Who do you support for Governor in Pennsylvania in 2010?

[John Galt]

skip the pee pee wrote:

<quoted text>
So you're FOR decreasing small business revenues? What happened to wah wah wah, small business is the engine of our economy, wah wah wah?

Reducing overhead for the lottery benefits taxpayers.

Small businesses that suck the blood of the poor running a scam do not deserve any sympathy.

[RepublicansFail]

TerryE wrote:

What about Democrat "talking points" like Pelosi's "You have to pass it to find what's in it!" That sure scored high with IQ points! What makes you pseudo-intellectual Democrats think that socialism is a step forward in human advancement? Ya can't fix stupid!
My president was elected by dead people!
Regards, Terri
<quoted text>

Perfect example of the Republicans appealing to your stupidity. That remark was then and is now taken totally out of context. She said that because of the background criticisms being made that the health care reform was going to be paying for abortions for all and death panels for the elderly. All stupid and untrue arguments made by morons and believed by idiots like you. So she said that quote of yours as meaning basically "just wait for the law to take effect and the idiotic criticisms will be proven false." Nice try though, and clearly your IQ points are lacking, just like most republican morons in this area. And no one advocates socialism as an economic agenda. Socialistic policies, like social security and medicare, do make good sense though where there is no market incentive to cure an economic shortfall. And indeed, you can't fix stupid, and clearly you are beyond repair. I hope your kids turn out better, or even better that you don't have kids.

[NoOpinion]

Try getting the message:
----------
"The Stupid Party"

--Bobby Jindal

[RepublicansFail]

Lol. I just wonder if TaxNoMore has padded walls at his place.

[LaughingAtYou]

TacksKnow More wrote:

The party of stupid is starting to lighten treir load.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/28/opinion/kurtz-p...

Priceless
==========
"The party of stupid is starting to lighten treir load."

[Franklin Templeton]

RepublicansFail wrote:

Lol. I just wonder if TaxNoMore has padded walls at his place.

Oh Yes, he does have padded walls so nobody can see change his tampon....yuckkkkk
He's a nasty bast.ard, isn't he?

He'd be better suited in a zoo....

[skip the pee pee]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Reducing overhead for the lottery benefits taxpayers.
Small businesses that suck the blood of the poor running a scam do not deserve any sympathy.

Here is the question the answer to which I truly do not know: Will this sale end up with the government having more net incoming revenue or not?

As to businesses sucking the blood out of the poor, you don't actually want people caring about each other now do you Mr. Galt? ;)

BTW I think it's a good idea that welfare recipients or people filing bankruptcy be barred from the lottery. Also lawyers. I just don't like lawyers :)

[skip the pee pee]

Franklin Templeton wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh Yes, he does have padded walls so nobody can see change his tampon....yuckkkkk
He's a nasty bast.ard, isn't he?
He'd be better suited in a zoo....

I like him because he's a dick. We have to stick together like the blacks do ;)

[skip the pee pee]

TaxNoMore wrote:

<quoted text>
.
.
.
I bet GE would like to see some of your e-mails.
.
.
November you would be standing in the free turkey line at Perry square.

You mean because of my brilliant fiscal ideas, right?
:)

[Franklin Templeton]

skip the pee pee wrote:

<quoted text>
I like him because he's a dick. We have to stick together like the blacks do ;)

I got news for you buddy....you're running with a king dork here....

Hahahahaahhahaaa

[Franklin Templeton]

TaxNoMore wrote:

skip the pee pee
Erie, PA
Franklin Templeton
New York, NY
LaughingAtYou
Chicago, IL
RepublicansFail
Hollidaysburg, PA
NoOpinion
New Castle, PA
//////////
Let's hear what you indoctrinated drones have to say.
Tell me about your black messiah and what the future holds for you and your family.

Well...let's see now hmmmm its about 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000 percent better than a friggin Romney/Ryan travesty....and that's just as plain as the poop in your diapers....isn't it?

[Franklin Templeton]

TaxNoMore wrote:

skip the pee pee
Erie, PA
Franklin Templeton
New York, NY
LaughingAtYou
Chicago, IL
RepublicansFail
Hollidaysburg, PA
NoOpinion
New Castle, PA
//////////
Let's hear what you indoctrinated drones have to say.
Tell me about your black messiah and what the future holds for you and your family.

Pretty fckn original for an indoctinated drone, huh?

Bettter than your empty headed cut and paste nonsense that's for sure...

And change those diapers too. they're starting to smell really bad.

[John Galt]

skip the pee pee wrote:

<quoted text>
Here is the question the answer to which I truly do not know: Will this sale end up with the government having more net incoming revenue or not?
As to businesses sucking the blood out of the poor, you don't actually want people caring about each other now do you Mr. Galt? ;)
BTW I think it's a good idea that welfare recipients or people filing bankruptcy be barred from the lottery. Also lawyers. I just don't like lawyers :)

Taxes are 80% of the revenue and should increase if out-of-state sales are reduced.

Eliminating future pension liabilities for state store workers will provide long-term savings.

However, consumer choice is the real benefit. State liquor stores carry only what they choose. Private stores will be responsive to consumer demand.

[skip the pee pee]

TaxNoMore wrote:

skip the pee pee
Erie, PA
Franklin Templeton
New York, NY
LaughingAtYou
Chicago, IL
RepublicansFail
Hollidaysburg, PA
NoOpinion
New Castle, PA
//////////
Let's hear what you indoctrinated drones have to say.
Tell me about your black messiah and what the future holds for you and your family.

Not sure what you mean about the black messiah except as you want to bring his half-black race into things. If he had your opinions I'd think he's an asswipe just as you are. He's nothing except someone with defined opinions to me, some of which I agree with. I don't know him personally. You?

And as to you listing my city...ooh...I'm scared. I'll gladly list my name and address anytime to anyone who asks and have done it before. What's the big "move that bus" reveal? I screw around sometimes, other times I'm serious. I've no shame here. It's a goof or something I want to challenge people with. But I'm who I am. You?

[skip the pee pee]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Taxes are 80% of the revenue and should increase if out-of-state sales are reduced.
Eliminating future pension liabilities for state store workers will provide long-term savings.
However, consumer choice is the real benefit. State liquor stores carry only what they choose. Private stores will be responsive to consumer demand.

Not sure if you answered what I asked.

Anyhow, why would State liquor stores not carry what consumers demand and also why would private stores carry what consumers demand if they didn't want to? Private stores can do what they want for their own reasons--such as blacklist brands for enhanced benefits from other brands--correct?(Shelf placement being a similar example.)

[Lou Schwartz]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Taxes are 80% of the revenue and should increase if out-of-state sales are reduced.
Eliminating future pension liabilities for state store workers will provide long-term savings.
However, consumer choice is the real benefit. State liquor stores carry only what they choose. Private stores will be responsive to consumer demand.

You're speaking from a vacuum.

[ref]

Super Bowl XLVII: 5 Reasons To Root Against The Ravens
http://www.footballnation.com/content/super-b...

[skip the pee pee]

Lou Schwartz wrote:

<quoted text>You're speaking from a vacuum.

I believe that's because he's speaking into a tube.

[John Galt]

skip the pee pee wrote:

<quoted text>
Not sure if you answered what I asked.
Anyhow, why would State liquor stores not carry what consumers demand and also why would private stores carry what consumers demand if they didn't want to? Private stores can do what they want for their own reasons--such as blacklist brands for enhanced benefits from other brands--correct?(Shelf placement being a similar example.)

The revenue loss to the Commonwealth, if any, would be negligible. The enhanced consumer choice would be well worth any reduced income.

Competition would force private stores to carry what consumers want.

Shelf placement is usually determined by price, with the highest priced brands receiving the best placement.

The only downside (for you) is that the clerks would earn far less, comparable to similar jobs in private industry.

Come to one of the excellent wineries here, learn that the Commonwealth will not stock their product, and then learn that they are prohibited from shipping to customers in the Commonwealth.

[Als Jazerra]

This money grab by Corbett should be better than the 2001 money grab by our legislators " I'll take a 50 % pension grab and give PSERS 25 % "
Sharia law would be better than anything coming from this gang that can't shoot straight.