key among them is the "excesses" of the US' "national security policy" complete with excess surveillance. We've been pointing out for a while that these revelations could have wider impact and reverberate much further than US officials seem willing to admit, but this may be a small sign of that in action.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130830/170...
and from that editorial.

" As a result, right from the start of its spiralling civil war, Syria has felt like a sacrifice too far. When the latest call to arms came, though it came from a respected American president and was provoked by clearly intolerable war crimes, the answer was a clear one. Enough."
Roger the Man LOL

Clearfield, PA

#52378 Sep 1, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
They're talking about the war criminal sonuvaBush, not Obama, dipshit. Brits are still astonished he isn't at the Hague for what he did to our nation as well Britain and Iraq with his lies. after all, Bush started the surveillance program and invading the wrong country is the "embarrassment."
and the secret muslim gave it mega doses of steroids.
Roger the Man LOL

Clearfield, PA

#52379 Sep 1, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
Why do you dumb tea baggers talk about Congress authorizing the war criminal's invasion of the wrong country? It was based on Bush's lies. You don't get to hold up a picture of a water truck and claim it's a "mobile chemical weapons facility" then wonder why people want to attack. He lied. Congress fell for it. And if the '88 attacks warranted our 2003 invasion, I guess that means Obama has until around 2034 to go after Syria. Dumbasses.
Bush lied? Look up the definition of lie then get back to me. Better yet, just listen to your Muslim speak, then do the research. Obama's entire life was built around lies. But, because he is a black man and feeds your family at the expense of the hard working taxpayer everything is cool. If anyone is a dumbass it's you.

“Comfort the afflicted”

Since: May 13

Afflict the comfortable

#52380 Sep 1, 2013
Roger the Man LOL wrote:
<quoted text> Bush lied? Look up the definition of lie then get back to me. Better yet, just listen to your Muslim speak, then do the research. Obama's entire life was built around lies. But, because he is a black man and feeds your family at the expense of the hard working taxpayer everything is cool. If anyone is a dumbass it's you.
A lie is to deliberately deceive. That's what Bush did. His own cabinet admitted it. He also committed more war crimes than just invading the wrong country and lying about it.
Dave Rogers

Clearfield, PA

#52381 Sep 2, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
A lie is to deliberately deceive. That's what Bush did. His own cabinet admitted it. He also committed more war crimes than just invading the wrong country and lying about it.


Okay, I'm going to be serious with you. This is something I rarely do on Topix, because of a few know-it-alls, liars and idiots.

From what I remember Bush was given information that was not accurate. Now, if Bush believed the information to be true and took this information before Congress to get their approval to invade, how is this a lie? When Bush received approval from Democrats and Republicans this would make those who voted to invade liars too, using your logic.

If his cabinet said Bush lied then kindly post an unbiased news source on this. What war crimes did Bush actually commit? I don't remember Bush being convicted or even charged for any war crimes. Again, I ask you for an unbiased news source.

Bush invaded the wrong country and lied about it?

I'm waiting your reply.

Since: May 12

Chambersburg, PA

#52385 Sep 2, 2013
Dave Rogers wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, I'm going to be serious with you. This is something I rarely do on Topix
Truer words were never spoken.
C Powell

West Mifflin, PA

#52386 Sep 2, 2013
Dave Rogers wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, I'm going to be serious with you. This is something I rarely do on Topix, because of a few know-it-alls, liars and idiots.
From what I remember Bush was given information that was not accurate. Now, if Bush believed the information to be true and took this information before Congress to get their approval to invade, how is this a lie? When Bush received approval from Democrats and Republicans this would make those who voted to invade liars too, using your logic.
If his cabinet said Bush lied then kindly post an unbiased news source on this. What war crimes did Bush actually commit? I don't remember Bush being convicted or even charged for any war crimes. Again, I ask you for an unbiased news source.
Bush invaded the wrong country and lied about it?
I'm waiting your reply.
The Lie That Got Us In: The Bush Administration Knew There Were No WMDs in Iraq:

wesley clark has reported in his book that the pentagon had plans to invade seven countries after 9/11 -- iraq being one of them.

former weapons inspectors like scott ritter should also be cited.

plus more on the illegality of the war.

plus the fact that saddam hussein was being honest in his massive release of iraqi documents before the war.

Bush administration truly believed their own assessments of Iraqi WMDs, the most authoritative intelligence concluded they were not an imminent threat to the United States. The administration went to war anyways. That makes the war a preventive war, which falls into the category of war crimes and incriminates the Bush administration regardless of what they truly believed about Iraq’s WMDs.

“Comfort the afflicted”

Since: May 13

Afflict the comfortable

#52388 Sep 2, 2013
The UN, CIA and British Intel all said there were no WMDs. The CIA was later directed by Bush to "make a case." Powell admitted he was told to "sell the WMDs" to the world. These are war crimes, along with torturing prisoners and war profiteering. Bush was given immunity by Obama as one of his first acts. It was a mistake, although the damage done to this country internationally would've been severe.

“Comfort the afflicted”

Since: May 13

Afflict the comfortable

#52392 Sep 2, 2013
bacon face wrote:
His point is a republican controlled house and senate puts people to work...
a democratically controlled house and senate puts people on the couch!
And when obama repealed all of clintons work requirements for govt assistance it took a big jump!
Why work for $400 a week when the govt will give you $380 for sittin on your azz?
..........
Truer words were never spoken.
Dumber words were never spoken. Clinton built a giant economy with a surplus. Republicans destroyed it with illegal wars and unfunded tax cuts for billionaires. Now, a democrat has rebuilt it. And they still wonder why they can't win an election.

“Comfort the afflicted”

Since: May 13

Afflict the comfortable

#52396 Sep 2, 2013
Clinton built wrote:
<quoted text>
..........
You are in for a surprise my friend..
very soon..
I am not going to chastise you, or even try to change your mind...
just want you to REMEMBER,
I told about that big economic surprise that is coming...
are you laughing yet?
Yep it was me,
I said it,
and you LOL'd ,
now lets just sit back and watch...
let me know when your crying...
I'll add this to the list of dumb tea bagger predictions along with "America won't elect a black president" and "Iraq will greet us as liberators."

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#52399 Sep 2, 2013
Only in tea bag land you desperate little one

“Comfort the afflicted”

Since: May 13

Afflict the comfortable

#52400 Sep 2, 2013
bobby6464 wrote:
Only in tea bag land you desperate little one
This dumb tea bagger will continue to post tea bagger blogs and pretend that readers will fall for them as news because he, like all dumb tea baggers, think that everyone else is as stupid as they are. Losing elections, being the laughingstocks of planet Earth and facts don't have any effect on them. They just keep blindly pushing forward with their ignorant agenda, oblivious to all reality. It would bother me if they weren't do damn funny.

“Comfort the afflicted”

Since: May 13

Afflict the comfortable

#52409 Sep 2, 2013
Why don't you take another vote to repeal the ACA? I mean, at about $8 million apiece, you've done it 40 TIMES. And you're 0-for-40. This from the people who call themselves "fiscally conservative." And the dumbasses still can't figure out why they can't win an election. But like I said, you're good for a laugh. After all, these are the people who tried to give Sarah Palin the launch codes.

Did you hear about Palin's recent FBI investigation? Yeah, they had to check her computers for security breaches. When they did, they found out she was using this password:

MickeyMinnieDonaldDaffyHueyDew eyLouiePlutoSacramento

When they asked her why she chose such a crazy password, she said it was because she was told to make sure it had at least 8 characters and one capital.

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#52412 Sep 2, 2013
What's a real ignorant racial hating tea bag to do with only pretend make believe political capital to do? President Obama won his and now he's spending it. Tea baggers can't do nothing about reality. That is a fact so keep on keeping on with that sippy cup full tilt full of that Limbaugh's nut juice as a pain relief, dumb asses. Tea bags need to bend over as president Obama about to slam the affordable care all up in and deep.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Loretto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jesus, Son of God (Mar '14) Sat deer hunter 5
News Our view: Could Erie church closing be new begi... Jul '15 Arington Sonya 6
celebrities phone numbers (Mar '08) Jul '15 Kandee805 17
What happen now? Jun '15 DontFront 1
Cambria County Prison (Dec '11) Jun '15 DontFront 4
Appeals court nixes suit May '15 unknown 1
To the REALIST, (Mar '14) Apr '15 The devil 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Loretto Mortgages