Doug Phelps and computers seized
lowiQ

Bolivar, MO

#474 Jan 27, 2012
oh man; this is tooooooo good
mysteryclue

Elizabethtown, KY

#475 Jan 27, 2012
amazed wrote:
One person has the guts to post their real name and you curse him. I'll tell you, I think maybe we are a bunch of illiterate hillbillies that deserve the sorry lives we have made for ourselves. How many of you are Phelps haters? I have lived here my whole life and never had a problem with any of the Phelps. Of course, I don't go around drinking and driving and doing meth and such either, maybe that is why I have no ax to grind with that family. Y'all claim to be Americans but insist on not letting the justice system do it's work. Innocent until proven guilty. I don't know if Doug Phelps is guilty or not but I am more than willing to let a jury decide. Y'all go to the devil and get there fastnow ya hear?
Get a grip!! This is not the posters real name!!!!! You are assuming that everyone that has a problem with the Phelps are
crimmnals. have you been living in a cave? I think you are one of the Phelps clan or a relative. Love the Y'all.
amazed

Richmond, KY

#476 Jan 27, 2012
mysteryclue wrote:
<quoted text>
Get a grip!! This is not the posters real name!!!!! You are assuming that everyone that has a problem with the Phelps are
crimmnals. have you been living in a cave? I think you are one of the Phelps clan or a relative. Love the Y'all.
Not related and as a matter of fact, yes I do live in a cave. This upcoming trial is about ONE MAN and that man only. Surely you can see the animosity on here just because he is a Phelps. Is that right? Is that fair? I have heard the stories about his brothers my whole life but like I said, I have never had a problem with them. I obey the law and as a result, have no fear from law enforcement types.
London Resident

London, KY

#477 Jan 27, 2012
amazed wrote:
<quoted text>Not related and as a matter of fact, yes I do live in a cave. This upcoming trial is about ONE MAN and that man only. Surely you can see the animosity on here just because he is a Phelps. Is that right? Is that fair? I have heard the stories about his brothers my whole life but like I said, I have never had a problem with them. I obey the law and as a result, have no fear from law enforcement types.
Hey to you stupid people and you to AMAZINGLY STUPID you can judge my post spam,nuts clueless all you want but it's the cold hard facts and by the way i'm in the process of setting up an appointment with the commonwealth atty. to take the FEMALE CHILD which is now 14 in so she can give a sworn statement and be available for testimony when the trial comes just like all the other female children and their parents should do and put a stop to some one that thinks their above the law in this F!CKED up town thats preying on little children..

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#478 Jan 27, 2012
You are right. Not prohibited by law but advised by legal counsel to not talk to media friends and even family. That is standard advise a lawyer gives to a client. News reporters know this is most certainly going to be the case with most people accused.
TFB wrote:
<quoted text>
A defendant is not prohibit by law fom discussing the case. But the Fifth Amendment to the United States gives a defendant the right to not talk to anyone, including the police. But some defendants do talk to the press. Jerry Sandusky, the former Penn State football coach, who is charged with child abuse gave several TV interviews. But its wise to keep your mouth shut.
London Resident

London, KY

#479 Jan 27, 2012
amazed wrote:
<quoted text>Not related and as a matter of fact, yes I do live in a cave. This upcoming trial is about ONE MAN and that man only. Surely you can see the animosity on here just because he is a Phelps. Is that right? Is that fair? I have heard the stories about his brothers my whole life but like I said, I have never had a problem with them. I obey the law and as a result, have no fear from law enforcement types.
The trial is als MORE IMPORTANTLY about UNDER AGED children.GET.IT.Or do you need a map drawed?
amazed

Richmond, KY

#480 Jan 27, 2012
London Resident wrote:
<quoted text>The trial is als MORE IMPORTANTLY about UNDER AGED children.GET.IT.Or do you need a map drawed?
Don't get your panties in a wad. I certainly want justice for the victims. You people that keep attacking the Phelps' only jeopardize the chances of a fair trial taking place. Of course I know the trial is about the victims also, that goes without speaking.

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#481 Jan 27, 2012
You can't seem to talk logically on here. You are immediately attacked as someone who isn't for justice. No one else may understand what you are saying but I do.
amazed wrote:
<quoted text>Don't get your panties in a wad. I certainly want justice for the victims. You people that keep attacking the Phelps' only jeopardize the chances of a fair trial taking place. Of course I know the trial is about the victims also, that goes without speaking.
amazed

Richmond, KY

#482 Jan 27, 2012
etab wrote:
You can't seem to talk logically on here. You are immediately attacked as someone who isn't for justice. No one else may understand what you are saying but I do.
<quoted text>
Finally, another Kentuckian with common sense.

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#483 Jan 27, 2012
There are a few of us.
amazed wrote:
<quoted text>Finally, another Kentuckian with common sense.
sosmart

Elizabethtown, KY

#484 Jan 27, 2012
I am so relieved that we have amazed and
etab in London. Reading their posts have
made such a difference in my feelings about
the court system and the Phelps. Sometimes
we uneducated hillbillies need a lesson from
the brightest in our town.
AAHHHH BORED

Doniphan, MO

#485 Jan 27, 2012
Journey wrote:
<quoted text>Yo need to go bck to school and lean grammar. You don't say:"I've not WENT anywhere!" The proper thing to say is:" I haven't GONE anywhere." Teachers even us this bad grammar.
U need to proof read urself...its learn grammer. not lean grammer....lol just saying...sorry to point that out...but it was just thr waitin for someont to do that lol.....
Lol

Harrison, AR

#486 Jan 27, 2012
AAHHHH BORED wrote:
<quoted text>
U need to proof read urself...its learn grammer. not lean grammer....lol just saying...sorry to point that out...but it was just thr waitin for someont to do that lol.....
You need to proof read yourself ...
Actually it's "grammar"..just saying......sorry to point that out but it was just there waiting on "someone" to do that..lol
Journey

Manchester, KY

#487 Jan 28, 2012
Lol wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to proof read yourself ...
Actually it's "grammar"..just saying......sorry to point that out but it was just there waiting on "someone" to do that..lol
That's fine, I expected that when I did not proofread. My mistakes were typos; yours were not.
amazed

London, KY

#488 Jan 28, 2012
Journey wrote:
<quoted text>That's fine, I expected that when I did not proofread. My mistakes were typos; yours were not.
How petty can you get?
Journey

Manchester, KY

#489 Jan 28, 2012
amazed wrote:
<quoted text>How petty can you get?
It is not petty when everyone around here says, "I shoulda WENT!" GONE IS THE WORD.
Star

Elkhart, IN

#490 Jan 28, 2012
Getting off the subject aren't you. Who cares about the grammar. When I first starting reading this post, I thought no way, a 52 year old man being with a 14 year old child. It just made me sick to my stomach. You know he has been doing this all along. Someone just finally believed the child. But I'm afraid the justice system sides with the powers that be. If this is true, hopefully someone out of London will deal with it, if not its just a waste of time. Just saying
Trump

Manchester, KY

#491 Jan 28, 2012
Star wrote:
Getting off the subject aren't you. Who cares about the grammar. When I first starting reading this post, I thought no way, a 52 year old man being with a 14 year old child. It just made me sick to my stomach. You know he has been doing this all along. Someone just finally believed the child. But I'm afraid the justice system sides with the powers that be. If this is true, hopefully someone out of London will deal with it, if not its just a waste of time. Just saying
You can bet this indictment is based on more than a child's word. You can also have confidence in the judicial system here. If, I said if, he is guility I am sure it will vigorously prosecuted.
BlaBlaBla

London, KY

#492 Jan 28, 2012
Trump wrote:
<quoted text>
You can bet this indictment is based on more than a child's word. You can also have confidence in the judicial system here. If, I said if, he is guility I am sure it will vigorously prosecuted.
As it should be!!!!
Trump

Manchester, KY

#493 Jan 28, 2012
BlaBlaBla wrote:
<quoted text>
As it should be!!!!
Yes, as it should be. Sometimes in all small towns people with connection or money get breaks. But that is not true with all crimes. There are some crimes no one will ignore and sexual abuse of a child is one of them. About 30 years ago a man here in Laurel county was indicted for sexually abusing small girls, who he and his wife had adopted. He was the brother in law of, perhaps, the wealthiest man in eastern Kentucky. Not a million, but a hundred million plus. Everyone said nothing would become of it. Well he was convicted and received over twenty years, most of which he served. So don't conclude the system here won't vigorously prosecute these offenses. Having said that, remember that Mr. Phelps is presumed innocent until proven guility. I don't know what happened and I assume most of you don't either. But I am confident, based on years of experience, that the prosecution will be vigorous and the penalty severe if he is convicted. I also wonder if the feds are really involved, as some suggest.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

London Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 5 min North Mountain 163,792
levi jackson state park 4 hr Get your facts st... 28
add a word--drop a word (Apr '10) 5 hr Princess Hey 1,449
Last Post Wins !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Dec '10) 5 hr Princess Hey 4,544
The problem around this place 5 hr thomas j 23
Grand jury targeting hillary 6 hr pissed 4
Joseph nestor 7 hr Sharie Asaro 5

London Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

London Mortgages