Longtime GOP Texas Gov. Perry wins another term

Full story: El Paso Times

Republican Gov. Rick Perry has defeated Democrat Bill White to win a third four-year term as Texas governor.

Comments (Page 919)

Showing posts 18,361 - 18,380 of20,379
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Cheerios

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20298
Sep 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Party
less than zero

Taylors, SC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20299
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Forand is becoming angry.Is the super republican"Dang"gett ing under his admittedly thin skin?
Bernard Forand

Lehigh Acres, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20300
Sep 7, 2013
 
Here we are just a few years down the road from Libya. Obama asked for funds to beef up security to the foreign embassies. Tea Party and republicans dysfunctional leadership replied with a resounding NAY ! Embassy’s attacked and the first to accuse Obama? You got it, the same one’s that denied the funding for embassy security ! Now lives are being lost due directly to Tea Party negligence.
Presently they are seeking to prevent Obama from chastising the use of chemical war fare tactics. Once again Tea Party and some dysfunctional republicans are NAYING. When the next chemical attack occurs OH how they will laminate their wailings upon Obama for failing to do something. This Republican Tea strategy has been played over and over again like a broken record. Repeating and repeating stuck in a rut. At the cost of thousands of innocent lives to be martyred for their egotistical dysfunction leadership.
Home of the Brave ! HA ! This republican leadership has and is illuminating to the world that America is the land of the WIMPIES !

Typical right wing nut. Obama wants to contain chemical weapons from being used and you go off all hyped up about another war! Dysfunctional minds follow Dysfunctional leadership.
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20302
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bernard Forand wrote:
Here we are just a few years down the road from Libya. Obama asked for funds to beef up security to the foreign embassies. Tea Party and republicans dysfunctional leadership replied with a resounding NAY ! Embassy’s attacked and the first to accuse Obama? You got it, the same one’s that denied the funding for embassy security ! Now lives are being lost due directly to Tea Party negligence.
Presently they are seeking to prevent Obama from chastising the use of chemical war fare tactics. Once again Tea Party and some dysfunctional republicans are NAYING. When the next chemical attack occurs OH how they will laminate their wailings upon Obama for failing to do something. This Republican Tea strategy has been played over and over again like a broken record. Repeating and repeating stuck in a rut. At the cost of thousands of innocent lives to be martyred for their egotistical dysfunction leadership.
Home of the Brave ! HA ! This republican leadership has and is illuminating to the world that America is the land of the WIMPIES !
Typical right wing nut. Obama wants to contain chemical weapons from being used and you go off all hyped up about another war! Dysfunctional minds follow Dysfunctional leadership.
"Dysfunctional minds follow Dysfunctional leadership."
It's about time that you realized what your problem is.

Do you see anyone else using chemical weapons other than Syria?.
Typical leftist hysteria. Who cares what the Muslim bastards do to each other?. I know I don't.
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20303
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bernard Forand wrote:
Here we are just a few years down the road from Libya. Obama asked for funds to beef up security to the foreign embassies. Tea Party and republicans dysfunctional leadership replied with a resounding NAY ! Embassy’s attacked and the first to accuse Obama? You got it, the same one’s that denied the funding for embassy security ! Now lives are being lost due directly to Tea Party negligence.
Presently they are seeking to prevent Obama from chastising the use of chemical war fare tactics. Once again Tea Party and some dysfunctional republicans are NAYING. When the next chemical attack occurs OH how they will laminate their wailings upon Obama for failing to do something. This Republican Tea strategy has been played over and over again like a broken record. Repeating and repeating stuck in a rut. At the cost of thousands of innocent lives to be martyred for their egotistical dysfunction leadership.
Home of the Brave ! HA ! This republican leadership has and is illuminating to the world that America is the land of the WIMPIES !
Typical right wing nut. Obama wants to contain chemical weapons from being used and you go off all hyped up about another war! Dysfunctional minds follow Dysfunctional leadership.
One more thing you leftist dunce. 90% of the American public are against getting involved in Syria. Know what that means?. Democrats along with Republicans actually agree that the whole thing is a stupid idea. Your Terrorist-In -Chief still hasn't got the message.
ABCD1

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20304
Sep 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

It is an honor to be a Texan!!!!!
Bernard Forand

Lehigh Acres, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20308
Sep 8, 2013
 

As it is in Syria so it is here with republicans. Ignore it at your peril.
In Syria; It all comes down to. Do we contain the proliferation of Nuclear, Bio, and Chemical weapons of mass destruction or not?
Ignore their use with no reprimand and we do so at our peril.
Senators that oppose the strike are calculating this chemical attack is a one time scenario. If they are wrong then all of the following martyred deaths blood and causalities will be on their heads. Increase proliferation, of weapons of mass destruction, will haunt them as well as to the innocent which will soon be their victims. Including ourselves.
As it is in Syria so it is here with republicans inequality of distribution.. Ignore it at your peril.
http://neweconomy.net/content/wealth-inequali... video chart USA wealth Distributions..
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20309
Sep 8, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bernard Forand wrote:
As it is in Syria so it is here with republicans. Ignore it at your peril.
In Syria; It all comes down to. Do we contain the proliferation of Nuclear, Bio, and Chemical weapons of mass destruction or not?
Ignore their use with no reprimand and we do so at our peril.
Senators that oppose the strike are calculating this chemical attack is a one time scenario. If they are wrong then all of the following martyred deaths blood and causalities will be on their heads. Increase proliferation, of weapons of mass destruction, will haunt them as well as to the innocent which will soon be their victims. Including ourselves.
As it is in Syria so it is here with republicans inequality of distribution.. Ignore it at your peril.
http://neweconomy.net/content/wealth-inequali... video chart USA wealth Distributions..
Keep squawking you stupid chicken hawk. You just might get your wish yet. When WWIII is ignited, you can sit back and enjoy the carnage and/or get a taste of it. It really shouldn't matter to you anyway as you are already older than dirt.

American foreign policy has been a complete disaster for the past 50 years. Why spoil a perfect record now?.
Texan

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20311
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Call it what ever you want Barney, but it is an attack, and no matter how you twist it, IT IS AN ATTACK and you support it. Damn aren't you just soooo much better than everyone else?
WHY

Hondo, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20312
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

TEST

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20313
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Texan wrote:
Call it what ever you want Barney, but it is an attack, and no matter how you twist it, IT IS AN ATTACK and you support it. Damn aren't you just soooo much better than everyone else?
Funny but all you right wing idiots for years have lumped all muslims in the same category, Christian hating terrorists. So then that would make Syria part of the group that attacked on 9/11 and the US would be responding to a terrorist attack.

Or are you going to go on record and say not all muslims are evil Christian hating terrorists?

So which is it?

Run from another direct question little tard.
LovelyHulaHands

Humble, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20315
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

At least when Bernard is on here, he's not in the coffee shop running his big loud mouth trying to get the whites to talk to him. What a loser.
JBH

Richmond, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20316
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

This is the most ridiculous fallacy coming from US, by just saying about chemical weapons, by calling redline by predetermining to jumping to conclusion.

When Obama says if he won't act, that would lose credibility--maybe his credibility is to the rebels.

But the world does not allow US to strike Syria. So that has no credibility by just thinking that does not care what the world says TO STRIKE, as well as in UN MATTERS, as Bush did.

US is the other party, by saying Syria used chemical weapons.
But Syria Assad says he has not used chemical weapons. But does the world have to act on this from what Obama says? US has chemical weapons too and there are over 40 countries also have.
It is up to the world if there is a court to look into it, that US is not policeman nor prosecutor, but the third party.
When the other party Syria says of not using chemical weapons, both US and the other party must be present, to show their case, and that is impossible as it will take a lot of time and procedure. ONE is too naive and unrealistic to be jumping to conclusion that the world will go by one side of what Obama and Kerry say that is their absolute proof and evidence, but that is not how it works. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE to waste on time to go by looking into Syria again and again.
When the other party Syria proves it is not true and they Syrians have not done it, then US is in deep trouble by falsifying to commit atrocity.

But the world might have no time for this, simply that is the credibility to rule out of any strike by US---that Obama does not know even where and what the credibility IS ABOUT.

UN might have to rule out US saying, because the public business of credibility of what the world wants is not to strike Syria--ASSAD SAYS HE DID NOT USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS--US EVEN SAYS HE IS LYING AS ALL OTHER SIDES SAY US LYING TOO--WHAT IS THE POINT BY MAKING THIS NUISANCE BY OBAMA?

The public business matter is in the UN as UN can reject and disapprove anything as not worthwhile.
Bernard Forand

Lehigh Acres, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20317
Sep 9, 2013
 
Texan wrote:
Call it what ever you want Barney, but it is an attack, and no matter how you twist it, IT IS AN ATTACK and you support it. Damn aren't you just soooo much better than everyone else?
Tex my use of words differ from the limited source you exist within. I Stated that the word attack is to strong a word in addressing the Syrian issue of present. That is why I introduced you to some new words for you. Reprimand and or Chastise. There are more, but you are having so much trouble comprehending those two. Not spinning, just far more precise in my use of the language I use on the subject. No doubt you will seek the Foxy hyped up definition tactic and fail to notice the subtle differences betwixt the literal atmosphere of “Attack” and Chastise and Reprimand”.
As I meander through several threads I have been asked do I ignore or gently deal with irrelevant comments.
“Interesting point. As for myself I do ignore comments that hold nothing more than callow sophomoric derogatory dysfunctional remarks. No substance and or facts. I have, as a child read many comic books. As an adult I put away the fairy tales, myths, and comic books, for books that have actual nutritious knowledge.
While the callow individuals spew their dysfunctional nonsense, I continue to feed relevant rational knowledge. It facilities to the readers that pass on by, as to which do they prefer. Comic book children views or something a wee bit more matured in comprehension of rational intelligence.”
A simple strategy.
Texan

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20318
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Kind of like calling a spade a spade, you could call it an excavating tool, or a f>in shovel Barney, anyone of the three will work. And yes Actually I do lump all Muslims into one category. Allah worshiping enemies of everyone who does not believe the same as they do. Is that clear enough for you? I just happen to believe as long as they are killing each other stay back and let them have at it. Why waste the price of a missle when they do the job a lot cheaper, and have no one to blame but themselves? I didn't think Bush should have gotten involved in Iraq they liked to fight with Iran and as long as they were killing each other they were leaving everyone else alone. It takes a ruthless dictator to keep those idiots in line, and like I stated as long as they are killing each other let them. The more the better and I don't care how they do it.
LovelyHulaHands

Humble, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20319
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
Tex my use of words differ from the limited source you exist within. I Stated that the word attack is to strong a word in addressing the Syrian issue of present. That is why I introduced you to some new words for you. Reprimand and or Chastise. There are more, but you are having so much trouble comprehending those two. Not spinning, just far more precise in my use of the language I use on the subject. No doubt you will seek the Foxy hyped up definition tactic and fail to notice the subtle differences betwixt the literal atmosphere of “Attack” and Chastise and Reprimand”.
As I meander through several threads I have been asked do I ignore or gently deal with irrelevant comments.nothing more than callow sophomoric derogatory dysfunctional remarks. No substance and or facts. I have, as a child read many comic books. As an adult I put away the fairy tales, myths, and comic books, for books that have actual nutritious knowledge.
While the callow individuals spew their dysfunctional nonsense, I continue to feed relevant rational knowledge. It facilities to the readers that pass on by, as to which do they prefer. Comic book children views or something a wee bit more matured in comprehension of rational intelligence.”
A simple strategy.
This is the only avenue Bernard has to rant,,,,,the white folks won't listen. He's always got to go check on his stock and blah blah blah. Rave on brother
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20321
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny but all you right wing idiots for years have lumped all muslims in the same category, Christian hating terrorists. So then that would make Syria part of the group that attacked on 9/11 and the US would be responding to a terrorist attack.
Or are you going to go on record and say not all muslims are evil Christian hating terrorists?
So which is it?
Run from another direct question little tard.
Blah,blah,blah. I'm all for turning the whole Gawd Dam place into a glass parking lot. The whole region is ripe for lots of unrest anyway, which means higher gas prices at the pumps so let's Git-R-Done.

Know why Middle Eastern schools won't hold sex education and drivers education on the same day?. Because it's too rough on the camel.
Bernard Forand

Lehigh Acres, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20322
Sep 10, 2013
 
Texan wrote:
Kind of like calling a spade a spade, you could call it an excavating tool, or a f>in shovel Barney, anyone of the three will work. And yes Actually I do lump all Muslims into one category. Allah worshiping enemies of everyone who does not believe the same as they do. Is that clear enough for you? I just happen to believe as long as they are killing each other stay back and let them have at it. Why waste the price of a missle when they do the job a lot cheaper, and have no one to blame but themselves? I didn't think Bush should have gotten involved in Iraq they liked to fight with Iran and as long as they were killing each other they were leaving everyone else alone. It takes a ruthless dictator to keep those idiots in line, and like I stated as long as they are killing each other let them. The more the better and I don't care how they do it.
Well Tex your honest about your bigotry and limited ability to evaluate solutions, without having your analyst of a situation all muddled up in your bigot logic. That is why you can not comprehend. This is not about taking one side or the other in their civil war problems. Its all about, do we give a green light for others to go ahead and use chemical warfare by simply ignoring it? LOL even Russia knows that SOMETHING must be done.
Obama’s sword rattling is starting to get the attention of the world to focus on this warfare weapon of mass destruction. Of course simple illiterate individuals will no be able to grasp its significance. They are to busy stroking their biases.
Bernard Forand

Lehigh Acres, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20323
Sep 10, 2013
 
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Blah,blah,blah. I'm all for turning the whole Gawd Dam place into a glass parking lot. The whole region is ripe for lots of unrest anyway, which means higher gas prices at the pumps so let's Git-R-Done.
Know why Middle Eastern schools won't hold sex education and drivers education on the same day?. Because it's too rough on the camel.
LOL another comic book solution by one who is defiant to all intelligent scenarios. Right Wing Nuts must be proud of this Tin Hat Nut of theirs. Exposes precisely the handicap mental issues that plagues the Right Wing Tea Intoxicated Nuts.
Bernard Forand

Lehigh Acres, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20324
Sep 10, 2013
 
JBH wrote:
This is the most ridiculous fallacy coming from US, by just saying about chemical weapons, by calling redline by predetermining to jumping to conclusion.
When Obama says if he won't act, that would lose credibility--maybe his credibility is to the rebels.
But the world does not allow US to strike Syria. So that has no credibility by just thinking that does not care what the world says TO STRIKE, as well as in UN MATTERS, as Bush did.
US is the other party, by saying Syria used chemical weapons.
But Syria Assad says he has not used chemical weapons. But does the world have to act on this from what Obama says? US has chemical weapons too and there are over 40 countries also have.
It is up to the world if there is a court to look into it, that US is not policeman nor prosecutor, but the third party.
When the other party Syria says of not using chemical weapons, both US and the other party must be present, to show their case, and that is impossible as it will take a lot of time and procedure. ONE is too naive and unrealistic to be jumping to conclusion that the world will go by one side of what Obama and Kerry say that is their absolute proof and evidence, but that is not how it works. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE to waste on time to go by looking into Syria again and again.
When the other party Syria proves it is not true and they Syrians have not done it, then US is in deep trouble by falsifying to commit atrocity.
But the world might have no time for this, simply that is the credibility to rule out of any strike by US---that Obama does not know even where and what the credibility IS ABOUT.
UN might have to rule out US saying, because the public business of credibility of what the world wants is not to strike Syria--ASSAD SAYS HE DID NOT USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS--US EVEN SAYS HE IS LYING AS ALL OTHER SIDES SAY US LYING TOO--WHAT IS THE POINT BY MAKING THIS NUISANCE BY OBAMA?
The public business matter is in the UN as UN can reject and disapprove anything as not worthwhile.
Well JBH you must have heard that even Russia knows who holds the responsibility of the chemical weapons. After all who has been selling it o them? The sellers know who has demonstrated a lack of responsibility in keeping those weapons secured. It may take you a while to figure it out but they already have that figured out.
In a crisis situation it is not always a viable solution, to say, oh lets just hold it right there, freeze, we have to take this to court. LOL
A court can latter be set up to address any violations to our humanity’s rights. Think its called the Hague Court think its in Geneva. What do you think…? LOL they have warrants for the Bushwhacking gang outstanding. They have some questions for them. U.S. won’t give them up. USA harboring fugitives? Hmmmm

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 18,361 - 18,380 of20,379
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••

Flood Warning for Morris County was issued at April 18 at 7:54PM CDT

•••
•••
•••
•••

Lone Star Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Lone Star People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••