it passed the house and going to the senate

[Truth]

Yes and when we wake up in the morning . the health care bill will be getting ready for the senate

[SpeakUp]

Financial Advisor wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Okay, I'll humor you, I'm not a Mr. I'm a Mrs. and you still don't know what you are talking about.
<quoted text>
It's obvious you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.
<quoted text>
Thank you for the compliment and I would rather be a genius than a meddling, arrogant, egotistical, conceited, over bearing, pompous ass that has his head stuck so far up his ass that he uses his belly button for a peep hole. I'm done with you and I'll not sink to your level again so ramble on all you want to, humor yourself.

Wrong also...I'm a HER as well. Nice way of getting around it. At least I can credit you for one thing. You couldn't even answer the first simple question when you said a person cannot lose their home simply by losing their job. That's about as ascinine as it gets. Then, you avoid this one though calling me names...taking the easy way out if you ask me. Why is it so hard for you to back up what you say. Personally, I'd prefer my head up my own ass versus yours because yours is dumb and it might be catching. Thank you for reminding me. Were you just on here to dish out advise you can't even explain?(By the way...it's hard to "sink" as you've indicated you're not going to, when you didn't even get your feet wet.)

Your adjectives are wonderful and I thank you.

If you ever want to come back and answer the questions, you'd be welcome back. In the meantime, go work on trying to bring those 101K's back up to at least 201's? Or, are you busy selling alot of variable annuities these days? I hear those are real winners. Are you Series 6 or 7? Nah, you probably can't answer that either. I can see you don't want to mess with me for more reasons than me just being arrogant and all those other cute little things. I know I can really get on the last nerve. I do hope the market gets better so you don't become another unemployment statistic.

If you ever need to tax book, let me know.

[SpeakUp]

Truth wrote:

Yes and when we wake up in the morning . the health care bill will be getting ready for the senate

You go Truth. I've done went and run the Financial Advisor out of Dodge...couldn't explain one single thing could she. It's amazing how these Republicans know everything, yet when we know something, it's that name calling shelter. We're arrogant, know it alls...whatever adjectives their dictionaries are open to at the time. I just figure after all this, they're going to have to put so many names on my tombstone, I may have to purchase an entire graveyard just for my own stone. I want them ALL on there. I earned them!

[SpeakUp]

Spitfire wrote:

Why are all you liberals, so excited about our latest tax increase? Unless of course you are on the "draw" and don't pay taxes!!

Could be we're "in the know"? What you don't know won't hurt you will it?

[TanyaHawke13]

Financial Advisor wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Okay, I'll humor you, I'm not a Mr. I'm a Mrs. and you still don't know what you are talking about.
<quoted text>
It's obvious you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.
<quoted text>
Thank you for the compliment and I would rather be a genius than a meddling, arrogant, egotistical, conceited, over bearing, pompous ass that has his head stuck so far up his ass that he uses his belly button for a peep hole. I'm done with you and I'll not sink to your level again so ramble on all you want to, humor yourself.

LMAO...you got her pegged....about the best she can do is bash Bush....she hasnt figured out yet that those of us that are conservative dont give a rats ass....we know what a mess Bush got us in....but she insist somehow that we can spend our way out of debt....what a loon...

[ZealotofReason]

I'm sure there are some things about the bill I won't like. But eliminating "pre-existing condition" is almost enough to make me jump for joy.

F**k the private healthcare industry.

[TanyaHawke13]

ZealotofReason wrote:

I'm sure there are some things about the bill I won't like. But eliminating "pre-existing condition" is almost enough to make me jump for joy.
F**k the private healthcare industry.

Sadly that reform and many others could have been done without the public option....and the 1.2 trillion in new spending....we all wanted reform.....especially tort reform what we got is another entitlment program crammed down our throats...the libs think they will tax the very rich to pay for this....how niave...to believe another promise from this administration or this congress.....its not the end of the line...there is still a long way to go....and I do believe they will fail.....

[Truth]

What tax increase dumb chit??

[TanyaHawke13]

Truth wrote:

What tax increase dumb chit??

You dumb chit.....5.4% a tax on the rich....so its called...but nancy pelosi said that a tax on the middle class was not off the table.....the video clip has been posted several times...if your to stupid to click and watch that is your own fault...I am not going back to find it....also may I remind you that a tax on the rich will float down to a tax on the working man...since it is the rich that do most of the hiring.....that way we can blame the the bad insurance companies for the increase in our cost sharing instead of the tax the government is levying on the companies......you dumb chit its not that hard to follow the money...its been done since the beginning.....walmart doesnt pay taxes....they collect taxes.......get it now....

[Keith O]

Speak Up and Truth... good and factual info, as usual.

T Hawke, well, just the usual from you.

[SpeakUp]

TanyaHawke13 wrote:

<quoted text>
LMAO...you got her pegged....about the best she can do is bash Bush....she hasnt figured out yet that those of us that are conservative dont give a rats ass....we know what a mess Bush got us in....but she insist somehow that we can spend our way out of debt....what a loon...

Neither you nor the Financial Advisor can and have answered any posed questions. I don't get that part. As I'd said before, with GWB's afterbirth, there wasn't a + dollar for Obama to buy a pack of chewing gum without using a credit card.

[SpeakUp]

ZealotofReason wrote:

I'm sure there are some things about the bill I won't like. But eliminating "pre-existing condition" is almost enough to make me jump for joy.
F**k the private healthcare industry.

Nicely put. We shall see, and yes, it will be tough in the Senate. To me, despite some others on here, I just want to see fairness for all good american citizens who work hard, give it everything they've got, yet never had opportunity like some who were born with silver spoons. It is an established fact, healthcare is breaking this country. And seniors aren't the only ones suffering. People are having to give up their homes, or, choose between food and medicine costs. When a pill costs $40 each, there's something drastically wrong with that picture.

[SpeakUp]

TanyaHawke13 wrote:

<quoted text>
You dumb chit.....5.4% a tax on the rich....so its called...but nancy pelosi said that a tax on the middle class was not off the table.....the video clip has been posted several times...if your to stupid to click and watch that is your own fault...I am not going back to find it....also may I remind you that a tax on the rich will float down to a tax on the working man...since it is the rich that do most of the hiring.....that way we can blame the the bad insurance companies for the increase in our cost sharing instead of the tax the government is levying on the companies......you dumb chit its not that hard to follow the money...its been done since the beginning.....walmart doesnt pay taxes....they collect taxes.......get it now....

Humor me also and pull the illegals out from under their desks and we'll talk some real logic here. And for those who think it's lessening or phasing itself out, come to any large city and get a wakeup call, but bring your muscle relaxers with you and the nitro glycerin to put under your tongues to prevent yourselves from having heart attacks when you do meet it head on.

[SpeakUp]

Keith O wrote:

Speak Up and Truth... good and factual info, as usual.
T Hawke, well, just the usual from you.

Why, thank you sir. That's one of the kindest things I've heard. I needed that. I've been called so many names, I'm surprised one of them hasn't dug Webster back up and made him write another dictionary.

[SpeakUp]

TanyaHawke13 wrote:

<quoted text>
You dumb chit.....5.4% a tax on the rich....so its called...but nancy pelosi said that a tax on the middle class was not off the table.....the video clip has been posted several times...if your to stupid to click and watch that is your own fault...I am not going back to find it....also may I remind you that a tax on the rich will float down to a tax on the working man...since it is the rich that do most of the hiring.....that way we can blame the the bad insurance companies for the increase in our cost sharing instead of the tax the government is levying on the companies......you dumb chit its not that hard to follow the money...its been done since the beginning.....walmart doesnt pay taxes....they collect taxes.......get it now....

I'll let you if anything happens to the middle class, but wouldn't count on that one.

[CyWe]

First of all Republicans were the ones that pushed for civil rights. Eventually the Democrats got on board after they realized which way the current was running. The Democrats have hijacked credit for it though because the last of it was signed into law under Johnson.

Secondly, The Federal government has no constitutional authority to create programs like social security, medicare, Obamacare etc. etc.

"The government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like the state governments, whose powers are more general. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government."

James Madison, speech in the House of Representatives, January 10, 1794

[CyWe]

Yeah, screw the private health insurance industry. They make obscene profits anyway. 2.2% average profit is entirely to much, what douchebags!

By the way HR 3400 would have solved the entire mess without the givernment mandated health insurance. Hopefully, it is going to get killed in the Senate and thankfully it passed the House, that went a long way in thinning out the Democrats come 2010.

[SpeakUp]

CyWe wrote:

First of all Republicans were the ones that pushed for civil rights. Eventually the Democrats got on board after they realized which way the current was running. The Democrats have hijacked credit for it though because the last of it was signed into law under Johnson.
Secondly, The Federal government has no constitutional authority to create programs like social security, medicare, Obamacare etc. etc.
"The government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like the state governments, whose powers are more general. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government."
James Madison, speech in the House of Representatives, January 10, 1794

Did you take this same position in prior years (or ones you've read about) when THEY all passed their legislations, or, is it more selective?

[SpeakUp]

CyWe wrote:

Yeah, screw the private health insurance industry. They make obscene profits anyway. 2.2% average profit is entirely to much, what douchebags!
By the way HR 3400 would have solved the entire mess without the givernment mandated health insurance. Hopefully, it is going to get killed in the Senate and thankfully it passed the House, that went a long way in thinning out the Democrats come 2010.

There is 2.2% profit, then there's 2.2% profit. Creative accounting works miracles when reflecting net profit.

Disagree the House vote amounts to a heel of beans as to Democratic popularity. Let's get real. As I'd stated before, both Congress and Senators are typically voting on behalf of the people they represent, therefore, since it did pass closely, I would put my money on it being 50-50. Never put much precidence on polls ever. It depends on who has been polled and the lack of knowledge of those who were polled...some not even having the most basic concept of the healthcare reform.

[CyWe]

SpeakUp wrote:

<quoted text>
Did you take this same position in prior years (or ones you've read about) when THEY all passed their legislations, or, is it more selective?

What do you mean exactly?