Switzerland Gun Control Violent Crime

Switzerland Gun Control Violent Crime

Posted in the London Forum

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
GunTownUSA

London, KY

#1 Jan 31, 2013
The left always trots out the EU pony about HC, muslims, etc. So I thought I would be just as stupid as the liberals for a change.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_...

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/switzerla...
GunTownUSA

London, KY

#2 Jan 31, 2013
Be sure to look at the percap rate of violent crime.
the truth

Greenbrier, AR

#3 Jan 31, 2013
GunTownUSA wrote:
The left always trots out the EU pony about HC, muslims, etc. So I thought I would be just as stupid as the liberals for a change.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_...
http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/switzerla...
This ain't switzerland, england, or mars. Until people learn to raise their kids better we need laws to stop all this robbing and killing.
GunTownUSA

London, KY

#4 Jan 31, 2013
the truth wrote:
<quoted text>
This ain't switzerland, england, or mars. Until people learn to raise their kids better we need laws to stop all this robbing and killing.
Exactly. Now what right are you willing to give up. Your freedom to rant? Worship? Vote? There is only one amendment that allows those things, considering how people are rasing their children, nowadays.
lol

Manchester, KY

#5 Jan 31, 2013
the truth wrote:
<quoted text>
This ain't switzerland, england, or mars. Until people learn to raise their kids better we need laws to stop all this robbing and killing.
I just can't understand why fools always use this Switzerland bullshit on gun control. How the hell do we know what goes on in Switzerland? We know, people are killed in cars too, but cars are needed, guns are not. accidents aren't Quite the same as mass murder! Keep you guns, when you use the ammo, you are done. The second amendment says nothing about the right to ammo or powder, fools!!! Problem solved!
haha

Manchester, KY

#6 Jan 31, 2013
you are right!!1
haha

Manchester, KY

#7 Jan 31, 2013
GunTownUSA wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Now what right are you willing to give up. Your freedom to rant? Worship? Vote? There is only one amendment that allows those things, considering how people are rasing their children, nowadays.
The right to own things made strictly for killing, you fool!
GunTownUSA

London, KY

#8 Jan 31, 2013
lol wrote:
<quoted text>
I just can't understand why fools always use this Switzerland bullshit on gun control. How the hell do we know what goes on in Switzerland? We know, people are killed in cars too, but cars are needed, guns are not. accidents aren't Quite the same as mass murder! Keep you guns, when you use the ammo, you are done. The second amendment says nothing about the right to ammo or powder, fools!!! Problem solved!
Cars are not a Constitutional right. Talk about irrelavant.
GunTownUSA

London, KY

#9 Jan 31, 2013
haha wrote:
<quoted text>
The right to own things made strictly for killing, you fool!
The purpose of cars? To accelerate a human to speeds and resulting crashes beyond survival. GFY

Since: Sep 09

o------------><-----------o

#10 Jan 31, 2013
GunTownUSA wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Now what right are you willing to give up. Your freedom to rant? Worship? Vote? There is only one amendment that allows those things, considering how people are rasing their children, nowadays.
What rights are you giving up? Who is attempting take our guns away from us or our right to defend ourselves? No one.

It's empty and fraudulent NRA bull because they get massive donations from the gun companies. The spokesman for the NRA makes 1.27 million dollars per year spreading false rumors and bull about gun bans for the gun companies.

No one is attempting to ban our guns. But saying there is causes idiots to run out and buy more. Not only that, but normal homeowners and hunters only buy a few guns in their life, whereas on the other hand riminals are always needing guns and are a huge return customer either directly or indirectly. Gun companies would lose a massive part of their profits if guns were kept away from criminals.

Since: Sep 09

o------------><-----------o

#11 Jan 31, 2013
GunTownUSA wrote:
<quoted text>
The purpose of cars? To accelerate a human to speeds and resulting crashes beyond survival. GFY
Guess what? We continue improving laws and enforcement concerning cars. The result? Traffic deaths are declining and are predicted to be lower than gun deaths by 2015. Which shows better laws do work.

“smiling on a cloudy day”

Since: Jan 09

Shakedown Street

#12 Jan 31, 2013
lol wrote:
<quoted text>
I just can't understand why fools always use this Switzerland bullshit on gun control. How the hell do we know what goes on in Switzerland? We know, people are killed in cars too, but cars are needed, guns are not. accidents aren't Quite the same as mass murder! Keep you guns, when you use the ammo, you are done. The second amendment says nothing about the right to ammo or powder, fools!!! Problem solved!
haha wrote:
<quoted text>
The right to own things made strictly for killing, you fool!
Same guy, agreeing with himself. Notice how they both use "fool" in their post? Both have a London, KY address. One posts a minute after the other, saying they agree?

It's so sad when someone has to agree with themselves!

“smiling on a cloudy day”

Since: Jan 09

Shakedown Street

#13 Jan 31, 2013
___Jenny___ wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess what? We continue improving laws and enforcement concerning cars. The result? Traffic deaths are declining and are predicted to be lower than gun deaths by 2015. Which shows better laws do work.
Funny you mention that, because gun homicides rates have also been on the decline over the past 20 years.

Why is that? Are guns safer now than they used to be? Laws are certainly less strict on gun ownership, as nowadays most states have CCW permits and many states have "castle doctrine" laws in place.
GunTownUSA

London, KY

#14 Jan 31, 2013
lol wrote:
<quoted text>
I just can't understand why fools always use this Switzerland bullshit on gun control. How the hell do we know what goes on in Switzerland? We know, people are killed in cars too, but cars are needed, guns are not. accidents aren't Quite the same as mass murder! Keep you guns, when you use the ammo, you are done. The second amendment says nothing about the right to ammo or powder, fools!!! Problem solved!
I was under the impression that an enlightened liberal as yourself wouldn't be a cold bold racist. Maybe you think this is confession and I am Father Gonzales? Are you claiming another peoples actions are so irrelavant to discussion? Is it the Nordic people or the fact they make good chocolate? Whatever your hatred for the other nations of the world? I try to glean the good from all people of every nation. Then without trampling or infringing upon anyone's rights go about setting the good in place.

The only time I was ever shooting at humans was for the same government that wants to restrict a familiar firearm platform and my being able to own one? I have never broken the laws I agree with and never in jail. I work hard go about my life. Firearms are a part of that pursuit of life liberty and my happiness.

What right does anyone have to place these hoops to jump through. You liberals would explode if every post or statement you wrote had to be submitted for approval and will be posted within three days. I would stand with Americans against that also.

You see my enlightened racist friend. The Second Amendment is the teeth of an otherwise "paper tiger."
GunTownUSA

London, KY

#15 Jan 31, 2013
Bronston Man wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Same guy, agreeing with himself. Notice how they both use "fool" in their post? Both have a London, KY address. One posts a minute after the other, saying they agree?
It's so sad when someone has to agree with themselves!
Hello BM. Mr T post here. Saw Tom Cruise earlier...... lol

“Smokin”

Since: May 12

Strawberry Fields of Dreams

#16 Jan 31, 2013
___Jenny___ wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess what? We continue improving laws and enforcement concerning cars. The result? Traffic deaths are declining and are predicted to be lower than gun deaths by 2015. Which shows better laws do work.
Saw you on the Newtown, Ct. forum doing much the same as you do here.

You are comparing automobile restrictions with gun laws, is that a fair comparison? Cars are not protected by the Constitution. Violence is not going to get any better even if you take away all guns (wish it could be done). Hammers and clubs would have to be banned next. Nothing is going to work, we have become a violent society so big brother is coming to the rescue. When that happens, you will be in the same boat with the rest of us, then you will be wishing all those "gun nuts" were better armed.
GunTownUSA

London, KY

#17 Jan 31, 2013
___Jenny___ wrote:
<quoted text>
What rights are you giving up? Who is attempting take our guns away from us or our right to defend ourselves? No one.
It's empty and fraudulent NRA bull because they get massive donations from the gun companies. The spokesman for the NRA makes 1.27 million dollars per year spreading false rumors and bull about gun bans for the gun companies.
No one is attempting to ban our guns. But saying there is causes idiots to run out and buy more. Not only that, but normal homeowners and hunters only buy a few guns in their life, whereas on the other hand riminals are always needing guns and are a huge return customer either directly or indirectly. Gun companies would lose a massive part of their profits if guns were kept away from criminals.
Once again honey, bless your heart. Black guns are the only guns I own, shoot , like. If anything were to ever be banned it should be handguns. You know, your kind. You don't have to worry Miss Jeneee, I will take care of you. I will fight those democrats with their war on women's gun rights with my life.

“smiling on a cloudy day”

Since: Jan 09

Shakedown Street

#18 Jan 31, 2013
GunTownUSA wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello BM. Mr T post here. Saw Tom Cruise earlier...... lol
I think you're thinking of Bronson. Bronston is a community in Pulaski county.

=D
i told ya

Orange, VA

#19 Jan 31, 2013
GunTownUSA wrote:
<quoted text>
Hello BM. Mr T post here. Saw Tom Cruise earlier...... lol
If the government wanted to take down freedom they wouldn't have to fire a shot. Your semiautomatic weapons are useless against them. You have to think more broadly than that.

“smiling on a cloudy day”

Since: Jan 09

Shakedown Street

#20 Jan 31, 2013
i told ya wrote:
<quoted text>If the government wanted to take down freedom they wouldn't have to fire a shot. Your semiautomatic weapons are useless against them. You have to think more broadly than that.
Yeah, look at how easy the only two superpowers in modern times, America and the USSR, steamrolled over cave people in Afghanistan.

Oh wait...

And remember, they only have 1/10 the population of the United States. The government does not have the means or the will to initiate martial law over the entirety of our country. Our "semi-automatic weapons" help ensure that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

London Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Walk to Emmaus DECEPTION or NOt? (Nov '12) 26 min John 548
Looking for Chris Elza 1 hr JJH 1
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 5 hr LMS 148,462
People saying they have a Indian Grandma (May '13) 21 hr brown 196
Looking For Stacy Larsen (Apr '12) 21 hr Know to much 6
ap says clinton lied about email Mon Skie 15
josh holland is gay (Jul '09) Mon lmao 16
More from around the web

Personal Finance

London Mortgages