Winston Smith

Chambersburg, PA

#43997 Dec 2, 2012
trident wrote:
<quoted text>
So by confirming that possibility means.....condition of being possible......you are confirming that you possibly are doubly idiotic. Look fella, anybody can look up a words definition, but, you still are not nearly as smart as you would like to impress people as being. And if you feel like you out-did me in your last post then you really are just on an elementary level my little student. I am done conversing with you. Your words are weak and unchallenging.
Well first of all, you stuck your nose into the conversation. If you don't care to talk anymore then why even bother responding? Probably because I out-did you and you didn't like that. Boo hoo hoo, what a cry baby. By the way, you forgot to add this about the meaning of possibility.."Possibility also refers to something that "could happen", that is not precluded by the facts, but usually NOT PROBABLE". So if you are going to give the meaning...give all of it, not part of it!

No loss to me that you're done conversing because like I said..you are the one that put yourself into the conversation. Now take a hike...a long one!
trident

Clearfield, PA

#43998 Dec 2, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>Well first of all, you stuck your nose into the conversation. If you don't care to talk anymore then why even bother responding? Probably because I out-did you and you didn't like that. Boo hoo hoo, what a cry baby. By the way, you forgot to add this about the meaning of possibility.."Possibility also refers to something that "could happen", that is not precluded by the facts, but usually NOT PROBABLE". So if you are going to give the meaning...give all of it, not part of it!
No loss to me that you're done conversing because like I said..you are the one that put yourself into the conversation. Now take a hike...a long one!
Okay. I'll do one more. The word "usually"....you don't seem to understand that this word leaves open the possibility that you're doubly idiotic. Like I said, you're not very smart.
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#43999 Dec 2, 2012
This Topix thread is used strictly for "dan the mans" mental masturbation of the entire state of Pennsylvania as stated by him in a previous post.

"dan the man" is an amoral sociopath who makes irrationally mendacious accusations and talks to himself as a multi-poster.

"dan the man" likes the "the big black shaft" , he has no gag reflex and without a doubt swallows gallons of Marxist obummer sperm (Obama nut juice) everyday.
..........

Two different things, dumbass.

I debate issues and return name-calling for name-calling.

Personal attacks and name-calling is ALL the nitwit from Chambersburg does.

But thanks for acknowledging that I don't lie.

I appreciate this rare display of honesty.
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#44000 Dec 2, 2012
Not only are you a name caller, you're a pathological LIAR!

And all the regulars know it.

.
.

Azz Wipe

The lowest form of suck-up in existence.

Someone who's not beyond wiping another's ass when told to do so.

One who is not "his own man."

.
.

Dan the Man Carlisle, PA obummer Azz Wipe
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#44001 Dec 2, 2012
Dan the Man Carlisle, PA

.
.
.

"I do not lie" and "I'm not a racist"

.
.

But I am an obummer Azz Wipe
gringo

Washington, DC

#44002 Dec 2, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>Hmmmm....that's interesting. You say you weren't talking to me, but yet your post is addressed to me? You do have some problems, naco. We can now add.... confusion because you don't know who you're talking to.
So you admit you hang out at rest stops talking to gay truckers. Danny is going to be upset with you.
I need to correct you again.... there was no governor election in 2008, try 2010. You're just wrong again. You confuse easily. Poor naco.
Are you really that confused?

I posted that I'm in PA.-wasn't addressed to you
Then the one announcing that I'm in Breezewood - not addressed to you

Now...

If I responded to you respondiing to me

then that's really not a fair assesment because you're not mentioning that in your post here and your truth filter being comprimised after watching to much Glenn Beck.
That's a misrepresentation often a tactic used by these type of individuals
Softened minds can't filter this type of garbage.
gringo

Washington, DC

#44003 Dec 2, 2012
TaxNoMore wrote:
Not only are you a name caller, you're a pathological LIAR!
And all the regulars know it.
.
.
Azz Wipe
The lowest form of suck-up in existence.
Someone who's not beyond wiping another's ass when told to do so.
One who is not "his own man."
.
.
Dan the Man Carlisle, PA obummer Azz Wipe
Oh, Yeah and you're a "pathological ass..hole".
How's that for a psychological disorder diagnosis?
gringo

Washington, DC

#44004 Dec 2, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>Are you now confused about who tax no more is? I hope you don't start suffering from Tax no more Derangement Syndrome. You seem to have great difficulty sorting posters out. You seem to think I' m Marisa. Now you think Dave Rogers is Tax no more. Poor naco.
Oh no no, I didn't claim that Dave Roger was Tax No More at all even though he always shows up to defend his damsel in distress Tax No More..

I was just comparing their relative degrees of ignorance that prompted my inquiry as to one actually being the other.

Notice I didn't come out and say that Dave Rogers is Tax No More. I just noticed some similarities.

Why...did you notice them too?
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#44005 Dec 2, 2012
gringo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, Yeah and you're a "pathological ass..hole".
How's that for a psychological disorder diagnosis?
..........

Why did you remove the venereal warts from the back of your throat? they were the best part of you.

Just look at all the friends you have lost.

How's that for a psychological disorder diagnosis?

Those are facts
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#44006 Dec 2, 2012
gringo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, Yeah and you're a "pathological ass..hole".
How's that for a psychological disorder diagnosis?
//////////

.
.
.

"I do not lie" and "I'm not a racist"
Dan the Man

Los Angeles, CA

#44007 Dec 2, 2012
.
.

There is only one TaxNoMore

.
.

Ewe obummer drones better believe it

.
.
.

"I do not lie" and "I'm not a racist"
Dan the Man

Los Angeles, CA

#44008 Dec 2, 2012
We made huge steps toward equality.

.
.

November sentiment highest since 2007

.
.

You know,

free turkeys at the homeless shelters,

obummercare,

free phones,

free food,

free condoms,

free gas,

free mortgage payments,

free education for illegals,

open borders,

cash for clunkers,

cash for caulkers,

cash for houses.

The dummies, yuppies and gimmies who voted for Obama are in the Christmas spirit.

.
.
.

"I do not lie" and "I'm not a racist"
TaxNoMore

Los Angeles, CA

#44009 Dec 2, 2012
We made huge steps toward equality.

.
.

..........

LASER-LIKE FOCUS:

OBAMA‘S JOBS COUNCIL HASN’T MET IN SIX MONTHS

Hey, remember all those times we were told President Obama was focused like a laser (or something) on jobs?

Yeah, we remember that too.

Say, it must be awfully difficult to address the nation’s unemployment when, you know, your jobs council hasn’t met in six months.

Yes, you read that correctly:

the president‘s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness hasn’t met since January 17.

“Coming off the worst quarter of job-creation in two years, and with the worst jobs record of any president in modern history, it’s clear President Obama has failed to live up to his promises,” said Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul.

With unemployment at 8.2 percent (and real unemployment much worse than that), some may think it rather odd that the president can find time to do back-to-back-to-back-to-back fundraisers and play his 100th round of golf but not find time to meet with this jobs panel.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-obamas ...

.
.
.

"I do not lie" and "I'm not a racist"

“Change is the only constant”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#44010 Dec 2, 2012
I'll tell ya' what else is "awfully difficult" and what else is "rather odd." Most Republicans insist that taxing the wealthiest two percent is a bad idea because the money they save on taxes goes for investment to create jobs. Well, those Bush-era tax cuts have been in effect for years now. Where are the jobs? This is the "awfully difficult" question for many current GOP supporters to answer ... the roaring sound of silence received in response to this question is "rather odd."

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#44011 Dec 2, 2012
gringo wrote:
<quoted text>
Only Tax No More could be that stupid...are you Tax No More?
You're not to bright are you?

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#44012 Dec 2, 2012
gringo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh no no, I didn't claim that Dave Roger was Tax No More at all even though he always shows up to defend his damsel in distress Tax No More..
I was just comparing their relative degrees of ignorance that prompted my inquiry as to one actually being the other.
Notice I didn't come out and say that Dave Rogers is Tax No More. I just noticed some similarities.
Why...did you notice them too?


Gringo always shows up at same time to defend Dan the Dumbass and Dan the Dumbass always shows up at the same time to defend gringo.

If Dan the Dumbass wasn't the honest man he says he is I would think they are one and the same.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#44013 Dec 2, 2012
EyesOverMcKeesport wrote:
I'll tell ya' what else is "awfully difficult" and what else is "rather odd." Most Republicans insist that taxing the wealthiest two percent is a bad idea because the money they save on taxes goes for investment to create jobs. Well, those Bush-era tax cuts have been in effect for years now. Where are the jobs? This is the "awfully difficult" question for many current GOP supporters to answer ... the roaring sound of silence received in response to this question is "rather odd."
Just think how bad Obama's economy would be if the two percent wasn't investing and keeping the lowlifes in food stamps.

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#44014 Dec 2, 2012
Where did mutt vs mitt go? Is he back in NJ on vacation again?

Since: Sep 12

Seattle, WA

#44015 Dec 2, 2012
trident wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay. I'll do one more. The word "usually"....you don't seem to understand that this word leaves open the possibility that you're doubly idiotic. Like I said, you're not very smart.
You're from Curwensville and accusing another of not being very smart? LMAO

“Change is the only constant”

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#44017 Dec 3, 2012
Dave Rogers wrote:
<quoted text> Just think how bad Obama's economy would be if the two percent wasn't investing and keeping the lowlifes in food stamps.
I understand how none can answer the question as trickle down, which is basically what the "reinvestment" rhetoric refers, never worked.

Interesting how when money for foreign aid or corporate aid is earmarked domestically for our citizens it somehow becomes an "entitlement."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Loretto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
grace mcguire (Feb '13) Mar 24 Gary Pelphrey 5
Apartment Hunting (Sep '14) Sep '14 Jima 1
News Nellie Lou Esworthy (Aug '14) Aug '14 MARIANNE DUBOIS-Z... 1
News Woman accused of having sex with boy (Aug '14) Aug '14 no sex 1
celebrities phone numbers (Mar '08) Apr '14 CJ Robertson 16
brother in prison in loretto (Feb '10) Oct '13 Concerned 17
News Pennsylvania: accused Franciscan friar commits ... (Feb '13) Feb '13 Fictional Shamed... 1
Loretto Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Loretto People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]