White Race Being Phased Out By Genocide

Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everyone, white race is only group not protected from Genocide. Genocide is worse than discrimination:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Genocide

Bob's Underground Graduate Seminar

Annihilation by Assimilation

Nobody is saying that Africa needs diversity.

Nobody is saying that Asia needs diversity.

They are already 100% diverse.

People are only telling white children in white countries that they need diversity.

White countries will be 100% diverse when there are no white people left.

Diversity is a code-word for the genocide of white people.

Every white country on earth is supposed to become multicultural and multiracial.

Every white country is expected to end its own race and end its own culture. No one asks that of ANY non-white country.

The Netherlands is as crowded as Japan, Belgium is as crowded as Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve the RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate with them.

Immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used against the white race.

All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.

Anti-white is called anti-racist, but it leads to the disappearance of one race and only one race, the white race. The real aim of anti-racism is to wipe out the white race or make it a minority anywhere it exists.

It is genocide.

Would a Black Line Go Unnoticed?

What if the same “anti-racist” policy that is at the heart of World Opinion today were applied to black countries?

Anti-whites insist on non-white immigration into white countries that have not adequately mixed to be called brown.

An example of the policy reversed would be if World Opinion split the island of Santo Domingo into two categories, the Dominican Republic, which is mixed race, and Haiti, which is black.

If the same policy currently applied to white countries were applied to Haiti, Haiti would be forced to be “ready for immigration,” as they are saying of Eastern Europe. The anti-white policy reversed would divide every island in the Caribbean into “black” and “mixed enough.”

Page 2 The American Virgin Islands are definitely black enough to fall inside the Black Line and World Opinion would demand they bring in non-black immigrants AND assimilate with them. In contrast, Puerto Rico, if it were independent, would be considered “brown enough” to lie outside the Black Line and immigration would not be forced on the theory that it was mixed with enough light-skinned people to pass.

The Black Line would run between the coast of Africa and Madagascar and also be somewhere in the Sahara and about the top of Ethiopia. World Opinion would demand that all of the countries within the Black Line have non-black immigration forced upon them so that they were mixed with enough light-skinned people to be considered the “proper” shade of brown.

What are the chances that the Black Line would go unnoticed if every single strip of land inside it, as in the case of the divided island of Santo Domingo, were the focus of a world-wide “anti-racist” campaign?

What if the attitude of World Opinion would be instantly hostile toward any country considered “too black”?

What sane black man would not object to this on the grounds of the genocide of black people?

Genocide is Worse than Discrimination‎

Doing away with whites is not idealistic; it is the sort of thing a lot of people got hanged for.

Certainly we cannot discuss future racial policy until a free discussion, and I mean totally free discussion, has been allowed on the present policy of demanding that All white countries and ONLY white countries be open to massive third-world immigration and forced into assimilation, with assimilation meaning intermarriage and an end of what THEY call the white race.

Until we get the basic message of white genocide across, we cannot go on to say that genocide is considered a far, far more serious crime than discrimination. The idea that a plan to completely get rid of a non-black race is worse than putting black people at the back of a bus would meet screams of resentment and bring out the Thought Police.

But we are faced with the utter destruction of what THEY call white people when there is immigration or punishment to be inflicted. THEY have set the precedents when it comes to discrimination.

If mere discrimination is cause for affirmative action, genocide is far more so. Which means that the program of doing away with all white people to the point where Europe and America are to be majority non-white this century requires a lot more than merely changing this policy. It calls for affirmative action at a far higher level to make up for this criminal behavior.

It will call for affirmative action so extreme that it is as alien to this genocidal age as the mention of hiring blacks over whites would have been when slavery was the issue.

And slavery is a lesser crime than genocide.

Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White Countries for Everyone

There will still be Africans in Africa. There will still be Asians in Asia. But my race is set to be blended out of existence through mass immigration and forced assimilation.

That's genocide.

This is happening in ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

This is genocide through racial replacement.

Wake up and fight the system!

Robert Whitaker

There are two kinds of people, those with hearts and minds in alignment, and those who trade deference for pay, done solely for personal advantage.

Page 3 However, do not be quick to praise those whose commitments and loyalties are genuine, for they may nevertheless serve resentments and objects that are unworthy, dangerous in their power to lead others astray.

But a small minority are different. Not only are their hearts and minds aligned, their loyalty is to the simple and obvious truth tragically unsaid: the greatest evils of any age are denied and unrecognized.

These are our real leaders. This is Robert Whitaker. NationalSalvation.Net PASS THE WORD.

Robert Whitaker grants full and free use of his ideas and writings especially as they pertain to aiding others in stating the facts about white race genocide and its agenda of forced non-white immigration and integration into ALL white countries and ONLY white countries. WhitakerOnline.Org

dont attack the libtard agenda.
they will give you bad marks.
they cannot dispute the facts, so they give bad marks for the truth.
anyone with any brains can look around and see the whole story is true.

This agenda has been ongoing for over 50 years, ever since they started encouraging Americans to get abortions, and adopt non-American children to breed and inter-breed. It started out so subtle.

Anybody would be a fool not to see it for what it really is.

They really did a top notch job in making the American women really believe that what they wanted to do was to kill their babies.

some are so cold hearted they will go and adopt some dam cats and dogs, after they kill their babyz.
this is so sick.

The best way to preserve ones race is to marry within your own color.
It was sort of looked over, for most and now THE WHITES ARE THE ONLY COLOR ENCOURAGED TO MARRY OUTSIDE OF THEIR OWN COLOR, because the Big Government wants to do away with the white race. WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT THIS WAY, IT IS WRONG.
Do Not Be Yoked With Unbelievers
14Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? 15What harmony is there between Christ and Belial[a]? What does a believer have in common with an unbeliever?
also this site has a good expanation http://www.gotquestions.org/i ...
Question: "What does the Bible say about interracial marriage?"

Answer: The Old Testament Law commanded the Israelites not to engage in interracial marriage (Deuteronomy 7:3-4). However, the reason for this was not primarily racial in nature. Rather, it was religious. The reason God commanded against interracial marriage was that people of other races were idolaters and worshippers of false gods. The Israelites would be led astray from God if they intermarried with idol worshippers, pagans, or heathens. A similar principle is laid out in the New Testament, but at a much different level:“Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?”(2 Corinthians 6:14). Just as the Israelites (believers in the one true God) were commanded not to marry idolaters, so Christians (believers in the one true God) are commanded not to marry unbelievers. To answer this question specifically, no, the Bible does not say that interracial marriage is wrong.

As Martin Luther King noted, a person should be judged by his or her character, not by skin color. There is no place in the life of the Christian for favoritism based on race (James 2:1-10). When selecting a mate, a Christian should always first find out if the potential spouse is born again by faith in Jesus Christ (John 3:3-5). Faith in Christ, not skin color, is the biblical standard for choosing a spouse. Interracial marriage is not a matter of right or wrong, but of wisdom, discernment, and prayer.
http://www.gotquestions.org/i ...
My opinion, is when we begin to become an endangered species, we should start worrying and blaming the directors of all this.
Who are the directors of white genocide? The Government of course.

i think the government dont make people hop in bed with any race it is the person that does it they make that decision my parents were both white and i dont think they were racists we always believed in you marry your own race but still you can love and be friends with other races without hopping in the bed with them .i love all people of all races and religions but i would not marry them.

Ky gal wrote:

i think the government dont make people hop in bed with any race it is the person that does it they make that decision my parents were both white and i dont think they were racists we always believed in you marry your own race but still you can love and be friends with other races without hopping in the bed with them .i love all people of all races and religions but i would not marry them.

That is your personal preference to do that, but many people of dif colors start to scream racists at you, when they find out that you are trying to preserve your race. It should be everyone's private preference, same as whether they are gay or not, but people around here tries to make it their business.

http://bit.ly/WHVlQl

i'm only a some white and I don't wanna phase your race out I want you to phase ours out

I want it to be a bunch of black people run around with blue eyes and stuff..

What is happening here in the UK is about as obvious as the sky over our heads. Whole towns and much of our cities are disappearing to non-white mass-immigration its been going on since the late 60s and still most of the indigenous population seem to be blind to it or will not speak of it. Liberal Cultural-Marxist brain-washing from a very young age has made the current up and coming generation seem cosigned to there fate. The future of Britain in say 50 years, if it even takes that long looks very bleak for us English, Scot, welsh ext. I am in Birmingham at the moment and am moving soon, i can tell you that this city looks like it will be totally Islamic within another 25 years. Political Correctness, Multiculturalism, the 'R' word coupled with self-loathing deluded liberals with a heavy lacing of Feminism (directed only at white heterosexual males with a ridiculous idea that we are all the same and that only white people need change to conform to the immigrants ideals is slowly but surely destroying us like a malignant disease. The political and media class are chattering simpering cowards who only understand personal greed and could not give a damn about future generations, even their own progeny.