Americans never give up your guns

Americans never give up your guns

Posted in the London Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
5 stars

Morehead, KY

#1 Jan 10, 2013
Americans never give up your guns
28.12.2012
These days, there are few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bear arms and use deadly force to defend one's self and possessions.
This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.
Various armies, such as the Poles, during the ?????(Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.
This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington's clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.
Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lying guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.
Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.
To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the SU, we are still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense. Why? We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere....but criminals are still armed and still murdering and too often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.
5 stars

Morehead, KY

#2 Jan 10, 2013
While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute contempt and often enough, criminal abuse.
For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or "talking to them", it is a bullet in the head, that is why they are a maniac, because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves.
The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and came from the same culture?
No it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.
So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.
Stanislav Mishin
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/2...
Not a Redneck Ashhole

Cadiz, KY

#3 Jan 10, 2013
Why can you not understand the difference between:
A few restrictions on assault weapons/gun show loop holes
They is taking all er guns!!!!!!!!!! Ever last one of them.....!!!!!NOOOOOOOOOOOO... ...

No one is taking ALL your guns.

Maybe if assault weapons could be smoked like pot you bybull thumpers would be all for the ban

You fight and deny the right of dying cancer patients to have medicinal marijuana....but dont worry about people having assault weapons made for wars and giant clips that will take out 20-30 kids at school.

You r f'ed up. glad your types aren’t in control anymore and wont be......
a couple of mild restrictions does not equal complete confiscation of all guns....

Thats some crazy GOP/NRA/Jeebus math right there.
Why not pray to jeebus and depend on your god to protect you?
sgweqrtwetr

London, KY

#4 Jan 10, 2013
"These days, there are few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA"

Move then
5 stars wrote:
Americans never give up your guns
28.12.2012
These days, there are few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bear arms and use deadly force to defend one's self and possessions.
This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.
Various armies, such as the Poles, during the ?????(Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.
This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington's clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.
Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lying guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.
Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.
To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the SU, we are still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense. Why? We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere....but criminals are still armed and still murdering and too often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.
sgweqrtwetr

London, KY

#5 Jan 10, 2013
"Maybe if assault weapons could be smoked like pot you bybull thumpers would be all for the ban"

Ha ha!
Not a Redneck Ashhole wrote:
Why can you not understand the difference between:
A few restrictions on assault weapons/gun show loop holes
They is taking all er guns!!!!!!!!!! Ever last one of them.....!!!!!NOOOOOOOOOOOO... ...
No one is taking ALL your guns.
Maybe if assault weapons could be smoked like pot you bybull thumpers would be all for the ban
You fight and deny the right of dying cancer patients to have medicinal marijuana....but dont worry about people having assault weapons made for wars and giant clips that will take out 20-30 kids at school.
You r f'ed up. glad your types aren’t in control anymore and wont be......
a couple of mild restrictions does not equal complete confiscation of all guns....
Thats some crazy GOP/NRA/Jeebus math right there.
Why not pray to jeebus and depend on your god to protect you?
fed up

Morehead, KY

#6 Jan 10, 2013
Of course they don't want to take all the guns. They want to keep the security for Obama and his family but don't think the same security is the answer for other children who aren't fortunate enough to attend expensive private schools.
Believe me

Somerset, KY

#7 Jan 10, 2013
There are many, normal Americans who want to see large clips and assault weapons banned and a lot of us are not democrats. Its time to require checks for all sales and ban military style weapons and large capacity magazines. I support such regulations, which are reasonable under the Constitution.
Guns Must Go

Corbin, KY

#8 Jan 10, 2013
Did you see the crazy gut nut on Piers Morgan? Much like some of the nuts in this area. I say take all of these military type guns and if anyone is caught with them, toss them in prison. That is what they do in England and there were only 39 gun murders there last year, compared to over 11,000 in this gun-crazy country.
ReallyII

Houston, TX

#9 Jan 10, 2013
Guns Must Go wrote:
Did you see the crazy gut nut on Piers Morgan? Much like some of the nuts in this area. I say take all of these military type guns and if anyone is caught with them, toss them in prison. That is what they do in England and there were only 39 gun murders there last year, compared to over 11,000 in this gun-crazy country.
Whats that red dot on your forehead ??
Bill

East Bernstadt, KY

#10 Jan 10, 2013
Guns Must Go wrote:
Did you see the crazy gut nut on Piers Morgan? Much like some of the nuts in this area. I say take all of these military type guns and if anyone is caught with them, toss them in prison. That is what they do in England and there were only 39 gun murders there last year, compared to over 11,000 in this gun-crazy country.
Sorry but you are wrong.Piers Morgan statistics arent correct.Great Britain is the most violent country in the EU.

2nd amendmt survey

Dallas, TX

#11 Jan 11, 2013
Since the horrific shootings in Connecticut and Colorado, President Obama, liberals in Congress and the media have been aggressively pushing for far-reaching restrictions and bans that ultimately undermine the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding American citizens.

The President has said gun violence is at the top of his domestic agenda and that he would consider using “executive action” to achieve his goals.

While Grassfire is sensitive to the recent gun-violence tragedies, we also are deeply concerned about the preservation of our God-given rights as American citizens.

In an ongoing effort to report truth and take action, Grassfire has chosen key members of our team to complete a brief, six-question survey regarding the current state of the Second Amendment.

Please go here now to complete our survey:

www.grassfire.com/977/survey.asp

This survey is confidential, and the results will only be interpreted by Grassfire to better represent the voice of our team members on this issue.

Again, to complete our Second Amendment survey, please go here now:

www.grassfire.com/977/survey.asp

This confidential survey is exclusive to Grassfire team members only. PLEASE DO NOT FORWARD IT TO YOUR FRIENDS.
2nd amendmt survey

Dallas, TX

#12 Jan 11, 2013
Not a Redneck Ashhole wrote:
Why can you not understand the difference between:
A few restrictions on assault weapons/gun show loop holes
They is taking all er guns!!!!!!!!!! Ever last one of them.....!!!!!NOOOOOOOOOOOO... ...
No one is taking ALL your guns.
Maybe if assault weapons could be smoked like pot you bybull thumpers would be all for the ban
You fight and deny the right of dying cancer patients to have medicinal marijuana....but dont worry about people having assault weapons made for wars and giant clips that will take out 20-30 kids at school.
You r f'ed up. glad your types aren’t in control anymore and wont be......
a couple of mild restrictions does not equal complete confiscation of all guns....
Thats some crazy GOP/NRA/Jeebus math right there.
Why not pray to jeebus and depend on your god to protect you?
Matthew 24:43 But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what hour the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.

Jesus gave us permission to protect our own.
Freakin gun headcases

London, KY

#13 Jan 11, 2013
Freakin' gun headcases is why gun crime is way high. They don't want any gun laws at all. Not even on keeping them from criminals.
ur a dingbat

Mesquite, NV

#14 Jan 11, 2013
Freakin gun headcases wrote:
Freakin' gun headcases is why gun crime is way high. They don't want any gun laws at all. Not even on keeping them from criminals.
people like you liberal democrats selling us out to communism is why america is going to the dogs.
we have made it good over the years. without our guns and freedoms we would not have made it that far.

trouble is that if guns are outlawed only outlaws and thieves will have guns to come and rob us with. freaken idiots want to steal old people's meds and they wont have any protection if guns are outlawed.
sage

Morehead, KY

#15 Jan 11, 2013
Robinhood wants to take your guns so he can take your money and possessions later.
EXACTLY WRONG

Chicago, IL

#16 Jan 12, 2013
Freakin gun headcases wrote:
Freakin' gun headcases is why gun crime is way high. They don't want any gun laws at all. Not even on keeping them from criminals.
What is causing Britian's "Way High Crime"? They banned guns a long while back, yet they have the honor of having the HIGHEST CRIME rate in the European Union.

Seems that when guns aren't available to thugs, they use ball bats, clubs and knives.

Anyway, what is your "Freakin' ideology on the 'HIGH CRIME' rate in the 'UNARMED ENGLAND"???????
EXACTLY WRONG

Chicago, IL

#17 Jan 12, 2013
Seems odd that all these shootings ONLY HAPPEN IN "GUN FREE ZONES"!!!!! Gun Free zones set up by our lawmakers. Gun free zones that only Law abiding citizens obey. Criminals seem to IGNORE THEM!

The school in Connecticut was "GUN FREE". Same for Columbine. on and on and on and on. Movie Theaters usually don't have a lot of armed folks. Neither do college campuses or churches. Kind of makes them fat/easy targets!!!!

Seems kind of logical to notice that these shootings only happen in so called "SAFE ZONES". Seems that it is "SAFER FOR THEM" to carry out mass murder in "GUN FREE" zones.

You never hear of a mass murder/suicide at a police station. Or a gun show, or a gun store, or a hunting lodge etc....

ONLY YOUR LIBERAL CREATED GUN FREE SAFETY ZONES. I guess it only makes sense that you will get more shots off in the 'SAFE ZONE'!!!
EXACTLY WRONG

Chicago, IL

#18 Jan 12, 2013
Not a Redneck Ashhole wrote:
Why can you not understand the difference between:
A few restrictions on assault weapons/gun show loop holes
They is taking all er guns!!!!!!!!!! Ever last one of them.....!!!!!NOOOOOOOOOOOO... ...
No one is taking ALL your guns.
Maybe if assault weapons could be smoked like pot you bybull thumpers would be all for the ban
You fight and deny the right of dying cancer patients to have medicinal marijuana....but dont worry about people having assault weapons made for wars and giant clips that will take out 20-30 kids at school.
You r f'ed up. glad your types aren’t in control anymore and wont be......
a couple of mild restrictions does not equal complete confiscation of all guns....
Thats some crazy GOP/NRA/Jeebus math right there.
Why not pray to jeebus and depend on your god to protect you?
There are already enough "GUN RESTRICTIONS" in place. Schools are "GUN FREE" etc.. That law doesn't seem to stop evil though now does it? 100 more "mild restrictions" won't schools any safer, or criminals less evil!!!!

I wonder if this example of thinking is the same kind that gave Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Castro, etc..... the power that they got over the masses in the 20th century. It was true that in Germany only around 15% of the population controlled the other 85%. WHY??? Because they had the POWER to do so....

Folks that think like you are crippled way too high for crutches!!!

SEMI-AUTO guns are not "ASSAULT WEAPONS". Handguns, Shotguns and Rifle can all be classified "ASSAULT WEAPONS" by your ideology!!! Who gets to be the final judge of what is and what is not an "ASSAULT WEAPON"???

We are supposed to trust the "LIBERAL" "JEEBUS HATING" enlightend drug abusers and their twisted ideas like yourself?? ALL THE MORE REASON TO NOT GIVE THEM UP!!!!

"Jeebus" told his followers in Luke that if they didn't have a sword, to sell something and buy one. He didn't condemn Peter for using a weapon in the Garden. We are told to "STAND" armed in Ephesians. Men are commanded to "PROTECT" their families throughout the Bybull!!

I'll trust "jeebus" and what he said over your magical exploding fairy dust that created a mindless killing machinery called mankind, ANY DAY OF THE WEEK!!!!
hehe

London, KY

#19 Jan 12, 2013
Ignorance
Comparing these wack-o's to common criminals - ignorant
Thinking the answer to gun violence is more guns - ignorant
Amassing assault weapons in the name constitution to protect one's self from their own Government in the 21st century - EXTREMEY ignorant

hehe
Marc

London, KY

#20 Jan 12, 2013
hehe wrote:
Ignorance
Comparing these wack-o's to common criminals - ignorant
Thinking the answer to gun violence is more guns - ignorant
Amassing assault weapons in the name constitution to protect one's self from their own Government in the 21st century - EXTREMEY ignorant
hehe
Someone that exhibits the above mentioned beliefs = [email protected]

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

London Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Single woman over 40 (Aug '15) 2 min Dumptrucker 201
Laurel Cookie Factory -- what do you think? (Jun '08) 23 min LMFAO 9,321
dem give up on ohio 35 min Shannon 3
Who is ben brown 1 hr Duh 3
Happy Ann Kristi/Don 1 hr Wrong 1
hillary war on woman 1 hr thomas slow 4
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 1 hr usa 152,028

London Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

London Mortgages