Who do you support for Governor in Pennsylvania in 2010?

[jmdammit]

Winston Smith wrote:

Hey Dan the man, what's the matter? Can't back your statement up on the "Audience urges board to stop indifference" thread.
I'm waiting for the Bible verse about wasting a seed.
First you said no where in the Bible does it state homosexuality is wrong. I present you with Leviticus 20:13. You know, where God told Moses it's an abomination for a man to lie with another man. The only response you had was wasting a seed. Okay, lets see it. Can you back your statement up or this another Dan the man distortion?
Get ready for DTM spinning and lying. I have caught him so many times lying and the doofus still denies it. He will try to change the subject and act like thw innocent one. Here's the thing.....everyone knows how you operate. So you go right ahead and try to squirm out of this one...this ought to be another good laugh provided by the topix clown.
Did you folks know that DTM thinks he knows more then God?

I don't know about the "God thing" but he holds "theory" higher than "fact".

[Colorado Chick]

OMG!! THIS thread is being OVER-PLAYED!!... Science has invaded this political thread..Hmmmm, is it different..Science and Politics??... Nah, each blow g HOT AIR...TEMPERATURE CONTROL!!

[jmdammit]

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:

<quoted text>
I already tried to educate you on this. Read it again. This time pay special attention to the difference between a fact and a theory.
----------
Definitions of Fact, Theory, and Law in Scientific Work
Science uses specialized terms that have different meanings than everyday usage. These definitions correspond to the way scientists typically use these terms in the context of their work. Note, especially, that the meaning of “theory” in science is different than the meaning of “theory” in everyday conversation.
- Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” Truth in science, however, is never final and what is accepted as a fact today may be modified or even discarded tomorrow.
- Hypothesis: A tentative statement about the natural world leading to deductions that can be tested. If the deductions are verified, the hypothesis is provisionally corroborated. If the deductions are incorrect, the original hypothesis is proved false and must be abandoned or modified. Hypotheses can be used to build more complex inferences and explanations.
- Law: A descriptive generalization about how some aspect of the natural world behaves under stated circumstances.
- Theory: In science, a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses.
----------
Also, I have no idea what your Jack Wagner gibberish means.

your attempts to "educate" me ignore the basic points of my opposion...it is a THEORY...not a fact.As to the "Jack Wagner Gibberish",check out the title of this thread...I supported Jack Wagner in 2010,and global warming is not his fault.

[Dan the Man Chambersburg]

jmdammit wrote:

<quoted text>your attempts to "educate" me ignore the basic points of my opposion...it is a THEORY...not a fact.As to the "Jack Wagner Gibberish",check out the title of this thread...I supported Jack Wagner in 2010,and global warming is not his fault.

It's sad that you choose ignorance over education. I guess that's what you have to do when education threatens your political ideology.

There is no doubt that man-made global warming is happening. The facts prove the theory. In science, a theory is the highest form of proof you can get.

[Winston Smith]

It's sad that you choose ignorance over fact. I guess that's what you have to do when facts threaten your political ideology.

There is no doubt that God told Moses man lying with another man is an abomination,(Leviticus20:13). The Bible proves the fact.

[jmdammit]

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:

<quoted text>
It's sad that you choose ignorance over education. I guess that's what you have to do when education threatens your political ideology.
There is no doubt that man-made global warming is happening. The facts prove the theory. In science, a theory is the highest form of proof you can get.

If the facts prove the theory,it is no longer a theory.Edu cation does not threaten my political ideaology.Jack Wagner doesn't cause global warming.Not a "THEORY",but a "FACT".Have you read the title of this thread? Or does your political idealogy threaten your education?

[Winston Smith]

Winston Smith wrote:

Hey Dan the man, what's the matter? Can't back your statement up on the "Audience urges board to stop indifference" thread.
I'm waiting for the Bible verse about wasting a seed.
First you said no where in the Bible does it state homosexuality is wrong. I present you with Leviticus 20:13. You know, where God told Moses it's an abomination for a man to lie with another man. The only response you had was wasting a seed. Okay, lets see it. Can you back your statement up or this another Dan the man distortion?
Get ready for DTM spinning and lying. I have caught him so many times lying and the doofus still denies it. He will try to change the subject and act like thw innocent one. Here's the thing.....everyone knows how you operate. So you go right ahead and try to squirm out of this one...this ought to be another good laugh provided by the topix clown.
Did you folks know that DTM thinks he knows more then God?

Still no response from Dan the man. This is what he does when he is caught lying. He runs and hopes the subject is forgotten, if not he will spin and lie and try to turn it on the other peeson.

Well Dan the man, caught lying again and he says he never lies. That in itself is a lie.

[Dan the Man Chambersburg]

jmdammit wrote:

<quoted text>If the facts prove the theory,it is no longer a theory.Edu cation does not threaten my political ideaology.Jack Wagner doesn't cause global warming.Not a "THEORY",but a "FACT".Have you read the title of this thread? Or does your political idealogy threaten your education?

LOL! Now you're just posting gibberish. Maybe you should go get some sleep.

[jmdammit]

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL! Now you're just posting gibberish. Maybe you should go get some sleep.

Good idea idea.your ramblings have made me sleepy.However,the title of this thread is indeed(fact) titled "who do you support for governor in pennsylvania in 2010 ?" Jack Wagner is more relevant than global warming.

[jmdammit]

And I've mentioned Jack Wagner in "more than one" post.That Danny was the way back.After over 44,000 posts,we're back to "Governor. Good.Night,nice chattin'.

[Punk215]

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:

<quoted text>
Solar activity isn't at fault. Human pollution is.

hey dan the man. i have been trying to catch up on the debate you are having. What is the underlying topic? I would like to chime in on it, if you don't mind. i do HVAC/R for a living and have some concerns on the whole new EPA laws and changes put into my field by the government all in regards to saving the climate, but also at the same time of doing my homework have come to learn it not all for the environment, but for profit and that makes me sick.

[Quoth the Raven]

Is TaxNoMore nevermore?

[Punk215]

Quoth the Raven wrote:

Is TaxNoMore nevermore?

Taxes are good if done with honesty, but there no honesty in government, only selfish needs to be fulfilled. It like the circus, the greatest show on earth.

[John Galt]

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, you really don't have any idea what you're talking about AT ALL. You just jump right into a debate know knowing ANYTHING about the basic facts.
When the globe warmed in the past due to natural causes, those causes were identified. It didn't just happen without explanation. People understand why it happened and what was behind it. And those factors aren't at work today.
The globe is warming today because of increased levels of CO2 in the atmosphere. The source of that CO2 is human activity. There is no debate about this. It is proven fact.
When you know as little as you do about the basic facts, you really ought to do yourself a favor and not embarrass yourself by trying to debate something you know nothing about.

Humans should stop breathing and exhaling CO2.

Eliminate 500 million or so Chinese and make a huge dent in global warming.

Or turn off the heat and freeze to death.

[John Galt]

jmdammit wrote:

<quoted text>No,Fact is the highest form.The earth is round and rotates around the sun.A proven FACT.Manmade global warming is a theory.And it's still not Jack Wagner's fault.Of course,this is just a theoy.If enough people research it and form a consensus,it just might be Jack's fault.

Who is Jack Wagner?

[John Galt]

Dan the Man Chambersburg wrote:

<quoted text>
It's sad that you choose ignorance over education. I guess that's what you have to do when education threatens your political ideology.
There is no doubt that man-made global warming is happening. The facts prove the theory. In science, a theory is the highest form of proof you can get.

Assuming that you are correct, a ridiculous assumption, how does man reverse global warming?

[Farnsworth]

jmdammit wrote:

<quoted text>If the facts prove the theory,it is no longer a theory.Edu cation does not threaten my political ideaology.Jack Wagner doesn't cause global warming.Not a "THEORY",but a "FACT".Have you read the title of this thread? Or does your political idealogy threaten your education?

Now this makes a lot of sense...good grammer to....
I understand it all now...you've made it very clear....hahahahahaaha

[Farnsworth]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Who is Jack Wagner?

He's you're long lost brother...you guys were seperated at birth....

Mom had better things to do.....

Have fun with the spell checking too. You guys should get along just peachy...

[D Cheney]

Mitt Romney says it "kills" him that he's not president. But he doesn't blame Superstorm Sandy, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie or anything else on his loss to President Barack Obama--except his campaign's failure to connect with minority voters.

“I lost my election because of my campaign," Romney said on "Fox News Sunday" in his first television interview since his November defeat. "Not because of what anyone else did."

The former Massachusetts governor refused place blame on Christie, who some Republicans say gave Obama a last-minute lift in his embrace of the president in the wake of the storm.

Romney said his inability to win over black and Hispanic voters--and the damage done by those disastrous "47 percent" comments--ultimately derailed his White House bid.

Ann Romney, though, pointed the finger at the fourth estate.“It was not just the campaign’s fault," Ann Romney said. "I believe it was the media's fault as well, in that he was not being given a fair shake--that people weren’t allowed to really see him for who he was. I’m happy to blame the media.”

Her husband, she said, "has an enormous skill set in dealing with difficult issues and I totally believe at this moment, if Mitt were there in the office, that we would not be facing sequestration right now."

[Paul]

Farnsworth wrote:

<quoted text>
He's you're long lost brother...you guys were seperated at birth....
Mom had better things to do.....
Have fun with the spell checking too. You guys should get along just peachy...

Speaking of good grammar and spelling. LOL