Who do you support for Governor in Pennsylvania in 2010?

[makin da bacon]

Benghazi gate is over. Find something else to sensationalize.

[Dan the Man]

Dave Rogers wrote:

<quoted text> Yep, I'm racist

LOL! I know.

Thanks for finally admitting it.

[TaxNoMore]

Obama stamps foot, demands no-limit credit card

[Dave Rogers]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL! I know.
Thanks for finally admitting it.

This is one reason you have no respect on here. Once again here is the entire post. LOL

Yep, I'm racist and you're a homo. BOO!

[TaxNoMore]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL! I know.
Thanks for finally admitting it.

//////////

Thanks for finally admitting it.

//////////

Samantha Power of the Atlantic said it best as the author of the Pulitzer-Prize winning

A Problem of Hell

who referred to

Ambassador Susan Rice and her colleagues in the Clinton Administration as Bystanders to Genocide said it best when she quoted Rice in her 2002 book

“If we use the word ‘genocide’

and are seen as doing nothing, what will be the effect on the November congressional election?”

.
.

Meaning – Rice’s saw genocide as being less important than partisan politics interests.

This is not partisan on Power’s behalf, seeing that presently Power currently is a Special Assistant to President Barack Obama.

//////////

Meaning –

Rice’s saw Benghazi as being less important than partisan politics interests.

//////////

Thy Incompetence of Susan Rice.

[Dan the Man]

Dave Rogers wrote:

<quoted text> This is one reason you have no respect on here. Once again here is the entire post. LOL
Yep, I'm racist and you're a homo. BOO!

See, this is how English works - when you make two declarative statements joined by the word 'and,' both declarative statements can stand on their own.

In this case, your first statement was "I'm a racist" (which happens to be true).

Your second statement was, "You're a homo" (which is not only false, it's also so hopelessly middle school that it makes you look even more juvenile than I thought you were).

Just because you chose to join those two statements with the word 'and' doesn't change the fact that they are still two separate statements.

And I chose to address only one of your two statements. Everyone here is free to address parts of anyone else's post. That's not dishonest or misleading - it's just how the world works.

You really need to grow up, Roger the Racist. Get a grip and stop acting like such a baby.

[Dan the Man]

Dave Rogers wrote:

<quoted text> This is one reason you have no respect on here. Once again here is the entire post. LOL
Yep, I'm racist and you're a homo. BOO!

And what is it with all you wingnuts who think calling someone a homosexual is an insult. It's the 21st century - it's time to grow the hell up.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised - racial bigotry and homophobia usually go together. They're both signs of the kind of stunted character development and emotional retardation you've repeatedly demonstrated here. LOL!

[Dave Rogers]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
See, this is how English works - when you make two declarative statements joined by the word 'and,' both declarative statements can stand on their own.
In this case, your first statement was "I'm a racist" (which happens to be true).
Your second statement was, "You're a homo" (which is not only false, it's also so hopelessly middle school that it makes you look even more juvenile than I thought you were).
Just because you chose to join those two statements with the word 'and' doesn't change the fact that they are still two separate statements.
And I chose to address only one of your two statements. Everyone here is free to address parts of anyone else's post. That's not dishonest or misleading - it's just how the world works.
You really need to grow up, Roger the Racist. Get a grip and stop acting like such a baby.

Lighten up dumbass.

I'm serious, lighten up.

[Dan the Man]

Dave Rogers wrote:

<quoted text>
Lighten up dumbass.
I'm serious, lighten up.

What makes you think I'm not light? Just because I have to explain things to you like you're a first grader?

LOL! Relax - I don't mind.

Hell, after this long over-due confession, I'm more than happy to indulge your childlike understanding of English grammar.

Dave Rogers wrote:

<quoted text> Yep, I'm racist

[Dave Rogers]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Republicans are afraid to support anything the UN does. They have convinced their ignorant base that supporting the UN is taking away our sovereignty. So now they are so pathetic,they can even vote to help the disabled people in other countries.

Why do we need the united nations to over see our laws? This is a slippery slope that gives away our sovereighnty! You need to brush up on your history...we are the greatest nation on the planet that has done more to free the oppressed, feed the hungry, always there in times of need for others and we give more money to other countries than anyone. Why in the hell do we need the United Nations? We can do the the same thing without them. You are sounding like a socialist!....I'm not surprised!

[TaxNoMore]

.
.

Dan the Man "tight,lean"

[TaxNoMore]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
See, this is how English works - when you make two declarative statements joined by the word 'and,' both declarative statements can stand on their own.
In this case, your first statement was "I'm a racist" (which happens to be true).
Your second statement was, "You're a homo" (which is not only false, it's also so hopelessly middle school that it makes you look even more juvenile than I thought you were).
Just because you chose to join those two statements with the word 'and' doesn't change the fact that they are still two separate statements.
And I chose to address only one of your two statements. Everyone here is free to address parts of anyone else's post. That's not dishonest or misleading - it's just how the world works.
You really need to grow up, Roger the Racist. Get a grip and stop acting like such a baby.

..........

Find a new bone, chickenshit.

[TaxNoMore]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
What makes you think I'm not light? Just because I have to explain things to you like you're a first grader?
LOL! Relax - I don't mind.
Hell, after this long over-due confession, I'm more than happy to indulge your childlike understanding of English grammar.
<quoted text>

Get a grip freak, it makes you a psychotic jackass.

[Dan the Man]

Dave Rogers wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do we need the united nations to over see our laws? This is a slippery slope that gives away our sovereighnty! You need to brush up on your history...we are the greatest nation on the planet that has done more to free the oppressed, feed the hungry, always there in times of need for others and we give more money to other countries than anyone. Why in the hell do we need the United Nations? We can do the the same thing without them. You are sounding like a socialist!....I'm not surprised!

Wow, you have no understanding of the treaty AT ALL. LOL! Why am I not surprised.

The UN treaty on disabilities was an international agreement encouraging all participating nations to live up to the standard the United States has set with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

It wouldn't have impacted the US in any way since we already have the gold standard of disability legislation. Our signing on would just have given the treaty additional credibility as we are the world leader in this area.

The ignorant, fearful GOP has just succeeded in making the US look stupid and backward. ANOTHER international embarrassment at the hands of the ignorant, backwardassed conspiracy theorists.

[RealDave]

Dave Rogers wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do we need the united nations to over see our laws? This is a slippery slope that gives away our sovereighnty! You need to brush up on your history...we are the greatest nation on the planet that has done more to free the oppressed, feed the hungry, always there in times of need for others and we give more money to other countries than anyone. Why in the hell do we need the United Nations? We can do the the same thing without them. You are sounding like a socialist!....I'm not surprised!

You need to brush up on your sanity.

It is a treaty with other nations. It has nothing to do with our sovereignty. It has to do with a group of nations getting together to work on a common cause. Each country pledging to do its part within its own country.

My God, you right whiners get dumber every fricking day.

T

[TaxNoMore]

You really need to grow up, Roger the Racist.

Get a grip and stop acting like such a baby.

//////////

Dan the Man
Carlisle, PA

sez

If Topix would clean up the verbal vomit of the mentally retarded troll, this thread would probably have half as many posts.

//////////

Do you mean terms like

----------

psychotic lies and hysterical bullshit

Grow up, chickenshit.

Why do Republicans hate America?

argue about irrelevant shit

their asinine ideas

you're a chickenshit coward

[I am] your moral superior

Dipshit the Fool is back

I've pasted it here half a dozen times, dipshit. Can't you read?

chickenshit liar

you might just be plain stupid

their asinine ideas

it makes you a psychotic jackass

Get a grip, freak

[?]Undermining the democratic principle of "majority rules" to prevent the will of the people from being enacted is un-American.

People who do un-American things obviously hate America.

your irrational pathetic existence

Chickenshit liar?

You lie. I do not.

[of North Carolinians] party while you can, bigots.

chickenshit

that makes me morally superior to you.

[love this one] You're a boring and tedious child who just doesn't have the mental capacity to have adult debate.

You being an idiot doesn't make me a liar.

you've never been right about anything.

Facts and reality are irrelevant to the right.

Jesus Christ, what kind of backwardassed bunch of bigoted nitwits are running that fking state?

Find a new bone, chickenshit.

hide behind "privacy," chickenshit.

don't you worry your racist little head

chickenshit

[of West Virginians] ignorant redneck racists

Dipshit.

find the balls

dipshit

you wouldn't sound like a know-nothing jackass.

You ALWAYS sound like a know-nothing jackass

dipshit

Dipshit the Fool

the chickenshit

aren't going to come out and vote for this ridiculous jackass.

conservative Christians have such little REAL regard for marriage
take their "war on marriage" and stick it

//////////

Dan the Man (punk liar)
Carlisle, PA

[TaxNoMore]

You really need to grow up, Roger the Racist.

Get a grip and stop acting like such a baby.

/////////

If Topix would clean up the verbal vomit of the mentally retarded troll, this thread would probably have half as many posts.

//////////

Once again….

“DAN THE MAN” has been pummeled by reason and logic concerning his beliefs in utopian socialism and his worship of the black messiah.

Although “DAN THE MAN” constantly criticizes people for lying, here is an example of a

socialist pig dog

limousine liberal

making rules for others to follow, but not for

“DAN THE MAN”

[RealDave]

Dave Rogers wrote:

<quoted text>
How many of those votes in the Democrat controlled Senate voted along with the Republicans? I didn't see where you mentioned this.

I did not mention it because NO DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST IT. Are you just stupid??

Ignorant?

Liar?

Which.

http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/11...

[TaxNoMore]

Dan the Man wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, you have no understanding of the treaty AT ALL. LOL! Why am I not surprised.
The UN treaty on disabilities was an international agreement encouraging all participating nations to live up to the standard the United States has set with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
It wouldn't have impacted the US in any way since we already have the gold standard of disability legislation. Our signing on would just have given the treaty additional credibility as we are the world leader in this area.
The ignorant, fearful GOP has just succeeded in making the US look stupid and backward. ANOTHER international embarrassment at the hands of the ignorant, backwardassed conspiracy theorists.

//////////

.
.

homo

.
.

Dan the Man "tight,lean", pony tail,wine barrel, rectory, KY Intense......

[Dan the Man]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
I did not mention it because NO DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST IT. Are you just stupid??
Ignorant?
Liar?
Which.
http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/11...

..........

The disabled have been cursed by God.

Those disabled by disease or misfortune are being punished for sins in life.

Those born disabled are being punished for their behavior in the pre-existence.

We should NOT coddle them.

We MUST not cater to them or they will NEVER learn the lessons God intended to learn by making them disabled.

We are damning their souls and denying them their opportunity for redemption by trying to make their lives "easier."

The life of the disabled SHOULD be hard, as that is what God intended.