Longtime GOP Texas Gov. Perry wins an...

Longtime GOP Texas Gov. Perry wins another term

There are 23548 comments on the El Paso Times story from Nov 2, 2010, titled Longtime GOP Texas Gov. Perry wins another term. In it, El Paso Times reports that:

Republican Gov. Rick Perry has defeated Democrat Bill White to win a third four-year term as Texas governor.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at El Paso Times.

Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#20297 Sep 6, 2013
Dang wrote:
Gee, it looks like the "Democrat in Charge" fell flat on his face in Russia, much to their glee, in trying to convince the world to bomb Syria. Of all places to look weak, it makes one wonder if it wasn't planned. "STRELNA, Russia — President Obama ran into an impasse on Friday in his bid to rally international backing for a military strike on Syria as world leaders wrapped up a summit meeting here remaining deeply divided over the right response to what the Americans have called the deadliest nerve gas attack in decades." "After a dinner debate that lasted into the early morning hours of Friday, Mr. Obama emerged with a few supporters but no consensus, as other leaders urged him not to attack without United Nations permission, which is not forthcoming. Instead, the president had to resign himself to generalized statements of concern over the use of chemical weapons." Now, any other time the chants of something about Bush and WMD's, would be deafening. Now, it's crickets.
That's Democrits for ya.
Cheerios

United States

#20298 Sep 6, 2013
Party
less than zero

Greenville, SC

#20299 Sep 7, 2013
Forand is becoming angry.Is the super republican"Dang"gett ing under his admittedly thin skin?
Bernard Forand

Cape Coral, FL

#20300 Sep 7, 2013
Here we are just a few years down the road from Libya. Obama asked for funds to beef up security to the foreign embassies. Tea Party and republicans dysfunctional leadership replied with a resounding NAY ! Embassy’s attacked and the first to accuse Obama? You got it, the same one’s that denied the funding for embassy security ! Now lives are being lost due directly to Tea Party negligence.
Presently they are seeking to prevent Obama from chastising the use of chemical war fare tactics. Once again Tea Party and some dysfunctional republicans are NAYING. When the next chemical attack occurs OH how they will laminate their wailings upon Obama for failing to do something. This Republican Tea strategy has been played over and over again like a broken record. Repeating and repeating stuck in a rut. At the cost of thousands of innocent lives to be martyred for their egotistical dysfunction leadership.
Home of the Brave ! HA ! This republican leadership has and is illuminating to the world that America is the land of the WIMPIES !

Typical right wing nut. Obama wants to contain chemical weapons from being used and you go off all hyped up about another war! Dysfunctional minds follow Dysfunctional leadership.
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#20302 Sep 7, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
Here we are just a few years down the road from Libya. Obama asked for funds to beef up security to the foreign embassies. Tea Party and republicans dysfunctional leadership replied with a resounding NAY ! Embassy’s attacked and the first to accuse Obama? You got it, the same one’s that denied the funding for embassy security ! Now lives are being lost due directly to Tea Party negligence.
Presently they are seeking to prevent Obama from chastising the use of chemical war fare tactics. Once again Tea Party and some dysfunctional republicans are NAYING. When the next chemical attack occurs OH how they will laminate their wailings upon Obama for failing to do something. This Republican Tea strategy has been played over and over again like a broken record. Repeating and repeating stuck in a rut. At the cost of thousands of innocent lives to be martyred for their egotistical dysfunction leadership.
Home of the Brave ! HA ! This republican leadership has and is illuminating to the world that America is the land of the WIMPIES !
Typical right wing nut. Obama wants to contain chemical weapons from being used and you go off all hyped up about another war! Dysfunctional minds follow Dysfunctional leadership.
"Dysfunctional minds follow Dysfunctional leadership."
It's about time that you realized what your problem is.

Do you see anyone else using chemical weapons other than Syria?.
Typical leftist hysteria. Who cares what the Muslim bastards do to each other?. I know I don't.
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#20303 Sep 7, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
Here we are just a few years down the road from Libya. Obama asked for funds to beef up security to the foreign embassies. Tea Party and republicans dysfunctional leadership replied with a resounding NAY ! Embassy’s attacked and the first to accuse Obama? You got it, the same one’s that denied the funding for embassy security ! Now lives are being lost due directly to Tea Party negligence.
Presently they are seeking to prevent Obama from chastising the use of chemical war fare tactics. Once again Tea Party and some dysfunctional republicans are NAYING. When the next chemical attack occurs OH how they will laminate their wailings upon Obama for failing to do something. This Republican Tea strategy has been played over and over again like a broken record. Repeating and repeating stuck in a rut. At the cost of thousands of innocent lives to be martyred for their egotistical dysfunction leadership.
Home of the Brave ! HA ! This republican leadership has and is illuminating to the world that America is the land of the WIMPIES !
Typical right wing nut. Obama wants to contain chemical weapons from being used and you go off all hyped up about another war! Dysfunctional minds follow Dysfunctional leadership.
One more thing you leftist dunce. 90% of the American public are against getting involved in Syria. Know what that means?. Democrats along with Republicans actually agree that the whole thing is a stupid idea. Your Terrorist-In -Chief still hasn't got the message.
ABCD1

Odessa, TX

#20304 Sep 7, 2013
It is an honor to be a Texan!!!!!
Bernard Forand

Cape Coral, FL

#20308 Sep 8, 2013

As it is in Syria so it is here with republicans. Ignore it at your peril.
In Syria; It all comes down to. Do we contain the proliferation of Nuclear, Bio, and Chemical weapons of mass destruction or not?
Ignore their use with no reprimand and we do so at our peril.
Senators that oppose the strike are calculating this chemical attack is a one time scenario. If they are wrong then all of the following martyred deaths blood and causalities will be on their heads. Increase proliferation, of weapons of mass destruction, will haunt them as well as to the innocent which will soon be their victims. Including ourselves.
As it is in Syria so it is here with republicans inequality of distribution.. Ignore it at your peril.
http://neweconomy.net/content/wealth-inequali... video chart USA wealth Distributions..
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#20309 Sep 8, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
As it is in Syria so it is here with republicans. Ignore it at your peril.
In Syria; It all comes down to. Do we contain the proliferation of Nuclear, Bio, and Chemical weapons of mass destruction or not?
Ignore their use with no reprimand and we do so at our peril.
Senators that oppose the strike are calculating this chemical attack is a one time scenario. If they are wrong then all of the following martyred deaths blood and causalities will be on their heads. Increase proliferation, of weapons of mass destruction, will haunt them as well as to the innocent which will soon be their victims. Including ourselves.
As it is in Syria so it is here with republicans inequality of distribution.. Ignore it at your peril.
http://neweconomy.net/content/wealth-inequali... video chart USA wealth Distributions..
Keep squawking you stupid chicken hawk. You just might get your wish yet. When WWIII is ignited, you can sit back and enjoy the carnage and/or get a taste of it. It really shouldn't matter to you anyway as you are already older than dirt.

American foreign policy has been a complete disaster for the past 50 years. Why spoil a perfect record now?.
Texan

Wichita, KS

#20311 Sep 9, 2013
Call it what ever you want Barney, but it is an attack, and no matter how you twist it, IT IS AN ATTACK and you support it. Damn aren't you just soooo much better than everyone else?
WHY

Hondo, TX

#20312 Sep 9, 2013
TEST

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#20313 Sep 9, 2013
Texan wrote:
Call it what ever you want Barney, but it is an attack, and no matter how you twist it, IT IS AN ATTACK and you support it. Damn aren't you just soooo much better than everyone else?
Funny but all you right wing idiots for years have lumped all muslims in the same category, Christian hating terrorists. So then that would make Syria part of the group that attacked on 9/11 and the US would be responding to a terrorist attack.

Or are you going to go on record and say not all muslims are evil Christian hating terrorists?

So which is it?

Run from another direct question little tard.
LovelyHulaHands

Chandler, TX

#20315 Sep 9, 2013
At least when Bernard is on here, he's not in the coffee shop running his big loud mouth trying to get the whites to talk to him. What a loser.
JBH

Vancouver, Canada

#20316 Sep 9, 2013
This is the most ridiculous fallacy coming from US, by just saying about chemical weapons, by calling redline by predetermining to jumping to conclusion.

When Obama says if he won't act, that would lose credibility--maybe his credibility is to the rebels.

But the world does not allow US to strike Syria. So that has no credibility by just thinking that does not care what the world says TO STRIKE, as well as in UN MATTERS, as Bush did.

US is the other party, by saying Syria used chemical weapons.
But Syria Assad says he has not used chemical weapons. But does the world have to act on this from what Obama says? US has chemical weapons too and there are over 40 countries also have.
It is up to the world if there is a court to look into it, that US is not policeman nor prosecutor, but the third party.
When the other party Syria says of not using chemical weapons, both US and the other party must be present, to show their case, and that is impossible as it will take a lot of time and procedure. ONE is too naive and unrealistic to be jumping to conclusion that the world will go by one side of what Obama and Kerry say that is their absolute proof and evidence, but that is not how it works. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE to waste on time to go by looking into Syria again and again.
When the other party Syria proves it is not true and they Syrians have not done it, then US is in deep trouble by falsifying to commit atrocity.

But the world might have no time for this, simply that is the credibility to rule out of any strike by US---that Obama does not know even where and what the credibility IS ABOUT.

UN might have to rule out US saying, because the public business of credibility of what the world wants is not to strike Syria--ASSAD SAYS HE DID NOT USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS--US EVEN SAYS HE IS LYING AS ALL OTHER SIDES SAY US LYING TOO--WHAT IS THE POINT BY MAKING THIS NUISANCE BY OBAMA?

The public business matter is in the UN as UN can reject and disapprove anything as not worthwhile.
Bernard Forand

Cape Coral, FL

#20317 Sep 9, 2013
Texan wrote:
Call it what ever you want Barney, but it is an attack, and no matter how you twist it, IT IS AN ATTACK and you support it. Damn aren't you just soooo much better than everyone else?
Tex my use of words differ from the limited source you exist within. I Stated that the word attack is to strong a word in addressing the Syrian issue of present. That is why I introduced you to some new words for you. Reprimand and or Chastise. There are more, but you are having so much trouble comprehending those two. Not spinning, just far more precise in my use of the language I use on the subject. No doubt you will seek the Foxy hyped up definition tactic and fail to notice the subtle differences betwixt the literal atmosphere of “Attack” and Chastise and Reprimand”.
As I meander through several threads I have been asked do I ignore or gently deal with irrelevant comments.
“Interesting point. As for myself I do ignore comments that hold nothing more than callow sophomoric derogatory dysfunctional remarks. No substance and or facts. I have, as a child read many comic books. As an adult I put away the fairy tales, myths, and comic books, for books that have actual nutritious knowledge.
While the callow individuals spew their dysfunctional nonsense, I continue to feed relevant rational knowledge. It facilities to the readers that pass on by, as to which do they prefer. Comic book children views or something a wee bit more matured in comprehension of rational intelligence.”
A simple strategy.
Texan

Wichita, KS

#20318 Sep 9, 2013
Kind of like calling a spade a spade, you could call it an excavating tool, or a f>in shovel Barney, anyone of the three will work. And yes Actually I do lump all Muslims into one category. Allah worshiping enemies of everyone who does not believe the same as they do. Is that clear enough for you? I just happen to believe as long as they are killing each other stay back and let them have at it. Why waste the price of a missle when they do the job a lot cheaper, and have no one to blame but themselves? I didn't think Bush should have gotten involved in Iraq they liked to fight with Iran and as long as they were killing each other they were leaving everyone else alone. It takes a ruthless dictator to keep those idiots in line, and like I stated as long as they are killing each other let them. The more the better and I don't care how they do it.
LovelyHulaHands

Chandler, TX

#20319 Sep 9, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
Tex my use of words differ from the limited source you exist within. I Stated that the word attack is to strong a word in addressing the Syrian issue of present. That is why I introduced you to some new words for you. Reprimand and or Chastise. There are more, but you are having so much trouble comprehending those two. Not spinning, just far more precise in my use of the language I use on the subject. No doubt you will seek the Foxy hyped up definition tactic and fail to notice the subtle differences betwixt the literal atmosphere of “Attack” and Chastise and Reprimand”.
As I meander through several threads I have been asked do I ignore or gently deal with irrelevant comments.nothing more than callow sophomoric derogatory dysfunctional remarks. No substance and or facts. I have, as a child read many comic books. As an adult I put away the fairy tales, myths, and comic books, for books that have actual nutritious knowledge.
While the callow individuals spew their dysfunctional nonsense, I continue to feed relevant rational knowledge. It facilities to the readers that pass on by, as to which do they prefer. Comic book children views or something a wee bit more matured in comprehension of rational intelligence.”
A simple strategy.
This is the only avenue Bernard has to rant,,,,,the white folks won't listen. He's always got to go check on his stock and blah blah blah. Rave on brother
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#20321 Sep 9, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny but all you right wing idiots for years have lumped all muslims in the same category, Christian hating terrorists. So then that would make Syria part of the group that attacked on 9/11 and the US would be responding to a terrorist attack.
Or are you going to go on record and say not all muslims are evil Christian hating terrorists?
So which is it?
Run from another direct question little tard.
Blah,blah,blah. I'm all for turning the whole Gawd Dam place into a glass parking lot. The whole region is ripe for lots of unrest anyway, which means higher gas prices at the pumps so let's Git-R-Done.

Know why Middle Eastern schools won't hold sex education and drivers education on the same day?. Because it's too rough on the camel.
Bernard Forand

Cape Coral, FL

#20322 Sep 10, 2013
Texan wrote:
Kind of like calling a spade a spade, you could call it an excavating tool, or a f>in shovel Barney, anyone of the three will work. And yes Actually I do lump all Muslims into one category. Allah worshiping enemies of everyone who does not believe the same as they do. Is that clear enough for you? I just happen to believe as long as they are killing each other stay back and let them have at it. Why waste the price of a missle when they do the job a lot cheaper, and have no one to blame but themselves? I didn't think Bush should have gotten involved in Iraq they liked to fight with Iran and as long as they were killing each other they were leaving everyone else alone. It takes a ruthless dictator to keep those idiots in line, and like I stated as long as they are killing each other let them. The more the better and I don't care how they do it.
Well Tex your honest about your bigotry and limited ability to evaluate solutions, without having your analyst of a situation all muddled up in your bigot logic. That is why you can not comprehend. This is not about taking one side or the other in their civil war problems. Its all about, do we give a green light for others to go ahead and use chemical warfare by simply ignoring it? LOL even Russia knows that SOMETHING must be done.
Obama’s sword rattling is starting to get the attention of the world to focus on this warfare weapon of mass destruction. Of course simple illiterate individuals will no be able to grasp its significance. They are to busy stroking their biases.
Bernard Forand

Cape Coral, FL

#20323 Sep 10, 2013
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Blah,blah,blah. I'm all for turning the whole Gawd Dam place into a glass parking lot. The whole region is ripe for lots of unrest anyway, which means higher gas prices at the pumps so let's Git-R-Done.
Know why Middle Eastern schools won't hold sex education and drivers education on the same day?. Because it's too rough on the camel.
LOL another comic book solution by one who is defiant to all intelligent scenarios. Right Wing Nuts must be proud of this Tin Hat Nut of theirs. Exposes precisely the handicap mental issues that plagues the Right Wing Tea Intoxicated Nuts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Lone Star Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Liepman Restaurants/ DBA Dairy Queen (May '12) Sep 21 Newboston187 11
News Texas State Medical Board disciplines ETX doctor (Jan '13) Aug '16 Krista 11
Former Daingerfield High student set to go on t... (Apr '14) Aug '16 Patrick Hill 5
Dangerfield High School Grad convicted of Medic... Aug '16 Patrick Hill 1
Election Who do you support for State Board of Education... (Oct '10) Jun '16 robert 994
News Texas man sentenced to probation in brutal rape... (Sep '15) Sep '15 Audi 5000 5
News City of El Paso has no rape kits backlogged, TX... (Aug '13) Aug '15 Too farts 3

Lone Star Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Lone Star Mortgages