Obama supporters shocked and angry at...

Obama supporters shocked and angry at new tax increases

Posted in the London Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
robinhood

Morehead, KY

#1 Jan 7, 2013
Sometimes, watching a Democrat learn something is wonderful, like seeing the family dog finally sit and stay at your command.

With President Obama back in office and his life-saving “fiscal cliff” bill jammed through Congress, the new year has brought a surprising turn of events for his sycophantic supporters.

“What happened that my Social Security withholding’s in my paycheck just went up?” a poster wrote on the liberal site DemocraticUnderground.com .“My paycheck just went down by an amount that I don’t feel comfortable with. I guarantee this decrease is gonna’ hurt me more than the increase in income taxes will hurt those making over 400 grand. What happened?”

Shocker. Democrats who supported the president’s re-election just had NO idea that his steadfast pledge to raise taxes meant that he was really going to raise taxes. They thought he planned to just hit those filthy “1 percenters,” you know, the ones who earned fortunes through their inventiveness and hard work. They thought the free ride would continue forever.

So this week, as taxes went up for millions of Americans — which Republicans predicted throughout the campaign would happen — it was fun to watch the agoggery of the left.

“I know to expect between $93 and $94 less in my paycheck on the 15th,” wrote the ironically named “RomneyLies.”

“My boyfriend has had a lot of expenses and is feeling squeezed right now, and having his paycheck shrink really didn’t help,” wrote “DemocratToTheEnd.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/...
yep

Dallas, TX

#2 Jan 7, 2013
liberal progressives consisting of pro abortion,(baby killers) gays, atheists, and everything else that is united against christ. millions of immigrants moving to america that is selling us out and selling jesus out.

these people have cut off their nose to spite their face.

whenever this muslim-islam shariah takes america by storm, they will think christianity was paradise. these people will be allowed to take your little girls out of school and marry them off to whomever. http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/childbri...
they will be forced to bow to the ways of a communistic religion of dictatorship. if you disobey your muslim husband you get beaten, if ANYONE disobeys islamic or muslims rules they are beaten within an inch of their lives.
christianity never FORCED anyone.
but they stated their praise of christ as openly as the unbelievers.
we are swiftly becoming a nation that will no longer be free to state our opinions. is this what you want?
do you want shariah law to come to america? well its on its way. google it.
SpeakUp

Eustis, FL

#3 Jan 7, 2013
Simply more propaganda on the right and paid twitters. lol

Why is it you people have such a tough time understanding anything.

The income tax issues were issues that revolved around the BUSH taxes, not social security.

Our President was good enough to give employees a break for (2) yrs. to be able to take 2% more of their gross wages home with them, given economic conditions. Our President NEVER at any point and time stated this was a permanent decrease. Stupid people shouldn't be bit-hing about money that's going into their own retirement program period. This is NOT a federal income tax. It's payroll tax and it was made clear in the onset this was a temporary thing. If you people can't comprehend things, well.....I'd give up if I were you.
Well

Louisville, KY

#4 Jan 7, 2013
SpeakUp wrote:
Simply more propaganda on the right and paid twitters. lol
Why is it you people have such a tough time understanding anything.
The income tax issues were issues that revolved around the BUSH taxes, not social security.
Our President was good enough to give employees a break for (2) yrs. to be able to take 2% more of their gross wages home with them, given economic conditions. Our President NEVER at any point and time stated this was a permanent decrease. Stupid people shouldn't be bit-hing about money that's going into their own retirement program period. This is NOT a federal income tax. It's payroll tax and it was made clear in the onset this was a temporary thing. If you people can't comprehend things, well.....I'd give up if I were you.
Its not going into their retirement program. It's going to pay the benefits of someone else who was also forced to pay the benefits for someone else. This is the perfect kind of program for a socialist who disguises their compassion for people by forcibly taking one person's earnings to give to another. This is much closer to the slavery of the past with the only real difference between the two being one person does not hold title to the other person. You can try but you cannot equate this kind of slavery to claiming people who do wish to pay minimum wages or living wages are slave masters. They are not forcing people to do anything but they instead are being forced to do something.
yep

Morehead, KY

#5 Jan 7, 2013
Obama giveth and Obama taketh away-we should have thrown him out in november. He gave the tax cut to get our votes and took it away as soon as we voted. I saw on the news that obama and the dems are planning to raise a trillion more in tax hikes in 2013. They ain't never satisfied. Everybody better be trying to pay off their debts before their checks are cut again. With higher gas prices and higher food and utility bills its going to be tough times ahead.
I like Obama

Whitewater, WI

#6 Jan 7, 2013
Went up to johnson hewlet the said they could file without a w-2 but couldnt er wouldnt. They caculated it up for me though. I get almost 6000 back and only paid $503 in. Pretty dam good if you ask me. If they's one that runs thatll get me more Ill vote for him. Or her, don't matter whoever got the bucks.
fed up

Morehead, KY

#7 Jan 7, 2013
I like Obama wrote:
Went up to johnson hewlet the said they could file without a w-2 but couldnt er wouldnt. They caculated it up for me though. I get almost 6000 back and only paid $503 in. Pretty dam good if you ask me. If they's one that runs thatll get me more Ill vote for him. Or her, don't matter whoever got the bucks.
That's why he's robbing the rest of us, so he can give to deadbeats with a house full of kids they won't provide for.
I like Obama

Belvidere, IL

#8 Jan 7, 2013
Yeah you jest thing life all that goood. Try to get it on wit yo ole lady in the middle of the day and a bunch of kids bangin around. Ain't no fun. I hope it don snow. Kids knock over beer to. Sh-t costs money. Im gettin me a big screen tv 66 inches baby. Done got it on the layaway. Show me the money.
fed up

Morehead, KY

#9 Jan 7, 2013
Enjoy it while it lasts but he'll be running out of money sooner than later.
Julie

East Bernstadt, KY

#10 Jan 7, 2013
SpeakUp wrote:
Simply more propaganda on the right and paid twitters. lol
Why is it you people have such a tough time understanding anything.
The income tax issues were issues that revolved around the BUSH taxes, not social security.
Our President was good enough to give employees a break for (2) yrs. to be able to take 2% more of their gross wages home with them, given economic conditions. Our President NEVER at any point and time stated this was a permanent decrease. Stupid people shouldn't be bit-hing about money that's going into their own retirement program period. This is NOT a federal income tax. It's payroll tax and it was made clear in the onset this was a temporary thing. If you people can't comprehend things, well.....I'd give up if I were you.
You think that really matter? The bottom line is that peoples take home pay will be less than it was due to this.Thats what counts in the vast majority of peoples minds and bank accounts.Call it what you might in the Communist state of Illinois but elsewhere people in the US will look at like that and feel they were mislead by Obummer which is true.He could have remedied that situation and extended that tax break as well.
SpeakUp

Eustis, FL

#11 Jan 7, 2013
Julie wrote:
<quoted text>
You think that really matter? The bottom line is that peoples take home pay will be less than it was due to this.Thats what counts in the vast majority of peoples minds and bank accounts.Call it what you might in the Communist state of Illinois but elsewhere people in the US will look at like that and feel they were mislead by Obummer which is true.He could have remedied that situation and extended that tax break as well.
No they clearly were NOT mislead. End of story and you should NOT in any way shape or form have a continued payroll tax cut period. Then when you get to S.S. age, you'll be crying the blues because you haven't paid enough in. Let me tell you something rookie. That 2% is YOUR pocket's future, not Obama's. If you are so disgrundled about it, then give back the cut OBAMA opted to go around your Congress junkies, and give to you to help you for a couple of years. It's NOT income tax and if you want to call it an increase, call it what you want. You people want your damn cake and eat it too. You cried the damn blues when he gave it out. Now you're crying the damn blues because he stopped it. I agree with Clinton. You people can't be pleased. It's truly illiterates such as yourself that creates the majority of problems in our nation as a result of your total lack of udnerstanding, comprehending and...retaining.
SpeakUp

Eustis, FL

#12 Jan 7, 2013
I like Obama wrote:
Went up to johnson hewlet the said they could file without a w-2 but couldnt er wouldnt. They caculated it up for me though. I get almost 6000 back and only paid $503 in. Pretty dam good if you ask me. If they's one that runs thatll get me more Ill vote for him. Or her, don't matter whoever got the bucks.
You can "prepare" without a W-3. You can't file without one you moron and I'd suggest you might want to learn how to spell the name of the company you went to, just so you don't get lost going back.
SpeakUp

Eustis, FL

#13 Jan 7, 2013
Correction: L1 "W-2.........." (A W-3 is the Transmittal form for the W-2)
SpeakUp

Eustis, FL

#14 Jan 7, 2013
Well wrote:
<quoted text>Its not going into their retirement program. It's going to pay the benefits of someone else who was also forced to pay the benefits for someone else. This is the perfect kind of program for a socialist who disguises their compassion for people by forcibly taking one person's earnings to give to another. This is much closer to the slavery of the past with the only real difference between the two being one person does not hold title to the other person. You can try but you cannot equate this kind of slavery to claiming people who do wish to pay minimum wages or living wages are slave masters. They are not forcing people to do anything but they instead are being forced to do something.
This nation has ALWAYS operated from a "redistribution of wealth" system. Always. This is not a new invention under Barack Obama. This is simply how it has to be. We cannot and will not give the wealthy exclusive control over our entire lives and that's exactly what you're expecting. It won't happen.

No, they don't on the surface "force' workers to do anything, but inadvertently, they indeed do. They do know people need a job, right? They do know that people have bills to pay. Right? They do know that people can't eat or pay their bills unless they do work, right? So, herein lies the problem. Your team needs to pay workers a decent wage and benefit whereby people can live at least reasonably, and, pay their own taxes. By corporate america paying these low wages, they are factually forcing these people onto govt. benefits and if these people get govt. benefits, it's to corporate America's advantage to pay less. Corporate America can do one of two things. They can pay people decent wages and benefits, subtract it from their income, or, they will not pay it, thus pay the govt. more money to purposely support the entitlement programs. By working so many part time people, employers avoid benefits, and, are pushing more to low income to qualify for govt. help. Their cheap labor benefits an employee by them forcing people onto govt. benefits and handouts. The govt. is paying corporate america's bill.
Filing wo W2

Whitewater, WI

#15 Jan 8, 2013
SpeakUp wrote:
<quoted text>
You can "prepare" without a W-3. You can't file without one you moron and I'd suggest you might want to learn how to spell the name of the company you went to, just so you don't get lost going back.
My brother been doing that for years. Take the last pay stub in they have all the info they need and you sign something to not hold them responsible if it's wrong. W-2 note needed with e-file. Probably couldn't e-file yet but JH is advertising it.
Filing wo W2

Whitewater, WI

#16 Jan 8, 2013
SpeakUp wrote:
<quoted text>
This nation has ALWAYS operated from a "redistribution of wealth" system. Always. This is not a new invention under Barack Obama. This is simply how it has to be. We cannot and will not give the wealthy exclusive control over our entire lives and that's exactly what you're expecting. It won't happen.
No, they don't on the surface "force' workers to do anything, but inadvertently, they indeed do. They do know people need a job, right? They do know that people have bills to pay. Right? They do know that people can't eat or pay their bills unless they do work, right? So, herein lies the problem. Your team needs to pay workers a decent wage and benefit whereby people can live at least reasonably, and, pay their own taxes. By corporate america paying these low wages, they are factually forcing these people onto govt. benefits and if these people get govt. benefits, it's to corporate America's advantage to pay less. Corporate America can do one of two things. They can pay people decent wages and benefits, subtract it from their income, or, they will not pay it, thus pay the govt. more money to purposely support the entitlement programs. By working so many part time people, employers avoid benefits, and, are pushing more to low income to qualify for govt. help. Their cheap labor benefits an employee by them forcing people onto govt. benefits and handouts. The govt. is paying corporate america's bill.
S.S. not a redistribution of wealth. Just a pay as you go plan. The working generation pays for the retired generation.
Gun Town USA

Liberty, KY

#17 Jan 8, 2013
The democrats are so damned stupid. Don't they see the gun control BS is nothing more than misdirection.

I know your taxes went up even though BHO said they would not. So instead of facing the press and angry voters he is directing his stooges to attack the U.S. Constitution. They will follow blindly as usual.

In the meantime BHO knows he can't do shit without an armed citizen expressing the ultimate of discourse.

Fools and suckers are not who I want leading this nation.
Julie

East Bernstadt, KY

#18 Jan 8, 2013
SpeakUp wrote:
<quoted text>
No they clearly were NOT mislead. End of story and you should NOT in any way shape or form have a continued payroll tax cut period. Then when you get to S.S. age, you'll be crying the blues because you haven't paid enough in. Let me tell you something rookie. That 2% is YOUR pocket's future, not Obama's. If you are so disgrundled about it, then give back the cut OBAMA opted to go around your Congress junkies, and give to you to help you for a couple of years. It's NOT income tax and if you want to call it an increase, call it what you want. You people want your damn cake and eat it too. You cried the damn blues when he gave it out. Now you're crying the damn blues because he stopped it. I agree with Clinton. You people can't be pleased. It's truly illiterates such as yourself that creates the majority of problems in our nation as a result of your total lack of udnerstanding, comprehending and...retaining.
Listen dipsh!t I understand it and I know why it was done.However the vast majority of those stupid enough to vote for Obummer in the first place wont look at it like that.All they will look at it and say is that their check went down and Obummer lied to them so they will be p!ssed at him which tickles me.I am just so glad I dont not live in a state like Illinois and a hell hole like Chicago where Communist rule.
Gun Town USA

Liberty, KY

#19 Jan 8, 2013
Julie wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen dipsh!t I understand it and I know why it was done.However the vast majority of those stupid enough to vote for Obummer in the first place wont look at it like that.All they will look at it and say is that their check went down and Obummer lied to them so they will be p!ssed at him which tickles me.I am just so glad I dont not live in a state like Illinois and a hell hole like Chicago where Communist rule.
Amen!
truth

Morehead, KY

#20 Jan 8, 2013
SpeakUp wrote:
<quoted text>
No they clearly were NOT mislead. End of story and you should NOT in any way shape or form have a continued payroll tax cut period. Then when you get to S.S. age, you'll be crying the blues because you haven't paid enough in. Let me tell you something rookie. That 2% is YOUR pocket's future, not Obama's. If you are so disgrundled about it, then give back the cut OBAMA opted to go around your Congress junkies, and give to you to help you for a couple of years. It's NOT income tax and if you want to call it an increase, call it what you want. You people want your damn cake and eat it too. You cried the damn blues when he gave it out. Now you're crying the damn blues because he stopped it. I agree with Clinton. You people can't be pleased. It's truly illiterates such as yourself that creates the majority of problems in our nation as a result of your total lack of udnerstanding, comprehending and...retaining.
Obama gave the payroll tax cut for 2 years so he could campaign on tax cuts for the middle class. He ended it as soon as the stupid followers reelected him. Now just wait a month or two for his next tax hike. I gotta say you people deserve just what you are going to get.
Illiterates like yourself will say he gave it to help out during the difficult times because he cares for the middleclass. The difficult times for the middleclass have not improved in the past two years so your explanation for the cut is bullcrap. It was all about the election as everything else has been for four years. He exploited the middleclass, the hispanics and women in every area possible to gain votes. He's through with all that now so hang on for the long journey of working for less pay, that is if you are lucky enough to still have a job.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

London Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 5 min ChromiuMan 166,261
Hot gals at sav-a lot 2 hr sometimes 4
frank 10 hr Mr clean 28
two ladies 10 hr Undercover 4
Smokin barrel 10 hr Undercover 6
Laurel Cookie Factory -- what do you think? (Jun '08) 11 hr Yep 9,501
great wall 12 hr neveragain 3

London Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

London Mortgages