Who do you support for Governor in Pe...
Ted

Johnstown, PA

#44580 Dec 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, typos don't mean someone is stupid.
But mocking them for it sure does.
danny BOY, how stupid are you? You continue confusing irony for stupidity.

Now you are accusing RealDave of being stupid in mocking others for THEIR stupidity.

RealDave mocked TaxNoMore and Dave Rogers for their stupidity. In so doing he made an embarrassing, ironic omission.

Brighten up and stop being a petulant little BOY.
Dan the Man

Shippensburg, PA

#44582 Dec 12, 2012
Ted wrote:
<quoted text>
danny BOY, how stupid are you? You continue confusing irony for stupidity.
Now you are accusing RealDave of being stupid in mocking others for THEIR stupidity.
RealDave mocked TaxNoMore and Dave Rogers for their stupidity. In so doing he made an embarrassing, ironic omission.
Brighten up and stop being a petulant little BOY.
Since critical thinking isn't in your skill-set, let me spell it out.

Dave is not stupid. He is thoughtful, insightful, and almost always right.

And he didn't make an omission - he made a typo. A meaningless typo. Just like everybody in the world does.

I'm mocking YOU for YOUR stupidity. Your petty, dickish stupidity. And nobody else.

Hope that clears it up for you, WATB. Hope you can quit crying now, WATB.
Dan the Man

Shippensburg, PA

#44584 Dec 12, 2012
Interestingly, Michigan already had protections in place to workers who don't want to support union political activities don't have to, but they did have to contribute toward the costs of wage and benefit negotiations.

So the point of the law wasn't to allow workers to opt out of political activity they don't agree with - they already had that right.

The point of the law was to cripple unions. Period.

Hell, at least one wingnut has publicly said so:
“We fight these battles on taxes and regulation but really what we would like to see is to take the unions out at the knees so they don’t have the resources to fight these battles.”

The law was pure partisan politics. It had absolutely nothing to do with workers rights.

Is there ANYTHING the right can tell the truth about?

Answer: not if they want to win elections.
Aspherical

Paterson, NJ

#44585 Dec 12, 2012
I heard that Ted and Tax No More are sweet on one another.

Tax No More needs his sweetie Ted for support in these difficult times.

Are they getting engaged....
Not sure

They're just thrusting a lot lately but maybe plans in the future.
Ted

Johnstown, PA

#44591 Dec 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Since critical thinking isn't in your skill-set, let me spell it out.
Dave is not stupid. He is thoughtful, insightful, and almost always right.
And he didn't make an omission - he made a typo. A meaningless typo. Just like everybody in the world does.
I'm mocking YOU for YOUR stupidity. Your petty, dickish stupidity. And nobody else.
Hope that clears it up for you, WATB. Hope you can quit crying now, WATB.
Gee, danny BOY, you're usually more self-conscious about hiding your stupidity. In this case your advertising it.

You are wrong, BOY, in stating "And he didn't make an omission - he made a typo." RealDave didn't make a typing mistake. He made an error of OMISSION, BOY.

See, BOY, how he OMITTED an important word (maybe 'they' after 'that'): "...who thinks that are clever & smart."

How ironic, eh, BOY, given that he was criticizing the stupidity of others while appearing stupid.

But now, BOY, your confused, petulant, oddly desperate defense is even funnier in calling an obvious omission a typo.

I'm mocking YOU for YOUR stupidity, BOY. Your petty, dickish stupidity. And nobody else.

danny BOY: racist, plagiarist, pathological liar.
NoOpinon

New Castle, PA

#44593 Dec 12, 2012
Guaranteed TaxNoMoron collects government checks.

Take up space...contributes nothing.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#44594 Dec 12, 2012
New Army Manual Tells Soldiers Not To Be Critical Of Taliban…Or Pedophilia

Just because they’ll cut your head off with a dull knife is no reason to be so negative:

Here is a strong indicator that the Obama Administration’s crusade to appease Islam has gone too far; a new U.S. military handbook for troops deployed to the Middle East orders soldiers not to make derogatory comments about the Taliban or criticize pedophilia, among other outrageous things.

It gets better; the new manual, which is around 75 pages, suggests that Western ignorance of Afghan culture— not Taliban infiltration—is responsible for the increase in deadly attacks by Afghan soldiers against the coalition forces.

The soon-to-be-released Army handbook is still being drafted, but a mainstream newspaper got a sneak preview and published an article that should infuriate the American taxpayers funding the never-ending war on terror. The manual is being created because someone with authority bought the theory that cultural insensitivity is driving insider attacks on U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

More than three dozen insider attacks have killed 63 members of the U.S.-led coalition this year, according to the article, and some blame “American cultural ignorance.” The bottom line is that troops may experience social-cultural shock and/or discomfort when interacting with Afghan security forces, the new military handbook says.“Better situational awareness/understanding of Afghan culture will help better prepare [troops] to more effectively partner and to avoid cultural conflict that can lead toward green-on-blue violence.”

The draft leaked to the newspaper offers a list of “taboo conversation topics” that soldiers should avoid, including “making derogatory comments about the Taliban,”“advocating women’s rights,”“any criticism of pedophilia,”“directing any criticism towards Afghans,”“mentioning homosexuality and homosexual conduct” or “anything related to Islam.”

In other words, if you’re being killed by a member of the Afghanistan military or police force, you probably brought it on yourself. Serves you right for being so critical of pedophilia.

http://www.libertynews.com/2012/12/new-army-m...

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#44597 Dec 12, 2012
Union thugs tear down tent on Capitol lawn.



The violence and hate is really something within the Unions today. The unions should take lessons from The Tea Party on how to be civil.

Did you have your Twinkies today?

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#44598 Dec 12, 2012
Q: How many Democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?

A: 501. One to screw in the bulb, and 500 to protest the coal mine that generated the electricity.
------

Q: How are politicians like baby diapers?

A: Because they should be changed often, and for the same reasons.
------
Dan the Man

Newville, PA

#44599 Dec 12, 2012
Two things...
Ted wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee, danny BOY, you're usually more self-conscious about hiding your stupidity. In this case your advertising it.
What would a petty little prick like Ted say about this? "your advertising it" after calling someone else stupid? I think we already know. LOL!
Ted wrote:
You are wrong, BOY, in stating "And he didn't make an omission - he made a typo." RealDave didn't make a typing mistake. He made an error of OMISSION, BOY.
See, BOY, how he OMITTED an important word (maybe 'they' after 'that'): "...who thinks that are clever & smart."
How ironic, eh, BOY, given that he was criticizing the stupidity of others while appearing stupid.
Or he could have merely spelled "they" as "that." As in, "nothing more pathetic than a right whiner who thinks they are clever & smart."

You're a petty little prick, Ted WATB. You distort meaningless semantic aberrations and act like you've uncovered a major crime. It's your pattern. It's how you've made every single accusation that I've lied, and it's what you're doing now.

Dave made a typo and you had to make an issue of it. You were childish and moronic - but that's your total MO, now isn't it? LMAO!

Like I've said countless times - grow up WATB.
Ted

Johnstown, PA

#44602 Dec 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
Two things...
<quoted text>
What would a petty little prick like Ted say about this? "your advertising it" after calling someone else stupid? I think we already know. LOL!
....
!LOL!

OMG Flushing out your hypocricy is just too easy, BOY! You are SUCH a chump!

Your high school years must have been tourtuous as the butt of jokes your social awkwardness just couldn't grasp.

danny BOY, first you defend then you condemn those who make typo errors. It depends on who is making them, doesn't it BOY. So much for your 'principled' defense of RealDave's omission.

ANOTHER instance added to the lengthy list of dannyBOY hypocricy.

Pro tip, BOY: If you see a car with keys in the ignition, don't jump in and take it. It's a bait car.

danny BOY: racist, plagiarist, pathological liar, chump.
Reverend Irreverent

State College, PA

#44604 Dec 12, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
Failed economic policies of the four year loser.
Except he didn't lose. He just won the past election and will remain in the seat of power for another four years. Have you already forgotten?

Blubber all you care to. Post some rehashed articles from other sites and cleverly insert my name and/or quotes. Call me a bully like you have in the past when I came after you wanting original material from your own failure-addled mind (and receiving nil). Nothing is changing, regardless of how many statistics or news stories you angrily paste in this forum. This drawn-out temper tantrum won't reverse the election or reveal Obama to be from Kenya or any other nonsense. Until 2016, Barack Obama will rule over your life.

I don't love the president. But seeing you so obsessively strung-out on resentment over something you can't alter is an affair that's both uproariously comical and painfully sad.
Dan the Man

Newville, PA

#44605 Dec 12, 2012
Dave Rogers wrote:
Union thugs tear down tent on Capitol lawn.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =SSRabbK-vQ0XX
The violence and hate is really something within the Unions today. The unions should take lessons from The Tea Party on how to be civil.
Did you have your Twinkies today?
They knocked down a TENT?!?! That's TERRIBLE!!!

LMAO!
Dan the Man

Newville, PA

#44606 Dec 12, 2012
Ted wrote:
<quoted text>
!LOL!
OMG Flushing out your hypocricy is just too easy, BOY! You are SUCH a chump!
Your high school years must have been tourtuous as the butt of jokes your social awkwardness just couldn't grasp.
danny BOY, first you defend then you condemn those who make typo errors. It depends on who is making them, doesn't it BOY. So much for your 'principled' defense of RealDave's omission.
ANOTHER instance added to the lengthy list of dannyBOY hypocricy.
Pro tip, BOY: If you see a car with keys in the ignition, don't jump in and take it. It's a bait car.
danny BOY: racist, plagiarist, pathological liar, chump.
Oh, I took your bait? When did that happen?

Oh that's right - it DIDN'T!

You really are one desperate crybaby, Ted WATB. It doesn't happen the way you want it to, so you just act like it did.

Just like when you make false claims that I lie.

Just like always.

LMAO! You're pathetic.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#44608 Dec 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, I took your bait? When did that happen?
Oh that's right - it DIDN'T!
You really are one desperate crybaby, Ted WATB. It doesn't happen the way you want it to, so you just act like it did.
Just like when you make false claims that I lie.
Just like always.
LMAO! You're pathetic.
False claims of lying danny BOY? You have been proven a liar on here so many times I've lost count. No, I won't go back and find them for you. I guess I should of kept files on you like you do on those who disagree with you.

Oh, about you taking the bait, you have taken the bait so many times from just me I would think you would have learned a long time ago, crybaby.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#44609 Dec 12, 2012
Dan the Man wrote:
Two things...
<quoted text>
What would a petty little prick like Ted say about this? "your advertising it" after calling someone else stupid? I think we already know. LOL!
<quoted text>
Or he could have merely spelled "they" as "that." As in, "nothing more pathetic than a right whiner who thinks they are clever & smart."
You're a petty little prick, Ted WATB. You distort meaningless semantic aberrations and act like you've uncovered a major crime. It's your pattern. It's how you've made every single accusation that I've lied, and it's what you're doing now.
Dave made a typo and you had to make an issue of it. You were childish and moronic - but that's your total MO, now isn't it? LMAO!
Like I've said countless times - grow up WATB.
You're very protective of Real Dave danny BOY. I bet you and Real Dave are so close you both have the same stench. lol

Go back to your Chambersburg forum and discuss your local eateries. Better yet why not leave the computer and take your daughter out for a nice fried chicken dinner.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#44610 Dec 12, 2012
interestingly, workers now get to chose between payin dues or not. i thought you libs liked freedom of choice? interesting indeed.....

unions are already crippled. the law in michigan just kicked a crutch away and gave workers a right to chose.

wont be long and the union goons will be called into action.
Dan the Man wrote:
Interestingly, Michigan already had protections in place to workers who don't want to support union political activities don't have to, but they did have to contribute toward the costs of wage and benefit negotiations.
So the point of the law wasn't to allow workers to opt out of political activity they don't agree with - they already had that right.
The point of the law was to cripple unions. Period.
Hell, at least one wingnut has publicly said so:
“We fight these battles on taxes and regulation but really what we would like to see is to take the unions out at the knees so they don’t have the resources to fight these battles.”
The law was pure partisan politics. It had absolutely nothing to do with workers rights.
Is there ANYTHING the right can tell the truth about?
Answer: not if they want to win elections.

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#44612 Dec 12, 2012
Whether they were an unfortunate foreshadowing of the following events, or a backhanded rally cry, his words rang true shortly after as Fox News contributor Steven Crowder was physically assaulted by union members as he tried desperately to keep them from destroying the tents put up by Americans for Prosperity. With everything being recorded on film, it is clear that the protestors were not concerned with the safety of rights of those still within the tents as they tore them down and attacked Crowder. The video clearly showed not only the union member landing several punches on Crowder with no retaliation; it also shows at least one woman emerging from one of the downed tents, visibly shocked.

In one instance, a police officer was forced to use pepper spray on one or more protestors because they pulled a female officer violently into the crowd. More reports of use of pepper spray by police officers were reported, including former Representative Mark Schauer. Eyewitness reports vary widely, with some on the left declaring the protests were loud but peaceful, and contradictory reports of shoving and pushing and assault which would have justified use of force
----------

ooops the union goons already have been called into action. i wonder what their marching orders will be next. is that all they did dan, knock down a tent ? professional union guidos have been called into action. they wont go down without a fight.
Dan the Man wrote:
<quoted text>
They knocked down a TENT?!?! That's TERRIBLE!!!
LMAO!

Since: Jul 12

Portland, Oregon

#44613 Dec 12, 2012
Scabs are dealt with according to problems the scab creates. If you don't want to work for a union then do not apply, find a rip the employees off company. The tea bags will be the last to fight when and if the shit hits. Tea bags prey to your corporate gods
Mitt vs Mutt

West Mifflin, PA

#44616 Dec 12, 2012
boxhard wrote:
interestingly, workers now get to chose between payin dues or not. i thought you libs liked freedom of choice? interesting indeed.....
unions are already crippled. the law in michigan just kicked a crutch away and gave workers a right to chose.
wont be long and the union goons will be called into action. <quoted text>
The right to work is just an excuse to NOT pay the non union worker the same as a union worker. A non union worker does not get the raises as a union worker does, or gets a union pension or might notget the same vacation as union workers or the same protection from being fired, the non union worker will work for less. The non union worker can be laid off before a union worker will. The union worker has the upper hand. The union worker worker pays a percentage of his/her healthcare, a non union worker might have to pay for it all. So whats advantage of a non union worker? For them there is none,it's a win-win for the company.

Wages and healthcare and vacations are negotiated , a non union worker doesnt have that. If you want a non union job join a non union workforse because if you mix in union and non union in the same workplace ,you're only going to create friction between the workers.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Loretto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What happen now? Jun 19 DontFront 1
Cambria County Prison (Dec '11) Jun 19 DontFront 4
Appeals court nixes suit May '15 unknown 1
Jesus, Son of God (Mar '14) Apr '15 Jesus 4
To the REALIST, (Mar '14) Apr '15 The devil 2
grace mcguire (Feb '13) Mar '15 Gary Pelphrey 5
Apartment Hunting (Sep '14) Sep '14 Jima 1
More from around the web

Loretto People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Loretto Mortgages